Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Survival and status in the liberal international order: the grantors of recognition

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Relations and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article focuses on the supply side of status recognition in the liberal international order (LIO). The order’s liberal milieu breeds hierarchies among states, which in turn generate certain exigencies for recognition. Although states receive ‘thin’ recognition, the order fails to structurally acknowledge their worth, value and uniqueness, or ‘thick’ recognition. This inconsistency lies at the heart of the order’s recognition regime and serves as a source of frustration and revisionism. Since recognition needs are not saturated systemically, an opening emerges for non-systemic grants of recognition, which are mostly conferred by a select core of liberal states. I unpack the said inconsistency in the LIO’s recognition regime and concentrate on the production of non-systemic grants of recognition and their practical implications. I identify the non-systemic grants of recognition as an effective, yet problematic characteristic of the recognition regime because they further exacerbate hierarchies based on a specific understanding of merit. In operationalizing the process of status recognition in the particular milieu of the LIO, the piece introduces a heuristic framework for qualitatively assessing the perceived functional worth of states and provides empirical examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source author

Fig. 2

Source author

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable

Notes

  1. The author would like to thank the reviewers for highlighting this point.

  2. The authors would like to thank the reviewers for this suggestion.

References

  • Abdelal, Rawi (2020) ‘Dignity, Inequality, and the Populist Backlash: Lessons from America and Europe for a Sustainable Globalization’, Global Policy 11: 492–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abulof, Uriel (2017) ‘Introduction: Why We Need Maslow in the Twenty-First Century’, Society 54: 508–9.

  • Adler-Nissen, Rebecca and Tsinovoi, Alexei (2019) ‘International misrecognition: The politics of humour and national identity in Israel’s public diplomacy’, European Journal of International Relations 25 (1): 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler-Nissen, Rebecca and Zarakol, Ayse (2021) ‘Struggles for Recognition: The Liberal International Order and the Merger of Its Discontents’, International Organization 75 (2): 611–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan, Pierre and Keller, Alexis (2012) ‘Is a Just Peace Possible Without Thin and Thick Recognition?’ in Lindemann, Thomas and Ringmar, Erik (eds.), The International Politics of Recognition, London: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, Basil et al. (1984) ‘Famine in China, 1958–61’, Population and Development Review 10 (4): 613–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aslani, Sorouch et al. (2016) ‘Dignity, face, and honor cultures: A study of negotiation strategy and outcomes in three cultures’, Journal of Organizational Behavior 37: 1178–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayers, Edward (1984) Vengeance and justice, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajpai, Kanti and Laksmana, Evan A. (2023) ‘Asian conceptions of international order: what Asia wants’, International Affairs 99 (4): 1371–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banka, Andris (2022) ‘Neither reckless nor free-riders: auditing the Baltics as US treaty allies’, Journal of Transatlantic Studies 20 (2): 161–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, William A. (2008) Chinese Visions of World Order: Post-Hegemonic or a New Hegemony? International Studies Review 10 (4): 749–761.

  • CNN (2003) Chirac lashes out at ‘new Europe’, February 18. Available at https://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/europe/02/18/sprj.irq.chirac/ (22 December 2023).

  • Colgan, Jeff D. and Keohane, Robert O. (2017) ‘The Liberal Order is Rigged: Fix It Now or Watch It Wither’, Foreign Affairs (May/June): 36–44.

  • ČT24 (2017) ‘Jsem první Čech, který se setkal s Trumpem, pochlubil se Kmoníček’, 24 April, available at https://ct24.ceskatelevize.cz/domaci/2098625-jsem-prvni-cech-ktery-se-setkal-s-trumpem-pochlubil-se-kmonicek (27 December 2023).

  • Dafoe, Allan, Renshon, Jonathan and Huth, Paul (2014) ‘Reputation and Status as Motives for War’, Annual Review of Political Science 17 (1): 371–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A. (1956) A preface to democratic theory, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Carvalho, Benjamin and Neumann, Iver. B. (eds.) (2015) Small State Status Seeking: Norway's Quest for International Standing, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deudney, Daniel and Ikenberry, John G. (1999) ‘The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order’, Review of International Studies 25(2): 179–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dezenski, Elaine and Austin, John C. (2012) ‘Rebuilding America’s economy and foreign policy with “ally-shoring” ’, Brookings Institution, 8 June, available at https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2021/06/08/rebuilding-americas-economy-and-foreign-policy-with-ally-shoring/ (21 December 2023).

  • Diez, Thomas (2004) ‘Europe's others and the return of geopolitics’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17 (2): 319–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner, Daniel. W. (2008) ‘The Realist Tradition in American Public Opinion’, Perspectives on Politics 6 (1): 51–70.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer, June T. (2015) ‘The ‘Tianxia Trope’: will China change the international system?’ Journal of Contemporary China 24 (96): 1015–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Nancy (1997) Justice Interruptus Critical Reflections on the ‘Postsocialist’ Condition, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, Jorg (2016) ‘An intercultural theory of international relations: How self-worth underlies politics among nations’, International Theory 8 (1): 63–96.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gambrell, Jon (2022) ‘Saudis say US sought 1 month delay of OPEC+ production cuts’, Associated Press, 14 October, available at https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-biden-inflation-business-elections-a359717a7edd2e609701d03328b55418 (28 December 2023).

  • Galston, William A. (2018) ‘The Populist Challenge to Liberal Democracy’ Journal of Democracy 29(2): 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genser, Jared and Cotler, Irwin (eds.) (2011) The Responsibility to Protect: The Promise of Stopping Mass Atrocities in our Time, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz, Elias (2021) ‘Status Matters in World Politics’, International Studies Review 23 (1): 228–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhill, Brian (2008) ‘Recognition and Collective Identity Formation in International Politics’, European Journal of International Relations 14(2): 343–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, Karl (2016) ‘Recognising recognition through thick and thin: Insights from Sino-Japanese relations’, Cooperation and Conflict 51(3), 255–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, Axel (1994) The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, Axel (2004) ‘Recognition and Justice: Outline of a Plural Theory of Justice’, Acta Sociologica 47 (4): 351–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, Axel (2012) ‘Recognition between States: On the Moral Substrate of International Relations’ in Lindemann, Thomas and Ringmar, Erik (eds.), The International Politics of Recognition, London: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, John and Black, Ian (2003) ‘Anger at Rumsfeld attack on “old Europe” ’, The Guardian, 24 January, available at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/jan/24/germany.france (2 January 2024).

  • Jahn, Beate (2012) ‘Critique in a time of liberal world order’, Journal of International Relations and Development 15: 145–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, Beate (2018) ‘Liberal internationalism: historical trajectory and current prospects’ International Affairs 94 (1): 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, David C. (2010) East Asia before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall-Taylor, Andrea and Frantz, Erica (2014) ‘Mimicking Democracy to Prolong Autocracies’, The Washington Quarterly 37 (4): 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Young-Hoon and Cohen, Dov (2010) ‘Information, Perspective, and Judgments About the Self in Face and Dignity Cultures’ Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36 (4): 537–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klaas, Brian (2017) The Despot's Accomplice: How the West is Aiding and Abetting the Decline of Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil, Friedrich and Ruggie, John. G. (1986) ‘International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State’ International Organization 40 (4): 753–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lake, David (2009) Hierarchy in International Relations, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, David (2020) ‘Whither the Liberal International Order? Authority, Hierarchy, and Institutional Change’, Ethics & International Affairs 34 (4): 461–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, Michele (2018) ‘Addressing Recognition Gaps: Destigmatization and the Reduction of Inequality’, American Sociological Review 83 (3): 419–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Deborah W. and Shevchenko, Alexei (2019) Quest for Status: Chinese and Russian Foreign Policy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, Angela K.-Y., and Cohen, Dov (2011) ‘Within- and between-culture variation: Individual differences and the cultural logics of honor, face, and dignity cultures’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100 (3): 507–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann, T and Ringmar, E (eds.) (2014) The International Politics of Recognition, London: Paradigm Publishers.

  • MacDonald, Paul K. and Parent, Joseph M. (2021) ‘The Status of Status in World Politics’, World Politics 73 (2): 358–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark, Clifton D. (2015) ‘Axel Honneth, The Struggle for Recognition’ in Levy, Jacob T. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Classics in Contemporary Political Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, Abraham H. (1943) ‘A theory of human motivation’, Psychological Review 50 (4): 370–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadzadeh, Babak (2017) ‘Status and Foreign Policy Change in Small States: Qatar’s Emergence in Perspective’, The International Spectator 52 (2): 19–36.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, Andrew (1997) ‘Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics’, International Organization 51 (4): 513–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulova, Katerina and Simecka, Michal (2013) ‘Norm Entrepreneurs and Atlanticist Foreign Policy in Central and Eastern Europe: The Missionary Zeal of Recent Converts’, Europe–Asia Studies 65 (6): 1192–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, Helen (1991) ‘The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory: A Critique’, Review of International Studies 17 (1): 67–85.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Michelle (2019) The Struggle for Recognition in International Relations: Status, Revisionism, and Rising Powers, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narozhna, Tanya (2020) ‘State–society complexes in ontological security-seeking in IR’, Journal of International Relations and Development 23: 559–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narozhna, Tanya (2022) ‘Misrecognition, ontological security and state foreign policy: the case of post-Soviet Russia’, Australian Journal of International Affairs 76 (1): 76–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orbán, Viktor (2017) Speech at the 28th Bálványos Summer Open University and Student Camp, 22 July, Tusnádfürdő (Băile Tuşnad, Romania), available at https://visegradpost.com/en/2017/07/24/full-speech-of-v-orban-will-europe-belong-to-europeans/ (28 December 2023).

  • Park, Ausra and Gerda Jakstaite-Confortola, G. (2021) ‘Small State Status Seeking: Lithuania’s Foreign Policy Status Aspirations’, Europe–Asia Studies 73 (7): 1279–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, Thazha V., Larson, Deborah and Wohlforth, William C. (2014) Status in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Putin, Vladimir (2022) ‘Address by the President of the Russian Federation’, 24 February, available at http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67843 (2 January 2024).

  • Renshon, Jonathan (2017) Fighting for Status: Hierarchy and Conflict in World Politics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoden, T.F. (2015) ‘The liberal in liberal democracy’, Democratization 22 (3): 560–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringmar, Erik (2014) ‘Introduction: The International Politics of Recognition’ in Lindemann, Thomas and Ringmar, Erik (eds.), The International Politics of Recognition, London: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringmar, Erik (2012) ‘Performing International Systems: Two East-Asian Alternatives to the Westphalian Order’, International Organization 66: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, Luis J. and Thornton, Christy (2022) ‘The liberal international order and the global south: a view from Latin America’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 35 (5): 626–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, Brad B. (2010) ‘Sovereign Equality and Non-Liberal Regimes’ in Nijman, Janne E. and Werner, Wouter G. (eds.) Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 2012, The Hague: Asser Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, Michael (2020) The Tyranny of Merit: What's Become of the Common Good? New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleich, Anne-Marie (2023) ‘Pacific Island Countries, China and the US: Recent Geopolitical Trends’, RSIS Commentary, November, available at https://www.rsis.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/CO23171.pdf (28 December 2023)

  • Siedentop, Larry (2017) Inventing the Individual: The Origins of Western Liberalism, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, John A. (1989) ‘Locke’s State of Nature’, Political Theory 17 (3): 449–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trump, Donald (2016) ‘Transcript: Foreign Policy Speech’, Center for the National Interest, 27 April, available at https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/28/us/politics/transcript-trump-foreign-policy.html (28 December 2023).

  • Villa, Dana (2005) ‘Hegel, Tocqueville, and “Individualism” ’, The Review of Politics 67 (4): 659–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, Alexander (1992) ‘Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization 46 (2): 391–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, Alexander (2003) ‘Why a World State is Inevitable’, European Journal of International Relations 9 (4): 491–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Michael. C. (2001) ‘The Discipline of the Democratic Peace: Kant, Liberalism and the Social Construction of Security Communities’, European Journal of International Relations 7 (4): 525–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wivel, Anders and Crandall, Matthew (2019) ‘Punching above their weight, but why? Explaining Denmark and Estonia in the transatlantic relationship’, Journal of Transatlantic Studies 17 (3): 392–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlforth, William C. (2015) ‘Conclusion: A small middle power’ in de Carvalho, Benjamin and Neumann, Iver. B. (eds.) Small State Status Seeking: Norway's Quest for International Standing, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlforth, William, De Carvalho, Benjamin, Leira, Halvard, and Neumann, Iver B. (2018) ‘Moral authority and status in International Relations: Good states and the social dimension of status seeking’, Review of International Studies 44 (3): 526–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Reinhard (2011) ‘Respect and disrespect in international politics: the significance of status recognition’, International Theory 3 (1): 105–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarakol, Ayse (2011) After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarakol, Ayse (ed.) (2017) Hierarchies in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and the journal editors for their constructive feedback. In addition, the author thanks Tomáš Weiss, Adrian Brisku and members of the ‘Small nation(-states) within/without empires and unions’ Research centre at the Institute of International Studies for reading and commenting on the first drafts of the paper. The research was funded by Charles University’s COOPERATIO Program and UNCE 24/SSH/018 (Peace Research Center Prague II).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

    Jan Hornat

Authors
  1. Jan Hornat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Hornat.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hornat, J. Survival and status in the liberal international order: the grantors of recognition. J Int Relat Dev 27, 95–115 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-024-00323-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-024-00323-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation