Skip to main content
Log in

Petrology and Geochemistry of Acid Volcano-Plutonic Rocks from Riwasa and Nigana Areas of Neoproterozoic Malani Igneous Suite, Northwestern Peninsular India: An Understanding Approach to Magmatic Evolution

  • Published:
Geochemistry International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the geochemical and petrological characteristics of acid volcano-plutonic suite of rocks exposed in Riwasa and Nigana areas of Malani Igneous Suite (MIS), Northwestern India. Geochemically, these acidic rocks having peraluminous and alkalic to alkali-calcic nature and classified as volcanic phase (Riwasa rhyolites), plutonic phase (Nigana granites) and dyke phase (micro-granites). Petrographically, rhyolites show porphyritic, granophyric, glomeroporphyritic, aphyritic, spherulitic and perlitic textures whereas granites show hypidomorphic, granophyric and microgranophyric textures. They are high in silica, A/CNK, total alkalis, Fe/Mg, Ga/Al, Zr, Rb, U, Th, Cu, REEs (except Eu) and low in CaO, MgO, Sc, Cr, Ni, Sr and Eu abundances, which have affinity with A-type granitoids. Their chemistry also support that they are high heat production (HHP) granitoids and their crustal origin. The enrichment of trace elements indicates a genetic link between fractional crystallization of silicate minerals and post magmatic fluid alterations in magmatic chamber. Negative anomalies of Ti, P, Sr and Eu in the multi-element spider diagrams indicate that the emplacement of these granites and associated acid volcanics were controlled by fractionation of feldspar (alkali and plagioclase) and crustal contamination in the magmatic melt arise upward. Normative values of silicate oxides further suggests that these rocks are formed between 2–7 kb pressure ranges and may be emplaced from shallow to greater depth ranges (15–30 km and 450–900°C). Furthermore, geochemical features in acidic rocks such as strong linear positive correlation between LREE, Zr, Nb, Ga, Y and Rb emphasize that the behavior and enrichment of these elements are largely controlled by post-magmatic processes in plume related associations. Hence, the geochemical data presented here, are therefore consistent with an intraplate, co-magmatic and A2-subtype granite field emplaced in extensional tectonic regime of MIS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. J. L. Anderson, “Mineral equilibria and crystallization conditions in the late Precambrian Wolf River Rapakivi Massif, Wisconsin,” J. Am. Sci. 280, 289–332 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. B. Barbarin, “A review of the relationships between granitoid types, their origins and their geodynamic environments,” Lithos, 46, 605–626 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R. A. Batchelor and P. Bowden, “Petrogenetic interpretation of granitoid rock series using multicationic parameters,” Chem. Geol. 48, 43–55 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. B. Bonin, “A-type granites and related rocks: evolution of a concept, problems and prospects,” Lithos. 97, 1–29 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. B. Bonin, “From orogenic to anorogenic environments: evidence from associated magmatic episodes,” Schweiz. Mineral. Petrogr. Mitt. 68, 301–311 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. F. Buddington, “Granite emplacement with special reference to North America,” Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 70, 611–747 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. K. Chaudhary et al., “Present status of the geochronology of the Precambrian rocks of Rajasthan,” J. Tectonophys. 105, 131–140 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D. B. Clarke, “Chemical variation in Al2O3–CaO–Na2O–K2O space: controls on the peraluminosity of the South Mountain Batholith,” J. Can. Earth. Sci. 41(7), 785–798 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. W. J. Collins et al., “Nature and origin of A-type granites with particular reference to southeastern Australia,” Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 80, 189–200 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. K. C. Condie, Mantle Plumes and their Record in Earth History (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 2001).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. K. G. Cox et al., The Interpretation of Igneous Rocks (Allen & Unwin, London, 1979).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. A. R. Crawford and W. Compston, “The age of Vindhyan system of peninsular India,” Quart. Jour. Geol. Soc. London. 175, 351–370 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Dhar et al., “Sr, Pb and Nd isotope studies and their bearing on the petrogenesis of the Jalor and Siwana complexes, Rajasthan, India,” J. Geol. Soc. India. 48 (2), 151–160 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. H. Donaldson and C. M. B. Henderson, “A new interpretation of round embayments in quartz crystals,” Min. Magaz. 52, 27–33 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. G. N. Eby and N. Kochhar, “Geochemistry and petrogenesis of the Malani Igneous Suite, North Peninsular India,” J. Geol. Soc. India. 36 (2), 109–130 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. N. Eby, “Chemical subdivision of the A-type granitoids: petrogenetic and tectonic implications,” J. Geol. 20, 641–644 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M. M. El. Dabe, “A geochemical tectonomagmatic classification of the A–type granitoids based on their magma types and tectonic regimes,” J. Arab. Geosci. 8, 187–193 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kh. M. Fawzy, “Characterization of a post orogenic A–type granite, Gabal El Atawi, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt: Geochemical and radioactive perspectives,” J. Geol. 7, 93–117 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. D. Frost and B. R. Frost, “Reduced rapakivi–type granites: the tholeiite connection,” Jour. Geol. 25, 647–650 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. D. Frost and B. R. Frost, “On Ferroan (A–type) Granitoids: their Compositional Variability and Modes of Origin,” J. Petrol. 52(1), 39–53 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. L. Gopeshwor and G. Vallinayagam, “Petrological and geochemical constraints in the origin and associated mineralization of A-type granite suite of the Dhiran Area, Northwestern Peninsular India,” J. Geosci. 2 (4), 66–80 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. V. Grebennikov, “A-type granites and related rocks: petrogenesis and classification,” Russ. Geol. Geophy. 55, 1074–1086 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. R. K. Gupta, “Embayed quartz crystals in Shyok volcanics, Ladakh,” Contemporary Geoscientific Researches in Himalaya 2, 65–68 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  24. G. N. Hanson and C. H. Langmuir, “Modeling of major elements: In mantle–melt system using trace elements approaches,” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 42, 725–741 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. P. Henderson, “General geochemical properties and abundances of the rare earth elements,” Rare Earth Element Geochemistry (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1984), pp. 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Isseini et al., “A–type granites from the Pan–African orogenic belt in south–western Chad constrained using geochemistry, Sr–Nd isotopes and U–Pb geochronology,” Lithos. 153, 39–52 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. N. Kochhar, “Malani Igneous Suite: Hot-spot magmatism and cratonization of the Northern part of the Indian Shield,” J. Geol. Soc. India. 25, 155–161 (1984a).

    Google Scholar 

  28. N. Kochhar, “Tusham ring complex, Bhiwani district, India,” Proc. Ind. Nat. Sci. Acad. 49 (4), 459–490 (1984b).

    Google Scholar 

  29. N. Kochhar et al., “Rb/Sr age of the Tusham Ring Complex Bhiwani, India,” J. Geol. Soc. India. 26, 216–218 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  30. N. Kochhar, “The Malani Supercontinent,” Front. Earth. Sci. 120–135 (2015).

  31. D. Konopelko et al., “Hercynian post–collisional A–type granites of the Kokshaal Range, Southern Tien Shan, Kyrgyzstan,” Lithos. 97, 140–160 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Y. A. Kostitsyn et al., “Trace elements and evolution of granite melt as exemplified by the Raumid Pluton, Southern Pamirs,” Geochem. Int. 45 (10), 971–982 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. N. Kumar and G. Vallinayagam, “Geochemistry and petrogenesis of Neoproterozoic A-type granites at Nakora in the Malani Igneous Suite, Western Rajasthan, India,” J. Chin. Geochem. 31, 221–233 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. S. G. Lee et al., “Geochemical significance of the Rb–Sr, La–Ce and Sm–Nd isotope systems in A-type rocks with REE tetrad patterns and negative Eu and Ce anomalies: the Cretaceous Muamsa and Weolaksan granites, South Korea,” Jour. Chem. Der. Erde. 73, 75–88 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. M. C. Loiselle and D. R. Wones, “Characteristics and origin of anorogenic granites,” Geol. Soc. America. Abstracts. 11, 468 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  36. M. Lopez-Plaza et al., “Contrasting mantle sources and processes involved in a peri–Gondwanan terrane. A case study of pre–Variscan mafic intrusives from the autochthon of the Central Iberian Zone,” Geol. Soc. Am. Spl. Paper. 423, 297–313 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  37. A. Maheshwari et al., “Geochemistry and petrogenesis of Siwana peralkaline granites, west of Barmer, Rajasthan, India,” Int. Assoc. Gond. Res. Japan, 4 (1), 87–95 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. P. D. Maniar and P. M. Piccoli, “Tectonic discrimination of granitoids,” J. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 101 (5), 635–643 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. A-K. M. Moghazi et al., “Sources of rare–metal–bearing A–type granites from Jabel Sayed Complex, Northern Arabian Shield, Saudi Arabia,” Jour. Asian. Earth. Sci. 107, 244–258 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. A. M. B. Moufti et al., “Geochemistry and petrogenesis of the Ediacaran post–collisional Jabal Al–Hassir ring complex, southern Arabian Shield, Saudi Arabia,” J. Chemie. Erde. 73 (4), 451–467 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. H. S. Pareek, “Petrography and geochemistry of Tusham hill felsic volcanics, Haryana,” Jour. Geol. Soc. India. 27, 254–262 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  42. J. A. Pearce et al., “Trace element description diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks,” Jour. Petrol. 25, 956–983 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. J. Pl`a Cid et al., “Paleoproterozoic late-orogenic and anorogenic alkaline granitic magmatism from northeast Brazil,” Precamb. Res. 104, 47–75 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. D. L. Roche et al., “A classification of volcanic and plutonic rocks using R1–R2 diagram and major–element analysis–its relationship with current nomenclature,” Chem. Geol. 29, 183–210 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. H. R. Rollinson, Using Geochemical Data: Evaluation, Presentation, Interpretation (Longman–Wileys, New York, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  46. R. Sharma and N. Kumar, “Petrology and Geochemistry of A-type granites from Khanak and Devsar areas of Bhiwani district, Southwestern Haryana,” J. Geol. Soc. India. 90, 138–146 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. A. K. Singh et al., “Anorogenic acid volcanic rocks in the Kundal area of the Malani Igneous Suite, Northwestern India: Geochemical and petrogenetic studies,” J. Asian. Earth. Sci. 27, 544–557 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. M. Stony, “Trachytic pyroclastic from Agua de volcano, Sao Miquel Azores: evolution of a magma body over 4000 years”, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 12, 423–432 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  49. S. S. Sun and W. F. McDonough, “Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: Implications for mantle composition and processes,” Magmatism in the Ocean Basin, Eds. by M. J. Norry and A. D. Saunders, Geol. Soc. Sp. Publ. 2, 313–345 (1989).

  50. W. Wang et al., “Low-δ18O rhyolites from the Malani Igneous Suite: a positive test for south China and NW India linkage in Rodinia,” J. Geophys. Res. 44 (10), 298–305 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  51. E. B. Watson, “Zircon saturation in felsic liquids: experimental results and applications to trace element geochemistry. Contrib. Miner. Petrol. 70, 407–419 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. J. B. Whalen et al., “A-type granites: Geochemical characteristics, discrimination and petrogenesis,” Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 96, 407–419 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors wish to express their thanks to Chairman, Department of Geology, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra and Director, Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun for their support. The first author wishes to acknowledge the financial support of the Junior Research Fellowship, University Grand Commission (UGC) to carry out the research work. We are grateful to two journal reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve the quality of manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naveen Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naveen Kumar, Kumar, N. & Singh, A.K. Petrology and Geochemistry of Acid Volcano-Plutonic Rocks from Riwasa and Nigana Areas of Neoproterozoic Malani Igneous Suite, Northwestern Peninsular India: An Understanding Approach to Magmatic Evolution. Geochem. Int. 57, 645–667 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S001670291906003X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S001670291906003X

Keywords:

Navigation