Skip to main content
Log in

The role of logistics performance in promoting trade

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Maritime Economics & Logistics Aims and scope

Abstract

There is widespread evidence that efficiency of logistics systems is a significant determinant of bilateral trade, but the magnitude of the effect may vary according to economic and geographical characteristics. An important aspect concerning the impact of logistics performance on trade volumes is the income level. This paper presents the findings of a gravity model, which is empirically tested to assess the extent to which logistics performance constitutes a facilitator to international trade. We compare the relative impact of various logistics performance dimensions on trade, and explore the differences over country income levels. Our research differs from previous studies in adopting an income-level approach, with an analysis of the impact of various logistics performance dimensions. We observed that the regulatory or trade facilitation environment could have divergent effects depending on the level of per capita income. Particularly, low-income economies realize highest benefits of their logistics excellence. For low- and lower-middle-income economies, logistics excellence increases exports more than imports. On the contrary, imports of upper-middle- and high-income economies tend to benefit more from better logistics performance than their exports. Accordingly, collaborative acts to improve logistics performance of partner countries may have a higher impact on the exports of an upper-middle-income country than improving only the exporter’s performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J.E. 1979. A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. American Economic Review 69 (1): 106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.E., and E. van Wincoop. 2003. Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review 93: 170–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvis, J.F., D. Saslavsky, L. Ojala, B. Shepherd, C. Busch, and A. Raj. 2016. Trade logistics in the global economy: The logistics performance index and its indicators. Washington: The World Bank.

  • Banomyong, R. 2005. The impact of port and trade security initiatives on maritime supply-chain management. Maritime Policy & Management 32 (1): 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behar, A., and P. Manners. 2008. Logistics and exports. Department of Economics and CSAE Working Paper Series (13).

  • Behar, A., P. Manners, and B. Nelson. 2013. Exports and international logistics. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 75 (6): 855–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrand, J. 1985. The gravity equation in international trade: Some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics 67 (3): 474–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brun, J.-F., C. Carrre, P. Guillaumont, and J. de Melo. 2005. Has distance died? Evidence from a panel gravity model. The World Bank Economic Review 19 (1): 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celebi, D., L. Ojala, J. Kauppila, and P. Crist 2014. Understanding drivers of trade and transport performance. In Proceedings of International Symposium on Logistics, Vietnam.

  • CEPII. 2016. Gravity dataset for all world pairs of countries. http://www.cepii.fr/cepii/en/bdd_modele/bdd.asp. Accessed 2016.

  • De Wulf, L., and J.B. Sokol. 2005. Customs modernization handbook. Technical report, The World Bank.

  • Djankov, S., C. Freund, and C.S. Pham. 2010. Trading on time. Review of Economics and Statistics 92 (1): 166–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, B., and D.A. Irwin. 1998. The role of history in bilateral trade flows. In The regionalization of the world economy, ed. J.A. Frankel, 33–57. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C.L. 2003. The economic significance of national border effects. The American Economic Review 93 (4): 1291–1312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guner, S., and E. Coskun. 2012. Comparison of impacts of economic and social factors on countries logistics performances: a study with 26 OECD countries. Research in Logistics & Production 2: 329–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., M. Goh, R. Desouza, and M. Garg. 2011. Assessing trade friendliness of logistics services in ASEAN. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 23 (5): 773–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, W.H., H.L. Lee, and U. Subramanian. 2013. The impact of logistics performance on trade. Production and Operations Management 22 (2): 236–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J.J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47 (1): 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman, B., and A. Nicita. 2011. Trade policy, trade costs, and developing country trade. World Development 12: 2069–2079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollweg, C., and M. Wong. 2009. Measuring regulatory restrictions in logistics services. ERIA Discussion Paper Series (14).

  • Hummels, D., V. Lugovskyy, and A. Skiba. 2009. The trade reducing effects of market power in international shipping. Journal of Development Economics 89 (1): 84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwanow, T., and C. Kirkpatrick. 2009. Trade facilitation and manufactured exports: Is Africa different? World Development 37 (6): 1039–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limao, N., and A.J. Venables. 2001. Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport costs, and trade. The World Bank Economic Review 15 (3): 451–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mart, L., R. Puertas, and L. Garca. 2014. The importance of the logistics performance index in international trade. Applied Economics 46 (24): 2982–2992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, C., O. Morrissey, and E. Zgovu. 2008. Trade facilitation in developing countries. CREDIT Research Paper (08-05).

  • Moavenzadeh, J., S. Doherty, and R.P. Thierry Geiger. 2013. Enabling trade: Valuing growth opportunities. Technical report, World Economic Forum.

  • Nordas, H., E. Pinali, and M. Grosso. 2006. Logistics and time as a trade barrier. OECD Trade Policy Working Paper (35).

  • OECD. 2014. Stan database for structural analysis. Accessed June 2015.

  • Portugal-Perez, A., and J.S. Wilson. 2012. Export performance and trade facilitation reform: Hard and soft infrastructure. World Development 40 (7): 1295–1307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puertas, R., L. Mart, and L. Garca. 2014. Logistics performance and export competitiveness: European experience. Empirica 41 (3): 467–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rantasila, K., and L. Ojala. 2012. Measurement of national-level logistics costs and performance, International Transport Forum, Discussion Paper: 2012-04.

  • Rodrigue, J.-P., C. Comtois, and B. Slack. 2009. The geography of transport systems. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos Silva, J., and S. Tenreyro. 2006. The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics 88: 641–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saslavsky, D., and B. Shepherd. 2014. Facilitating international production networks: The role of trade logistics. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 23 (7): 979–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkson, F.E. 2011. Logistics and bilateral exports in developing countries: A multiplicative form estimation of the logistics augmented gravity eq. CREDIT Research Paper 11(06).

  • Wilson, J.S., C.L. Mann, and T. Otsuki. 2005. Assessing the benefits of trade facilitation: A global perspective. World Economy 28 (6): 841–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2015. Databank: Tariff rate applied. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org.

  • WTO. 2016. World trade organization statistics: Trade and tariff data. Accessed June 2016.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to express my deepest thanks to the anonymous reviewers and Professor Haralambides for their valuable time and effort. Their comments and suggestions helped improve this manuscript to a great extent.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dilay Çelebi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Çelebi, D. The role of logistics performance in promoting trade. Marit Econ Logist 21, 307–323 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-017-0094-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-017-0094-4

Keywords

Navigation