Skip to main content
Log in

Livestock Diversification for Improved Resilience and Welfare Outcomes Under Climate Risks in Kenya

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The European Journal of Development Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study contributes to the emerging literature on livestock composition and resilience by applying two waves of a panel dataset of 360 rural households in Kenya. The paper investigates the role of livestock diversification in managing risks and improving household well-being outcomes in the context of climate risks and multiple shocks. One major result is that climatic shocks do not affect small ruminant and non-ruminant animals because they are more resilient to climate variability than cattle. Subsequently, households rely on diversified livestock portfolios and borrow from social groups to smooth their consumption level and foster resilience. The latter coping strategy is predominantly preferred by female-headed and asset-poor households to protect their already low asset base. Small ruminants, poultry and cattle contribute significantly to household’s income and food consumption across different quintiles. Small ruminants improve income and consumption for households in the bottom of quintiles. The policy implication of these findings is that diversification of livestock portfolios is germane in fostering resilience to climate risks and thus improve the well-being outcomes of livestock farmers.

Résumé

L'étude vient contribuer à la littérature agricole qui commence à apparaître au sujet de la composition du bétail et de sa résilience, et applique deux vagues d’analyse à un ensemble de données de panel de 360 ménages ruraux au Kenya pour étudier le rôle que peut jouer la composition du bétail dans sa propre résilience et dans l'amélioration du bien-être des ménages. L’un des résultats principaux est que les chocs climatiques n'affectent pas les petits ruminants et les animaux non ruminants car ils sont plus résilients que les bovins face aux variations climatiques. Par la suite, les ménages s'appuient sur des élevages diversifiés et empruntent aux groupes d’entraide sociale pour stabiliser leur niveau de consommation et pour favoriser la résilience. Cette stratégie d'adaptation-là est principalement privilégiée par les ménages dirigés par des femmes et ceux possédant peu de richesses pour protéger leur possessions déjà faibles. Les petits ruminants et la volaille contribuent de façon significative à un bien-être accru des ménages, en particulier pour les ménages situés dans les derniers quintiles de revenus. En matière de politique publique, ces résultats signifient que la diversification des élevages est essentielle pour une plus grande résilience face aux risques climatiques et pour un bien-être accru

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atake, E. 2018. Health shocks in Sub-Saharan Africa: Are the poor and uninsured households more vulnerable ? Health Economics Review 8: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bati, B.M., 2013. Climate change, cattle herd vulnerability and food insecurity: Adaptation through livestock diversification in the Borana pastoral system of Ethiopia. University of Hohenheim.

  • Berihulay, H., A. Abied, X. He, L. Jiang, and Y. Ma. 2019. Adaptation mechanisms of small ruminants to environmental heat stress. Animals 9: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9030075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakeslee, D.S., and R. Fishman. 2017. Weather shocks, crime, and agriculture: Evidence from India. Journal of Human Resources. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.53.3.0715-7234R1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonfrer, I., and E. Gustafsson-Wright. 2016. Health shocks, coping strategies and foregone healthcare among agricultural households in Kenya. Global Public Health 20: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M.E. 2014. Food security. Routledge, New York: Food Prices and Climate Variability P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui, A.T., M. Dungey, C.V. Nguyen, and T.P. Pham. 2014. The impact of natural disasters on household income, expenditure, poverty and inequality: Evidence from Vietnam. Applied Economics 46: 1751–1766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dercon, S. 2002. Income risk, coping strategies, and safety nets. The World Bank Research Observer 17: 141–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO, 2018. Transforming the livestock sector through the Sustainable Development Goals 222.

  • Feldt, T., 2015. Interrelatedness of grazing live-stock with vegetation parameters and farmers’ livelihoods in the Mahafaly region, southwest-ern Madagascar.

  • Filmer, D., and L.H. Pritchett. 2001. Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data–or tears: An application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography 38: 115–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frija, A., Afi, M., Dhehibi, B., 2018. “Livestock for resilience”: Revisiting the role of livestock in the major agricultural production systems of the MENA region. ACAE 30th Inter.

  • Gebrekidan, T., Y. Guo, S. Bi, Jing Wang, C. Zhang, and Jimin Wang. 2019. Climate Risk Management Effect of index-based livestock insurance on herd offtake: Evidence from the Borena zone of southern Ethiopia. Climate Risk Management 23: 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2018.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HLPE, 2016. Sustainable agricultural development for food security and nutrition: what roles for livestock? A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security, Rome 140.

  • Hӓnke, H., and J. Barkmann. 2017. The insurance function of livestock: farmers’ coping capacity with crop failure in southwestern Madagascar. World Development 96: 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFAD. 2016. Rural Development Report 2016. Fostering inclusive rural transformation, September ed. Rome: International Fund for Agricultural Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • IGAD, 2013. The contribution of livestock to the economies of Kenya, Ethiopia, Uganda and Sudan. IGAD Center for Pastoral Areas & Livestock Development (ICPALD) Policy brief. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146512469014

  • Iyer, L., Topalova, P., 2014. Poverty and Crime: Evidence from Rainfall and Trade Shocks in India Poverty and Crime : Evidence from Rainfall and Trade. Harvard Development working Paper 14.

  • Janzen, S.A., Carter, M.R., 2013. The Impact of Microinsurance on Consumption Smoothing and Asset Protection: Evidence from a Drought in Kenya. Selected paper prepared for presentation at the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association’s 2013 AAEA & CAES Joint Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2013.

  • Joy, A., F.R. Dunshea, B.J. Leury, I.J. Clarke, K. DiGiacomo, and S.S. Chauhan. 2020. Resilience of small ruminants to climate change and increased environmental temperature: A review. Animals 10: 867. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10050867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabubo-Mariara, J., Karanja, F.K., 2007. The Economic Impact of Climate Change on Kenyan Crop Agriculture : A Ricardian Approach. Policy Research Working paper, The World Bank 4334.

  • Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. 2018. Basic report: based on 2015/16 Kenya integrated household budget survey (KIHBS). Nairobi: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. 2014. Economic Survey 2014. Kenya: Nairobi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kibrom, A.A., and N.D. Jensen. 2020. Access to markets, weather risk, and livestock production decisions: Evidence from Ethiopia. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • KIPPRA. 2013. Kenya Economic Report 2013: Creating an enabling environment for stimulating investment for competitive and sustainable counties. Kenya: Nairobi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. 1952. Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance 7: 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mekuria, W., and K. Mekonnen. 2018. Determinants of crop–livestock diversification in the mixed farming systems: Evidence from central highlands of Ethiopia. Agriculture and Food Security 7: 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-018-0212-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B.D., and J.X. Sullivan. 2003. Measuring the well-being of the poor using income and consumption. The Journal of Human Resources 38: 1180–1220. https://doi.org/10.2307/3558985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mijatović, D., Meldrum, G., Robitaille, R., 2019. Diversification for climate change resilience: Participatory assessment of opportunities for diversifying agroecosystems Rome: Bioversity International and the Platform for Agrobiodiversity Research 35 p. ISBN: 978-92-9255-120-9.

  • Moser, C., Felton, A., 2007. The construction of an asset index measuring asset accumulation in ecuador, CPRC working paper. Chronic Poverty Research Centre Working Paper No. 87, UK.

  • Ngigi, M., U. Mueller, and R. Birner. 2015. The role of livestock portfolios and group-based approaches for building resilience in the face of accelerating climate change: an asset-based panel data analysis from rural Kenya. ZEF Discusion Paper on Development Policy. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2676574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngigi, M.W., U. Mueller, and R. Birner. 2017. Gender differences in climate change adaptation strategies and participation in group-based approaches: An Intra-household Analysis From Rural Kenya. Ecological Economics 138: 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolli, F., Acosta, A., Karfakis, P., 2018. Are Livestock’ s keepers more resilient to climate shocks: Fact or Artifact? ICAE.

  • Rojas-Downing, M.M., A.P. Nejadhashemi, T. Harrigan, and S.A. Woznicki. 2017. Climate change and livestock: Impacts, adaptation, and mitigation. Climate Risk Management 16: 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2017.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvioni, C., Henke, R., Vanni, F., 2020. The impact of non-agricultural diversification on financial performance: Evidence from family farms in Italy. Sustainability.

  • Sekhampu, T.J., Niyimbanira, F., 2013. Analysis of the factors influencing household expenditure In A South African Township. International Business and Economics Research 12.

  • Sibiko, K.W., P.C. Veettil, and M. Qaim. 2018. Small farmers’ preferences for weather index insurance: Insights from Kenya. Agriculture and Food Security. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-018-0200-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sichoongwe, K., L. Mapemba, G. Tembo, and G. Ngongola. 2014. The determinants and extent of crop diversification among smallholder farmers: A case study of southern province Zambia. Journal of Agricultural Science 6: p150. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v6n11p150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, T., D. Lewis, D. Wrathall, R. Bronen, N.S.H. Cradock-Henry, C. Lawless, R. Nawrotzki, V. Prasad, MdA Rahman, R. Alaniz, K. King, K. McNamara, Md Nadiruzzaman, S. Henly-Shepard, and F. Thomalla. 2015. Livelihood resilience in the face of climate change. Nature Climate Change 5: 23–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P.K., J.Van Steeg, Notenbaert De, and A., Herrero, M., 2009. The impacts of climate change on livestock and livestock systems in developing countries: A review of what we know and what we need to know. Agricultural Systems 101: 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2009.05.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Zonneveld, M., M.-S. Turmel, and J. Hellin. 2020. Decision-making to diversify farm systems for climate change adaptation. Front. Sustain. Food Syst.: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weindl, I., H. Lotze-campen, A. Popp, C. Müller, and P. Havlík. 2015. Livestock in a changing climate: Production system transitions as an adaptation strategy for agriculture. Environmental Research Letters 10: 94021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodajo, H.D., B.A. Gemeda, W. Kinati, A.A. Mulem, A. van Eerdewijk, and B. Wieland. 2020. Contribution of small ruminants to food security for Ethiopian smallholder farmers. Small Ruminant Research 184: 106064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2020.106064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodson, L., Frankenberger, T., Smith, L., Langworthy, M., Presnall, C., 2016. The Effects of Social Capital on Resilience Capacity: Evidence from Ethiopia, Kenya, Uganda, Niger and Burkina Faso. Report prepared by the Technical Consortium, a project of the CGIAR. Technical Report Series No 2: Strengthening the Evidence Base for Res. Nairobi

  • Wooldridge, J.M. 2010. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, 2nd, Edition ed. London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge financial support from Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), Germany under the project “Enhancing Women’s Assets to Manage Risk under Climate Change: Potential for Group–Based Approach” through the Center for Development Research (ZEF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marther W. Ngigi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declares that there are no conflict of interest in publishing the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ngigi, M.W., Mueller, U. & Birner, R. Livestock Diversification for Improved Resilience and Welfare Outcomes Under Climate Risks in Kenya. Eur J Dev Res 33, 1625–1648 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00308-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00308-6

Keywords

Navigation