Skip to main content
Log in

Stratification of the ant species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in the urban broadleaf woodlands of the city of Kiev

  • Published:
Entomological Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Investigations were carried out in June–August 2012 and 2013 in broadleaf forests and planted stands of the northern red oak Quercus rubra in Kiev. The ant visitation rates of 3–6 most abundant plant species within each vegetation layer were analyzed. In all, 16 species of ants were found in the broadleaf forest (Quercus robur + Acer spp. + Carpinus betulus), with the dominance of three species: Formica rufa, Lasius fuliginosus, and L. emarginatus. Eight ant species occurred in Q. rubra stands with the undergrowth of Acer campestre and A. platanoides; the dominant species were Lasius fuliginosus and L. emarginatus. The northern red oak stands with conspecific undergrowth had only four ant species with no dominants among them. Plants with the highest ant visitation rates in the herbage layer of the broadleaf forest were the invasive Impatiens parviflora and the native Aegopodium podagraria. Ants were rare or absent on the remaining herbs: Impatiens noli-tangere, Carex sylvatica, Stellaria holostea, and Galium odoratum. The herbage layer was mostly visited by influents, the dominants being represented only by Lasius emarginatus. Within the shrub layer, ants most frequently visited the undergrowth of the maple Acer platanoides, often harboring colonies of the aphid Periphyllus lyropictus; the highest visitation rates were recorded in the dominants L. emarginatus and L. fuliginosus. The arboreal layer had the highest visitation rate and was most often visited by the dominants Lasius fuliginosus, L. emarginatus, and F. rufa. The common oak Q. robur was the most visited tree in broadleaf forests. In addition to providing ants with food (colonies of the aphids Lachnus roboris and Stomaphis quercus, and also phytophagous insects and other invertebrates), these trees were used for nesting by the dominants L. fuliginosus and L. emarginatus. The presence of aphid colonies was also typical of ripe trees and undergrowth of the maple A. platanoides, the second-visited tree in broadleaf forests. The common hornbeam Carpinus betulus was the least frequently visited, though some ant species, usually L. emarginatus, nested in the trunks and branches of old trees. The vertical distribution of ants in broadleaf forests and red oak stands formed two clusters: the influents occupied the lower (herbage and shrub) vegetation layers, while the subdominants and dominants occupied the upper (shrub and arboreal) ones. The smallest number of ant species (1 or 2) in all the vegetation layers was recorded in the areas with F. rufa; areas with L. fuliginosus had twice as many species; the greatest numbers of ant species were found in the areas with L. emarginatus and in those without dominants. This pattern may result from different territoriality of the dominants: the strongest in F. rufa (defending the whole territory) and the weaker in the other two species (defending only a part of the territory). Plants of all the vegetation layers varied in their attractiveness to ants. As a result, the layers had a mosaic structure in their vertical (between-layer) and horizontal (between different plant species within one layer) arrangement. From 60 to 100% of plants of certain species were visited by ants while plants of other species were not visited at all. The main reason for visiting plants by ants was the presence of aphid colonies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aleshkina, U.M., “Plant Associations in the Green Belt of Kiev,” in Phytosociology in Russia: Milestones and Prospects, Vol. 1: Diversity of Plant Associations and Problems of Their Protection. Plant Geography and Cartography. The History and Prospects of Phytosociological Research, Ed. by V.T. Yarmishko (St. Petersburg, 2011), pp. 7–10 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andrienko, T.L. and Shelyag-Sosonko, Yu.R., Flora of the Ukrainian Polesie: Conservation Aspects (Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1983) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anuchin, N.P., Forest Assessment: A Teaching Aid (Lesnaya Promyshlennost, Moscow, 1982) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chmura, D., “Impact of Alien Tree Species Quercus rubra L. on Understorey Environment and Flora: a Study of the Silesian Upland (Southern Poland),” Polish Journal of Ecology 61 (3), 431–442 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Czechowski, W., Radchenko, A., and Czechowska, W., The Ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of Poland (Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Czechowski, W., Marko, B., Radchenko, A., and Slipinski, P., “Long-Term Partitioning of Space between Two Territorial Species of Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and Their Effect on Subordinate Species,” European Journal of Entomology 110 (2), 327–337 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dlussky, G.M., The Desert Ants (Nauka, Moscow, 1981) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ddukh, Ya.P. and Al'oshkna, U.M., The Urban Biotopes of Kiev (NaUKMA, Kiev, 2012) [in Ukrainian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goncharenko, G.V., Ahnatyuk, O.A., and Shelyag-Sosonko, Yu.P., “Forest Vegetation of the Feofaniya Landscape Memorial and Its Anthropogenic Transformation,” Ekologiya ta Noosferologya 24 (3–4), 51–63 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gorb, E.V. and Gorb, S.N., “Effects of Ant Species Composition on Seed Removal in Deciduous Forest in Eastern Europe,” Oikos 84, 110–118 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ihnatiuk, O.A. and Stukalyuk, S.V., “Degradation Changes in the Structure of Multispecies Associations of Ants in Urbanized Areas,” Russian Journal of Ecology 46 (1), 109–115 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ito, F. and Higashi, S., “An Indirect Mutualism between Oaks and Wood Ants via Aphids,” Journal of Animal Ecology 60 (2), 463–470 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaczmarek, W., “Badania nad zespolami mrówek lesnych,” Ekologia Polska 1 (2), 69–96 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Labanowski, G. and Soika, G., “Aphids (Hemiptera, Aphidoidea) on Trees and Shrubs Belonging to Betulaceae Family in Ornamental Plants Nurseries,” Aphids and Other Hemipterous Insects 17, 81–97 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mackos, E., “Aphids (Hemiptera, Aphidoidea) on Maple Acer platanoides in the Urban Green Areas of the City of Lublin,” Aphids and Other Hemipterous Insects 14, 73–81 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Povarntsin, V.O. and Shendrkov, M.A., “Forest Types in the Feofaniya Experimental Forestry of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences,” Ukrainskii Botanicheskii Zhurnal 14 (1), 75–85 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Putyatina, T.S., Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Moscow, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pyšek, P., Jarošík, V., and Pergl, J., “The Global Invasion Success of Central European Plants is Related to Distribution Characteristics in Their Native Range and Species Traits,” Diversity and Distributions 15, 891–903 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Radchenko, A.G. and Elmes, G.W., Myrmica Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of the Old World (Natura Optima Dux Foundation, Warszawa, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Reznikova, Zh.I., Interspecific Interactions in Ants (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1983) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  21. Robinson, E.J.H., Tofilski, A., and Ratnieks, F.L.W., “The Use of Native and Non-Native Tree Species for Foraging and Nesting Habitat by the Wood-Ant Formica lugubris (Hymenoptera: Formicidae),” Myrmecological News 11, 1–7 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Seima, F.A., The Structure of the Taiga Ant Population (Perm State University, Perm, 2008) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  23. Southwood, T.R.E., Moran, V.C., and Kennedy, C.E.J., “The Richness, Abundance and Biomass of the Arthropod Communities on Trees,” Journal of Animal Ecology 51 (2), 635–649 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Southwood, T.R.E., Wint, G.R.W., Kennedy, C.J., and Greenwood, S., “The Composition of the Arthropod Fauna of the Canopies of Some Species of Oak (Quercus),” European Journal of Entomology 102, 65–72 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Starý, P. and Láska, P., “Adaptation of Native Syrphid Flies to New Exotic Plant (Impatiens spp.)–Aphid–Ant Associations in Central Europe (Dipt., Syrphidae; Hom., Aphididae; Hym., Formicidae),” Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde 72 (3), 72–75 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stukalyuk, S.V., “Structure of the Ant Assemblages (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in Broad-Leaved Forests of Kiev,” Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 94 (1), 67–89 (2015) [Entomological Review 95 (3), 370–387 (2015)].

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stukalyuk, S.V. and Radchenko, V.G., “Structure of Multi-Species Ant Assemblages (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in the Mountain Crimea,” Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 89 (3), 532–560 (2010) [Entomological Review 91 (1), 15–36 (2011)].

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vepsäläinen, K. and Savolainen, R., “A Competition Hierarchy among Boreal Ants: Impact on Resource Partitioning and Community Structure,” Oikos 51 (2), 135–155 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vepsäläinen, K., Savolainen, R., Tiainen, J., and Vilen, J., “Successional Changes of Ants Assemblages from Virgin and Ditched Bogs to Forest,” Annales Zoologici Fennici 37, 135–149 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zakharov, A.A., Organization of Ant Communities (Nauka, Moscow, 1991) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zakharov, A.A., “Structure of Ant Communities in the Tonga and Western Samoa Islands,” in Fauna of Southwestern Oceania (Nauka, Moscow, 1994), pp. 94–142 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zakharov, A.A., Ants in the Forest Associations: Their Life and Role in the Forest (KMK Scientific Press, Moscow, 2015) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zakharov, A.A. and Sablin-Yavorsky, A.D., “Ants in the Biodiversity Studies,” Uspekhi Sovremennoi Biologii 118 (3), 246–265 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. V. Stukalyuk.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © S.V. Stukalyuk, 2017, published in Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 2017, Vol. 96, No. 1, pp. 43–74.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stukalyuk, S.V. Stratification of the ant species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in the urban broadleaf woodlands of the city of Kiev. Entmol. Rev. 97, 320–343 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S001387381703006X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S001387381703006X

Navigation