Skip to main content
Log in

Geomagnetic Studies in the North Atlantic

  • MARINE GEOLOGY
  • Published:
Oceanology Aims and scope

Abstract

The paper deals with the description of new geomagnetic data collected in the North Atlantic during cruises of research vessels of the Russian Academy of Sciences performed in 2020–2022. Modern technologies of geomagnetic measurements in the ocean and methods of their processing are considered. The obtained geomagnetic data indicate the heterogeneous nature of the sources of magnetic anomalies in the Charlie–Gibbs fracture zone and adjacent areas of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and allow solving a wide range of geological and tectonic problems. Priority directions for further research aimed at adjusting spreading parameters and constructing models of the magnetic layer typical for transform faults and amagmatic segments of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge are formulated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 13.
Fig. 14.
Fig. 15.
Fig. 16.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. E. G. Astafurova, A. M. Gorodnitskii, S. V. Luk’yanov, et al., “The nature of magnetic anomalies and the structure of the oceanic crust of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and adjacent basins within the Canary-Bahamian geotarverse,” in The Nature of Magnetic Anomalies and the Structure of the Oceanic Crust (Izd. VNIRO, Moscow, 1996), pp. 134–170.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yu. V. Brusilovskii, A. M. Gorodnitskii, and A. N. Ivanenko, “Geomagnetic study of seamountsm,” in Magnetic Field of the Ocean (Nauka, Moscow, 1993), pp. 231–271.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. M. Valyashko, A. M. Gorodnitskii, and S. V. Luk’yanov, “Geomagnetic study of transform faults,” in Magnetic Field of the Ocean (Nauka, Moscow, 1993), pp. 201–224.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. M. Gorodnitskii, The Structure of the Oceanic Lithosphere and the Formation of Seamounts (Nauka, Moscow, 1985) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. M. Gorodnitskii and N. A. Shishkina, “Generalized petromagnetic model of the oceanic lithosphere,” in The Nature of Magnetic Anomalies and the Structure of the Oceanic Crust (Izd. VNIRO, Moscow, 1996), pp. 243–252.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. M. Gorodnitskii, Yu. V. Brusilovskii, A. N. Ivanenko, et al., “Hydration of the oceanic lithosphere and the magnetic field of the ocean,” Geofiz. Issled. 18 (4), 32–49 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. A. Ivanov and S. A. Merkur’ev, “Interpretation of marine magnetic anomalies. Part I. A survey of existing methods and analysis of the analytic signal method,” Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.) 54 (3), 388–396 (2014).

  8. S. A. Ivanov and S. A. Merkur’ev, “Interpretation of marine magnetic anomalies. Part II. Analysis of the new method and algorithm based on the least squares method,” Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.) 54 (4), 530–536 (2014).

  9. N. A. Pal’shin, A. N. Ivanenko, and D. A. Alekseev, “Inhomogeneous structure of the magnetically active layer of the Kuril Island arc,” Geodin. Tektonofiz. 11 (3), 583–594 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. A. Peive, “Dry” spreading of the oceanic crust, tectonic and geodynamic aspects,” Geotektonika, No. 6, 3–18 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. A. Peyve, S. Yu. Sokolov, A. N. Ivanenko, et al., “Accretion of the oceanic crust in the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (48°–51.5° N) during “dry” spreading,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 507, S349–S356 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. A. Peive, S. Yu. Sokolov, A. A. Razumovskii, et al., “Correlation between magmatic and tectonic processes during the formation of the oceanic crust south of the Charlie-Gibbs Fault (North Atlantic),” Geotektonika, No. 1, 48–74 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. G. Skolotnev, A. Sanfilippo, A. A. Peive, et al., Geological and geophysical studies of the Charlie Gibbs fracture zone (North Atlantic), Dokl. Earth Sci. 497 (1), 191–194 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S. G. Skolotnev, A. A. Peive, A. Sanfilippo, et al., “Geological-geophysical investigations in the North Atlantic during cruise 53 of the R/V Akademik Sergey Vavilov,” Oceanology 62 (4), 575–577 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. G. Skolotnev, A. A. Peive, A. N. Ivanenko, et al., “New data on the geological structure of the eastern flank of the Charlie Gibbs fracture zone (North Atlantic), Dokl. Earth Sci. 504 (2), 333–337 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. A. Shreider, I. I. Belyaev, E. A. Popov, et al., “Geomagnetic studies in the rift zone of the Reykjanes Ridge,” in Rift Zone of the Reykjanes Ridge (Nauka, Moscow, 1990), pp. 62–78 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Alken, E. Thebault, C. D. Beggan, et al., “International Geomagnetic Reference Field: The thirteenth generation,” Earth Planets Space 73, 49 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Cannat, C. Mevel, M. Maia, et al., “Thin crust, ultramafic exposures, and rugged faulting patterns at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (22°–24° N),” Geology 23 (1), 49–52 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S. C. Cande and D. V. Kent, “Revised calibration of the geomagnetic polarity timescale for the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic,” J. Geophys. Res. 100, 6093–6095 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. H. Choe, PhD Thesis (Universite de Paris, 2019).

  21. J. Dyment, J. Arkani-Hamed, and A. Ghods, “Contribution of serpentinized ultramafics to marine magnetic anomalies at slow and intermediate spreading centres: Insights from the shape of the anomalies,” Geophys. J. Int. 129, 691–701 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J. S. Gee and D. V. Kent, “Source of oceanic magnetic anomalies and the geomagnetic polarity reversals,” in Treatise on Geophysics, Geomagnetism, Ed. by M. Kono (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007), Vol. 5, pp. 455–508.

    Google Scholar 

  23. P. Fryer, “Recent studies of serpentinite occurrences in the oceans: Mantle–ocean interactions in the plate tectonic cycle,” Geochemistry 62 (4), 257–302 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. A. M. Gorodnitskiy, Yu. V. Brusilovskiy, A. N. Ivanenko, et al., “New methods for processing and interpretation marine magnetic anomalies: Application to structure, oil and gas exploration, Kuril forearc, Barents and Caspian seas,” Geosci. Front. 4, 73–85 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J. R. Heirtzler, G. O. Dickson, E. M. Herron, et al., “Marine magnetic anomalies, geomagnetic field reversals, and motions of the ocean floor and continents,” J. Geophys. Res. 73, 2119–2136 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. C. Hensen, J. C. Duarte, P. Vannucchi, et al., “Marine transform faults and fracture zones: A joint perspective integrating seismicity, fluid flow and life,” Front. Earth Sci. 7, 39 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J. A. Karson and R. M. Lawrence, “Tectonic setting of serpentinite exposures on the western median valley wall of the MARK area in the vicinity of site 920,” Proc. ODP, Sci. Results 153, 5–21 (1997).

  28. D. Kerrick, “Serpentinite seduction,” Science 298, 1344–1345 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. M. Ligi, M. Cuffaro, F. Muccini, et al., “Generation and evolution of the oceanic lithosphere in the North Atlantic,” Riv. Nuovo Cim. 45, 587–659 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. M. Maffione, A. Morris, J. Plumper, et al., “Magnetic properties of variably serpentinized peridotites and their implication for the evolution of oceanic core complexes,” Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 15, 923–944 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. S. Merkouriev and C. DeMets, “High-resolution Quaternary and Neogene reconstructions of Eurasia-North America plate motion,” Geophys. J. Int. 198, 366–384 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. C. Mevel, M. Cannat, P. Gente, et al., “Emplacement of deep crustal and mantle rocks on the west median valley wall of the MARK Area (MAR 23° N),” Tectonophysics 190, 31–53 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. K. A. Nazarova, “Serpentinized peridotites as a possible source for oceanic magnetic anomalies,” Mar. Geophys. Res. 16, 455–462 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. S. G. Skolotnev, A. Sanfilippo, A. A. Peyve, et al., “Seafloor spreading and tectonics at the Charlie Gibbs transform system (52–53° N, Mid Atlantic Ridge): Preliminary results from R/V A. N. Strakhov expedition S50,” Ofioliti 46 (1), 83–101 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  35. V. Vacquier, Geomagnetism in Marine Geology, Elsevier Oceanography Series 6 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1972).

  36. F. Vine and D. Matthews, “Magnetic anomalies over oceanic ridges,” Nature 199, 947–949 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. W. M. White and E. M. Klein, “Composition of the oceanic crust,” in Treatise on Geochemistry, Ed. by H. D. Holland and K. K. Turekian (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2014), pp. 457–496.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank the participants and organizers of the 2020–2022 expeditions for assistance in carrying out magnetometric surveys, as well as to the reviewers for useful comments and suggestions that allowed us to improve the article.

Funding

The study was carried out within a state task (topic no. FMWE-2021-0005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. A. Palshin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palshin, N.A., Ivanenko, A.N., Gorodnitskiy, A.M. et al. Geomagnetic Studies in the North Atlantic. Oceanology 63, 693–708 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437023050120

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437023050120

Keywords:

Navigation