Skip to main content
Log in

Empathy an impossible task? Engaging with groups in a troubling Brexit landscape

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Brexit referendum produced a tumultuous reminder of the emotional-affective dimensions of political life in the UK. This article attends to affective dimensions in political experience, the fantasies and identifications that shape engagement within the shifting landscapes of politics and the structures of feeling that underpin them. The article reflects on a project undertaken between 2016 and 2019 in which we convened eight groups of ‘Leavers’ and ‘Remainers’ with an explicit questioning of the place and possibility of ‘empathy’ in the small spaces of a widening political fray. Through detailed thematic analysis of the group experiences and discourses, including personal-reflective accounts from the group conductor, we discuss ‘clusters of preoccupation’ characteristic of these groups and the challenges of researching empathy within the turbulent psycho-political mood of a Brexit landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, D. (2018) Emotions in organizations: disturbance or intelligence? In: C. Huffington, W. Halton, D. Armstrong and J. Pooley (eds) Working Below the Surface: The Emotional Life of Contemporary Organizations. London: Routledge, pp. 11–31.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Behr, R. (2021) Brexit is a machine to generate perpetual grievance. It’s doing its job perfectly. The Guardian [online], 23 February. https://tinyurl.com/2axkkuz4, accessed 28 February 2021.

  • Benjamin, J. (2018) Beyond Doer and Done To: Recognition Theory, Intersubjectivity and the Third. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. (1962) Learning from Experience. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonikowski, B., Halikiopoulou, D., Kaufmann, E. and Rooduijn, M. (2018) Populism and nationalism in a comparative perspective: a scholarly exchange. Nations and Nationalism 25(1): 58–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braddock, L. (2018) Sympathy and projection, and why we should be wary of empathy. In: D. Matravers and A. Waldow (eds) Philosophical Perspectives on Empathy; Theoretical Approaches and Emerging Challenges. London: Routledge, pp. 91–107.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S. and Hoggett, P. (eds) (2009) Researching Beneath the Surface: Psycho-Social Research Methods in Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Closs Stephens, A. (2019) Moving home. The emotional politics of Brexit. Eurozine https://www.eurozine.com/moving-home/, accessed 10 April 2020.

  • Crociani-Windland, L. (2019) Between Scylla and Charybdis: Losing balance in an age of extremes. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society 24(3): 344–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dartington, T. (2000) The preoccupations of the citizen-reflections from the OPUS Listening Posts. Organizational and Social Dynamics 1(1): 94–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eatwell, R. and Goodwin, M. (2018) National Populism: The Revolt Against Liberal Democracy. London: Pelican.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figlio, K. and Richards, B. (2003) The containing matrix of the social. American Imago 60(4): 407–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foulkes, S.H. (1948) Introduction to Group-Analytic Psychotherapy. London: William Heinemann Medical Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodhart, D. (2017) The Road to Somewhere, The New Tribes Shaping British Politics. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (2016) Strangers in Their Own Land; Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollway, W. (2016) Emotional experience plus reflection: countertransference and reflexivity in research. The Psychotherapist 62(Spring): 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1935) A contribution to the psychogenesis of manic-depressive states. International Journal of Psychoanalysis. 16: 145–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1946) Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. The Writings of Melanie Klein, Vol. 3. London: Hogarth, pp. 1–24.

  • Miller, E. (1993) From Dependency to Autonomy: Studies in Organization and Change. London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofer, G. (2018) A Bridge Over Troubled Water: Conflicts and Reconciliation in Groups and Society. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, T.H. (1993) The Matrix of the Mind: Object Relations and the Psychoanalytic Dialogue. Kindle: Jason Aronson Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • OPUS (2018) Listening Post UK. https://www.opus.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/LP-2018-UK.pdf, accessed 2 February 2020.

  • OPUS (2019) Listening Post UK. https://www.opus.org.uk/project/2019/, accessed 2 February 2020.

  • O’Rourke, K. (2019) A Short History of Brexit: From Brentry to Backstop. London: Pelican Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedwell, C. (2014) Affective Relations: The Transnational Politics of Empathy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Polmear, C. (2018) Finding the bridge: psychoanalytic work with Asperger’s syndrome adults. In: M. Rhode and T. Klauber (eds) The Many Faces of Asperger’s Syndrome. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 86–107.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1961) The Long Revolution. London: Penguin Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sturgis, P., Baker, N., Callegaro, M., Fisher, S., Green, J., Jennings, W., Kuha, J., Lauderdale, B. and Smith, P. (2016) Report of the inquiry into the 2015 British general election opinion polls. London: Market Research Society and British Polling Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, B. (2013) Extreme nationalism and the hatred of the liberal state. In Emotions in Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 124–142.

  • Richards, B. (2018) What Holds Us Together: Popular Culture and Social Cohesion. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2016) Autumn. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D.W. (1971) Playing and Reality. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the contributors to this research project that led to the writing of this article. These include John Biggs, Sonia Devji, Darren Ellis, Irene Eskanazi, Lynn Froggett, Jacob Johanssen, Brett Kahr, Amy Tatum and Katy Vaughan. Our thanks also to the Bournemouth University Women’s Academic Network and the ESRC Festival of Social Sciences for supporting the research discussed in the paper. The project followed the Bournemouth University Code of Ethical Practice and was approved by the Bournemouth University Research Ethics Committee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Candida Yates.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yates, C., MacRury, I. Empathy an impossible task? Engaging with groups in a troubling Brexit landscape. Psychoanal Cult Soc 26, 473–496 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41282-021-00238-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41282-021-00238-0

Keywords

Navigation