Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How Should You Tweet?: The Effect of Crisis Response Voices, Strategy, and Prior Brand Attitude in Social Media Crisis Communication

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Corporate Reputation Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the role of human voice over corporate voice in crisis responses and the moderating role of prior brand attitude on the public evaluation of corporate crisis communication on Twitter. The impact of crisis response strategies and its interaction with prior brand attitude is also explored in this study. Using a mixed-design experiment, the findings showed that human voice had no impact overall on crisis communication evaluation but that prior brand attitude had a significant moderating effect on participants’ crisis communication evaluation. Theoretical implications as well as implications for managers who utilize social media in crisis communication are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argenti, P. 2006. How technology has influenced the field of corporate communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 20 (3): 357–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, W.L. 1997. Image repair discourse and crisis communication. Public Relations Review 23 (2): 177–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Y., and Y. Lin. 2009. Consumer responses to Mattel product recalls posted on online bulletin boards: exploring two types of emotion. Journal of Public Relations Research 21 (2): 198–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W.T. 2007. Protecting corporate reputations during a crisis: the development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review 10: 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W. 2008. Crisis communication and social media, Essential Knowledge Project, Institute for Public Relations. http://www.instituteforpr.org/essential_knowledge. Accessed 31 March 2008.

  • Coombs, W. 2014. Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing and responding. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W., and S.J. Holladay. 2002. Helping crisis managers protect corporate reputational assets initial tests of the situational crisis communication theory. Management Communication Quarterly 16 (2): 165–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutot, V., and S. Castellano. 2015. Designing a measurement scale for E-Reputation. Corporate Reputation Review 18 (4): 294–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fediuk, T.A., K.M. Pace, and I.C. Botero. 2010. Crisis response effectiveness: Methodological considerations for advancement in empirical investigation into response impact. In Handbook of crisis communication, ed. W.T. Coombs, and S.J. Holladay, 221–242. Wiley-Blackwell: Malden.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • González-Herrero, A., and S. Smith. 2008. Crisis communications management on the web: How Internet-based technologies are changing the way public relations professionals handle business crises. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 16: 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gretry, A., C. Horváth, N. Belei, and A.C. van Riel. 2017. Don’t pretend to be my friend!: When an informal brand communication style backfires on social media. Journal of Business Research 74: 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallahan, K. 2004. Protecting an organization’s digital public relations assets. Public Relations Review 30 (3): 255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, R., J. Lee, and L. Ni. 2009. Crisis and risk approaches to emergency management planning and communication: The role of similarity and sensitivity. Journal of Public Relations Research 21 (2): 123–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, S., and B. Kim. 2013. What can we expect from Facebook?: Its impact on publics’ perceived level of crisis severity, attitude toward a university, and evaluation of the corporate performance. U.K.: Paper presented at the annual conference of International Communication Association; London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, S., and H.S. Park. 2012. Computer-mediated persuasion in online reviews: Statistical versus narrative evidence. Computers in Human Behavior 28 (3): 906–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, A., and C. Li. 2008. The moderating effect of brand image on public relations perception and customer loyalty. Marketing Intelligence and Planning 26 (1): 26–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, L., and B. Lawrence. 2016. The role of social media and brand equity during a product recall crisis: A shareholder value perspective. International Journal of Research in Marketing 33 (1): 59–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, Y., B. Liu, D. Anagondahalli, and L. Austin. 2014. Scale development for measuring publics’ emotions in organizational crises. Public Relations Review 40 (3): 509–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karp, G. 2015. Missed airline connections? User Twitter to get help quickly, Chicago Tribune. http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-airline-help-twitter-0612-biz-20150611-story.html. Accessed 12 June 2015.

  • Kelleher, T. 2009. Conversational voice, communicated commitment, and public relations outcomes in interactive online communication. Journal of Communication 59 (1): 172–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, T., and B. Miller. 2006. Corporate blogs and the human voice: relational strategies and relational outcomes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11 (2): 395–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ki, E., and L. Hon. 2007. Testing the linkages among the organization–public relationship and attitude and behavioral intentions. Journal of Public Relations Research 19 (1): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., and S. Chan-Olmsted. 2005. Comparative effects of organization: public relationships and product-related attributes on brand attitude. Journal of Marketing Communications 11 (3): 145–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, B., S. Hong, and G. Cameron. 2014. What corporations say matters more than what they say they do?: A test of a truth claim and transparency in press releases on corporate websites and Facebook pages’. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 9 (4): 811–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostyra, D., J. Reiner, M. Natter, and D. Klapper. 2016. Decomposing the effects of online customer reviews on brand, price, and product attributes. International Journal of Research in Marketing 33 (1): 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey-Bordeaux, E 2012. The customer service blues: Going viral with complaints, CNN, June 25. http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/22/living/customer-service-social-media. Accessed 27 Sept 2016.

  • Laroche, M., M. Habibi, M. Richard, and R. Sankaranarayanan. 2012. The effects of social media based brand communities on brand community markers, value creation practices, brand trust and brand loyalty. Computers in Human Behavior 28 (5): 1755–1767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., and H. Park. 2013. Testing the impact of message interactivity on relationship management and organizational reputation. Journal of Public Relations Research 25 (2): 188–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. M., Gil de Zuniga, H., Johnson, T., & Coleman, R. (2013). The dialogic potential of social media: Assessing the ethical reasoning of companies’ public relations on Facebook and Twitter. Paper to be presented at the annual convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (AEJMC), Washington, D.C.

  • Lerbinger, O. 2011. The crisis manager. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B., L. Austin, and J. Yan. 2011. How publics respond to crisis communication strategies: The interplay of information form and source. Public Relations Review 37: 345–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, L., and G. Cameron. 2004. A relational approach examining the interplay of prior corporate reputation and immediate response to a crisis. Journal of Public Relations Research 16 (3): 213–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marken, G.A. 2001. Online public relations. Public Relations Quarterly 46 (4): 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, L., B. Sparks, and A. Glendon. 2010. Stakeholder reactions to company crisis communication and causes. Public Relations Review 36 (3): 263–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I.I. 1994. Crisis management and environmentalism: A natural fit. California Management Review 36: 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott, L., and P. Theunissen. 2015. Corporate reputation at risk: Engagement during social media crises. Public Relations Review 41 (1): 97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H., and H. Lee. 2013. Show us you are real: the effect of human-versus-corporate presence on online relationship building through social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 16 (4): 265–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C.M., and J.A. Clair. 1998. Reframing crisis management. Academy of Management Review 23 (1): 58–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepitone, J. (2010). Twitter users not so social after all, CNN, March 20. http://money.cnn.com/2010/03/10/technology/twitter_users_active. Accessed 16 Sept 2016.

  • Picchi, A. (2013) ‘Target says data break bigger than previously thought’, CBS news, 10 January. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/target-warns-data-breach-impacted-70-million-people/. Accessed 16 Sept 2016.

  • Prentice, S., and E. Huffman. 2008. Social medias new role in emergency management. Idaho National Laboratory 2008: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Procopio, C., and S. Procopio. 2007. Do you know what it means to miss New Orleans?: internet communication, geographic community, and social capital in crisis. Journal of Applied Communication Research 35 (1): 67–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, B., and M. Seeger. 2005. Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model. Journal of Health Communication 10 (1): 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M., and C. Hovland. 1960. Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitude. In Attitude corporate and change, ed. C.I. Hovland, and M.J. Rosenberg, 1–14. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, F., S. Utz, and A. Göritz. 2011. Is the medium the message? Perceptions of and reactions to crisis communication via twitter, blogs and traditional media. Public relations review 37 (1): 20–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, T., and M. Mitrook. 2007. The dialogic potential of weblogs in relationship building. Public Relations Review 33 (2): 227–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R., T. Levine, K. Lachlan, and T. Fediuk. 2002. The high cost of complexity in experimental design and data analysis: Type I and Type II error rates in multiway ANOVA. Human Communication Research 28 (4): 515–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, K.K., and P.C. Malone. 2009. ‘If the organizations won’t give us information: The use of multiple new media for crisis technical translation and dialogue. Journal of Public Relations Research 21 (2): 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J., Palen, L., Shklovski, I. 2008. Backchannels on the front lines: Emergent uses of social media in the 2007 southern California wildfires. Proceedings of the 5th International ISCRAM Conference; 624–632, in Washington, USA.

  • Swann, P. 2014. Cases in public relations management: The rise of social media and activism. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweetser, K., and E. Metzgar. 2007. Communicating during crisis: Use of blogs as a relationship management tool. Public Relations Review 33 (3): 340–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temin, D. 2013. Target’s worst nightmare: 7 lessons from Target’s well-meant but flawed response, Forbes, 30 Dec. https://www.forbes.com/sites/daviatemin/2013/12/30/targets-worst-pr-nightmare-7-lessons-from-targets-well-meant-but-flawed-crisis-response/#7d80736443cf

  • Tidwell, L., and J. Walther. 2002. Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research 28 (3): 317–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turk, J., Y. Jin, S. Stewart, J. Kim, and J. Hipple. 2012. Examining the interplay of an organization’s prior reputation, CEO’s visibility, and immediate response to a crisis. Public Relations Review 38 (4): 574–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulmer, R., T. Sellnow, and M. Seeger. 2013. Effective crisis communication: Moving from crisis to opportunity. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Meer, T., and J. Verhoeven. 2014. Emotional crisis communication. Public Relations Review 40 (3): 526–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veil, S., T. Buehner, and M. Palenchar. 2011. A work-in-process literature review: Incorporating social media in risk and crisis communication. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 19 (2): 110–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J. 2008. Social information processing theory: Impressions and relationship development online. In Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives, ed. L.A. Baxter, and D.O. Braithwaite, 391–404. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J., and U. Bunz. 2005. The rules of virtual groups: trust, liking, and performance in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Communication 55 (4): 828–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, R.D., E. Burnett, A. Lamm, and J. Lucas. 2009. Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public relations review 35 (2): 102–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S., and N. Krämer. 2014. A question of credibility - Effects of source cues and recommendations on information selection on news sites and blogs. The European Journal of Communication Research 39 (4): 435–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, D.K., and M.D. Hinson. 2009. An updated look at the impact of social media on public relations practice. Public Relations Journal 3 (1): 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S.U., and J.E. Grunig. 2005. Decomposing organisational reputation: The effects of organisation–public relationship outcomes on cognitive representations of organisations and evaluations of organisational performance. Journal of Communication Management 9 (4): 305–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication, Wayne State University, 906 W. Warren Ave. 525 Manoogian Hall, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA

    Mi Rosie Jahng

  2. Department of Communication and Journalism, Webster University, Sverdrup Hall, 8300 Big Bend Blvd., Saint Louis, MO, 63119, USA

    Seoyeon Hong

Authors
  1. Mi Rosie Jahng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seoyeon Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mi Rosie Jahng.

Appendix

Appendix

See Figs. 1 and 2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jahng, M.R., Hong, S. How Should You Tweet?: The Effect of Crisis Response Voices, Strategy, and Prior Brand Attitude in Social Media Crisis Communication. Corp Reputation Rev 20, 147–157 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-017-0022-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-017-0022-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation