Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

When do active citizens abstain from the polls? Civic associations, non-electoral participation, and voting in 21st-century democracies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Politica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the most consistent findings in the literature is that non-electoral political participation has a positive and robust association with electoral participation. However, all democracies have citizens who regularly engage in non-electoral political action but do not vote. Curiously, this abstentionist-activist profile has received little attention. Drawing on elements of the civic voluntarism model and electoral theories, this study tests an argument as to why and when active citizens—i.e., citizens who are politically active in non-electoral terms—are more likely to abstain from the polls. Using data from the International Social Survey Program and multivariate logistic regressions, the results show that when active citizens lack ties to social organizations, their probability of abstaining from the polls increases significantly. However, the results also showed that membership in organizations is relevant only for active citizens who express a limited sense of civic duty. This article discusses the electoral consequences of growing levels of activism based on forms of coordination that are not rooted in traditional civic associations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source: Prepared by the author based on ISSP 2014

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Even so, if the citizenship norms variables are not included in the regression model, active membership in religious organizations does turn out to be statistically significant in explaining voting. See Models 3 and 4 in Table B5 in the online supplement, where I included citizenship norms and participation in organizations (religious and voluntary) in separate models.

  2. In Model 1 in Table B5 in the online supplement we can see the effect of only the sociodemographic variables.

References

  • Achen, C.H., and A. Hur. 2011. Civic duty and voter turnout in Japan and South Korea. Election Studies 1: 45–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, J.H. 1993. Rational choice and turnout. American Journal of Political Science 37: 246–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, K., and L. Schädel. 2015. Social inequality in political participation: The dark sides of individualisation. West European Politics 38 (1): 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, S.H., and M. Kaase. 1979. Political action: Mass participation in five western democracies. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W.L. 2012. The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 644 (1): 20–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, C. 1991. Participation and political protest: A model with Australian evidence. Political Behavior 13 (3): 253–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blais, A. 2000. To vote or not to vote?: The merits and limits of rational choice theory, 210. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blais, A. 2006. What affects voter turnout? Annual Review of Political Science 9 (1): 111–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blais, A. 2010. Political participation. In Comparing democracies, ed. L. LeDuc, R.G. Niemi, and P. Norris. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blais, A. 2014. Why is turnout so low in Switzerland? Comparing the attitudes of Swiss and German citizens towards electoral democracy. Swiss Political Science Review 20 (4): 520–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blais, A., and C.H. Achen. 2010. Taking civic duty seriously: Political theory and voter turnout, p. 26. Unpublished Manuscript.

  • Blais, A., and C.H. Achen. 2019. Civic duty and voter turnout. Political Behavior 41 (2): 473–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blais, A., and C. Galais. 2016. Measuring the civic duty to vote: A proposal. Electoral Studies 41 (514): 60–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolzendahl, C., and H. Coffé. 2013. Are ‘good’ citizens ‘good’ participants? Testing citizenship norms and political participation across 25 nations. Political Studies 61: 45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., and A. Hamlin. 1998. Expressive voting and electoral equilibrium. Public Choice 95 (1–2): 149–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhagen, P., and M. Marsh. 2007. Voting and protesting: Explaining citizen participation in old and new European democracies. Democratization 14 (1): 44–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, B.E., R.J. Dalton, and S.E. Scarrow. 2006. Democracy transformed?: Expanding political opportunities in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. 2005. Schools and civic norms. Education next 5 (3): 62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassel, C.A. 1999. Voluntary associations, churches, and social participation theories of turnout. Social Science Quarterly 80 (3): 504–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R.J. 2017. The participation gap: Social status and political inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R.J. 2008a. Citizen politics. Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R.J. 2008b. Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies 56 (1): 76–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R.J., and C. Welzel. 2014. The civic culture transformed: From allegiant to assertive citizens. In The civic culture transformed: From allegiant to assertive citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. 1957. An economic theory of political action in a democracy. Journal of Political Economy 65 (2): 135–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, J., and K. Kimport. 2011. Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the internet age. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galais, C. 2014. Don’t vote for them: The effects of the Spanish indignant movement on attitudes about voting. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 24 (3): 334–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallego, A. 2015. Unequal political participation worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, A.S., D.P. Green, and C.W. Larimer. 2008. Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. American Political Science Review 102 (1): 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, A.S., J. Gruber, and D.M. Hungerman. 2016. Does church attendance cause people to vote? Using blue laws’ repeal to estimate the effect of religiosity on voter turnout. British Journal of Political Science 46 (3): 481–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geys, B. 2006. ‘Rational’ theories of voter turnout: A review. Political Studies Review 4 (1): 16–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goerres, A. 2007. Why are older people more likely to vote? The impact of ageing on electoral turnout in Europe. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 9 (1): 90–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, H. 2014. How organizations develop activists: Civic associations and leadership in the 21st century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, F. 2014. Freedom in the world: The annual survey of political rights and civil liberties 1998–1999. New York: Freedom House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, M., and E. Quintelier. 2014. Political participation in European countries: The effect of authoritarian rule, corruption, lack of good governance and economic downturn. Comparative European Politics 12 (2): 209–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • IDEA. 2016. Compulsory voting. Stockholm: International institute for democracy and electoral assistance. disponible en: https://www.idea.int/data-tools/data/voter-turnout/compulsory-voting. Accessed 28 Nov 2016.

  • Leroux, K. 2007. The Role of community-based organizations in promoting political participation. Urban Affairs Review 42: 410–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marien, S., M. Hooghe, and E. Quintelier. 2010. Inequalities in non-institutionalised forms of political participation: A multi-level analysis of 25 countries. Political Studies 58 (1): 187–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, O.B., and E.A. Wilkening. 1987. Religious participation and involvement in local politics throughout the life cycle. Sociological Focus 20 (4): 309–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J.D., and M.N. Zald. 1977. Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology 82 (6): 1212–1241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer D.S, and S. Tarrow. (eds). 1998. The social movement society: Contentious politics for a new century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michels, R. 1962. Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. New York: Collier Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbrath, L.W., and M.L. Goel. 1977. Political participation: How and why do people get involved in politics? Chicago: Rand McNally College Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkoff, D., S. Aisenbrey, and J. Agnone. 2008. Organizational diversity in the US advocacy sector. Social Problems 55 (4): 525–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. 2002. Democratic phoenix: Political activism worldwide. In American political science association annual meeting.

  • Oberschall, A. 1973. Social conflict and social movements. Hoboken: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, M. 1972. Social participation and voting turnout: A multivariate analysis. American Sociological Review 37 (3): 317–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oser, J. 2017. Assessing how participators combine acts in their “political tool kits”: A person-centered measurement approach for analyzing citizen participation. Social Indicators Research 133 (1): 235–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portos, M., L. Bosi, and L. Zamponi. 2019. Life beyond the ballot box: The political participation and non-participation of electoral abstainers. European Societies 22: 231–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudig, W. 2010. Boon or burden? Antiwar protest and political parties. In The world says no to war: Demonstrations against the war on Iraq, ed. Stefaan Walgrave and Dieter Rucht. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Sarracino, F., and M. Mikucka. 2017. Social capital in Europe from 1990 to 2012: Trends and convergence. Social Indicators Research 131 (1): 407–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sallach, D.L., N. Babchuk, and A. Booth. 1972. Social involvement and political activity: Another view. Social Science Quarterly 52: 879–892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, C. 2014. Anti-politics in action? Measurement dilemmas in the study of unconventional political participation. Political Research Quarterly 67 (3): 574–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schussman, A., and J. Earl. 2004. From barricades to firewalls? Strategic voting and social movement leadership in the Internet age. Sociological Inquiry, 74 (4): 439–463.

  • Schussman, A., and S.A. Soule. 2005. Process and protest: Accounting for individual protest participation. Social Forces 84 (2): 1083–1108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlozman, K.L., S. Verba, and H. Brady. 2012. The unheavenly chorus: Political voice and the promise of American democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlozman, K.L., H.E. Brady, and S. Verba. 2018. Unequal and unrepresented: Political inequality and the people’s voice in the new gilded age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T., and M.P. Fiorina. 1999. Making sense of the civic engagement debate. Civic engagement in American Democracy, ed. T. Skocpol and M. P. Fiorina, 1–23 Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.

  • Skov, L., H. Kristin, and L. Svedberg. 2019. Civic engagement in scandinavia. Volunteering, informa help and giving in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somma, N., and M. Bargsted. 2018. Political inequality in 38 countries: A distributional approach. Comparative Sociology 17 (5): 469–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staggenborg, S. 1988. The consequences of professionalization and formalization in the pro-choice movement. American Sociological Review 53: 585–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolle, D. 1998. Bowling together, bowling alone: The development of generalized trust in voluntary associations. Political Psychology 19 (3): 497–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, S. 2022. Power in movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teorell, J. 2003. Linking social capital to political participation: Voluntary associations and network of recruitment in Sweden. Scandinavian Political Studies 26: 49–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theocharis, Y. 2015. The conceptualization of digitally networked participation. Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115610140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theocharis, Y., S. Vitoratou, and J. Sajuria. 2017. Civil society in times of crisis: Understanding collective action dynamics in digitally-enabled volunteer networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 22 (5): 248–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1899. Democracy in America. Vol. 2. Translated by H. Reeve. New York: The Colonial Press.

  • Verba, S., and N.H. Nie. 1972. Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. Manhattan: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., K.L. Schlozman, and H.E. Brady. 1995. Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vráblíková, K. 2014. How context matters? Mobilization, political opportunity structures, and nonelectoral political participation in old and new democracies. Comparative Political Studies 47 (2): 203–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vráblíková, K., and L. Linek. 2015. Explaining the composition of an individual’s political repertoire: Voting and protesting. In MPSA conference, 1–21.

  • van Deth, J.W. 2014. A conceptual map of political participation. Acta Politica 49 (3): 349–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Deth, J.W. 2020. Non-electoral participation. In The Oxford handbook of political representation in liberal democracies, ed. R. Rohrschneider and J. Thomassen. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Welzel, C., and R. Inglehart. 2005. Liberalism, postmaterialism, and the growth of freedom. International Review of Sociology 15 (1): 81–108.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

  This research has been funded by FONDECYT Iniciación (Chile), Grant No. 11220613.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Facultad de Educación y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Andres Bello, República 276, Santiago, Chile

    Rodrigo M. Medel

Authors
  1. Rodrigo M. Medel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodrigo M. Medel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 75 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Medel, R.M. When do active citizens abstain from the polls? Civic associations, non-electoral participation, and voting in 21st-century democracies. Acta Polit 59, 220–244 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-023-00290-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-023-00290-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation