Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Observations of Geomagnetic Induced Currents in Northwestern Russia: Case Studies

  • Published:
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes a number of events of recorded intense geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) in transformers at stations located on the Karelia–Kola power transmission line in northwestern Russia and in a magnetometer at a gas pipeline compressor station located near the city of Mäntsälä in Finland. Located in the auroral and subauroral zones, these two different GIC recording systems made it possible to trace the occurrence and dynamics of GICs from subauroral to high latitudes and compare them with the motion of the substorm westward electrojet according to data obtained by the Scandinavian network of IMAGE magnetometers. For a detailed study, two events were considered (March 15, 2012 and March 17, 2013), when intense GICs were observed in the technological networks under consideration. It is shown that the development of GICs on the meridional observation profile is consistent with the latitudinal motion of the westward electrojet and corresponded to the appearance of successive substorm intensifications. In addition, a relationship has been established between the appearance of GICs and an increase in the intensity and wave activity of a substorm, determined from the IL and Wp geomagnetic indices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Belakhovsky, V.B., Pilipenko, V.A., Sakharov, Ya.A., and Selivanov, V.N., Characteristics of the variability of a geomagnetic field for studying the impact of the magnetic storms and substorms on electrical energy systems, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2018, no. 1, pp. 52–65.

  2. Belakhovsky, V., Pilipenko, V., Engebretson, M., Sakharov, Y., and Selivanov, V., Impulsive disturbances of the geomagnetic field as a cause of inducted currents of electric power lines, J. Space Weather Clim., 2019, vol. 9, p. A18. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2019015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Clilverd, M.A., Rodger, C.J., Brundell, J.B., Dalzell, M., Martin, I., Macmanus, D.H., Thomson, N.R., Petersen, T., and Obana, Y., Long-lasting geomagnetically induced currents and harmonic distortion observed in New Zealand during the 7–8 September 2017 disturbed period, Space Weather, 2018, vol. 16, pp. 704–717. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018SW001822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Davis, T.N. and Sugiura, M., Auroral electrojet activity index AE and its universal time variations, J. Geophys. Res., 1966, vol. 71, pp. 785–801. https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ07li003p00785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Despirak, I.V., Kozelova, T.V., Kozelov, B.V., and Lubchich, A.A., Observations of substorm activity from the data of main camera system and THD satellite in the plasma sheet, in Proceedings of 44th Annual Seminar “Physics of Auroral Phenomena”, Apatity, 2021, pp. 16‒19. https://doi.org/10.51981/2588-0039.2021.44.003.

  6. Echer, E., Gonzalez, W.D., and Tsurutani, B.T., Interplanetary conditions leading to superintense geomagnetic storms (Dst ≤ –250 nT) during solar cycle 23, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2008, vol. 35, p. L06S03. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gjerloev, J.W., A global ground-based magnetometer initiative, Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 2009, vol. 90, pp. 230–231. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009EO270002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Haira, R., Intense geomagnetically induced currents (GICs): Association with solar and geomagnetic activities, Sol. Phys., 2022, vol. 297, p. 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-021-01945-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harang, L., The mean field of disturbance of polar geomagnetic storms, Terr. Magn. Atmos. Electr., 1946, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 353–380. https://doi.org/10.1029/TE051i003p00353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huttunen, K.E.J., Kilpua, S.P., Pulkkinen, A., Viljanen, A., and Tanskanen, E., Solar wind drivers of large geomagnetically induced currents during the solar cycle 23, Space Weather, 2008, vol. 6, no. 10, S10002. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007SW000374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kamide, Y., Yokoyama, N., Gonzalez, W., Tsurutani, B.T., Daglis, I.A., Brekke, A., and Masuda, S., Two-step development of geomagnetic storms, J. Geophys. Res., 1998, vol. 103, pp. 6917–6921. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JA03337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kisabeth, J.L. and Rostoker, G., The expansive phase of magnetospheric substorms. I. Development of the auroral electrojets and auroral arcs configuration during substorm, J. Geophys. Res., 1974, vol. 79, pp. 972–984. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA079i007p00972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kozyreva, O., Pilipenko, V., Krasnoperov, R., Baddeley, L., Sakharov, Y., and Dobrovolsky, M., Fine structure of substorm and geomagnetically induced currents, Ann. Geophys., 2020, vol. 63, no. 2, p. GM219. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-8198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kunkel, T., Untiedt, J., Baumjohann, W., and Greenwald, R., Electric fields and currents at the Harang discontinuity: A case study, J. Geophys., 1986, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lakhina, G.S., Hajra, R., and Tsurutani, B.T., Geomagnetically induced current, in Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics, Gupta, H.K., Ed., Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2020.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10475-7_245-1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Maris Muntean, G., Besliu-Ionescu, D., Georgieva, K., and Kirov, B., Analysis of the geomagnetic activity during the SC 24 maximum phase, in 6th Workshop “Solar Influences on the Magnetosphere, Ionosphere and Atmosphere”, 26–30 May 2014, Sunny Beach, Bulgaria, Abstracts Book, 2014, p. 10. http://ws-sozopol.stil.bas.bg/.

  17. Newell, P.T. and Gjerloev, J.W., Substorm and magnetosphere characteristic scales inferred from SuperMAG auroral electrojet indices, J. Geophys. Res., 2011, vol. 116, p. A12211. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nosé, M., Iyemori, T., Wang, L., et al., Wp index: A new substorm index derived from high-resolution geomagnetic field data at low latitude, Space Weather, 2012, vol. 10, no. 8, p. 08002. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012SW000785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Oliveira, D.M. and Ngwira, C.M., Geomagnetically induced currents: Principles, Braz. J. Phys., 2017, vol. 47, pp. 552–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-017-0523-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pudovkin, M.I., Semenov, V.S., Kotikov, A.L., and Shishkina, E.M., Dynamics of auroral electrojets and energetics of substorm, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 1995, pp. 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(93)E0033-6

  21. Pulkkinen, A., Lindahl, S., Viljanen, A., and Pirjola, R., Geomagnetic storm of 29–31 October 2003: Geomagnetically induced currents and their relation to problems in the Swedish high-voltage power transmission system, Space Weather, 2005, vol. 3, no. 8, p. C08C03. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004SW000123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sakharov, Ya.A., Danilin, A.N., and Ostafiichuk, R.M., Recording of GICs in power systems of the Kola Peninsula, in Trudy 7-go Mezhdunar. simp. po elektromagnitnoi sovmestimosti i elektromagnitnoi ekologii (Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility and Electromagnetic Ecology), St. Petersburg: IEEE, 2007, pp. 291–293.

  23. Sakharov, Ya.A., Kat’kalov, Yu.V., Selivanov, V.N., and Viljanen, A., Recording of GICs in a regional power system, in Prakticheskie aspekty geliogeofiziki, Materialy spetsial’noi sektsii “Prakticheskie aspekty nauki kosmicheskoi pogody” 11-i ezhegodnoi konferentsii “Fizika plazmy v solnechnoi sisteme” (Practical Aspects of Heliogeophysics: Proceedings of the Special Section “Practical Aspects of the Science of Space Weather” of the 11th Annual Conference “Physics of Plasma in the Solar System”), Moscow. IKI, 2016, pp. 134–145.

  24. Sakharov, Ya.A., Selivanov, V.N., Bilin, V.A., and Nikolaev, V.G., Extreme values of GICs in a regional power system, in Proc. XLII Annual Seminar “Physics of Auroral Phenomena”, Apatity, 2019, pp. 53–56. https://doi.org/10.25702/KSC.2588-0039.2019.42.53-56

  25. Sergeev, V.A. and Yahnin, A.G., Correspondence of the substorm explosive phase signatures, in Geomagnitnye issledovaniya (Geomagnetic Investigations), Moscow: Sov. Radio, 1079, vol. 24, pp. 78–89.

  26. Tsurutani, B.T. and Hajra, R., The interplanetary and magnetospheric causes of geomagnetically inducted currents (GICs) > 10 Å in the Mäntsälä Finland pipeline: 1999 through 2019, J. Space Weather Clim., 2021, vol. 11, p. A23. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2021001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tsurutani, B.T., Gonzalez, W.D., Tang, F., Akasofu, S.-I., and Smith, E.J., Solar wind southward Bz features responsible for major magnetic storms of 1978–1979, J. Geophys. Res., 1988, vol. 93, no. A8, pp. 8519–8531. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA093iA08p08519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tsurutani, B.T., Echer, E., Shibata, K., Verkhoglyadova, O.P., Mannucci, A.J., Gonzalez, W.D., Kozyra, J.U., and Pätzold, M., The interplanetary causes of geomagnetic activity during the 7–17 march 2012 interval: A CAWSES II overview, J. Space Weather Space Clim., 2014, vol. 4, p. A02. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2013056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Val’chuk, T.E., The solar wind and magnetic storms of cycle 24 of solar activity, Astron. Tsirk., 2013, no. 1585.

  30. Viljanen, A. and Häkkinen, L., IMAGE magnetometer network, in Satellite – Ground Based Coordination Sourcebook, Lockwood, M., Wild, M.N., and Opgenoorth, H.J., Eds., Noordwijk, The Netherlands: ESA, 1997, pp. 111–117.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Viljanen, A., Tanskanen, E.I., and Pulkkinen, A., Relation between substorm characteristics and rapid temporal variations of the ground magnetic field, Ann. Geophys., 2006, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 725–733. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-24-725-2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vorob’jev, A.V., Pilipenko, V.A., Sakharov, Ya.A., and Selivanov, V.N., Statistical relationships between variations of the geomagnetic field, auroral electrojet, and geomagnetically induced current, J. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 2019, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 35–42. https://doi.org/10.12737/stp-51201905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Vorob’jev, V.G., Sakharov, Ya.A., Yagodkina, O.I., Petrukovich, A.A, and Selivanov, V.N., Geoinduced currents and their relationship with the western electrojet position and auroral precipitation boundaries, Tr. Kol’sk. Nauchn. Tsentra Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2018, vol. 4, pp. 16–28. https://doi.org/10.25702/KSC.2307-5252.2018.9.5.16-28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wiens, R.G. and Rostoker, G., Characteristics of the development of the westward electrojet during the expansive phase of magnetospheric substorms, J. Geophys. Res., 1975, vol. 16, pp. 2109–2128. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA080i016p02109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yermolaev, Yu.I., Nikolaeva, N.S., Lodkina, I.G., Yermolaev, M.Yu., Catalog of large-scale solar wind phenomena during 1976–2000, Cosmic Res., 2009, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are grateful to the creators of the OMNI database (http://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov), the catalog of large-scale solar-wind types (ftp://ftp.iki.rssi.ru/pub/ omni/catalog), the SuperMAG database (http://supermag.jhuapl.edu/), and IMAGE (http://space.fmi.fi/image/) for the permission to use these data in the study.

Funding

The work by I.V. Despirak, A.A. Lyubchich, and P.V. Setsko was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the National Science Foundation of Bulgaria, project no. 20-55-18003. The work by D. Valev was supported by the National Science Foundation of Bulgaria, project no. KP-06-Rusiya/15. The work by Ya.A. Sakharov and V.N. Selivanov was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 22-29-00413.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Polar Geophysical Institute, Apatity, Murmansk oblast, Russia

    I. V. Despirak, P. V. Setsko, Ya. A. Sakharov & A. A. Lyubchich

  2. Center for Physical and Technological Problems of Northern Energetics, Kola Science Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, Murmansk oblast, Russia

    V. N. Selivanov

  3. Space Research and Technology Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria

    D. Valev

Authors
  1. I. V. Despirak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. V. Setsko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ya. A. Sakharov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. A. Lyubchich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. V. N. Selivanov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. D. Valev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. V. Despirak.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by V. Arutyunyan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Despirak, I.V., Setsko, P.V., Sakharov, Y.A. et al. Observations of Geomagnetic Induced Currents in Northwestern Russia: Case Studies. Geomagn. Aeron. 62, 711–723 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793222060032

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793222060032

Search

Navigation