Skip to main content
Log in

Energy efficiency of a continuous-detonation combustion chamber

  • Published:
Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves Aims and scope

Abstract

Systematic experimental and computational studies of the energy efficiency of continuous-detonation combustors (CDCs) have been performed. A small-size and a large-size CDCs using hydrogen as fuel and oxygen or air as oxidizer have been developed and tested. It was first experimentally proved that the Zel’dovich thermodynamic cycle with continuous-detonation combustion of a hydrogen-oxygen mixture in an annular combustor is more efficient than the Brayton thermodynamic cycle with continuous combustion of the mixture, other things being equal. The specific impulse of a small-size bench-scale rocket engine with a 50 mm diameter CDC operating in the continuous-detonation mode was 6–7% higher than that in the continuous combustion mode of operation. The measured fuel-based specific impulse for the large-size CDC of 406 mm diameter running on a hydrogen-air mixture was at a level of 3000 s. Three-dimensional calculations to optimize the structure and operation mode of the large-size CDC have shown that when running on a combustible mixture with a nearly stoichiometric overall composition, the specific impulse can be increased to ≈4200 s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ya. B. Zel’dovich, “On the Energetic Use of Detonation Combustion,” Zh. Tekh. Fiz. 10(17), 1455–1461 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. A. Bykovskii and S. A. Zhdan, Continuous Spin Detonation (Izd. Sib. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Novosibirsk, 2013) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. D. Roy, S. M. Frolov, A. A. Borisov, and D. W. Netzer, “Pulse Detonation Propulsion: Challenges, Current Status, and Future Perspective,” Prog. Energ. Combust. Sci. 30(6), 545–672 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S. A. Zhdan, F. A. Bykovskii, and E. F. Vedernikov, “Mathematical Modeling of a Rotating Detonation Wave in a Hydrogen-Oxygen Mixture,” Fiz. Goreniya Vzryva 43(4), 90–101 (2007) [Combust., Expl., Shock Waves 43 (4), 449–459 (2007)].

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Kailasanath and D. A. Schwer, “Numerical Simulations of a Rotating-Detonation-Wave Engine Concept,” in Transient Combustion and Detonation Phenomena: Fundamentals and Applications, Ed. by G. D. Roy and S. M. Frolov (Torus Press, Moscow, 2014), pp. 436–441.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yo. Eude and D. Davidenko, “Use of the Adaptive Mesh Refinement for Continuous-Detonation Simulation,” in Transient Combustion and Detonation Phenomena: Fundamentals and Applications, Ed. by G. D. Roy and S. M. Frolov (Torus Press, Moscow, 2014), pp. 454–463.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Wolanski, “Detonative Propulsion,” Proc. Combust. Inst. 34, 125–158 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dan Wu, Yan Liu, Yusi Liu, and Jianping Wang, “Numerical Investigations of the Restabilization of Hydrogen-Air Rotating Detonation Engines,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 39(28), 15803–15809 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yu. Uemuraa, A. K. Hayashi, A. Asahara, N. Tsuboi, and E. Yamada, “Transverse Wave Generation Mechanism in Rotating Detonation,” Proc. Combust. Inst. 34(2), 1981–1989 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. F. Ma, J.-Y. Choi, and V. Yang, “Thrust Chamber Dynamics and Propulsive Performance of Single-Tube Pulse Detonation Engines,” J. Propul. Power 21(3), 512–526 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. W. H. Heiser and D. T. Pratt, “Thermodynamic Cycle Analysis of Pulse Detonation Engines,” J. Propul. Power 18(1), 68–76 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. M. Frolov, A. E. Barykin, and A. A. Borisov, “Thermodynamic Cycle with Detonation Combustion of Propellant,” Khim. Fiz. 23(3), 17–25 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. K. Chvanov, S. M. Frolov, and L. E. Sternin, “Liquid Detonation Rocket Engine,” in Tr. NPO Energomash im. Akad. V. P. Glushko, No. 29, 4–14 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. M. Frolov, A. V. Dubrovskii, and V. S. Ivanov, “Three-Dimensional Numerical Simulation of the Operation of a Continuous-Detonation Combustor with Separate Supply of Fuel and Oxidizer,” Khim. Fiz. 32(2), 56–65 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. B. Pope, “PDF Methods for Turbulent Reactive Flows,” Prog. Energ. Combust. Sci. 11,(2), 119–192 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. V. Ya. Basevich and S. M. Frolov, “Kinetics of Blue Flames in Gas-Phase Oxidation and Combustion of Hydrocarbons and Their Derivatives,” Usp. Khimii 76(9), 927–944 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. V. Dubrovsky, S. M. Frolov, and V. S. Ivanov, “Computational Studies of a Large-Scale Hydrogen-Air Continuous Detonation Combustor,” in Transient Combustion and Detonation Phenomena: Fundamentals and Applications, Ed. by G. D. Roy and S. M. Frolov (Torus Press, Moscow, 2014), pp. 442–453.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. M. Frolov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © S.M. Frolov, V.S. Aksenov, A.V. Dubrovskii, V.S. Ivanov, I.O. Shamshin.

Published in Fizika Goreniya i Vzryva, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 102–117, March–April, 2015.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frolov, S.M., Aksenov, V.S., Dubrovskii, A.V. et al. Energy efficiency of a continuous-detonation combustion chamber. Combust Explos Shock Waves 51, 232–245 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010508215020070

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010508215020070

Keywords

Navigation