Skip to main content
Log in

Feeding, egg production, and respiration rate of pteropods Limacina in Arctic seas

  • Marine Biology
  • Published:
Oceanology Aims and scope

Abstract

The feeding, egg production, and respiration rate of the dominant pteropod Limacina helicina have been studied in Russia’s Arctic seas. The sinking rates of fecal pellets and dead individuals have been measured to estimate their role in vertical carbon flux. As has been shown, the rate of ecophysiological processes taking place in the pteropods is higher than that of copepods, the main consumers of phytoplankton. The gut pigment content in Limacina (3084 ng ind–1 as a maximum) was two orders of magnitude higher than in copepods. The egg production rate in Limacina even without feeding reached 4000 eggs ind–1 versus 350–450 egg ind–1 typical of the dominant copepods even with excess food. A close correlation between the pteropod feeding rate and individual body weight was observed for Limacina rather than a correlation with food concentration. The experimentally estimated sinking rate of Limacina fecal pellets was 270 m day–1, higher than for most copepods. The sinking rate of dead pteropods reaches 2000 m day–1. According to the literature, discarded mucous feeding nets sink at a rate of 80 to 1080 m day–1. Evidently, pteropods play a significant role in biogeochemical cycles by accelerating sedimentation. High rates of all studied processes suggest that Limacina are an important component of plankton communities and play the most important role in trophodynamics at sites of their accumulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. M. Voronina, Ecosystems of Pelagial of the Southern Ocean (Nauka, Moscow, 1984) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. V. Drits, E. G. Arashkevich, A. B. Nikishina, V. M. Sergeeva, K. A. Solovyev, and M. V. Flint, “Mesozooplankton grazing impact on phytoplankton in the northern regions of the Kara Sea in autumn,” Oceanology (Engl. Transl.) 55, 595–605 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. V. Flint, S. G. Poyarkov, A. G. Timonin, and K. A. Soloviev, “The structure of the mesoplankton community in the area of the continental slope of the St. Anna Trough (Kara Sea),” Oceanology (Engl. Transl.) 55 (4), 583–594 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Accornero, C. Manno, F. Esposito, et al., “The vertical flux of particulate matter in the polynya of Terra Nova Bay. Part II. Biological components,” Antarct. Sci. 15, 175–188 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. U. Båmstedt, D. J. Gifford, X. Irigoien, et al., “Feeding,” in ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual, Ed. by R. Harris, (Academic, London, 2000), pp. 297–380.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. N. Bednaršek, G. A. Tarling, S. Fielding, et al., “Population dynamics and biogeochemical significance of Limacina helicina antarctica in the Scotia Sea (Southern Ocean),” Deep Sea Res., Part II 59–60, 105–116 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. K. S. Bernard, PhD Thesis (Rhodes University, Grahamstown, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. S. Bernard and P.W. Froneman, “Trophodynamics of selected mesozooplankton in the west-Indian sector of the Polar Frontal Zone, Southern Ocean,” Polar Biol. 28, 594–606 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. K. S. Bernard and P.W. Froneman, “The sub-Antarctic euthecosome pteropod, Limacina retroversa: Distribution patterns and trophic role,” Deep Sea Res., Part I 56, 582–598 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. K. W. Bruland and M. W. Silver, “Sinking rates of fecal pellets from gelatinous zooplankton (salps, pteropods, doliolids),” Mar. Biol. 63, 295–300 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Collier, J. Dymond, S. M. Honjo, et al., “The vertical flux of biogenic and lithogenic material in the Ross Sea: moored sediment trap observations 1996–1998,” Deep Sea Res., Part II 47, 3491–3520 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Comeau, R. Jeffree, J.-L. Teyssié, et al., “Response of the Arctic pteropod Limacina helicina to projected future environmental conditions,” PLoS One 5 (6), e11362 (2010). doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0011362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R. J. Conover, “Reproductive cycle, early development, and fecundity in laboratory populations of the copepod Calanus hyperboreus,” Crustaceana 13, 61–72 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H. G. Dam and W. T. Peterson, “The effect of temperature on the gut clearance rate constant of planktonic copepods,” J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 123, 1–14 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. C. Gannefors, M. Böer, G. Kattner, et al., “The Arctic sea butterfly Limacina helicina: lipids and life strategy,” Mar. Biol. 147, 169–177 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. W. D. Gardner, M. J. Richardson, and W. O. Smith, “Seasonal patterns of water column particulate organic carbon and fluxes in the Ross Sea, Antarctica,” Deep Sea Res., Part II 47, 3423–3449 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R. W. Gilmer and G. R. Harbison, “Morphology and field behavior of pteropod mollusks: feeding methods in the families Cavoliniidae, Limacinidae and Peraclididae (Gastropoda: Thecosomata),” Mar. Biol. 91, 47–57 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. R. W. Gilmer and G. R. Harbison, “Diet of Limacina helicina (Gastropoda: Thecosomata) in Arctic waters in midsummer,” Mar. Ecol.: Progr. Ser. 77, 125–134 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. H.-J. Hirche, “Egg production in the Arctic copepod Calanus glacialis: laboratory experiments,” Mar. Biol. 103, 311–318 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. W. R. Howard, D. Roberts, A. D. Moy, et al., “Distribution, abundance and seasonal flux of pteropods in the Sub-Antarctic zone,” Deep Sea Res., Part II 58, 2293–2300 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. P. D. Komar, A. P. Morse, L. F. Small, et al., “An analysis of sinking rates of natural copepod and euphausiid fecal pellets,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 26, 172–180 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. K. N. Kosobokova and R. R. Hopcroft, “Diversity and vertical distribution of mesozooplankton in the Arctic’s Canada Basin,” Deep Sea Res., Part II 57, 96–110 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. C. M. Lalli and R. W. Gilmer, Pelagic Snails: The Biology of Holoplanktonic Gastropod Mollusks (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. M. Lalli and F. E. Wells, “Reproduction in the genus Limacina (Opisthobranchia: Thecosomata),” J. Zool. London 186, 95–108 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. M. V. Lebour, “Limacina retroversa in Plymouth waters,” J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 18, 123–129 (1932).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. D. L. Mackas and R. N. Bohrer, “Fluorescence analysis of zooplankton gut contents and investigation of diel feeding patterns,” J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 25, 77–85 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. D. L. Mackas and M. D. Galbraith, “Pteropod timeseries from the NE Pacific,” ICES J. Mar. Sci. 69 (3), 448–459 (2012). doi 10.1093/icesjms/fsr163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. C. Manno, V. Tirelli, A. Accornero, et al., “Importance of the contribution of Limacina helicina faecal pellets to the carbon pump in Terra Nova Bay (Antarctica),” J. Plankton Res. 32 (2), 145–152 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. J. Mauchline, The Biology of Calanoid Copepods (Academic, San Diego, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  30. T. Noji, V. Ulrich, U. V. Bathmann, B. von Bodungen, et al., “Clearance of picoplankton-sized particles and formation of rapidly sinking aggregates by the pteropod, Limacina retroversa,” J. Plankton Res. 19 (7), 863–875 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. E. A. Pakhomov and R. Perissinotto, “Mesozooplankton community structure and grazing impact in the region of the Subtropical Convergence south of Africa,” J. Plankton Res. 19, 675–691 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. M. A. Paranjape, “The egg mass and veligers of Limacina helicina Phipps,” Veliger 10, 322–326 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  33. A. Pasternak, E. Arashkevich, M. Reigstad, et al., “Dividing mesozooplankton into upper and lower size groups: Applications to the grazing impact in the Marginal Ice Zone of the Barents Sea,” Deep Sea Res., Part II 55, 2245–2256 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. J. D. H. Strickland and T. R. Parsons, “A practical handbook of seawater analysis. Pigment analysis,” Bull. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 167, 1–311 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  35. M. Tsurumi, D. L. Mackas, F. A. Whitney, et al., “Pteropods, eddies, carbon flux, and climate variability in the Alaska Gyre,” Deep Sea Res., Part II 52, 1037–1053 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. F. Pasternak.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.F. Pasternak, A.V. Drits, M.V. Flint, 2017, published in Okeanologiya, 2017, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 137–145.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pasternak, A.F., Drits, A.V. & Flint, M.V. Feeding, egg production, and respiration rate of pteropods Limacina in Arctic seas. Oceanology 57, 122–129 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S000143701701012X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S000143701701012X

Navigation