Skip to main content
Log in

Microinsurance in Ghana: investigating the impact of Outreville's four-factor framework and firm and product characteristics on adoption

  • Published:
The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microinsurance is a risk management tool for low-income households. However, its adoption is low in Ghana. This study examines the determinants of microinsurance adoption in Ghana, analysing primary data from 1453 households across six key markets and three regions. We also gathered secondary data from 14 microinsurance firms and 47 microinsurance products between 2017 and 2021. We estimate the critical factors influencing microinsurance uptake using robust probit, fixed-effects and panel-corrected standard error models. Our findings indicate that income levels, trust in financial institutions and participation in community risk management groups and the national health insurance scheme are the key determinants affecting microinsurance adoption. Firm- and product-specific factors such as affordability, outstanding claims, risk premiums and benefits paid to microinsurance participants also influence adoption. This study also highlights the crucial role of structural, social and economic factors in predicting demand for microinsurance, utilising Outreville's four-factor insurance demand framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data is available upon reasonable request.

Notes

  1. The conceptual framework consists of four categories that categorise the factors affecting insurance demand. The first is economic, which typically includes the price of insurance and the influence of wealth and income. The second category comprises social and cultural factors, which are concerned with the utility function of insurance. The third category is structural factors, which refer to the underlying market conditions that affect demand for insurance, including discount rates. The fourth category is personal and demographic factors, which represent the various types of loss exposures individuals may face.

  2. Factor analysis was employed for the categorisation. The results are presented in “Appendix”.

  3. Assets represent ownership of a television set, microwave, gas cooker, car, home theatre, freezer, mobile phone, computer or laptop, radio set, DVD player, bicycle, motorbike or house.

References

Download references

Funding

There is no funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Emmanuel Owusu Oppong: Data collection, modeling, analysis of data and writing of the paper. Baorong Yu: Modelling and guidance on paper writing. Bruvine Orchidée Mazonga Mfoutou: Data curation, writing and reviewing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel Owusu Oppong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare no competing or conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Factor analysis construct

Appendix: Factor analysis construct

Construct

Variable

Factor

Uniqueness

Eigenvalue

Structural

Has NHIS

0.5797

0.6639

0.67221

 

Alternative

0.5797

0.6639

0.24843

Demographic

Age

0.2775

0.9230

0.15995

 

Gender

0.0706

0.9950

 − 0.00425

 

Marriage

0.2792

0.9221

 − 0.11734

Economic

Income

0.1123

0.9564

0.61644

 

Assets

0.5616

0.6841

0.03473

 

Saving

0.5364

0.7083

 − 0.26283

Social–cultural

Years of schooling

0.5221

0.7264

0.58875

 

Years of schooling * have NHIS

0.4252

0.8172

0.05219

 

Risk

 − 0.0233

0.9645

0.04508

 

Trust

0.0125

0.9760

0.03947

 

Willingness

0.0355

0.9739

0.06789

 

Area

0.3651

0.8560

 − 0.24089

  1. LR test: Independent vs. saturated χ2 = 0.0000

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oppong, E.O., Baorong, Y. & Mazonga Mfoutou, B.O. Microinsurance in Ghana: investigating the impact of Outreville's four-factor framework and firm and product characteristics on adoption. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41288-024-00324-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41288-024-00324-1

Keywords

Navigation