Skip to main content
Log in

Affirming Europe with trade: deal negotiations and the making of a political identity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Comparative European Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

Drawing from economic sociology, this article argues that trade liberalization is never devoid of cultural and symbolic content. As such, when pursued by international entities, it can help affirm collective identities. The EU Commission’s recent external trade negotiations with the USA (TTIP) and Canada (CETA) over food quality offer excellent examples. Pitting itself against North American neoliberalism and business-oriented commercialism, the Commission has championed a European understanding of food integrity and social responsibility. In so doing, it has also emphasized its role as the institution protective of European values on the world stage. Internally, the Commission’s pursuit of a digital single market has in parallel revealed a different approach. Here, the Commission has stressed the values of efficiency, the transcending of national borders, and consumer and business freedom. In that context, the Commission has presented itself as the political entity capable of advancing a dynamic and competitive vision of Europe. These differences point to the complexity associated with crafting ‘European’ values. They also point to preexisting domestic regulatory traditions in certain sectors as key factors influencing the Commission. We close by reflecting on the fact that the Commission’s rhetoric has not gone unchallenged externally or internally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Our argument thus intersects with recent work on the Commission’s use of cognitive ‘frames’ to legitimate its own authority (Thomas and Turnbull 2017) and scholarship on the emergence of a EU identity through political symbolism, narratives, and debate (Lucarelli et al. 2011).

  2. The Commission’s 2002 European General Food Law laid the foundations on food and feed by stating that European citizens should ‘have access to safe and wholesome food of the highest standard’ (European Commission 2016b). This was preceded by a regulation proposal on feed, adopted by the Commission in December 2001, establishing ‘animal and public health as the primary objective of EU feed legislation’ (Commission of the European Communities 2000). Article 100a EEC of the Single European Act also mandated a ‘high level of protection’ in light of ‘any new development based on scientific facts’ (Coggi and Deboyser 2016) when it comes to environmental or consumer protection, health, and safety.

  3. For a summary of the US approach, see http://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2015/same-science-different-policies/.

  4. Estrogen, progesterone, testosterone, zeranol, melengestrol acetate, and trenbolone acetate.

  5. See http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=685 and http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=126.

  6. See the transcript section of https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4608594/cecilia-malmstrom-says-tpp-negotiations-will-move-forward-brexit-vote&start=561.

  7. In a white paper, the Commission stated that ‘the key principle for imported foodstuffs and animal feed is that they must meet health requirements at least equivalent to those set by the Community’ (Commission of the European Communities 2000).

  8. See: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/january/tradoc_153004.3%20Food%20safety,%20a+p%20health%20(SPS).pdf.

  9. See: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/in-focus/ttip/about-ttip/questions-and-answers/index_en.htm.

  10. See, for instance, the protests during the deal’s October 2016 signing (https://www.rt.com/news/364743-ceta-canada-eu-signed-protest/) and the months leading up to it (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-37450742).

  11. Thus, CETA granted Canada preferential access to the EU for its own hormone-free beef, with expanded export quotas and the elimination of a 20% tariff (Canadian Cattlemen’s Association 2013).

  12. See http://ec.europa.eu/priorities/digital-single-market_en.

  13. The EU’s initiatives on the DSM have largely been praised for their transparence and vision. However, some criticisms—albeit much less vocal than with food—have been raised. While the Open Science Cloud, for instance, has not attracted many objections (see https://www.nature.com/news/don-t-let-europe-s-open-science-dream-drift-1.22179), the choice of Elsevier—a for-profit company that has historically benefited from restricting access to scientific data unless users pay—as monitor of the database has irked some observers (see, for instance, Tennant 2018).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Duina.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duina, F., Smith, E. Affirming Europe with trade: deal negotiations and the making of a political identity. Comp Eur Polit 17, 491–511 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00180-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00180-7

Keywords

Navigation