Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic hazard assessment for oil-and-gas-bearing shelf zones: A case study of the North Caspian region

  • Marine Geology
  • Published:
Oceanology Aims and scope

Abstract

Seismic hazard assessment is done for oil field areas in the North Caspian region by a method earlier successfully applied to other areas. The method involves general seismic zoning data, available regional databases on recurrence of seismic shaking, known models of ground motion attenuation in seismoactive regions, and data on geological and geophysical surveys in the studied area. The assigned level of seismic hazard of the region is refined using probabilistic analysis; additionally, disaggregation is made and accelerograms are synthesized (the latter are necessary for seismic microzoning of particular sites using the numerical nonlinear analysis of ground seismic response). The amplitude and spectral characteristics of ground motions are obtained which are necessary for seismic resistance design and construction of petroleum industry objects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A Report of the Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences within Agreement No. 4577 between Lukoil-VolgogradNIPImorneft Company and Shirshov Institute of Oceanology “Correction of Engineering-Geological Profiles and Maps of the Sea Depths along the Routs of Submerged Pipelines from the Riser Block (RB) of the Filanovskiy Field to LSP-1 of the Korchagin Field”, (Moscow, 2010) [in Russian].

  2. A Report of the Caspian Branch of the Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences on the Results of the Second Stage within the Agreement No. 12V0474 between Lukoil-Nizhnevolzhskneft and Shirshov Institute of Oceanology “The Data Processing of Seismological Observation on Geodynamic Area of the Korchagin Field”, (Astrakhan, 2012) [in Russian].

  3. SNiP (Building Code) II-7–81*: Construction Norms and Rules. Part 2, Ch. 7: Construction in Seismically Active Regions (Federal Center of Standardization, Moscow, 2014) [in Russian].

  4. V. I. Ulomov, L. S. Shumilina, and K. N. Akatova, Electron database on recurrence of seismic shakes with different intensity in Northern Eurasia. 2014 http://seismosu.ifz.ru/electr-earth.htm

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. A. Abrahamson and W. J. Silva, “Summary of the Abrahamson & Silva NGA ground-motion relations,” Earthquake Spectra 24 (1), 67–97 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J. P. Bardet, K. Ichii, and C. H. Lin, EERA: A Computer Program for Equivalent Linear Earthquake Site Response Analysis of Layered Soils Deposits: Software Manual (University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. P. Bardet and T. Tobita, NERA: A Computer Program for Nonlinear Earthquake Site Response Analyses of Layered Soil Deposits: Software Manual (University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Bazzuro and C. A. Cornell, “Disaggregation of seismic hazard,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 89 (2), 501–520 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. Bender and D. M. Perkins, “SEISRISK II: a computer program for seismic hazard estimation,” in U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 82–293 (U.S. Governmental Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Bender and D. M. Perkins, SEISRISK III: A Computer Program for Seismic Hazard Estimation, U.S. Geol. Surv. Bull. (U.S. Governmental Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. W. Campbell and Y. Bozorgnia, “NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD, and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s,” Earthquake Spectra 24 (1), 139–171 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. C. Chapman, “A probabilistic approach to ground motion selection for engineering design,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 85 (3), 937–942 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Y. M. A. Hashash, DEEPSOIL V. 3.7: Tutorial and User Manual, 2002–2009 (University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  14. N. C. Nigam and P. C. Jennings, “Calculation of response spectra from strong-motion earthquake records,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 59 (2), 909–922 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  15. F. Sabetta and A. Pugliese, “Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 86, 337–352 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. B. Schnabel, J. Lysmer, and H. B. Seed, “SHAKE: a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites,” in Report No. UCB/EERC28–72/12 (Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  17. V. I. Ulomov, Earthquake source zones of Northern Eurasia–GSHAP region 7. http://www.seismo.ethz.ch/static/gshap/neurasia/source_zones.ans

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Krylov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.A. Krylov, A.I. Ivashchenko, S.A. Kovachev, 2015, published in Okeanologiya, 2015, Vol. 55, No. 6, pp. 1006–1012.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krylov, A.A., Ivashchenko, A.I. & Kovachev, S.A. Seismic hazard assessment for oil-and-gas-bearing shelf zones: A case study of the North Caspian region. Oceanology 55, 910–915 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437015060089

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437015060089

Keywords

Navigation