Skip to main content
Log in

Bushwhacking: accounts as symbolic violence in the arts-based gentrification of Bushwick, Brooklyn

  • Original Article
  • Published:
American Journal of Cultural Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A sizable body of research on arts-based gentrification has documented how artist residences have been strategically deployed by developers to kick-start capital reinvestment and lure so-called “creative class” professionals into formerly disinvested neighborhoods. Yet researchers rarely investigate how actual occupants of such residences perceive their role in neighborhood change. Addressing this gap, this article examines how residents of CastleBraid—a controversial luxury apartment complex designed for artists in Bushwick, Brooklyn—mediate tensions between their espoused preferences and the well-known negative consequences associated with gentrification. Drawing on the cultural sociology of Pierre Bourdieu, I argue that CastleBraid residents meaningfully account for gentrification through the practical logic of a particular group habitus which reinforces a shared identity and validates their presence in Bushwick. Moreover, I argue that these gentrification accounts constitute a form of symbolic violence which obscures underlying patterns of spatial inequality through misrecognition and the denial of gentrifiers’ privilege. Throughout, I argue that a renewed engagement with Bourdieusian theory may facilitate insights into gentrifier meaning-making that transcend the usual stylized typology of gentrifiers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source 2006 1-year American Community Survey; 2014 1-year American Community Survey.

Fig. 2

Source Taken by author, early 2016

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. More detailed historical overviews of the relationship between art and gentrification in the United States can be found in Cameron and Coaffee (2005), Mathews (2010), and Pratt (2018).

  2. Japonica Brown-Saracino, for instance, in her 2010 book A Neighborhood that Never Changes, divides gentrifiers into three categories: pioneers, social homesteaders, and social preservationists, based on their evaluation of gentrification and willingness to fight against gentrification’s negative consequences with long-time residents. Similarly, Schlichtman et al.’s recent book Gentrifier (2017) constructs six ideal types of gentrifier (conqueror; colonizer; consumer; competitor; capitalist; curator), on a loose continuum ranging from disregard for negative externalities to active efforts to preserve local neighborhood character.

  3. Relatedly, recent work in cultural sociology and cognitive psychology has noted how social actors negotiate apparent discrepancies in expressed belief and behavior (Lakoff, 2008; Patterson, 2014). The so-called “attitude-behavior-consistency problem” (Jerolmack and Khan, 2014) posits that social actors can (and often do) unproblematically switch between seemingly contradictory worldviews. This research should give pause to gentrification researchers who bucket gentrifiers into categories like “homesteader” or “conqueror” based on perceptions and attitudes.

  4. However, Bushwick housing activists and community organizers have also protested a luxury artist complex similar to CastleBraid (egregiously named “Colony 1209”) which also benefits from the 421−a despite providing no affordable housing units (Whitford, 2015).

  5. Gentrification scholars continue to wrestle with how to best compare patterns of gentrification unfolding in particular global contexts, but any comparative endeavor must be carefully attendant to the specific historical trajectories relevant to each locale. For an expanded meditation on this issue, see Ley and Teo’s (2020) recent commentary, “Is Comparative Gentrification Possible?”.

References

  • Alexander, J.C., and P. Smith. 1993. The discourse of American civil society: A new proposal for cultural studies. Theory and Society 22 (2): 151–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borén, T., and C. Young. 2013. Getting creative with the ‘creative city’? Towards new perspectives on creativity in urban policy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (5): 1799–1815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borén, T., and C. Young. 2017. Artists and creative city policy: Resistance, the mundane and engagement in Stockholm, Sweden. City, Culture and Society 8: 21–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice, vol. 16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. (Nice, R., Trans.). London: Routledge.

  • Bourdieu, P. 1990. The logic of practice. Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., and L.J. Wacquant. 1992. An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N., and N. Theodore. 2002. Cities and the geographies of “actually existing neoliberalism.” Antipode 34 (3): 349–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridge, G. 2001. Bourdieu, rational action and the time-space strategy of gentrification. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 26 (2): 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridge, G. 2006. It’s not just a question of taste: Gentrification, the neighbourhood, and cultural capital. Environment and Planning A 38 (10): 1965–1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown-Saracino, J. 2010. A neighborhood that never changes: Gentrification, social preservation, and the search for authenticity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. 2019. Symbolic violence: Conversations with Bourdieu. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, S., and J. Coaffee. 2005. Art, gentrification and regeneration—From artist as pioneer to public arts. European Journal of Housing Policy 5 (1): 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caulfield, J. 1989. ‘Gentrification’and desire. Canadian Review of Sociology/revue Canadienne De Sociologie 26 (4): 617–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T.C. 2016. ‘New uses need old buildings’: Gentrification aesthetics and the arts in Singapore. Urban Studies 53 (3): 524–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, M.P. 2010. ‘God’s golden acre for children’: Pastoralism and sense of place in new suburban communities. Urban Studies 47 (12): 2537–2554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dereszewski, J.A. 2007. Bushwick notes: From the 70’S to today. Up from flames. New York: Brooklyn Historical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. 2003. Hard-branding the cultural city–from Prado to Prada. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 27 (2): 417–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L. 2013. Bushwick’s Luxury ‘Artist’ Residence Is Tearing Bushwick Apart. Gothamist.

  • Gross, M. 2009. Out in the open. New York Post.

  • Hackworth, J., and N. Smith. 2001. The changing state of gentrification. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie 92 (4): 464–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haghighat, L. 2020. Hegemonic struggles in the city: Artist-run spaces and community art in the anti-gentrification movement. European Journal of Creative Practices in Cities and Landscapes 3 (1): 73–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, K. 2018. Cultural policy and collaboration in Seoul’s Mullae art district. Geoforum 97: 177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. 1989a. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler: Series b, Human Geography 71 (1): 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989b) The condition of postmodernity (Vol. 14). Blackwell, Oxford.

  • Harvey, D. 2013. Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. Paperback. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, M. 2021. Bohemia and the new urban tourism. In The Power of New Urban Tourism. Routledge.

  • Horgan, M. 2018. Territorial stigmatization and territorial destigmatization: A cultural sociology of symbolic strategy in the gentrification of Parkdale (Toronto). International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 42 (3): 500–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jager, M. 2013. Class definition and the esthetics of gentrification: Victoriana in Melbourne. In Gentrification of the city, ed. N. Smith and P. Williams. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerolmack, C., and S. Khan. 2014. Talk is cheap: Ethnography and the attitudinal fallacy. Sociological Methods & Research 43 (2): 178–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkness, P. 2014. The Cités Strike Back: Restive Responses to Territorial Taint in the French Banlieues. Environment and Planning a: Economy and Space 46 (6): 1281–1296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusenbach, M. 2017. “Look at my house!” Home and mobile home ownership among Latino/a immigrants in Florida. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 32 (1): 29–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. 2008. The political mind: A cognitive scientist’s guide to your brain and its politics. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ley, D. 1996. The new middle class and the remaking of the central city. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ley, D. 2003. Artists, aestheticisation and the field of gentrification. Urban Studies 40 (12): 2527–2544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ley, D., and S.Y. Teo. 2020. Is comparative gentrification possible? Sceptical voices from Hong Kong. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 44 (1): 166–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipinski, J. 2010. An Artful Way to Rent Apartments. The New York Times.

  • Madden, D.J. 2014. Neighborhood as spatial project: Making the urban order on the downtown Brooklyn waterfront. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (2): 471–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makhubu, N. 2017. Changing the city after our heart’s desire: Creative protest in Cape Town. Journal of Postcolonial Writing 53 (6): 686–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A. 2006. Urban development and the politics of a creative class: Evidence from a study of artists. Environment and Planning A 38 (10): 1921–1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A., and A. Gadwa. 2010. Arts and culture in urban or regional planning: A review and research agenda. Journal of Planning Education and Research 29 (3): 379–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marwell, N.P. 2009. Bargaining for Brooklyn: Community Organizations in the Entrepreneurial City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, V. 2010. Aestheticizing space: Art, gentrification and the city. Geography Compass 4 (6): 660–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, H.E. 2014. Cracks in the creative city: The contradictions of community arts practice. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (6): 2156–2173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merlan, A. 2014. The Castle Braid vs. Occupy Bushwick Fight Has Devolved Into a Highly Entertaining, Possibly Fake Twitter Brawl | Village Voice. Village Voice.

  • Pacewicz, J. 2016. Partisans and partners: The politics of the post-Keynesian society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, O. 2014. Making sense of culture. Annual Review of Sociology 40: 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. 2005. Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29 (4): 740–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perine, J. 2005. The Rheingold Brewery’s Brownfield redevelopment in Bushwick, Brooklyn, New York. In International Cities, Town Centres and Communities Conference.

  • Pinto, A.T. 2018. The art of gentrification: The Lisbon version. Afterall: A Journal of Art, Context and Enquiry 45 (1): 88–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, A. 2018. Gentrification, artists and the cultural economy. In Handbook of Gentrification Studies, ed. L. Lees and M. Philips, 346–362. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauscher, R.C., and S. Momtaz. 2014. Brooklyn’s Bushwick-Urban Renewal in New York. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Riely, A. 2020. Gentrifiers, distinction, and social preservation: A case study in consumption on Mount Pleasant Street in Washington, DC. Urban Studies 57 (12): 2383–2401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, D. 2004. DISCOURSES AND EXPERIENCES OF SOCIAL MIX IN GENTRIFYING NEIGHBOURHOODS: A MONTRÉAL CASE STUDY. Canadian Journal of Urban Research 13 (2): 278–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlichtman, J.J., J. Patch, and M.L. Hill. 2017. Gentrifier. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, A.F. 2014. Housing policy in the United States. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M.B., and S.M. Lyman. 1968. Accounts. American Sociological Review 33 (1): 46–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, T. 2006. The eviction of critical perspectives from gentrification research. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30 (4): 737–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, S. 2019. Capital city: Gentrification and the real estate state. London: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szőke, T., and K. Parizeau. 2019. Community-based public art and gentrification in the Downtown Eastside of Vancouver. GeoHumanities 5 (1): 157–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valli, C. 2015. A sense of displacement: Long-time residents’ feelings of displacement in gentrifying Bushwick, New York. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 (6): 1191–1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valli, C. 2021. Artistic careers in the cyclicality of art scenes and gentrification: symbolic capital accumulation through space in Bushwick, NYC. Urban Geography. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2021.1902122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L., T. Slater, and V.B. Pereira. 2014. Territorial stigmatization in action. Environment and Planning a: Economy and Space 46 (6): 1270–1280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, P. 2006. Respectability, roughness and ‘Race’: neighbourhood place images and the making of working-class social distinctions in London. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30 (4): 776–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weichselbaum, S. 2010. Brooklyn apartment building celebrates Purim with house party. nydailynews.com.

  • Whitford, E. (2015/22/April) ‘Our home is not a new frontier’: Bushwick locals fight new luxury development. Gothamist.

  • Wyly, E.K., and Hammel, D.J. 1999. Islands of decay in seas of renewal: Housing policy and the resurgence of gentrification.

  • Zukin, S. 1989. Loft living: Culture and capital in urban change. Baltimore, MD: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukin, S. 2008. Consuming authenticity: From outposts of difference to means of exclusion. Cultural Studies 22 (5): 724–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zukin, S., and L. Braslow. 2011. The life cycle of New York’s creative districts: Reflections on the unanticipated consequences of unplanned cultural zones. City, Culture and Society 2 (3): 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Philip Smith and the two anonymous reviewers for providing thorough and insightful commentary that significantly improved this paper. I would also like to thank Denise Milstein, Teresa Sharpe, Adam Reich, and my MA cohort at Columbia University, whose feedback during the development of this project was indispensable. Finally, my thanks to Selen Güler, Marco Brydolf-Horwitz, and Lindsey Beach for their constructive remarks on earlier drafts of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Devin Collins.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A: interview schedule

Demographic information:

  • How old are you?

  • What do you do for a living?

  • How long have you worked at your current job?

  • How do you get to work? How long does it take you to get to work?

  • What is your highest level of educational attainment?

  • (If some college or higher) What was your major?

  • Tell me about your family. What do your parents do for a living?

  • Are you married or in a relationship?

  • Do you have children?

  • What racial or ethnic category/categories would you say best describes you?

Residential questions:

  • What is your current address? (Ask if not current CB resident)

  • How long have you lived at this address?

  • What is your monthly rent? Do you find it financially difficult to pay your rent?

  • Has your rent increased since you have been at your current address?

  • (If yes) How much?

  • Where did you live prior to your current address?

  • Where are you originally from?

Neighborhood questions:

  • Why did you choose to move to Bushwick?

  • What did you think living in Bushwick would be like before you moved?

  • What were your initial feelings about the area when you got here?

  • What are the general feelings you have about your neighborhood now?

  • How is this neighborhood different from other places you have lived?

  • How long do you think you will live in this neighborhood? Why?

  • What aspects of the neighborhood do you enjoy most?

  • What aspects of the neighborhood would you like to see change?

CastleBraid questions:

  • Why did you choose to move to CastleBraid?

  • What aspects do/did you like about CastleBraid?

  • What aspects do/did you not like about CastleBraid?

  • (If current resident) How long do you think you will live in CastleBraid?

  • Why?

  • (If previous resident) Why did you move out of CastleBraid?

Recreation:

  • With whom do you socialize?

  • Where do you socialize?

  • How many times during a week do you socialize with friends?

  • Do many or most of your friends also live in this neighborhood?

  • Are many or most of your friends from this neighborhood?

  • How did you make friends when you moved to this neighborhood?

Culture/consumption:

  • Do you, or have you ever, attended any community events in this neighborhood?

  • (If yes) Can you briefly tell me about this/these experience(s)?

  • Do you, or have you ever, attended any cultural (e.g. music or film) events in this neighborhood?

  • (If yes) Can you briefly tell me about this/these experience(s)?

  • Do you go shopping for clothing in this neighborhood? Where? Why do you shop there?

  • What are your favorite bars or restaurants in this neighborhood? Why do you go there?

  • Where do you go grocery shopping? Why do you shop there?

Art and creativity:

  • Do you consider yourself to be a part of the Bushwick arts community?

    • (If yes) How do you contribute to that community?

  • Can you tell me a little about the art you make?

  • Can you tell me about a specific project you’ve recently worked on?

  • With whom do you share your art?

Political views:

  • Are you a registered voter?

    • (If yes) With which political party are you registered?

    • (If no) Why not?

  • Are your political views similar to your family’s political views? Your friends?

  • Which 2016 presidential candidate are you most likely to vote for? Why?

  • What political or social issue do you feel most strongly about? Why?

Religious/civic engagement:

  • Are you a member of any church or religious association?

  • Do you consider yourself to be a religious person?

  • Do you engage in any volunteer or community work?

Gentrification questions:

  • What kinds of changes have you noticed in Bushwick since you moved?

  • Do you and your friends ever talk about how neighborhood changes? What do you talk about?

  • On the whole, do you think that your neighborhood has changed positively or negatively since you have moved here? Why?

  • On the whole, how do you think this neighborhood has changed over the past twenty years?

  • What, in your opinion, are the biggest problems in your community?

  • Have you ever heard the term “gentrification”?

    • (If yes) How would you define the term?

    • (If yes) When did you first hear the term?

    • (If yes) How do you feel about gentrification?

    • (If yes) Do you think gentrification is happening here?

    • (If yes) Why?

    • (If yes) Do you and your friends ever talk about gentrification?

    • (If yes) How often?

    • (If yes) What, if any, would you say are the negative aspects of gentrification?

    • (If yes) What, if any, would you say are the positive aspects?

    • (If yes) Do you consider yourself to be affected by gentrification?

    • (If yes) How?

    • (If yes) Do you consider yourself to be a contributor to gentrification?

    • (If yes) How? How do you feel about that?

    • (If no) Why not?

Appendix B: anti-gentrification graffiti in Bushwick

See Figs. 3 and 4.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Source photo taken by author, early 2016

Sidewalk stencil reading “Gentrification is the New Colonialism.”

Fig. 4
figure 4

Source photo taken by author, early 2016.

Sidewalk stencil reading “Your Luxury is Our Displacement.”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Collins, D. Bushwhacking: accounts as symbolic violence in the arts-based gentrification of Bushwick, Brooklyn. Am J Cult Sociol 11, 77–104 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-021-00149-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-021-00149-8

Keywords

Navigation