Abstract
As scholars interested in theories of empire our investigation focuses on the physical construction of islands as a means, both literally and litorally, of empire-building. In traditional academic discourse on imperialism, empires are often described as large states invading foreign territory. The presumption is that this territory exists and is ready to be occupied. Our work instead examines the possibility of states physically creating new territory in order to establish or expand their empires. We focus upon an initiative by China, the world’s most populous country and a growing super-power “seeking a regional and global role” (Mitter in modern China: a very short introduction. OUP: 2008: 2), to develop a land reclamation campaign for the construction of “massive air bases” (Hayton 2016) on at least seven previously uninhabited rocks and reefs in the Spratly Islands in the South China Sea.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Whilst we recognise that the use of the term South China Sea is contested by some nations, such as the Philippines and Indonesia, we continue to use it here as it remains officially approved by the International Hydrographic Organization of which both the above-named countries remain members as of May 2020. See: Limits of Oceans and Seas, Special Publication number 23, 3rd edition (Montecarlo 1953), 30–31.
References
Alessio, D. and Renfro, W. 2019. ‘The Island of Thieves’: Rethinking Empire and the United States in the South Pacific. Foreign Policy Analysis 15(1): 89–98.
Alessio, D. 2016. Filibustering from Africa to the Americas: Non-state actors and empire. Small Wars & Insurgencies 27 (6): 1043–1066. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2016.1234114.
Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative (AMTI). https://amti.csis.org/island-tracker/. Accessed 29 October 2019.
Biccum, A. 2018. What is an Empire? Assessing the postcolonial contribution to the American Empire Debate. Interventions 20 (4): 697–716.
Blanchard, B. 2019. China downplays Solomon Island Lease Debacle, Tells U.S. to Stay Out. Reuters World News. October 4. https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-china-solomonislands/china-downplays-solomon-island-lease-debacle-tells-us-to-stay-out-idUKKBN1X819L. Accessed 30 Oct 2019.
Blanken, L. 2012. Rational Empires: Institutional Incentives and Imperial Expansion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brautigam, D. and Ekman, S. 2012. Briefing rumours and realities of Chinese agricultural engagement in Mozambique. African Affairs 111(444): 483–492.
Brown, K. 2017. CEO, China. The Rise of Xi Jinping. London: I B Tauris, 2017.
Burbank, J. and Cooper, F. 2012. Empires in World History. Power and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Clute, J. and Nicholls, P. 1999. The Encyclopedia of science fiction. London: Orbit.
Colas, A. 2007. Empire. Cambridge: Polity Press.
CSEG, About Us, http://www.samgroup.cn/em/page/93. Accessed 31 Oct 2019.
CSIS, A brief History. https://www.csis.org/programs/about-us/more-about-csis/brief-history. Accessed 29 Oct 2020.
Friedan, J. 1994. International investment and colonial control: A new interpretation. International Organization 48 (4): 559–593.
Gjetnes, M. 2001. The Spratlys: Are they Rocks or Islands? Ocean Development & International Law 32(2): 191–204.
Harris, H. 2015. Speech delivered to the Australian Strategic Policy Institute. March 31. https://www.cpf.navy.mil/leaders/harry-harris/speeches/2015/03/ASPI-Australia.pdf. Accessed October 31, 2019.
Hay, P. 2006. A phenomenology of Islands. Island Studies Journal 1 (1): 19–42.
Hayton, B. 2014. The South China Sea. The struggle for power in Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hobsbawm, E. 1994. The age of extremes: The Short Twentieth Century, 1914–1991. London: Abacus.
Hoganson, K, and Sexton, J. (eds.) 2020. Introduction. in Crossing Empires: Taking U.S. History into Transimperial Terrain. Durham: Duke University Press.
Howe, S. 2002. Empire. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Immerwahr, D. 2019. How to hide an empire: A history of the greater United States. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
Gaynor, J. 2016. Intertidal history in Island Southeast Asia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Jakobson, L. and Pend J. 2012. China’s arctic aspirations: SIPRI Policy Paper 34. SOLNAL Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
Joyner, C. 1998. The spratly Islands Dispute: Rethinking the interplay of law, diplomacy, and geo-politics in the South China Sea. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 13(2): 193–236.
Kerswell, T. and Jake, L. 2017. Capitalism denied with Chinese characteristics. Socialism and Democracy, 31(2): 33–52.
Kumar, K. 2010. Nation-States as Empires, Empires as Nation-States: Two Principles, One Practice? Theory and Society, 39: 119–143.
Lague, D. and Kang Lim, B. 2019. China’s vast fleet is tipping the balance of the Pacific. Reuters. April 30. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/china-army-navy/. Accessed 18 June 2020.
Lens, S. 2003. The Forging of the American Empire. London: Pluto Press.
Lewis, J. and Xue, L. 2016. China’s security agenda transcends the South China Sea. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 72(4): 212–221.
Markowitz, J. 2020. Perils of Plenty: Arctic Resource Competition and the Return of the Great Game. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McCurry, J. 2014. Ocean spiral: Japanese firm plans underwater city powered by seabed. The Guardian. November 20. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/nov/20/ocean-spiral-japan-underwater-city#_=_. Accessed 6 June 2020.
McDevitt, M. 2015. The South China Sea: Island building and evolving U.S. Policy. American Foreign Policy Interests 37(5/6): 253–263.
Mitter, R. 2008. Modern China. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press.
Moltz, J. 2019. The politics of space security: Strategic restraint and the pursuit of National Interests. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Münkler, H. 2007. Empires. The Logic of World Domination from Ancient Rome to the United States. Cambridge: Polity.
Reeves, J. 2018. Imperialism and the Middle Kingdom: The Xi Jinping Administration’s Peripheral Diplomacy with Developing States. Third World Quarterly 39 (5): 976–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2018.144737.
Roberts, J.M. 2002. The New Penguin History of the World. London: Penguin.
Schmitt, C. 2006. The Nomos of the Earth in International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum. Translated and Annotated by G.L. Ulmen. New York: Telos Press Publishing.
The Seasteading Institute. Vision. https://www.seasteading.org/about/vision-strategy/. Accessed 8 Oct 2019.
Shoemaker, N. 2015. A typology of colonialism. Perspectives on History. October 1. https://www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/october-2015/a-typology-of-colonialism. Accessed 3 May 2021.
Thomson, J. 1994. Mercenaries, pirates and sovereigns: State-building and extraterritorial violence in early modern Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tkachenko, B. 2016. Territorial disputes in the South China Sea. The spratly archipelago. Asia-Pacific Journal of Marine Science & Education 6(1): 56–99
United States Department of Defense. 2019. Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China. https://media.defense.gov/2019/May/02/2002127082/-1/-1/1/2019_CHINA_MILITARY_POWER_REPORT.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2020.
Verne, J. 1895. The self-propelled Island. Translated by Marie-Thérèse Noiset. Introduction by Volker Dehs. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 2015.
Wolf, N. 2010. Avatar and Empire. Project Syndicate. January 20. http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/wolf20/English. Accessed 18 May 2020.
Young, R. 2015. Empire, colony, postcolony. Chichester: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alessio, D., Renfro, W. Building empires litorally in the South China Sea: artificial islands and contesting definitions of imperialism. Int Polit 59, 687–706 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00328-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00328-x