Skip to main content
Log in

California advocates’ perspectives on challenges and risks of advancing the tobacco endgame

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the USA, California’s highly-regarded Tobacco Control Program (CTCP) has defined its goal as “ending the tobacco epidemic for all population groups” by 2035. To understand local advocates’ perceptions of endgame-oriented policies, we interviewed 28 advocates from California communities that had recently adopted tobacco control policies. There was no consensus among participants on which specific policies would constitute the tobacco endgame in California. There was an agreement, however, that policymakers should promote policies that would impact communities with the highest tobacco use prevalence and that policies should be ‘clean’, avoiding exemptions. Participants were cognizant of California’s history of tobacco control policy innovations beginning locally and eventually being adopted at the state level. Many commented that recent policy innovations in the state had begun a conversation that made more ‘radical’ ideas seem possible. California tobacco control advocates are engaged in local endgame policy discussions and prepared to advance California’s endgame goal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. California Tobacco Control Program. California Tobacco Control Program Overview 2017. https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/DCDIC/CTCB/CDPH%20Document%20Library/AboutUS/ProgramOverview/AboutUsProgramOverview081216.pdf.

  2. Rogers T. The California Tobacco Control Program: Introduction to the 20-year retrospective. Tob Control. 2010;19(Suppl 1):i1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. California Department of Public Health, California Tobacco Control Program. 2017–2021 Local lead agency comprehensive tobacco control plan guidelines 2017. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=2ahUKEwjf3-GIwKbkAhUFsJ4KHRlaBDUQFjABegQIAhAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fotis.catcp.org%2Futilities%2FtcforFileFetch.cfm%3FdocID%3D1214&usg=AOvVaw3kKI9P_ro6qrWMWHX874w1.

  4. McDaniel PA, Smith EA, Malone RE. The tobacco endgame: a qualitative review and synthesis. Tob Control. 2015;25(5):594–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith EA, McDaniel PA, Malone RE. Leadership perceptions of endgame strategies for tobacco control in California. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2019;25(6):554–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. American Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation. Municipalities prohibiting the sale of flavored tobacco products 2019 [updated 1 October 2019. https://no-smoke.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf/flavored-tobacco-product-sales.pdf.

  7. Chapman S. Public health advocacy and tobacco control: making smoking history. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. McClurg L. San Francisco passes first-in-the-nation flavored tobacco, vaping ban: KQED.Org; 2018. https://www.kqed.org/futureofyou/441395/sf-voters-may-ban-vape-flavors-menthol-cigarettes.

  9. Baker A, Goodman JD, Mueller B. Beyond the chokehold: the path to Eric Garner's death. New York: New York Times; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Park M, Selig R. San Francisco bans sales of flavored tobacco products CNN: CNN; 2018. https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/06/health/san-francisco-flavored-cigarettes-proposition-e/index.html.

  11. Khoo D, Chiam Y, Ng P, Berrick AJ, Koong HN. Phasing-out tobacco: proposal to deny access to tobacco for those born from 2000. Tob Control. 2010;19(5):355–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Callard CD, Thompson D, Collishaw NE. Curing the addiction to profits: a supply-side approach to phasing out tobacco. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Borland R. A strategy for controlling the marketing of tobacco products: a regulated market model. Tob Control. 2003;12(4):374–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of smoking 50 years of progress: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Support for this paper was provided by the California Tobacco Related Disease Research Program, Grant No. 26IR-0003.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth A. Smith.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smith, E.A., McDaniel, P.A. & Malone, R.E. California advocates’ perspectives on challenges and risks of advancing the tobacco endgame. J Public Health Pol 41, 321–333 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-020-00230-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-020-00230-5

Keywords

Navigation