Skip to main content
Log in

Magnetic Reconnection Flux during Two Flares on September 6, 2017

  • Published:
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyzed the dynamics of the reconnection and energy release processes of the X2.2 and X9.3 flares that occurred on September 6, 2017 in the active region NOAA 12673. We used SDO/AIA 1600 Å images together with SDO/HMI magnetograms. As a proxy for the flare energy release rate, we used the KRIM and RSTN microwave time profiles, GOES soft X-rays and its time derivative. Assuming that the chromospheric flare ribbons are located at the footpoints of magnetic field lines reconnecting in the corona and that the magnetic flux is conserved from the photosphere to the corona, we obtained magnetic reconnection fluxes and rates of its change. The cumulative positive and negative magnetic fluxes involved in the reconnection process were balanced. Temporal correlations are found between the calculated reconnection rate and the observed microwave emissions from for both events. An analysis of the total cumulative magnetic flux and SXR fluence of events showed that the magnitude of the magnetic flux involved in the reconnection process was greater in more energetic events and less in weaker ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Asai, A., Kiyohara, J., Takasaki, H., et al., Temporal and spatial analyses of spectral indices of nonthermal emissions derived from hard X-rays and microwaves, Astrophys. J., 2013, vol. 763, p. 87. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/763/2/87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cornell, M.E., Hurford, G.J., Kiplinger, A.L., and Dennis, B.R., The relative timing of microwaves and hard X-rays in solar flares, Astrophys. J., 1984, vol. 279, pp. 875–881. https://doi.org/10.1086/161958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dennis, B.R. and Zarro, D.M., The Neupert effect: What can it tell us about the impulsive and gradual phases of solar flares, Sol. Phys., 1993, vol. 146, pp. 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00662178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Forbes, T.G., Linker, J.A., Chen, J., et al., CME theory and models, Space Sci. Rev., 2006, vol.123, pp. 251–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-006-9019-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gopasyuk, O.S., Volvach, A.E., and Yakubovskaya, I.V., Magnetic reconnection rates in a confined X class flare, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2022, vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 888–894. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793222070106

  6. Guidice, D.A., Cliver, E.W., Barron, W.R., and Kahler, S., The air force RSTN system, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc., 1981, vol. 13, p. 553.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hu, Q., Qiu, J., Dasgupta, B., et al., Structures of interplanetary magnetic flux ropes and comparison with their solar sources, Astrophys. J., 2014, vol. 793, p. 53. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/793/1/53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Isobe, H., Takasaki, H., and Shibata, K., Measurement of the energy release rate and the reconnection rate in solar flares, Astrophys. J., 2005, vol. 632, pp. 1184–1195. https://doi.org/10.1086/444490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jing, J., Qiu, J., Lin, J., et al., Magnetic reconnection rate and flux-rope acceleration of two-ribbon flares, Astrophys. J., 2005, vol. 620, pp. 1085–1091. https://doi.org/10.1086/427165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kundu, M.R., Schmahl, E.J., and Velusamy, T., Magnetic structure of a flaring region producing impulsive microwave and hard X-ray bursts, Astrophys. J., 1982, vol. 253, pp. 963–974. https://doi.org/10.1086/159694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lemen, J.R., Title, A.M., Akin, D.J., et al., The Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) on the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO), Sol. Phys., 2012, vol. 275, pp. 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-011-9776-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Miklenic, C.H., Veronig, A.M., and Vršnak, B.A., Temporal comparison of nonthermal flare emission and magnetic-flux change rates, Astron. Astrophys., 2009, vol. 499, pp. 893–904. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200810947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Neupert, W.M., Comparison of solar X-ray line emission with microwave emission during flares, Astrophys. J., 1968, vol. 153, p. L59. https://doi.org/10.1086/180220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Qiu, J. and Yurchyshyn, V.B., Magnetic reconnection flux and coronal mass ejection velocity, Astrophys. J., 2005, vol. 634, pp. L121–L124. https://doi.org/10.1086/498716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Qiu, J., Wang, H., Cheng, C.Z., and Gary, D.E., Magnetic reconnection and mass acceleration in flare-coronal mass ejection events, Astrophys. J., 2004, vol. 604, pp. 900–905. https://doi.org/10.1086/382122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Qiu, J., Hu, Q., Howard, T.A., and Yurchyshyn, V.B., On the magnetic flux budget in low-corona magnetic reconnection and interplanetary coronal mass ejections, Astrophys. J., 2007, vol. 659, pp. 758–772. https://doi.org/10.1086/512060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schou, J., Scherrer, P.H., Bush, R.I., et al., Design and ground calibration of the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) instrument on the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO), Sol. Phys., 2012, vol. 275, pp. 229–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-011-9842-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Temmer, M., Veronig, A.M., Vršnak, B., and Miklenic, C., Energy release rates along Hαflare ribbons and the location of hard X-ray sources, Astrophys. J., 2007, vol. 654, pp. 665–674. https://doi.org/10.1086/509634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Veronig, A.M. and Polanec, W., Magnetic reconnection rates and energy release in a confined X-class flare,Sol. Phys., 2015, vol. 290, pp. 2923–2942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-015-0789-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Veronig, A., Vršnak, B., Dennis, B.R., et al., Investigation of the Neupert effect in solar flares. I. Statistical properties and the evaporation model, Astron. Astrophys., 2002, vol. 392, pp. 699–712. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20020947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Volvach, A.E. and Yakubovskaya, I.V., Diagnostic complex of solar activity based on small radiotelescopes of the Sun service KRIM, Astron. Astrophys. Trans., 2019, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 389–398.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

SDO is a project of the NASA Living with a Star program. SDO/AIA and SDO/HMI data were provided by the Joint Science Operation Center (JSOC).

Funding

This work was supported by ongoing institutional funding. No additional grants to carry out or direct thisparticular research were obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. S. Gopasyuk.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note.

Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gopasyuk, O.S., Volvach, A.E. & Yakubovskaya, I.V. Magnetic Reconnection Flux during Two Flares on September 6, 2017. Geomagn. Aeron. 63, 1000–1006 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793223070095

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793223070095

Keywords:

Navigation