Skip to main content
Log in

Typification of urban habitats, with ant assemblages of Moscow city taken as an example

  • Published:
Entomological Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A typification of Moscow city habitats is undertaken, based on their consideration as mosaic of patches and using such fundamental parameters as habitat origin (soil type), floristic composition, vegetation structure, and area of the biotopes. Altogether, 11 habitat types are distinguished: lawns, agrocenoses, xerophytic and mesophytic meadows, tall weeds, boulevards, small degenerative parks, small oppressed artificial parks, landscape parks, forest parks, and technocenoses. Such a classification is primarily useful for studying ants. The present paper describes the basic structure of ant assemblages in most types of urban biocenoses. The main pool of Moscow’s ant species ranked by their occurrence is as follows: Lasius niger (87%), Myrmica rugulosa (44%), Myrmica rubra (33%), Formica cunicularia (11%), Myrmica ruginodis (10%), etc. Leaf litter removal with a rake was shown to negatively affect the numbers, biomass, and species diversity of ant communities in urban areas with trees. The most stable two-species ant community revealed in Moscow City, termed an “elementary urban community,” consists of L. niger and M. rugulosa, with the former always outnumbering the latter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antonov, I.A., Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Ulan-Ude, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Antonova, V. and Penev, L., “Classification of Ant Assemblages in Green Areas of Sofia,” Acta Zoologica Bulgarica, No. 2, 103–110 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blinova, S.V., “Changes in the Ant Assemblages under the Conditions of a Large Industrial Center,” Ekologiya, No. 2, 158–160 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bugrova, N.M., “The Effect of Anthropogenic Transformation of the Environment on the Ecological Groups of Ants,” in Ants and Forest Protection: Proceedings of the XI All-Russian Myrmecological Symposium (Perm, 2001), pp. 154–157.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bugrova, N.M. and Reznikova, J.I., “The State of Formica polyctena Först. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) Population in Recreation Forests,” Memorabilia Zoologica 44, 13–19 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ishitani, M., Kotze, D.J., and Niemelä, J., “Changes in Carabid Beetle Assemblages across an Urban-Rural Gradient in Japan,” Ecography 26 (4), 481–489 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalennikova, O.A., Romashkova, O.P., Seradzhi, V.E., and Odinets, A.A., “Ants as Household Pests under Urban Conditions,” in Ants and Forest Protection: Proceedings of the X All-Russian Myrmecological Symposium (Moscow, 1998), pp. 151–152.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Klausnitzer, B., Ökologie der Großstadtfauna (Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, 1987; Mir, Moscow, 1990) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kunashev, M.V. and Niyazova, M.V., “On the Finding of Tapinoma melanocephalum (Dolichoderinae) in Moscow,” in Ants and Forest Protection: Proceedings of the X All-Russian Myrmecological Symposium (Moscow, 1998), p.153.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Niemelä, J., Kotze, J.D., Venn, S., Penev, L., Stoyanov, I., et al., “Carabid Beetle Assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae) across Urban-Rural Gradients: an International Comparison,” Landscape Ecology 17, 387–401 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Odinets, A.A., “Experience of Ant Control in Moscow,” in Ants and Forest Protection: Proceedings of the IX All-Union Myrmecological Symposium (Moscow, 1991), pp. 49–51.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Petal, J., “The Effect of Industrial Pollution of Silesia on Populations of Ants,” Polish Ecological Studies 6 (4), 665–672 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pisarski, B., “Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicoidea) of Warsaw and Mazovia,” Memorabilia Zoologica 36, 73–90 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pisarski, B., “The Invertebrate Fauna in Urban Districts of Warsaw,” in Bioindication in Cities and Suburban Zones (Nauka, Moscow, 1993), pp. 43–49 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pisarski, B. and Czechowski, W., “Influence de la pression urbaine sur la myrmecofaune,” Memorabilia Zoologica 29, 109–128 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Putyatina, T.S., “The Choice of Foraging Strategy as a Mechanism for the Coexistence of Myrmica Species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in a Multispecific Ant Association,” Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 86 (6), 701–708 (2007) [Entomological Review 87 (6), 650–657 (2007)].

    Google Scholar 

  17. Putyatina, T.S., “The Influence of Recreation Load on Ant Communities in Open Biocenoses of Moscow,” Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, Ser. 16. Biologiya, No. 1, 47–51 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Red Data Book of Moscow. 2nd Edition, Emended and Supplemented, Ed. by B.L. Samoilov and G.V. Morozova (Department of Nature Management and Protection of the Government of Moscow, Moscow, 2011) [in Russian].

  19. Santos, M.N., “Research on Urban Ants: Approaches and Gaps,” Insectes Sociaux 63 (3), 359–371 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Škopek, V., “Method and Procedure of Ascertaining the Water Regime of a Geoecological Locality,” Ecology (CSSR) 3, 55–64 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stebaev, I.V., Pivovarova, Zh.F., Smolyakov, B.S., and Nedelkina, S.V., Biogeosystems of Russian Forests and Waters (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1993) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tikhonova, G.N., Tikhonov, I.A., Bogomolov, P.L., Bodyak, N.D., and Surov, A.V., “Distribution of Small Mammals and Typification of Undeveloped Territories in Moscow,” Uspekhi Sovremennoi Biologii 117 (2), 218–239 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vepsäläinen, K. and Wuorenrinne, H., “Ecological Effects of Urbanization on the Mound-Building Formica L. Species,” Memorabilia Zoologica 29, 191–202 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vepsäläinen, K., Ikonen, H., and Koivula, M.J., “The Structure of Ant Assemblages in an Urban Area of Helsinki, Southern Finland,” Annales Zoologici Fennici 45, 109–127 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vertebrates in Alma-Ata: Fauna, Distribution, and Protection (Nauka, Alma-Ata, 1988) [in Russian].

  26. Zakharov, A.A., Ants in Forest Communities: Their Life and Role in the Forest (KMK Scientific Press, Moscow, 2015) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zakharov, A.A. and Sablin-Yavorsky, A.D., “Ants in the Study of Biological Diversity,” Uspekhi Sovremennoi Biologii 118 (3), 246–264 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zakharov, A.A., Byzova, Yu.B., Uvarov, A.V., Zalesskaya, N.T., Lanina, V.V., et al., Soil Invertebrates in Recreation Spruce Forests of Moscow Environs (Nauka, Moscow, 1989) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhigarev, I.A., “Regularities of Recreation-Induced Disturbances of Phytocenoses,” Uspekhi Sovremennoi Biologii 113 (5), 564–575 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zukkop, G., Elvers, G., and Mattes, G., “The Study of Ecology of Urbanized Territories (by the Example of West Berlin),” Ekologiya, No. 2, 15–20 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. S. Putyatina.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © T.S. Putyatina, K.S. Perfilieva, Yu.V. Zakalyukina, 2017, published in Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 2017, Vol. 96, No. 11, pp. 1373–1383.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Putyatina, T.S., Perfilieva, K.S. & Zakalyukina, Y.V. Typification of urban habitats, with ant assemblages of Moscow city taken as an example. Entmol. Rev. 97, 1053–1062 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873817080048

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873817080048

Navigation