Abstract
In this article, we discuss the social demands on parents and children in a context of growing neoliberalisation and sociocultural change. Borrowing from the notion of intensive parenting, and extending it to children’s experience, we conceive of the parent–child link as a social relationship in which the participants relationally configure heterogeneous and dynamic subject positions. Based on the results of a discursive study conducted in Chile, we also describe some of the positions that parents and children adopt in the contemporary context. In this study, the almost claustrophobic and over-attentive tone through which parents and children describe their relationship is remarkable, as is the painful and emotionally taxing nature of the reciprocal care they have for one another, and the profoundly moral nature of the positions they adhere to.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The rate of female participation in the labour force in productive work in Chile was 47.4%, according to the Casen Survey 2015, remaining one of the lowest in Latin America.
These figures will be updated based on the 2017 Census data.
References
Alanen, L. 2001. Explorations in generational analysis. In Conceptualizing child-adult relations, ed. L. Alanen and B. Mayall, 11–23. London: Routledge Falmer.
Ariès, P. 1987. El niño y la vida familiar en el antiguo régimen. Madrid: Taurus.
Blackman, L., J. Cromby, D. Hook, D. Papadopoulos, and V. Walkerdine. 2008. Editorial. Creating subjectivities. Subjetivities 22: 1–27.
Bourdieu, P. 1990. Sociología y cultura. México, DF: Grijalbo.
Brown, W. 2016. El pueblo sin atributos: la secreta revolución del neoliberalismo. Barcelona: Malpaso.
Burkitt, I. 2008. Subjectivity, self and everyday life in contemporary capitalism. Subjectivity 23: 236–245.
Burman, E. 1994. La deconstrucción de la psicología evolutiva. Madrid: Visor.
Butler, J. 1997. The psychic life of power: theories in subjection. Standford: Standford University Press.
Conde, F. 2008. Los grupos triangulares como espacios transicionales para la producción discursiva: un estudio sobre la vivienda en Huelva. In Estrategias y prácticas cualitativas de investigación social, ed. A.J. Gordo and A. Serrano, 155–188. Madrid: Pearson Educación.
Donzelot, J. 1998 [1977]. La policía de las familias. Valencia: Pre-textos.
Elliott, S., R. Powell, and J. Brenton. 2015. Being a good mom: Low-income, black single mothers negotiate intensive mothering. Journal of Family Issues 36 (3): 351–370.
Faircloth, Ch. 2014. Intensive fatherhood? The (Un)involved dad. In Parenting culture studies, ed. E. Lee, J. Bristow, Ch. Faircloth, and J. Macvarish, 184–199. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fairclough, N. 2001. Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In Methods of critical discourse analysis, ed. R. Wodak and M. Meyer, 121–138. London: Sage.
Fairclough, N. 2003. Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N., R.D. Jessop, and A. Sayer. 2004. Critical realism and semiosis (revised version). Journal of Critical Realism 5 (1): 2–10.
Furedi, F. 2002. Paranoid parenting: Why ignoring the experts may be best for your child. Chicago: Chicago Review Press.
García Méndez, E. 1991. Niño abandonado, niño delincuente. Nueva Sociedad 112: 124–135.
Geinger, F., M. Vandenbroeck, and G. Roets. 2014. Parenting as a performance: Parents as consumers and (de)constructors of mythic parenting and childhood ideals. Childhood 21 (4): 488–501.
Giddens, A. 1999. Consecuencias de la modernidad. Madrid: Alianza.
Gómez, J. 2012. Two sides of intensive parenting: Present and future dimensions in contemporary relations between parents and children in Spain. Childhood 20 (1): 22–36.
Hall, S. 2003. Introducción. ¿Quién necesita identidad? In Cuestiones de identidad cultural, ed. S. Hall and P. Du Gay, 13–39. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Hall, S. 2007. Through the prism of an intellectual life. In Culture, politics, race and diaspora: The thought of Stuart Hall, ed. B. Meeks, 269–291. Kingston: Ian Randle Publishers.
Hall, S. 2010a [1985]. Significación, representación, ideología: Althusser y los debates postestructuralistas. In Sin garantías. Trayectorias y problemáticas en estudios culturales, ed. S. Hall, 193–220. Popayán-Lima-Quito: Envión Editores-IEP-Instituto Pensar-Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar.
Hall, S. 2010b [1991]. Antiguas y nuevas etnicidades. In Sin garantías. Trayectorias y problemáticas en estudios culturales, ed. S. Hall, 419–446. Popayán-Lima-Quito: Envión Editores-IEP-Instituto Pensar-Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar.
Hall, S. 2010c [1997]. El espectáculo del otro. In Sin garantías. Trayectorias y problemáticas en estudios culturales, ed. S. Hall, 419–446. Popayán-Lima-Quito: Envión Editores-IEP-Instituto Pensar-Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar.
Harvey, D. 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hays, Sh. 1996. The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Housley, W. 2009. Interaction, discourse and the subject. Subjectivity 26: 69–86.
INE. 2018. Segunda entrega de resultados definitivos del Censo 2002. Santiago de Chile: INE.
James, A., and A.L. James. 2004. Constructing childhood. Theory, police and social practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 2004. Hegemonía y estrategia socialista. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Lara, A., W. Liu, C.P. Ashley, A. Nishida, R.J. Liebert, and M. Billies. 2017. Affect and subjectivity. Subjectivity 10: 30–43.
Laval, C., and P. Dardot. 2013 [2009, 2010]. La nueva razón del mundo. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Lee, E. 2014. Introduction. In Parenting culture studies, ed. E. Lee, J. Bristow, C. Faircloth, and J. Macvarish, 1–23. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lorey, I. 2016 [2012]. Estado de inseguridad. Gobernar la precariedad. Madrid: Traficantes de sueños.
Luttrell, W. 2013. Children’s counter-narratives of care: Towards educational justice. Children and Society 27 (4): 295–308.
Mannheim, K. 1987 [1929]. Ideología y utopía: Introducción a la sociología del conocimiento. México, DF: Fondo De Cultura Económica.
Mayall, B. 2002. Towards a sociology for childhood. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Milanich, N. 2009. Children of fate. Childhood, class and the State in Chile, 1850-1930. Durham: Duke University Press.
Murillo, S. 2015. Biopolítica y procesos de subjetivación en la cultura neoliberal. In Neoliberalismo y gobiernos de la vida. Diagrama global y sus configuraciones en la Argentina y América Latina, ed. S. Murillo, 17–40. Buenos Aires: Biblos.
Murray, M. 2015. Back to work? Childcare negotiations and intensive mothering in Santiago de Chile. Journal of Family Issues 36 (9): 1171–1191.
PNUD. 2009. Informe sobre Desarrollo Humano en Chile. La manera de hacer las cosas. Santiago de Chile: PNUD.
Power, S., and K. Smith. 2016. Giving, saving, spending: What would children do with £1 million? Children and Society 30: 192–203.
Prout, A., and A. James. 1997. A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood? Provenance, promise and problems. In Constructing and reconstructing childhood. Contemporary issues in the sociological study if childhood, ed. A. James and A. Prout, 7–32. London: Falmer Press.
Redondo, J. 2005. El experimento chileno en educación: ¿Conduce a Mayor Equidad y Calidad en la Educación? Última Década 22: 95–110.
Reguillo, R. 2004. Subjetividad, crisis y vida cotidiana. Acción y poder en la cultura. In La cultura en las crisis latinoamericanas, ed. A. Grimson, 249–270. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
Restrepo, E. 2014. Sujeto e identidad. In Stuart Hall desde el sur: legados y apropiaciones, ed. E. Restrepo, 97–118. CLACSO: Buenos Aires.
Roudinesco, E. 2003. La familia en desorden. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Scarano, L. 1997. Travesías de la subjetividad: Ficciones del sujeto/Posiciones del sujeto. Celehis 9: 13–29.
Shirani, F., K. Henwood, and C. Coltart. 2012. Meeting the challenges of intensive parenting culture: Gender, risk management and the moral parent. Sociology 46 (1): 25–40.
Sloterdijk, P. 2017. Estrés y libertad. Buenos Aires: Godot.
UNICEF. 2010. Los derechos de la infancia y la adolescencia a 20 años de la ratificación de la Convención sobre los Derechos del Niño en Chile. http://unicef.cl/web/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/La-Voz-de-los-Ni-os-y-adolescentes-Los-derechos-de-la-infancia-y-la-adolescencia-a-20-a-os-de-la-ratificacion-de-la-Convencion-sobre-los-Derechos-del-Ni-o-en-Chile-2010.pdf. Accessed 9 Sept 2018.
Vergara, A. 1999. Infancia y vida cotidiana: un recorrido inicial. Praxis 1: 10–23.
Vergara, A. 2008. La negociación de la infancia en la relación entre padres e hijos: vinculando ciencias sociales y vida cotidiana. In Niños y jóvenes en el Chile de hoy: su lugar en los nuevos contextos familiares, ed. A. Vergara and P. Barros, 73–88. Santiago: Universidad Diego Portales.
Vergara, A., M. Sepúlveda, and P. Chávez. 2018. Parentalidades intensivas y éticas del cuidado. Discursos de niños y adultos de estrato bajo de Santiago. Psicoperspectivas 17 (2): 55–65.
Walkerdine, V. 2017. Neoliberalismo, trabajo y subjetividad. Santiago de Chile: Diego Portales University.
Wetherell, M. 2013. Affect and discourse—What’s the problem? From affect as excess to affective/discursive practice. Subjectivity 6: 349–368.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the support provided by the Fondecyt project “The relationship between parents and children from the eyes of children and adults: a discursive study in Santiago de Chile” (1160650). This work was also financially supported by the Millennium Scientific Initiative of the Ministry of Economy, Development and Tourism of Chile, grant “Millennium Nucleus Center Authority and Power Asymmetries”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vergara, A., Sepúlveda, M. & Salvo, I. Being a parent and being a child in Chile today: the relational construction of subject positions in a neoliberal context. Subjectivity 12, 371–388 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-019-00084-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-019-00084-7