Skip to main content
Log in

Feminism and Revolution: Looking Back, Looking Ahead

  • Thematic Section
  • Published:
Development Aims and scope

Abstract

Since the stirring of ‘second-wave’ feminism a half century ago, the movement has become progressively more inclusive and systemic. Early on, Marxist-feminists argued that true women’s liberation required transcending both patriarchy and capitalism, and thus a politics at once feminist and anti-classist was essential. Soon, they, too, were challenged to broaden their theory and practice to acknowledge oppressions arising from race, nationality, sexual orientation, and other sources of identity and social location. Addressing this challenge gave birth to a solidarity politics within feminism rooted in intersectionality and manifest both within the movement and in its relationship with other movements. Importantly, this new politics offers ways for individuals to engage in radical social change now by creating new practices and institutions in the solidarity economy. An implacable and inclusive feminism remains essential for building the larger solidarity politics and economics we need for a Great Transition that eliminates oppression of all kinds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Two noteworthy collections in the USA were Eisenstein (1979) and Sargent (1981). In Britain, Kuhn and Wolpe (1978) explored similar issues.

  2. See Scott (1974) on the treatment of women in socialist states. On the rise of socialist-feminist unions, see ‘The Berkeley-Oakland Women’s Union Statement’ (Eisenstein. 1979).

  3. In Matthaei (1992), these ideas were further developed in Folbre (2001).

  4. Path-breaking books included Moraga and Anzaldua (1981) and Hooks (1984).

  5. See principle 10 of the ‘World Social Forum Charter of Principles’, 2002, http://www.universidadepopular.org/site/media/documentos/WSF_-_charter_of_Principles.pdf.

  6. ‘Women’s March 2017’, accessed August 30, 2017, https://www.womensmarch.com.

  7. www.Blacklivesmatter.com/about/.

  8. For overviews of the solidarity economy, Allard et al. (2008), Kawano et al. (2010) and Utting (2015) edited collection; RIPESS, the transcontinental Network for the Promotion of the Social Solidarity Economy (www.ripess.org) is an excellent resource, as is the US Solidarity Economy Network (www.ussen.org).

References

  • Allard, Jenna, Carl Davidson, and Julie Matthaei. 2008. Solidarity Economy: Building Alternatives for People and Planet. Chicago: Changemaker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, Zillah. 1979. Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case for Socialist Feminism. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, Ann, and Nancy Folbre. 1981. The Unhappy Marriage of Patriarchy and Capitalism. In Women and Revolution: A Discussion of the Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism, ed. Lydia Sargent, 313–338. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, Nancy. 2001. The Invisible Heart: Economics and Family Values. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, Heidi. 1981. The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union. In Women and Revolution: A Discussion of the Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism, ed. Lydia Sargent, 1–42. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooks, Bell. 1984. Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawano, Emily, Thomas Neal Masterson, and Jonathan Teller-Elsberg. 2010. Solidarity Economy I: Building Alternatives for People and Planet. Amherst, MA: Center for Popular Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Annette, and AnnMarie Wolpe. 1978. Feminism and Materialism: Women and Modes of Production. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, Nancy. 2017. Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right’s Stealth Plan for America. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthaei, Julie. 1992. Marxist-Feminist Contributions to Radical Economics. In Radical Economics, ed. Susan Feiner and Bruce Roberts, 117–144. Norwell, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, Carolyn. 1980. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mies, Maria, and Vandana Shiva. 1993. Ecofeminism. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghadem, Valentine. 2005. Globalizing Women: Transnational Feminist Networks. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moraga, Cherie, and Gloria Anzaldua. 1981. This Bridge Called My Back. London: Persephone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penny, Laurie. 2011. Don’t Worry About the Glass Ceiling—The Basement is Flooding. New Statesman, 27 July. https://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/laurie-penny/2011/07/women-business-finance-power. Accessed 1 April 2018.

  • Sargent, Lydia. 1981. Women and Revolution: A Discussion of the Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Hilda. 1974. Does Socialism Liberate Women?: Experiences from Eastern Europe. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spelman, Elizabeth. 1988. Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Women’s March Organizers, Condé Nast. 2018. Together We Rise: The Women’s March: Behind the Scenes at the Protest Heard Around the World. New York: Dey Street Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utting, Peter. 2015. Social and Solidarity Economy: Beyond the Fringe. London: Zed Books/UNRISD.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie Matthaei.

Additional information

This article was originally published by the Great Transition Initiative at www.greattransition.org, under a Creative Commons BC-NC-ND copyright, held by the Tellus Institute.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matthaei, J. Feminism and Revolution: Looking Back, Looking Ahead. Development 61, 30–37 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-018-0183-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-018-0183-4

Keywords

Navigation