Abstract
The distribution of positive and negative photospheric fields is considered based on the synoptic maps of the photospheric magnetic field from the National Solar Observatory/Kitt Peak (NSO Kitt Peak) for 1976–2016. The analysis took into account only the sign of the field regardless of its strength, which underlined the role of the fields with medium and weak magnitudes. We considered the time variations in positive and negative magnetic fields, as well as their imbalances, for two hemispheres, for high latitudes, and for the sunspot zone. The distributions of the fields of different polarity are mainly conditioned by the high-latitude fields and vary with a 22-year cycle. The imbalance of polarities within a separate hemisphere is closely associated with the variations in the dipole moment g10. The high-latitude imbalance for two hemispheres varies with a 22-year period; its sign coincides with the polar field in the southern hemisphere and with the quadrupole moment g20. For the fields in the sunspot zone, the relation of the magnetic field imbalance to the quadrupole moment (–g20) and to the sign of the polar field in the northern hemisphere is observed ~75% of the time. The results show the evidence for cyclic variations in the imbalance of polarities.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Akhtemov, Z.S., Andreyeva, O.A., Rudenko, G.V., Stepanian, N.N., and Fainshtein, V.G., Variations over time in latitudinal distribution of the large-scale magnetic fields in the solar atmosphere at heights from the photosphere to the source surface, Adv. Space Res., 2015, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 968–978.
Andryeyeva, O.A. and Stepanian, N.N., Background magnetic fields during last three cycles of solar activity, Astron. Nachr., 2008, vol. 329, no. 6, pp. 579–582.
Bravo, S. and González-Esparza, J.A., The north–south asymmetry of the solar and heliospheric magnetic field during activity minima, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2000, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 847–849.
Hoeksema, J.T., Global solar magnetic fields, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 1991, vol. 43, no. Suppl.1, pp. 59–70.
Hoeksema, J.T. and Scherrer, P.H., Solar magnetic field—1976 through 1985, WDCA Report UAG-94, Boulder, 1986.
Ioshpa, B.A., Obridko, V.N., and Chertoprud, V.E., Small-scale background magnetic field on the Sun in solar cycle 23, Astron. Lett., 2009, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 424–431.
Kotov, V.A., Forty years of measurements of the mean magnetic field of the Sun: view from today, Bull. Crim. Astrophys. Obs., 2009, vol. 105, pp. 45–55.
Petrie, G.J.D., Evolution of active and polar photospheric magnetic fields during the rise of cycle 24 compared to previous cycles, Sol. Phys., 2012, vol. 281, pp. 577–598.
Roudier, Th., Švanda, M., Ballot, J., Malherbe, J.M., and Rieutord, M., Large-scale photospheric motions determined from granule tracking and helioseismology from SDO/HMI data. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1712.05255.
Svalgaard, L. and Kamide, Y., Asymmetric solar polar field reversals, Astrophys. J., 2013, vol. 763, no. 23, pp. 1–6.
Vernova, E.S., Tyasto, M.I., Baranov, D.G., and Danilova, O.A., Polarity imbalance of the photospheric magnetic field. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.09249.
Wilcox, J.M., Why does the sun sometimes look like a magnetic monopole?, Comments Astrophys. Space Phys., 1972, vol. 4, pp. 141–147.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The NSO/Kitt Peak data used here are produced cooperatively by NSF/NOAO, NASA/GSFC, and NOAA/SEL. This work utilizes the SOLIS data obtained by the NSO Integrated Synoptic Program (NISP), managed by the National Solar Observatory. The Wilcox Solar Observatory data used in this study were obtained via the website http://wso.stanford.edu courtesy of J.T. Hoeksema.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Translated by M. Chubarova
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vernova, E.S., Tyasto, M.I., Baranov, D.G. et al. Positive and Negative Photospheric Fields in Solar Cycles 21–24. Geomagn. Aeron. 58, 1136–1143 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793218080194
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793218080194