Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

‘The Market’ of European integration: a constitutional problem

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Comparative European Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

A rupture in the dominant economic and political ideology of European integration is often identified with the rise of neo-liberalism in the 1980s. Studies suggest, however, that inbuilt problems of liberalism pertaining to notions of ‘free markets’ and ‘unrestrained competition’ are also legally rooted as far back as in the Treaty of Rome. Drawing on recent developments in ‘problem analysis’ methodology, the article analyzes and compares the treaties of Rome (1957) and of Lisbon (2007) and identifies problems in them—conceptual tensions, uncertainties and contradictions—related to ‘the market’. I demonstrate that the decidedly negative determination of ‘the market’ (the absence of barriers to competition) has remained stable in the treaties. While acknowledging the substantial changes in policy and regulation that took place in the period, I argue that the problematic constitution of the market in the EU implies fundamental conceptual instabilities, for example, regarding the limits to competition. Moreover, I suggest that this problem is likely to emerge in market integration processes. Rather than forming a causal mechanism determining historical outcomes, such conceptual instabilities may be the basis for recurring problems across different domains and aspects of market integration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It has been suggested that the ‘ordoliberal’ variant of economic theory was historically particularly important for the design of the European Community (Behrens 2018; Foster 2021). See also Maes (2002) on the role of economists in EU policy making.

  2. I am leaving out considerations of the European Social Fund (Title III, Chapter 2) and the European Investment Bank (Title IV) for the sake of brevity.

References

  • Akman, P., Kassim, H. 2010. Myths and Myth-Making in the European Union: The Institutionalization and Interpretation of EU Competition Policy. Journal of Common Market Studies 48(1):111–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartalevich, D. 2016. The Influence of the Chicago School on the Commission’s Guidelines, Notices and Block Exemption Regulations in EU Competition Policy. Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (2): 267–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartl, M. 2015. Internal Market Rationality, Private Law and the Direction of the Union: Resuscitating the Market as the Object of the Political. European Law Journal 21 (5): 572–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgarten, A. G. 1757. Metaphysica. 4th ed. Halae Magdeburgicae: Carolus Herman Hemmerde. Available at: http://phaidra.univie.ac.at/o:65878 (Accessed 25 August 2020).

  • Behrens, P. 2018. The Ordoliberal Concept of ‘Abuse’ of a Dominant Position and its Impact on Article 102 TFEU. In Abusive Practices in Competition Law, ed. F.D. Porto and R. Podszun, 5–25. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Béland, D., M.B. Carstensen, and L. Seabrooke. 2016. Ideas, Political Power and Public Policy. Journal of European Public Policy 23 (3): 315–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bevir, M., and R. Phillips. 2017. Genealogies of European governance. Comparative European Politics 15 (5): 685–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billows, S., Kohl, S., and Tarissan, F. 2021. Bureaucrats or Ideologues? EU Merger Control as Market-Centred Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13130.

  • Braun, B. 2014. Why Models Matter: The Making and Unmaking of Governability in Macroeconomic Discourse. Journal of Critical Globalisation Studies 1 (7): 48–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buch-Hansen, H., and Wigger, A. 2010. Revisiting 50 years of market-making: The neoliberal transformation of European competition policy. Review of International Political Economy 17(1): 20–44.

  • Campbell, J.L., and O.K. Pedersen. 2015. Policy ideas, knowledge regimes and comparative political economy. Socio-Economic Review 13 (4): 679–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, B.G., and S. Babb. 1996. The Color of Money and the Nature of Value: Greenbacks and Gold in Postbellum America. American Journal of Sociology 101 (6): 1556–1591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, M.B., and V.A. Schmidt. 2016. Power through, over and in ideas: Conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy 23 (3): 318–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, W. 2013. When is a market not a market?: ‘exemption’, ‘externality’ and ‘exception’ in the case of European State Aid rules. Theory, Culture & Society 30 (2): 32–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G. 2015. Democracy and Legitimacy in the Shadow of Purposive Competence. European Law Journal 21 (1): 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desautels-Stein, J. 2012. The Market as a Legal Concept. Buffalo Law Review 60: 387–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • EEC. 1957. Treaty establishing the European Economic Community. Available at: https://www.cvce.eu/obj/treaty_establishing_the_european_economic_community_rome_25_march_1957-en-cca6ba28-0bf3-4ce6-8a76-6b0b3252696e.html (Accessed 4 March 2021).

  • Ergen, T., and S. Kohl. 2019. Varieties of economization in competition policy: Institutional change in German and American antitrust, 1960–2000. Review of International Political Economy 26 (2): 256–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU, 1992. Treaty on European Union [Maastricht Treaty]. Available at: http://europa.eu/eu-law/decision-making/treaties/pdf/treaty_on_european_union/treaty_on_european_union_en.pdf (Accessed 20 January 2016).

  • EU, 2020a. Consolidated version of the Treaty of the European Union. EUR-Lex. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02016E%2FTXT-2020a0301&qid=1611647289066 (Accessed 26 January 2021).

  • EU, 2020b. Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. EUR-Lex. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02016E%2FTXT-2020b0301&qid=1611647289066 (Accessed 26 January 2021).

  • Foster, C. 2021. Varieties of Neoliberalism and the Atlantic Divide in Antitrust. Socio-Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwab050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1998. Polemics, Politics and Problematizations. In Essential Works of Foucault, ed. P. Rabinow, 111–119. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 2002. Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P.A. 1993. Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, D., and E.P. Berman. 2014. Do economists make policies? On the political effects of economics. Socio-Economic Review 12 (4): 779–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias-Rodríguez, P. 2012. The Regulation of Cross-Border Clearing and Settlement in the European Union from a Legitimacy Perspective. European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR) 13 (03): 441–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabko, N. 2006. Playing the Market: A Political Strategy for Uniting Europe, 1985–2005. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaupa, C. 2016. The Pluralist Character of the European Economic Constitution (Modern Studies in European Law): 67. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D. 1979. Michel Foucault: The Archaeology and Sociology of Knowledge. Theory & Society 8 (2): 269–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krarup, T. 2019. Between competition and centralization: The new infrastructures of European finance. Economy and Society 48 (1): 107–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krarup, T. 2021a. Archaeological Methodology: Foucault and the History of Systems of Thought. Theory, Culture & Society 38 (5): 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krarup, T. 2021b. Money and the ‘Level Playing Field’: The Epistemic Problem of European Financial Market Integration. New Political Economy 26 (1): 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letelier, R., and Menéndez, A.J. 2009. The Sinews of European Peace: Reconstituting the Democratic Legitimacy of the Socio-Economic Constitution of the European Union. RECON 10. ARENA Centre for European Studies.

  • Maddalon, P. 2007. La Notion de Marché Dans La Juriprudence de La Cour de Justice Des Communautés Européennes. Paris: LGDJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, I. 2002. Economic Thought and the Making of European Monetary Union: Selected Essays of Ivo Maes. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manko, R. 2017. The EU as a community of law: Overview of the role of law in the Union. Briefing, March. EPRS - European Parliamentary Research Service.

  • Marsh, D. 2011. The Euro: The Battle for the New Global Currency. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P., and D.W. Hands. 1998. A Paradox of Budgets: The Postwar Stabilization of American Neoclassical Demand Theory. History of Political Economy 30 (Supplement): 260–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P., and D. Plehwe. 2009. The Road from Mont Pelerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mourlon-Druol, E. 2012. A Europe Made of Money: The Emergence of the European Monetary System. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quaglia, L. 2010. Governing Financial Services in the European Union: Banking, Securities and Post-Trading. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosamond, B. 2020. European Integration and the Politics of Economic Ideas: Economics, Economists and Market Contestation in the Brexit Debate. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 58(5): 1085–1106.

  • Schweitzer, H., and K.K. Patel. 2013. EU Competition Law in Historical Context: Continuity and Change. In The Historical Foundations of EU Competition Law, ed. K.K. Patel and H. Schweitzer, 207–230. Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, R.M. 2019. Economic Liberalism and the State: Dismantling the Myth of Naïve Laissez-Faire. New Political Economy 24 (4): 473–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waarden, F. van, and Drahos, M. 2002. Courts and (epistemic) communities in the convergence of competition policies. Journal of European Public Policy 9(6). 913–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warlouzet, L. 2019. The EEC/EU as an Evolving Compromise between French Dirigism and German Ordoliberalism (1957–1995). JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 57(1): 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, M. 2020. The Market. Newcastle upon Tyne: Agenda Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigger, A., and H. Buch-Hansen. 2012. The Unfolding Contradictions of Neoliberal Competition Regulation and the Global Economic Crisis: A Missed Opportunity for Change? In Neoliberalism in Crisis, ed. H. Overbeek and B. van Apeldoorn, 23–44. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Planning, Aalborg University, A.C. Meyers Vænge 15, 2450, Copenhagen SV, Denmark

    Troels Krarup

Authors
  1. Troels Krarup
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Troels Krarup.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krarup, T. ‘The Market’ of European integration: a constitutional problem. Comp Eur Polit 20, 671–688 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-022-00309-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-022-00309-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation