Abstract
After the generally acknowledged failure of privatization, public–private partnerships (PPPs) have been promoted as a better means for private interests to secure lucrative rents at public expense. PPPs are supposed to reduce the fiscal burden, fill the resource gap for much needed investment to achieve economic development and to better provide infrastructure and services. These claims are grossly exaggerated in light of actual experience. The private sector, for example, is supposed to be better in risk assessment and management; but all too often, the public sector ends up bearing the bulk of the risk, worsening fiscal burdens contrary to what has been promised. Through revenue guarantees to the private partner, PPPs socialize risks, enabling private gains. PPPs in social sectors, such as health, are particularly problematic as they tend to adversely affect access, thus undermining universal health coverage. PPPs have also distorted national investment and development strategies. Thus, by and large, PPPs generally do not serve the public interest well. Hence, public alternatives, including procurement, have to be considered, before governments commit to PPPs. Instead of promoting PPPs, such as ‘blended finance’ arrangements for aid delivery, sincere development partners should empower governments through appropriate strategic capacity building and budget support.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Report of the Intergovernmental Committee of Experts on Sustainable Development Financing—Final Draft, 8 August 2014. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/4588FINALREPORTICESDF.pdf
For a summary of research findings, Torchia et al. (2015).
Hodge (2006: 318) argues, ‘whilst partnership notions have a long historical pedigree, the new long-term contractual form of partnership has three characteristics that deserve research: the preferential use of private finance, high level of complexity through bundled contracts, and new accountability and governance assumptions. Moreover, the first two of these characteristics have major implications for the third.’ Drawing on the research literature as well as parliamentary inquiries, he concludes that ‘the PPP tool currently lacks legitimacy in the eyes of citizens in whose name it is being employed’.
See the comments by Dr. Elly Nyaim, the Kenya Medical Association chair. https://www.nation.co.ke/lifestyle/dn2/Brand-new-equipment-same-old-problems-equipments/957860-2621846-gykocd/index.html.
References
Ahmad, Ehtisham, Amar Bhattacharya, Annalisa Vinella and Kezhou Xiao. 2014. Involving the Private Sector and PPPs in Financing Public Investments: Some Opportunities and Challenges. Working Paper 67, Asia Research Centre (ARC), London School of Economics & Political Science. https://www.lse.ac.uk/asiaResearchCentre/_files/ARCWP67-AhmadBhattacharyaVinellaXiao.pdf.
Cashdan, Ben. 1998. Public–Private Partnerships for Local Economic Development and Their Impact on Poverty and Inequality. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a08da240f0b64974001982/R6911.pdf.
Hodge, Graeme. 2006. Public Private Partnerships and legitimacy. UNSW Law Journal 29(3): 318–327.
Jomo, K.S., Anis Chowdhury, Krishnan Sharma and Daniel Platz. 2015. Public–Private Partnerships and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Fit for Purpose? UN-DESA Working Paper No. 148; ST/ESA/2016/DWP/148; http://www.un.org/esa/desa/papers/2016/wp148_2016.pdf.
Kostyak, L., D.M. Shaw, B. Elger and B. Annaheim. 2017. A Means of Improving Public Health in Low- and Middle-Income Countries? Benefits and Challenges of International Public–Private Partnerships. Public Health 149: 120–129.
Oxfam. 2017. Private-Financing for Development: Risks and Opportunities. Oxfam Briefing Paper, February. https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/bp-private-finance-blending-for-development-130217-en.pdf.
Oxfam. 2014. Moral Hazard? ‘Mega’ public–private partnerships in African agriculture. Oxfam Briefing Paper 188, 1 September. https://d1tn3vj7xz9fdh.cloudfront.net/s3fspublic/file_attachments/oxfam_moral_hazard_ppp-agriculture-africa-010914-en_0.pdf.
Pereira, Javier. 2017. Blended Finance: What it is, How it Works and How it is Used. Eurodad-Oxfam Research Report, February. http://www.eurodad.org/files/pdf/58a1e294657ab.pdf.
Roehrich, Jens K., Michael A. Lewis and Gerard George. 2014. Are Public–Private Partnerships a Healthy Option? A Systematic Literature Review. Social Science and Medicine 113: 110–119.
Talbot, Theodore. 2015. Four Challenges for Blended Finance and Development Finance Institutions. Center for Global Development, Washington, DC. https://www.cgdev.org/blog/four-challenges-blended-finance-and-development-finance-in.
Torchia, Mariateresa, Andrea Calabrò and Michèle Morner. 2015. Public–Private Partnerships in the Health Care Sector: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.792380.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jomo, K.S., Chowdhury, A. PPPs: Public Costs and Risks for Private Profits. Development 61, 89–93 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-018-0188-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-018-0188-z