Abstract
Mercury emissions during production of blister copper at the smelter Karabashmed are roughly estimated. The high mercury content in the atmospheric dust, soils, lake sediments of the Karabash geotechnogenic system shows that emissions of the plant are the main source of environmental contamination. The mercury content in soils of residential territory ranges within 0.2–11.4 mg/kg, reaching 15 mg/kg in soils of the impact zone. The maximum mercury content in the bottom sediments of Lake Serebry is 32 mg/kg. The high degree of contamination by other elements of emissions (Cu, Pb, Zn, As, Cd) is also demonstrated. Obtained results justify the need for the instrumental control of mercury in emissions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACAP. Assessment of Mercury Releases from the Russian Federation. Arctic Council Action Plan to Eliminate Pollution of the Arctic (ACAP), Russian Federal Service for Environmental, Technological and Atomic Supervision & Danish Environmental Protection Agency (Danish EPA, Copenhagen, 2005).
AMAP/UNEP. Technical Background Report for the Global Mercury Assessment 2013. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (Oslo, Norway/UNEP Chemicals Branch, Geneva, Switzerland, 2013).
V. V. Deryagin, Field Practice on the Geomorphology in Form of Expedition Route on the Administrative Territory of the Town of Karabash. Methodical Textbook (Abris, Chelyabinsk, 2010) [in Russian].
M. S. Ermolin, P. S. Fedotov, A. I. Ivaneev, V. K. Karandashev, A. A. Burmistrov, and Yu. G. Tatsy, “Assessment of elemental composition and properties of copper smelter-affected dust and its nano- and micron size fractions,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23 (23), 23781–23790 (2016).
P. S. Fedotov, M. S. Ermolin, A. I. Ivaneev, N. N. Fedyunina, V. K. Karandashev, and Yu. G. Tatsy, “Continuous- flow leaching in a rotating coiled column for studies on the mobility of toxic elements in dust samples collected near a metallurgic plant,” Chemosphere 146, 371–378 (2016).
V. E. Fioletov, C. A. McLinden, N. Krotkov, C. Li, J. Joiner, N. Theys, S. Cam, and M. D. Moran, “A global catalogue of large SO2 sources and emissions derived from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument,” Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 11497–11519 (2016).
N. A. Gashkina, Yu. G. Tatsii, V. N. Udachin, and P. G. Aminov, “Biogeochemical indication of environmental contamination: a case study of a large copper smelter,” Geochem. Int. 53 (3), 253–264 (2015).
GN 2.1.7.2041-06. Maximum Permissible Concentrations of Chemical Matters in Soil. Hygienic Standards (Federal Service on Customer’s right protectonic and human well-being surveillance, 2006).
GOST 17.4.3.01-83 Nature Protection. Soils. General Requirements to Sampling.
GOST 17.4.4.02-84 Nature Protection. Soils. Methods of Sampling and Sample Preparation for Chemical, Bacteriological, and Helminthologic Analysis.
GOST P 51592-2000. Water. Generally Accepted Requirements to Sampling. Russian State Standard.
N. A. Grigor’ev, Distribution of Chemical Elements in the Upper Continental Crust (UrO RAN, Yekaterinburg, 2009) [in Russian].
H. Hultberg, “Treatment of lakes and storage reservoirs with very low dosages of selenium to reduce methyl mercury in fish,” IVL Report B 1488, (2002) 38 p.
L. D. Hylander and R. B. Herbert, “Global emission and production of mercury during the pyrometallurgical extraction of nonferrous sulfide ores,” Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 5971–5977 (2008).
ITS 3-2015. Information–Technical Reference Book on the Best Available Technologies. Copper Production. Federal Agency on the Technical Regulation and Metrology (Byuro NDT, Moscow, 2015) [in Russian].
N. S. Kasimov, and D. V. Vlasov, “Average contents of elements as comparison standards in ecogeochemistry,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 5. Geogr., 2, 7–17 (2015).
A List of Contaminants Subjected to Measures of State Regulation in the Field of Environmental Protection. Russian Government Decree no. 1316-r on July 8, 2015. http://government.ru/media/files/NQsLnpwkA9vtce- Goj46TRcTSm6yxJXmH.pdf [in Russian].
Methodical Indications on the Performance of Field and Laboratory Studies of Soils and Plants during Control of the Environmental Pollution by Metals (Moscow, Gidrometeoizdat, 1981) [in Russian].
Minamata Convention on Mercury Text and Applications (Electron Resource) (UNEP, 2013). http://mercuryconvention. org/Portals/11/documents/Booklets/Minamata_convention_Russian.pdf
V. S. Nesterenko, “Urban associations of elements pollutants in the town of Karabash, Chelyabinsk District, as reflection of ore-chemical characteristics of raw minerals,” Bezopasn. Zhiznedeyat., No. 9, 40–45 (2006).
E. G. Pacyna, J. M. Pacyna, F. Steenhuisen, and S. Wilson, “Global anthropogenic mercury emission inventory for 2000,” Atmos. Environ. 40, 4048–4063 (2006).
E. G. Pacyna, J. M. Pacyna, K. Sundseth, J. Munthe, K. Kindbom, F. Steenhuisen, P. Maxson, and S. Wilson, “Global emission of mercury to the atmosphere from anthropogenic sources in 2005 and projections to 2020,” Atmos. Environ. 44, 2487–2499 (2010).
N. Pirrone, G. J. Keeler, and J. O. Nriagu, “Regional differences in worldwide emissions of mercury to the atmosphere,” Atmos. Environ. 30, 2981–2987 (1996).
C. Reimann and P. De Caritat, “Intrinsic flaws of element enrichment factors (EFs) in environmental geochemistry,” Environ. Sci. Technol. 34, 5084–5091 (2000).
Standards and Criteria for Assesment of Pollution of Bottom Deposits in Aqueous Objects of St. Petersburg. Regional Normative (1996) [in Russian].
State Report “On state and use of raw–mineral resources of the Russian Federation in 2014”. Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology of the Russian Federation (Mineral-Info, 2015) [in Russian].
A. M. Stepanov, R. R. Kabirov, T. V. Chernen’kova, O. F. Sadykov, G. M. Khanislamova, L. S. Nekrasova, O. B. Butusov, and L. A. Bal’tsevich, Complex Ecological Assessment of Technogenic Impact on the South Taiga Ecosystem (TSEPL, Moscow, 1992) [in Russian].
V. N. Udachin, M. Djedzhi, P. G. Aminov, G. F. Lonshakova, K. A. Filippova, V. V. Deryagin, and L. G. Udachina, “Chemical composition of atmospheric precipitates of the South Urals,” Estestv. Tekhn. Nauki 6, 304–311 (2010).
V. N. Udachin, P. G. Aminov, and K. A. Filippova, Geochemistry of Mining Technogenesis of the South Urals (RIO UrO RAN, Yekaterinburg, 2014) [in Russian].
E. L. Vorobeichik, “Change of thickness of forest cover under conditions of chemical pollution,” Ekologiya, No. 4, 278–284 (1995).
B. J. Williamson, I. Mikhailova, O. W. Purvis, and V. Udachin, “SEM-EDX analysis in the source apportionment of particulate matter on Hypogimnia physodes lichen transplants around the Cu smelter and former mining town of Karabash, South Urals, Russia,” Sci.Total Environ. 322, 139–154 (2004).
Q. Wu, S. Wang, L. Zhang, M. Hui, F. Wang, and J. Hao, “Flow analysis of the mercury associated with nonferrous ore concentrates: implications on mercury emissions and recovery in China,” Environ. Sci. Technol. 50 (4), 1796–1803 (2016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © Yu.G. Tatsii, V.N. Udachin, P.G. Aminov, 2017, published in Geokhimiya, 2017, No. 10, pp. 942–953.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tatsii, Y.G., Udachin, V.N. & Aminov, P.G. Environmental geochemistry of mercury in the area of emissions of the Karabashmed copper smelter. Geochem. Int. 55, 935–945 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016702917100093
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016702917100093