Skip to main content
Log in

Friend or foe? British receptions of Tocqueville’s Democracy in America, 1835–1885

  • Original Article
  • Published:
British Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America (1835, 1840) strongly influenced Western understandings of democracy. The dissemination and reception of Tocqueville’s ideas had been studied in various countries, but not in Britain. While some scholars did notice the British influence on Tocqueville, few have asked the reverse question: how did he shape the British political lexicon, especially when it came to the issue of ‘democracy’? Drawing on conceptual history and reception studies, this article examines the British uses and interpretations of Democracy in America in periodical reviews and parliamentary debates, with a few incursions into newspapers and monographs, from 1835 to 1885. I underline the dual nature of the British response to Tocqueville’s work. Whereas in France and the USA, Tocqueville was identified as a liberal and read as such, in the British Isles, both conservatives and progressives tried to claim him as one of their own. The former argued that his book demonstrated the dangers of ‘democracy’, while for the latter it analysed both the challenges and benefits of the democratic age. Through this study of this double claiming of Tocqueville, I illustrate larger trends in the uses of ‘democracy’ and plea for an historical and reflexive understanding of current debates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1 

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. While previous historiography focussed specifically on England, this article tries to encompass sources from all four nations, with a focus on Britain. Nonetheless, much of the literature cited was produced in London and is often Anglo-centric. More work remains to be done to analyse the specificities of the Gaelic, Irish and Scottish reception of Tocqueville.

  2. Annual Register, Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine, British and Foreign Review, Dublin University Magazine, Eclectic Review, Edinburgh Review, Fraser’s Magazine, Gentleman's Magazine, London Review, Macmillan's Magazine, Monthly Magazine, Monthly Review, New Monthly Magazine, North British Review, Quarterly Review, Tait’s Edinburgh Magazine, Westminster Review.

  3. Considering the difficulties inherent in defining liberalism and identifying specific individuals as Liberal, this article adopts Duncan Bell’s contextualist and comprehensive position according to which ‘the liberal tradition is constituted by the sum of the arguments that have been classified as liberal, and recognised as such by other self-proclaimed liberals, across time and space’ (2014, pp. 689–690).

  4. This distinction between conservatives and progressives is first and foremost conceptual. I recognise that individuals changed positions across time while often crossing ideological borders on various issues. Nonetheless, it has a certain hermeneutic value.

  5. Since there are no Saunders & Otley surviving archives, I have not been able to recover the exact sale figures for the various editions of volumes I and II of Democracy in America. However, the successive re-editions indicate a certain commercial success. In terms of advertisement for the books in the press, the British Newspaper Archives records 73 hits from 1835 to 1839, 51 from 1840 to 1849, none from 1850 to 1859, 27 from 1860 to 1869, 12 from 1870 to 1879 and 1 from 1880 to 1889.

  6. Whereas Tocqueville’s name was mentioned several times in the Northern Star, it was mainly in his capacity as deputy and minister, not for his interpretation of American democracy (Brake et al. 2020).

  7. On the ballot, see Henry George Grey, HC Deb 07 March 1837 vol. 37 cc53 and Benjamin Disraeli, HC Deb 30 June 1857 vol. 146 cc657. On the Australian Colonies Bill, see Charles Adderley, HC Deb 18 February 1850 vol. 108 cc1017; William Gladstone, HC Deb 22 March 1850 vol. 109 cc1258 and William Molesworth, HC Deb 06 May 1850 vol. 110 cc1180–1181. On the Legislative Council of Canada, see John Pakington, HC Deb 04 August 1854 vol. 135 cc1332.

  8. Charles Du Cane, HC Deb 31 March 1859 vol. 153 cc1168. See also HC Deb 30 April 1860 vol. 158 cc407; Gathorne Hardy, HC Deb 19 April 1866 vol. 182 cc1746.

  9. John Pakington, HC Deb 22 March 1860 vol. 157 col 1038–1039; William Gregory, HC Deb 03 May 1860 vol. 158 col 578–594, see also HC Deb 20 April 1866 vol. 182 cc1792.

  10. William Digby Seymour, HC Deb 03 May 1860 vol. 158 col 601; Ralph Bernal Osborne, HC Deb 12 July 1867 vol. 188 cc1445.

  11. During the Civil War, Democracy in America was also often quoted in debates regarding the sustainability of American federalism (Cairnes 1862; Rawlins 1862). In a similar vein, Timb’s Predictions Realised in Modern Times argued that the first volume had predicted some aspects of the Civil War (1862, pp. 174–177).

  12. Ralph Bernal Osborne, HC Deb 16 March 1870 vol. 200 cc40; Henry Campbell-Bannerman, HC Deb 10 June 1870 vol. 201 cc1860; Henry Fawcett, HC Deb 15 June 1870 vol. 202 cc172.

  13. Charles Newdegate, HC Deb 06 July 1871 vol. 207 cc1237 and HC Deb 10 July 1871 vol. 207 cc1391.

  14. John George MacCarthy, HC Deb 02 July 1874 vol. 220 cc883; Michael Hicks-Beach, HC Deb 02 July 1874 vol. 220 cc894.

References

  • Acton, L. 1878. Sir Erskine May’s Democracy in Europe. Quarterly Review, January.

  • Acton, L. 1889. Review of The American Commonwealth. English Historical Review 4 (14): 388–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adderley, C.B. 1867. Europe Incapable of American Democracy: An Outline Tracing of the Irreversible Course of Constitutional History. London: E. Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M., and M. Davies. 2015. Hansard Corpus 1803–2005. Available at: https://www.english-corpora.org/hansard/. Accessed 30 December 2020.

  • Alison, A. 1837. The Athenian Democracy. Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine, July.

  • An Old Whig. 1866. Americanisation: A Letter to John Stuart Mill. London: Robert John Bush.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. 1835. Democracy in America by Mons. Alexis de Tocqueville [I]. Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine, May.

  • Anon. 1836. De la démocratie en Amérique (Part I). The British and Foreign Review, January.

  • Anon. 1840a. De la démocratie en Amérique (Part II). The British and Foreign Review, April.

  • Anon. 1840b. De Tocqueville on Democracy in America. The Eclectic Review, July.

  • Anon. 1840c. Democracy in America. Dublin University Magazine, November.

  • Anon. 1840d. Democracy in America by Mons. A. de Tocqueville [II]. Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine, October.

  • Anon. 1840e. Influence of Democracy on Society. Tait’s Edinburgh Magazine, August.

  • Anon. 1840f. Tocqueville’s Democracy in America. The Monthly Review, June.

  • Anon. 1861a. Alexis de Tocqueville. North British Review, May.

  • Anon. 1861b. Alexis de Tocqueville. Quarterly Review.

  • Anon. 1862. Alexis de Tocqueville, Statesman and Patriot. Dublin University Magazine, January.

  • Anon. 1877. Democracy in Europe. The Athenaeum, December.

  • Anon. 1878. Democracy in Europe. Westminster Review, January.

  • Anon. 1889. Bryce’s American Commonwealth. Edinburgh Review, April.

  • Audier, S. 2004. Tocqueville Retrouvé: Genèse et Enjeux du Renouveau Tocquevillien Français. Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beiser, F.C., and P. Edwards. 2012. Philosophical Responses to the French Revolution. In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century (1790–1870), ed. A.W. Wood and S.S. Hahn, 601–622. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. 2014. What Is Liberalism? Political Theory 42 (6): 682–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591714535103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackie, J.S. 1867. On Democracy: A Lecture Delivered to the Working Men’s Institute, Edinburgh, on the 3d January, 1867. Edinburgh. Edinburgh: Edmonston & Douglas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonin, H. 2019. From Antagonist to Protagonist: “Democracy” and “People” in British Parliamentary Debates, 1775–1885. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 35 (4): 759–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonin, H. 2019. Ambivalences Libérales : L’Anti-Corn Law League et la « democracy », 1838–1848. Revue D’histoire Du XIXe Siècle 59 (2): 167–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonin, H. 2020. Between Panacea and Poison: “Democracy” in British Socialist Thought, 1881–1891. Intellectual History Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2020.1810911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brake, L., M. Turner, and J. Mussel. 2020. Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition. Available at: https://ncse.ac.uk/cms. Accessed 30 June 2020.

  • Bryce, J. 1888. The American Commonwealth. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairnes, J.E. 1862. The Slave Power: Its Character, Career, & Probable Designs. London: Parker, Son and Bourn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnall, G. 1954. The Monthly Magazine. The Review of English Studies 5 (18): 158–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, R. 2018. The Hidden Labors of Mary Mottley Madame De Tocqueville. Hypatia 33 (4): 643–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, M. 1836. Lettres Sur l’Amérique Du Nord. Paris: Charles Gosselin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinard, G. 1942. Alexis de Tocqueville et le Capitaine Basil Hall. Bulletin De L’institut Français à Washington 15: 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobden, R. 1835. England, Ireland, and America, 2nd ed. London: James Ridgway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutmore, J. 2007. Conservatism and the Quarterly Review: A Critical Analysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Groot, H.B. 1970. Lord Brougham and the Founding of the ‘British and Foreign Review.’ Victorian Periodicals Newsletter 8: 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, A. 1856. L’Ancien Régime et La Révolution. Paris: Michel Lévy.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, A. 1856. On the State of Society in France Before the Revolution of 1789. London: J. Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, A. 1861. Memoir, Letters, and Remains. Beaumont G (ed.). London: Macmillan.

  • de Tocqueville, A. 1862. Democracy in America, 3rd ed. London: Longman, Green, Longman, and Roberts.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, A. 1875. Democracy in America. London: Longman, Green, Longman, and Roberts.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, A. 1889. Democracy in America. London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, A. 1932. Selections from Democracy in America. Cambridge, MA.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, A. 1958. Journeys to England & Ireland. Mayer, J.P. (ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • de Tocqueville, A. 1992. De La Démocratie En Amérique. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, A. 2006. Memoir on Pauperism: Does Public Charity Produce an Idle and Dependent Class of Society? Cosimo, Inc.

  • de Tocqueville, A. and N. W. Senior. 1872. Correspondence & Conversations of Alexis De Tocqueville with Nassau William Senior from 1834 to 1859. Simpson, M. C. M. (ed.). London: Henry S. King.

  • de Tocqueville, A., J.S. Mill, and H. Reeve. 1954. Correspondance anglaise. In Oeuvres Complètes, ed. J.P. Mayer and G. Rudler. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drescher, S. 1964. Tocqueville and England. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easley, A. 2005. ‘Tait’s Edinburgh Magazine’ in the 1830s: Dialogues on Gender, Class, and Reform. Victorian Periodicals Review 38 (3): 263–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, W.F.V. 1884. Democracy in the Old World and the New. London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonblanque, A. 1837. England Under Seven Administrations. London: Bentley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeden, M. 2019. Temporal Evolution and Morphological Complexity: The Multiple Layers of British Liberalism. In In Search of European Liberalisms: Concepts, Languages, Ideologies, ed. M. Freeden, J. Fernández-Sebastián, and J. Leonhard, 302–328. Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhammer, A. 2006. Translating Tocqueville: The Constraints of Classicism. In The Cambridge Companion to Tocqueville, ed. C.B. Welch, 139–166. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grey, H.G. 1858. Parliamentary Government Considered with Reference to a Reform of Parliament: An Essay. London: R. Bentley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grund, F.J. 1837. The Americans, in Their Moral, Social, and Political Relations. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green & Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillin, V. 2016. The French Influence. In A Companion to Mill, ed. C. Macleod and D.E. Miller, 488–503. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurney, P.J. 2014. The Democratic Idiom: Languages of Democracy in the Chartist Movement. Journal of Modern History 86 (3): 566–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. 1829. Travels in North America in the Years 1827 and 1828. Edinburgh: Cadell and Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. 1836. Tocqueville on the State of America. Quarterly Review, September.

  • Hammersley, R. 1835. Hints Addressed to the Young Men of Great Britain, on the Progress of Political Opinion. In Pamphlets for the People, ed. J.A. Roebuck, 487–492. London: Charles Ely.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hongtu, L. 2015. Transformation Des Sociétés Et Naissance Des Révolutions: La Mode De Tocqueville Dans La Chine Actuelle. The Tocqueville Review/la Revue Tocqueville. 36 (1): 215–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihalainen, P. 2017. The Springs of Democracy: National and Transnational Debates on Constitutional Reform in the British, German, Swedish and Finnish Parliaments, 1917–1919. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J., and M. Philp, eds. 2013. Re-Imagining Democracy in the Age of Revolutions: America, France, Britain, Ireland 1750–1850. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J., and M. Philp, eds. 2018. Re-imagining Democracy in the Mediterranean, 1780–1860. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J., M. Philp, R. Saunders, and (2013) The Rise of Democratic Discourse in the Reform Era: Britain in the 1830s and 1840. In Re-Imagining Democracy in the Age of Revolutions: America, France, Britain, Ireland 1750–1850, ed. J. Innes and M. Philp, 114–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, J. 2006. Democracy Before Tocqueville: Michel Chevalier’s America. The Review of Politics 68 (3): 398–427. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670506000155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, L.J. 1868. Eighty Years of Republican Government in the United States. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E.C. 1867. Democracy Vindicated: A Lecture Delivered in Reply to Professor Blackie’s Lecture on Democracy. London: Ridgway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan, A.N. 1859. Alexis de Tocqueville in Memoriam. Fraser’s Magazine, May.

  • Koselleck, R. 2002. The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lauterbach, F. 2001. British Travel Writing about the Americas: Different and Differentiating Views. Clcweb 3 (2): 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, G. 2010. Saunders & Otley. In The Oxford Companion to the Book, ed. S.J. Smith and H.R. Woudhuysen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonhard, J. 2004. From European Liberalism to the Languages of Liberalisms: The Semantics of ‘Liberalism’ in European Comparison. Redescriptions 8: 17–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, R. 1867. Speeches and Letters on Reform. London: John Robert Bush.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maine, H.S. 1885. Popular Government: Four Essays. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancini, M.J. 2008. Too Many Tocquevilles: The Fable of Tocqueville’s American Reception. Journal of the History of Ideas 69 (2): 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2008.0010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manent, P. 1996. Tocqueville and the Nature of Democracy. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, H.C. 2010. Tocqueville: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • May, T.E. 1877. Democracy in Europe: A History. London: Longman, Green & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J.P. 1954. Introduction. In Correspondance anglaise. Oeuvres Complètes, ed. J.P. Mayer and G. Rudler, 9–20. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J.P. 1988. A Postscript: Tocqueville and His British Friends. In Journeys to England and Ireland, 2nd ed., ed. J.P. Mayer, 193–196. London: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mélonio, F. 1993. Tocqueville et les Français. Paris: Editions Aubier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mélonio, F. 2017. Tocqueville, la Chine et le Japon Introduction. The Tocqueville Review 38 (1): 7–17. https://doi.org/10.3138/ttr.38.1.7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michie, M. 2006. ‘On behalf of the Right’: Archibald Alison, Political Journalism, and Blackwood’s Conservative Response to Reform, 1830–1870. In Print Culture and the Blackwood Tradition, 1805–1930, ed. D. Finkelstein, 119–145. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S. 1835. Rationale of Representation. London Review, July.

  • Mill, J.S. 1861. Considerations on Representative Government. London: Parker, Son and Bourn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S. 1977. De Tocqueville on Democracy in America [I]. In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XVIII – Essays on Politics and Society Part I, ed. J.M. Robson, 47–90. Toronto: Toronto University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S. 1977. De Tocqueville on Democracy in America [II]. In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XVIII – Essays on Politics and Society Part I, ed. J.M. Robson, 153–204. Toronto: Toronto University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motley, J.L. 1869. Democracy: The Climax of Political Progress and the Destiny of Advanced Races. Glasgow: Cameron Ferguson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, R. 1976. Many Tocquevilles. American Scholar 46: 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolla, E. 2010. Editor’s Introduction. In Democracy in America: Historical-Critical Edition of De La Démocratie En Amérique, ed. E. Nolla, 7–9. Liberty Fund: Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, R.R. 2014. The Two Tocquevilles, Father and Son: Herve and Alexis de Tocqueville on the Coming of the French Revolution, 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappe, H.O. 1964. Mill and Tocqueville. Journal of the History of Ideas 25 (2): 217–234. https://doi.org/10.2307/2708013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parisianus. 1838. On the Democracy of the United States, and the Bourgeoisie in France [I]. Monthly Magazine, January.

  • Peel, R. 1837. Speech of Sir R. Peel at Glasgow, Jan. 13, 1837. Glasgow: Constitutional Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, G.W. 1998. Tocqueville in America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plassart, A., and H. Bonin. 2020. Democratic struggle or national uprising? The Canadian rebellions in British political thought, 1835–1840. Global Intellectual History. https://doi.org/10.1080/23801883.2020.1711530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska, F. 2014. Eminent Victorians on American Democracy: The View from Albion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, G. 1838. Political Discourses. Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawlins, C.E. 1862. American Dis-Union: Constitutional or Unconstitutional? London: Edward Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, H. 1898. Memoirs of the Life and Correspondence of Henry Reeve. Laughton, J.K. (ed.). London: Longmans Green and Co.

  • Roebuck, J.A. 1835. Democracy in America. In Pamphlets for the People, ed. J.A. Roebuck, 241–244. London: Charles Ely.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, F. 1878. Sir Erskine May’s Democracy in Europe. Edinburgh Review, April.

  • Rosanvallon, P. 1995. The History of the Word ‘Democracy’ in France. Journal of Democracy 6 (4): 140–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, R.W. 1848. American Compared with England. London: E. Wilson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, R. 2011. Democracy and the Vote in British Politics, 1848–1867: The Making of the Second Reform Act. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, R. 2013. Democracy. In Languages of Politics in Nineteenth Century Britain, ed. D. Craig and J. Thompson, 142–167. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, R. 2016. ‘Let America Be the Test’: Democracy and Reform in Britain, 1832–1867. In The American Experiment and the Idea of Democracy in British Culture, 1776–1914, ed. E. Dzelzanis and R. Livesey, 79–91. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, R. 2019. Doubtful Democrats: Democracy in Britain Since 1800. Journal of Modern European History 17 (2): 184–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleifer, J.T. 2012. The Chicago Companion to Tocqueville’s Democracy in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, D.F. 1995. The Cave of Adullam, Household Suffrage and the Passage of the Second Reform Act. Parliamentary History 14 (2): 149–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidgwick, H. 1861. Alexis de Tocqueville. Macmillan’s Magazine, November.

  • Skinner, Q. 2002. Visions of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. 1889. The American Commonwealth. Macmillan’s Magazine, February.

  • Thompson, D. 2015. Who Were ‘the People’ in 1842? In The Dignity of Chartism, ed. S. Roberts, 42–57. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M.P. 1993. Reception Theory and the Interpretation of Historical Meaning. History and Theory 32 (3): 248–272. https://doi.org/10.2307/2505525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillery, A.B. 2018. Reading Tocqueville behind the Veil: African American Receptions of Democracy in America, 1835–1900. American Political Thought 7 (1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/695643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timbs, J. 1862. Predictions Realized in Modern Times. London: Kent and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Various. 1867. Essays on Reform. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varouxakis, G. 1999. Guizot’s Historical Works and JS Mill’s Reception of Tocqueville. History of Political Thought 20 (2): 292–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, E.G. 1833. England and America. A Comparison of the Social and Political State of Both Nations. London: Richard Bentley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, S. 1889. The Basis of Socialism: Historic. In Fabian Essays in Socialism, ed. G.B. Shaw, 30–61. London: Fabian Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, C.B., ed. 2006. The Cambridge Companion to Tocqueville. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, R., ed. 1996. The Oxford Companion to Irish Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe C. W. 1877. Democracy in Europe. The Academy, December.

  • Wolloch, N. 2018. Alexis de Tocqueville, John Stuart Mill, and the Modern Debate on the Enlightenment. The European Legacy 23 (4): 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2018.1435009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zemach, A. 1951. Alexis de Tocqueville on England. The Review of Politics 13 (3): 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zunz, O. 2006. Tocqueville and the Americans: Democracy in America as Read in Nineteenth-Century America. In The Cambridge Companion to Tocqueville, ed. C.B. Welch, 359–396. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hugo Bonin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bonin, H. Friend or foe? British receptions of Tocqueville’s Democracy in America, 1835–1885. Br Polit (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-021-00182-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-021-00182-8

Keywords

Navigation