Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A micro perspective on political competition: Electoral availability in the European electorates

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Politica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article develops an empirical measure of electoral availability, i.e., the micro perspective of political competition. As existing research conceptualizes political competition mainly as a macro- or party-level phenomenon, the micro perspective remains underdeveloped and, therefore, an important dimension of political competition, the availability of votes, is ignored. We introduce and discuss an individualized measure of electoral competition that is based on propensities to vote as indicators of the availability of voters to different political parties. The theoretical and empirical advantages of this measure are discussed: it is not restricted to parties’ positions but is based on multidimensional party evaluations; it does not only focus on actual behavior but instead on the potential behavior of voters; the proposed measure takes all (relevant) parties into account instead of only including the two largest parties; as a continuous index it avoids arbitrary cut-off points; and the resulting individual-level results are easily summable to obtain party- and country-level values. Finally, correlations with individual, party and party system characteristics are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Source: van der Brug et al (2007, p. 11)

Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. (2012) Causes and electoral consequences of party policy shifts in multiparty elections: Theoretical results and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Political Science 15(1): 401–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkermann, T. (2012) Immigration policy and electoral competition in Western Europe. A fine-grained analysis of party positions over the past two decades. Party Politics, 21 1 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, J., Geys, B., Heyndels, B. and Wille, F. 2008. political competition and local government performance: Evidence from Flemish municipalities.

  • Bartolini, S. (1999) Collusion, competition and democracy: Part I. Journal of Theoretical Politics 11(4): 435–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini, S. (2000) Collusion, competition and democracy: Part II. Journal of Theoretical Politics 12(1): 33–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blais, A. and Lago, I. (2009) A general measure of district competitiveness. Electoral Studies 28(1): 94–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blais, A. and St-Vincent, S.L. (2011) Personality traits, political attitudes and the propensity to vote. European Journal of Political Research 50(3): 395–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, S. and Donovan, T. (2011) Electoral competition and the voter. Public Opinion Quarterly 75(1): 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa-i-Font, J., Rodriguez-Oreggia, E. and Lunapla, D. (2003) Political competition and pork-barrel politics in the allocation of public investment in Mexico. Public Choice 116(1–2): 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R.A. (1971) Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. Yale: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J.D. (2006) Electoral competition and democratic responsiveness: A Defense of the Marginality Hypothesis. The Journal of Politics 68(4): 911–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grofman, B. and Selb, P. (2009) A fully general index of political competition. Electoral Studies 28(1): 291–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huckfeldt, R., Carmines, E.G., Mondak, J.J. and Zeemering, E. (2007) Information, activation, and electoral competition in the 2002 congressional elections. Journal of Politics 69(3): 798–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S.P. (1991) How countries democratize. Political Science Quarterly 106(4): 579–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Immergut, E.M. and Abou-Chadi, T. (2014) How electoral vulnerability affects pension politics: Introducing a concept, measure and empirical application. European Journal of Political Research 53(2): 269–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P.E. (2013) The effect of political competition on democratic accountability. Political Behavior 35(3): 481–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayser, M.A. and Linstädt, R. (2015) A cross-national measure of electoral competitiveness. Political Analysis 23(2): 242–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroh, M., van der Brug, W. and van der Eijk, C. (2007) Prospects for electoral change. In: W. van der Brug and C. van der Eijk (eds.) European Elections and Domestic Politics. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuklinski, J.H. (1977) District competitiveness and legislative roll-call behavior: A reassessment of the marginality hypothesis. American Journal of Political Science 21(3): 627–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachat, R. (2009) Issue ownership and issue salience effects: A two-stage model of the voting decision process. Zurich, Switzerland: The Center for Comparative and International Studies. CIS Working Paper no. 50.

  • Mainwaring, S. and Zoco, E. (2007) Political sequences and the stabilization of interparty competition. Electoral volatility in old and new democracies. Party Politics 13(2): 155–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, Michael (2006) Stability and change in the structure of electoral competition, 1989–2002. In: John Garry, Niamh Hardiman and Diane Payne (eds.) Irish Social and Political Attitudes. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 78–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D.L. and Rogers, J.H. (2000) Political competition and state government size: Do tighter elections produce looser budgets? Public Choice 105(1–2): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1976) Parties and Party-Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strøm, K. (1989) Inter-Party Competition in Advanced Democracies. Journal of Theoretical Politics 1(3): 277–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strøm, K. (2000) Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research 37(3): 261–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurner, P.W. and Eymann, A. (2000) Policy-Specific Alienation and Indifference in The Calculus of Voting: A Simultaneous Model of Party Choice and Abstention. Public Choice 102(1): 49–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillie, J. (1995) Party Utility and Voting Behavior. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Brug, W., van der Eijk, C. and Franklin, M. (2007) The Economy and the Vote: Economic Conditions and Elections in Fifteen Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van der Eijk, C. (2002) Design issues in electoral research: taking care of (core) business. Electoral Studies 21(2): 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Eijk, C. and Franklin, M.N. (eds.) (1996) Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. The University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Eijk, C. and Marsh, M. (2007) Don’t expect me to vote for you just because I like you, even if you do make me feel warm inside. A comparison of the validity of non-ipsative measures of party support. APSA, Chicago.

  • van der Eijk, C. and Niemöller, B. (1983) Electoral Change in the Netherlands. Empirical Results and Methods of Measurement. Amsterdam: CT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Eijk, C. and Oppenhuis, E.V. (1991) European parties’ performance in electoral competition. European Journal of Political Research 19: 55–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Eijk, C., van der Brug, W., Kroh, M. and Franklin, M. (2006) Rethinking the dependent variable in voting behavior: On the measurement and analysis of electoral utilities. Electoral Studies 25(3): 424–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Egmond, M., van der Brug, W., Hobolt, S., Franklin, M. and Sapir, E.V. (2013) European Parliament Election Study 2009, Voter Study. GESIS Data Archive: Cologne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weßels, B. and Schmitt, H. (2008) Meaningful choices, political supply, and institutional effectiveness. Electoral Studies 27(1): 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Democracy and Democratization, WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Reichpietschufer 50, 10785, Berlin, Germany

    Aiko Wagner

Authors
  1. Aiko Wagner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aiko Wagner.

Additional information

This paper is part of a special issue of Acta Politica entitled ‘Information and Electoral Competition’ edited by Sylvia Kritzinger, Susan Banducci, and Heiko Giebler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wagner, A. A micro perspective on political competition: Electoral availability in the European electorates. Acta Polit 52, 502–520 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-016-0028-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-016-0028-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation