Skip to main content
Log in

The gift of shame

  • Article
  • Published:
postmedieval Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This short confession looks back at the confessional mode of a 2009 article, ‘The Object of Devotion,’ on the impact of religious orientation on my scholarly formation, before turning to a different sort of self-examination: the moment of shame that is at once a source of pain and a generous gift. The inventory offered here concerns not religious orientation but the shame that arises from being wrong. It also casts light on changes that have come to our profession, where racist structures of thought and their administrative and social manifestations have become more visible than before. It’s not that our work environment has changed; rather, the assumptions that were there all along have become visible, and recognizing them – and responding to them – has become imperative. In this way, when I make a confession, and talk about my own shame, it’s in part the product of my own experience, but it is also the product of our common situation. This confession also looks forward to the fruitful outcomes of this experience, including collaborative workshops on indigenous pedagogy, on the role of indigenous story, and on the stories we tell about the land.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. ‘Decolonization as metaphor allows people to equivocate these contradictory decolonial desires because it turns decolonization into an empty signifier to be filled by any track towards liberation. In reality, the tracks walk all over land/people in settler contexts. Though the details are not fixed or agreed upon, in our view, decolonization in the settler colonial context must involve the repatriation of land simultaneous to the recognition of how land and relations to land have always already been differently understood and enacted; that is, all of the land, and not just symbolically. This is precisely why decolonization is necessarily unsettling, especially across lines of solidarity’ (Tuck and Yang, 2012, 7).

References

  • Akbari, S.C. 2010. The Object of Devotion: Fundamentalist Perspectives on the Medieval Past. Religion and Literature 42: 299–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maracle, L. 2015. Memory Serves: Oratories, ed. S. Kamboureli. Edmonton, AB: NeWest Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuck, E. and K.W. Yang. 2012. Decolonization is Not a Metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education, and Society 1(1): 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suzanne Conklin Akbari.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akbari, S.C. The gift of shame. Postmedieval 11, 318–325 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41280-020-00165-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41280-020-00165-w

Navigation