Skip to main content
Log in

Income divergence and global connectivity of U.S. urban regions

  • Published:
Journal of International Business Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After a century of inter-regional income convergence, average incomes have been diverging between U.S. cities since the 1980s, calling for new policy agendas. We argue that policy research should move beyond its current focus on the effects of inter-city divergence from technological change, migration, and trade, to include the effect of outward foreign-direct investments (OFDIs). This paper suggests that OFDIs have contributed to income divergence across U.S. cities. We argue that OFDIs can positively contribute to average income levels in investing (home) cities through labor, knowledge, multiplier and trade effects – a relationship that has not been systematically investigated in prior research. It is suggested that regional income levels and OFDIs are subject to a virtuous co-evolutionary process for high-income cities while having weaker effects for lower-income cities. This is tested with a combination of fixed-effects panel regressions and quantile regressions, before and after the 2008/2009 financial crisis. Our key finding is that, while OFDIs have a positive effect on regional income levels in the post-crisis period, their effect is largest for cities with incomes around the 60th to 80th percentiles of the income distribution. This suggests that the benefits of OFDIs primarily accrue to already successful city-regions, allowing them to further their pre-existing lead.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, J. P. 1997. Effect of foreign direct investment on employment in home countries. Transnational Corporations, 6(2): 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, P. 1996. Multinationals: Patent citation analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue): 155–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. H. 2013. The China syndrome: Local labor market impacts of import competition in the United States. American Economic Review, 103(6): 2121–2168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autor, D. H., Katz, L. F., & Kearney, M. S. 2006. The Polarization of the U.S. Labor Market. NBER Working Paper No. 11986. Cambridge, MA. http://www.nber.org/papers/w11986.

  • Barry, F., Görg, H., & McDowell, A. 2003. Outward FDI and the investment development path of a late-industrializing economy: Evidence from Ireland. Regional Studies, 37(4): 341–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartik, A. 2018. Moving costs and worker adjustment to changes in labor demand: Evidence from longitudinal census data. Unpublished Manuscript. Urbana-Champaign: Department of Economics, University of Illinois. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5a0928c18dd0412bcedaea63/t/5bb291f69140b7394f34e16c/1538429444828/Bartik_2018_movingcosts.pdf.

  • Bathelt, H., & Buchholz, M. 2019. Outward foreign-direct investments as a catalyst of urban-regional income development? Evidence from the United States. Economic Geography, 95(5): 442–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt, H., Cantwell, J. A., & Mudambi, R. 2018. Overcoming frictions in trans-national knowledge flows: Challenges of connecting, sense-making and integrating. Journal of Economic Geography, 18(5): 1001–1022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt, H., & Conserva, N. 2018. Globalization and institutional change in Italian industrial districts. In J. Glückler, R. Lenz, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), Knowledge and space—Vol. 13: Knowledge and institutions (pp. 247–269). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt, H., & Glückler, J. 2011. The relational economy: Geographies of knowing and learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt, H., & Li, P. 2014. Global cluster networks: Foreign direct investment flows from Canada to China. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(1): 45–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt, H., & Li, P. 2020. Processes of building cross-border knowledge pipelines. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belderbos, R., Du, H. S., & Slangen, A. 2020. When do firms choose global cities as foreign investment locations within countries? The roles of contextual distance, knowledge intensity, and target-country experience. Journal of World Business, 55(1): 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, C. R., & Glaeser, E. L. 2005. The divergence of human capital levels across cities. Papers in Regional Science, 84(3): 407–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beugelsdijk, S., & Mudambi, R. 2013. MNEs as border-crossing multi-location enterprises: The role of discontinuities in geographic space. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(5): 413–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J. 2000. Upgrading of industry clusters and foreign investment. International Studies of Management and Organization, 30(2): 93–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomström, M., & Kokko, A. 1998. Multinational corporations and spillovers. Journal of Economic Surveys, 12(3): 247–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borga, M. 2005. Trends in employment at U.S. multinational companies: Evidence from firm-level data. In S. M. Collins & L. Brainard (Eds.), Brookings trade forum, offshoring white-collar work (pp. 135–163). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Economic Analysis. 2019. Regional economic accounts: Annual personal income by metropolitan statistical area [Dataset]. Suitland, MD. https://apps.bea.gov/regional/downloadzip.cfm.

  • Canay, I. A. 2011. A simple approach to quantile regression for panel data. Econometrics Journal, 14(3): 368–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cano-Kollmann, M., Cantwell, J. A., Hannigan, T. J., Mudambi, R., & Song, J. 2016. Knowledge connectivity: An agenda for innovation research in international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(3): 255–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cano-Kollmann, M., Hannigan, T. J., & Mudambi, R. 2018. Global innovation networks: Organizations and people. Journal of International Management, 24(2): 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J. A. 1987. The reorganization of European industries after integration: Selected evidence on the role of multinational enterprise activities. Journal of Common Market Studies, 26(2): 127–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J. A. 1989. Technological innovation and multinational corporations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J. A. 1994. The relationship between international trade and international production. In D. Greenaway & L. A. Winters (Eds.), Surveys in international trade (pp. 303–328). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J. A., & Janne, O. E. M. 1999. Technological globalisation and innovative centres: The role of corporate technological leadership and locational hierarchy. Research Policy, 28(2–3): 119–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellani, D., Mariotti, I., & Piscitello, L. 2008. The impact of outward investments on parent company’s employment and skill composition: Evidence from the Italian case. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 19(1): 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Kline, P., & Saez, E. 2014. Where is the land of opportunity? The geography of intergenerational mobility in the United States. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(4): 1553–1623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C. C., Petkova, E., & Haritou, A. 1995. Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. American Journal of Sociology, 100: 1261–1293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crescenzi, R., Datu, K., & Iammarino, S. 2017. European cities and foreign investment networks. Scienze Regionali: Italian Journal of Regional Science, 16(2): 229–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crescenzi, R., & Ganau, R. 2019. On the heterogeneous link between outward FDI and local domestic employment in the USA. Paper presented at the AAG meeting in Washington, DC.

  • Criscuolo, P. 2009. Inter-firm reverse technology transfer: The home country effect of R&D internationalization. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(5): 869–899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. R., & Dingel, J. I. 2019. A spatial knowledge economy. American Economic Review, 109(1): 153–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drennan, M. P. 2005. Possible sources of wage divergence among metropolitan areas of the United States. Urban Studies, 42(9): 1609–1620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. 1981. Explaining the international direct investment position of countries: Towards a dynamic or developmental approach. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 117(1): 30–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H., & Narula, R. 1996. The investment development path revisited: Some emerging issues. In J. H. Dunning & R. Narula (Eds.), Foreign direct investment and governments: Catalysts for economic restructuring (pp. 1–40). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranton, G., & Puga, D. 2004. Microfoundations of urban agglomeration economies. In J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. 4, pp. 2063–2117). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranton, G., & Puga, D. 2005. From sectoral to functional urban specialization. Journal of Urban Economics, 57(2): 343–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekholm, K., & Hakkala, K. 2006. The effect of offshoring on labor demand: Evidence from Sweden. CEPR Working Paper No. 5648. London. http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=5648.

  • fDi Markets. 2017. fDi Markets Dataset, 20032017 [Customized Dataset]. https://www.fdimarkets.com.

  • Figueiredo, P. 2011. The role of dual embeddedness in the innovative performance of MNE subsidiaries: Evidence from Brazil. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2): 417–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. 1999. The spatial economy: Cities, regions, and international trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagliardi, L., Iammarino, S., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2015. Offshoring and the geography of jobs in Great Britain. SERC Discussion Paper SERCDP0185. London: Spatial Economics Research Centre.

  • Ganong, P., & Shoag, D. 2017. Why has regional income convergence in the U.S. declined? Journal of Urban Economics, 102: 76–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannone, E. 2017. Skilled-biased technical change and regional convergence. Chicago: University of Chicago. http://home.uchicago.edu/~elisagiannone/files/JMP_ElisaG.pdf.

  • Gil-Pareja, S., Vivero, R. L., & Paniagua, J. 2013. The effect of the great recession on foreign direct investment: Global empirical evidence with a gravity approach. Applied Economics Letters, 20(13): 1244–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Globerman, S., Kokko, A., & Sjoholm, F. 2000. International technology diffusion: Evidence from Swedish patent data. Kyklos, 53(1): 17–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, E. M. 1996. The United States: Some musings on its investment development path. In J. H. Dunning & R. Narula (Eds.), Foreign direct investment and governments: Catalysts for economic restructuring (pp. 76–98). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez-Portilla, P., Maza, A., & Villaverde, J. 2019. Has the crisis affected Spanish investment strategy abroad? A spatial panel data approach. World Economy, 42(4): 1032–1056.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao, L., & Naiman, D. Q. 2011. Quantile regression. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzer, D. 2010. Outward FDI and economic growth. Journal of Economic Studies, 37(5): 476–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. 1958. The strategy of economic development. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iammarino, S. 2018. FDI and regional development policy. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(3–4): 157–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. 1977. The internationalisation process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. 1985. Economics without equilibrium. Cardiff: University College Cardiff Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemeny, T., & Rigby, D.2012. Trading away what kind of jobs? Globalization, trade and tasks in the US economy. Review of World Economics, 148(1): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenker, R. 2004. Quantile regression for longitudinal data. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 91(1): 74–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenker, R. 2017. Quantile regression: 40 years on. Annual Review of Economics, 9: 155–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koşar, G., Ransom, T., & van de Klaauw, W. 2019. Understanding migration aversion using elicited counterfactual choice probabilities. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports No. 883. New York: Federal Reserve Bank of New York. https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/staff_reports/sr883.pdf.

  • Krugman, P. 1991. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3): 483–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, P., & Bathelt, H. 2018. Location strategy in cluster networks. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(8): 967–989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, P., Bathelt, H., & Wang, J. 2012. Network dynamics and cluster evolution: Changing trajectories of the aluminum extrusion industry in Dali. China. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(1): 127–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, R.E. 1994. Outward direct investment and the U.S. economy. NBER Working Paper No. 4691. Cambridge, MA. https://www.nber.org/papers/w4691.pdf.

  • Lipsey, R. E., & Weiss, M. Y. 1981. Foreign production and exports in manufacturing industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 63(4): 488–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, R. E., & Weiss, M. Y. 1984. Foreign production and exports of individual firms. Review of Economics and Statistics, 66(2): 304–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, N. G., & Swagel, P. 2006. The politics and economics of offshore outsourcing. NBER Working Paper No. 12398. Cambridge, MA. http://www.nber.org/papers/w12398.pdf.

  • Milanovic, B. 2016. Global inequality: A new approach for the age of globalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moretti, E. 2004. Estimating the social return to higher education: Evidence from longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional data. Journal of Econometrics, 121(1–2): 175–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moretti, E. 2010. Local multipliers. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 100(2): 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moretti, E. 2012. The new geography of jobs. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, G. 1957. Economic theory and underdeveloped regions. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosés, J. R., & Wolf, N. 2018. Regional economic development in Europe, 19002010: A description of the patterns. London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History Working Paper No. 278. London. http://www.lse.ac.uk/Economic-History/Assets/Documents/WorkingPapers/Economic-History/2018/WP278.pdf.

  • Ryan, P., Giblin, M., Andersson, U., & Clancy, J. 2018. Subsidiary knowledge creation in co-evolving contexts. International Business Review, 27(5): 915–932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, J. M., & Flyer, F. 2000. Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 21(12): 1175–1193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spicer, J. S. 2018. Electoral systems, regional resentment and the surprising success of Anglo-American populism. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1): 115–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M. 2010. Agglomeration, trade, and spatial development: Bringing dynamics back in. Journal of Regional Science, 50(1): 313–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M. 2018. IMPULSES: Separate worlds? Explaining the current wave of regional economic polarization. Journal of Economic Geography, 18(2): 247–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M., Kemeny, T., Makarem, N., & Osman, T. 2015. The rise and fall of urban economies: Lessons from San Francisco and Los Angeles. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M., & Walker, R. 1989. The capitalist imperative: Territory, technology and industrial growth. New York: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkina, E., & Van Assche, A. 2018. Global connectedness and local innovation in industrial clusters. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(6): 706–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2013. World investment report 2013: global value chains: Investment and trade for development. New York, Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages: QCEW. 2018. QCEW Data Files, 20042014 [Dataset]. Washington, DC. https://www.bls.gov/cew/datatoc.htm.

  • United States Census Bureau, American FactFinder. 2018. American Community Survey: AMS, 20052013 [Dataset]. Washington, DC. https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml.

  • Van Assche, A. 2018. Steering a policy turn in international business research. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(3–4): 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B., & Lichtenberg, F. 2001. Does foreign direct investment transfer technology across borders? Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(3): 490–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, M. A., Foley, C. F., & Hines, J. R. 2009. Domestic effects of the foreign activities of US multinationals. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1(1): 181–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. n.d. GINI Index (World Bank Estimate): United States. Washington, DC. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI?locations=US.

  • Yang, Q., Mudambi, R., & Meyer, K. E. 2008. Conventional and reverse knowledge flows in multinational corporations. Journal of Management, 34(5): 882–902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. A. 1928. Increasing returns and economic progress. The Economic Journal, 38(152): 527–542.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank three anonymous reviewers, the editor Ari van Assche, and Flávia Lake for excellent comments and suggestions. They would also like to thank the participants of the 2018 iBEGIN Conference on “The Relationship Between Local and Global Connectivity” for excellent feedback, especially Rafael Corredoira for very helpful methodological suggestions. Financial support was provided by the Canada Research Chair in Innovation and Governance at the University of Toronto and a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) Insight Grant (File Number 435-2019-0273).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maximilian Buchholz.

Additional information

Accepted by Ari Van Assche, Deputy Editor, 23 May 2020. This article has been with the authors for two revisions.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 100 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Buchholz, M., Bathelt, H. & Cantwell, J.A. Income divergence and global connectivity of U.S. urban regions. J Int Bus Policy 3, 229–248 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-020-00057-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-020-00057-7

Keywords

Navigation