Skip to main content
Log in

Representing a sequential allotment rule in the form of a strategy-proof mechanism of multicriteria active expertise

  • Large Scale Systems Control
  • Published:
Automation and Remote Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We demonstrate that any sequential allotment rule enjoying strategy-proofness on the domain of single-peaked preference functions can be represented in the form of a strategy-proof mechanism of active expertise on the domain of multidimensional single-plateaued preference functions, i.e., a generalized median voter scheme with a tie-breaking rule.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burkov, V.N., Gorgidze, I.I., Novikov, D.A., and Yusupov, B.S., Modeli i mekhanizmy raspredeleniya zatrat i dokhodov v rynochnoi ekonomike (Models and Mechanisms of Distribution of Costs and Income in a Market Economy), Moscow: Inst. Probl. Upravlen., 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burkov, V.N., Danev, B., Enaleev, A.K., et al., Bol’shie sistemy: modelirovanie organizatsionnykh mekhanizmov (Large-scale Systems: Modeling of Organizational Mechanisms), Moscow: Nauka, 1989.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Burkov, V.N., Iskakov, M.B., and Korgin, N.A., Application of Generalized Median Voter Schemes to Designing Strategy-proof Mechanisms of Multicriteria Active Expertise, Autom. Remote Control, 2010, vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 1681–1694.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Korgin, N.A., Use of Intersection Property for Analysis of Feasibility of Multicriteria Expertise Results, Autom. Remote Control, 2010, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 1169–1183.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Korgin, N.A., Equivalence and Strategy-proofness of Non-anonymous Priority Resource AllocationMechanisms, Upravlen. Bol’shimi Sist., 2009, no. 26.1, pp. 319–347.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Novikov, D.A., Theory of Control in Organizations, New York: Nova Science, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barberá, S., Masso, J., and Serizawa, S., Strategy-Proof Voting on Compact Ranges, Games Econom. Behav., 1998, vol. 25, pp. 272–291.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Barberá, S., Jackson, M., and Neme, A., Strategy-Proof Allotment Rules, Games Econom. Behav., 1997, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–21.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Berga, D., Strategy-Proofness and Single-Plateaued Preferences, Math. Soc. Sci., 1998, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 105–120.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Moulin, H., On Strategy-Proofness and Single-Peakedness, Public Choice, 1980, vol. 35, pp. 437–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nehring, K. and Puppe, C., Efficient and Strategy-Proof Voting Rules: A Characterization, Games Econom. Behav., 2007, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 132–153.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Sprumont, Y., The Division Problem with Single-Peaked Preferences: A Characterization of the Uniform Rule, Econometrica, 1991, vol. 59, pp. 509–519.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. A. Korgin.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © N.A. Korgin, 2012, published in Upravlenie Bol’shimi Sistemami, 2012, No. 36, pp. 186–208.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Korgin, N.A. Representing a sequential allotment rule in the form of a strategy-proof mechanism of multicriteria active expertise. Autom Remote Control 75, 983–995 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117914050178

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117914050178

Keywords

Navigation