Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

A well-established body of international business research examines how the institutional environment influences corporate decisions. We add to this literature by investigating the unexplored link between family, a fundamental institution in human society, and corporate tax decisions. Applying theories on social norms and the evolution of moral boundaries, we argue that the strength of family ties in a society increases corporate tax avoidance by narrowing the scope of moral responsibilities. We confirm this argument by conducting regression analyses using a large sample of firms from 44 countries. In addition, the positive effect of family ties on tax avoidance is attenuated for firms in countries with inclusive political institutions and is amplified for family firms. Using a sample of U.S. companies, we also find that firms avoid more taxes when they are located in states with stronger family ties and when their CEOs are from countries with stronger family ties, indicating that both the social norms that surround firms and those that are embedded in the origin countries of the managers affect firm tax decisions. Our study implies that the institution of family provides a valuable perspective to understand the international differences in corporate behaviors.

Plain language summary

In a globalized business environment, comprehending the elements that sway corporate actions is vital. Corporate tax avoidance, which could result in significant revenue deficits for worldwide governments, is one focus area. Despite extensive studies on formal institutions like laws and regulations, the influence of informal institutions, such as family, on corporate tax strategies is not well understood. This research addresses this gap by investigating how the intensity of family ties in various societies affects corporate tax avoidance. This research scrutinized data from 148,459 firm-year observations across 44 countries from 2002 to 2020. The World Values Survey, which gauges the intensity of family ties in each country, was utilized by researchers and compared to the degree of tax avoidance by companies, defined as the disparity between the tax on pre-tax income and the actual taxes paid. The study is observational and employs statistical techniques to account for different factors that could impact the results, ensuring the findings are solid and dependable. The researchers discovered that companies in nations with strong family ties tend to avoid more taxes than those in nations with weaker family ties. This implies that in societies where family bonds are strong, there may be a lesser moral obligation to pay taxes for the welfare of the wider public. Additionally, the research examined whether inclusive political institutions (which spread power widely and have robust governance) or family control of firms moderated this relationship. It was found that inclusive political institutions lessen the positive effect of family ties on tax avoidance, while family-controlled firms are more likely to engage in tax avoidance in societies with strong family ties. The study's findings are significant. They underscore that informal institutions like family ties can influence corporate behavior just as much as formal regulations. This understanding could assist policymakers, regulators, and international organizations in understanding the cultural factors that drive tax avoidance and in formulating strategies to address it. The findings also suggest that fostering inclusive political institutions could counteract the negative effects of strong family ties on tax compliance. In conclusion, while the study doesn't assert that avoiding taxes is inherently bad, as firms may reinvest the saved money in ways that ultimately benefit society, it does provide a clearer understanding of the intricate relationship between culture, institutions, and corporate behavior. The hope is that this research will lay the groundwork for future studies on the determinants of tax avoidance and the design of tax systems that consider cultural factors. This text was initially drafted using artificial intelligence, then reviewed by the author(s) to ensure accuracy.

Résumé

Il existe un ensemble bien établi de recherches en affaires internationales examinant comment l'environnement institutionnel influence les décisions des entreprises. Nous enrichissons cette littérature en étudiant le lien inexploré entre les décisions fiscales des entreprises et la famille, institution fondamentale de la société humaine. En appliquant les théories des normes sociales et de l'évolution des frontières morales, nous argumentons que la force des liens familiaux dans une société augmente l'évitement de l'impôt sur les sociétés en réduisant la portée des responsabilités morales. Nous confirmons cet argument en effectuant des analyses de régression à partir d'un large échantillon d'entreprises de 44 pays. En outre, l'impact positif des liens familiaux sur l'évasion fiscale est atténué pour les entreprises des pays dotés d'institutions politiques inclusives et est amplifié pour les entreprises familiales. En utilisant un échantillon d'entreprises américaines, nous constatons également que les entreprises évitent davantage d'impôts lorsqu'elles sont situées dans des États où les liens familiaux sont plus forts et lorsque leurs PDG sont originaires de pays où les liens familiaux sont plus forts, ce qui indique que les normes sociales qui entourent les entreprises et celles qui sont ancrées dans les pays d'origine des dirigeants influencent les décisions fiscales de l'entreprise. Notre recherche implique que l'institution de la famille offre une perspective précieuse pour comprendre les différences internationales dans les comportements des entreprises.

Resumen

Un corpus bien establecido de publicaciones de investigación en negocios internacionales examina como el entorno institucional influencia las decisiones corporativas. Añadimos a esta literatura al investigar en vínculo inexplorado entre la familia, una institución fundamental en la sociedad humana, y las decisiones fiscales corporativas. Al aplicar teorías sobre normas sociales y la evolución de los limites morales, argumentamos que la fortaleza de los lazos familiares en una sociedad aumenta la evasión corporativa de impuestos al reducir el alcanza del ámbito de las responsabilidades morales. Confirmamos este argumento al llevar a cabo análisis de regresión utilizando una amplia muestra de empresas de 44 países. Adicionalmente, el efecto positivo de los lazos familiares es atenuado en países con instituciones políticas inclusivas y se amplifica para las empresas familiares. Usando una muestra de empresas estadounidenses, también encontramos que las empresas evaden más impuestos cuando están ubicadas en estados con mayores vínculos familiares y cuando sus directores ejecutivos (CEOs) son oriundos de países con lazos familiares más fuertes, esto indica que tanto las normas sociales que rodean las empresas como aquellas que están integradas en los países de origen de los gerentes afecta las decisiones fiscales corporativas. Nuestro estudio implica que la institución de la familia suministra una perspectiva valiosa para entender las diferencias internacionales en comportamientos corporativos.

Resumo

Um corpo bem estabelecido de pesquisas em negócios internacionais examina como o ambiente institucional influencia decisões corporativas. Acrescentamos a esta literatura ao investigar a ligação inexplorada entre família, uma instituição fundamental na sociedade humana, e decisões fiscais corporativas. Aplicando teorias sobre normas sociais e a evolução de fronteiras morais, argumentamos que a força de laços familiares numa sociedade aumenta a evasão fiscal de empresas ao estreitar o escopo de responsabilidades morais. Confirmamos este argumento conduzindo análises de regressão utilizando uma grande amostra de empresas de 44 países. Além disso, o efeito positivo de laços familiares na evasão fiscal é atenuado para empresas em países com instituições políticas inclusivas e amplificado para empresas familiares. Utilizando uma amostra de empresas americanas, descobrimos também que empresas evitam mais impostos quando estão localizadas em estados com laços familiares mais fortes e quando seus CEO são de países com laços familiares mais fortes, indicando que tanto as normas sociais que cercam as empresas como as que são incorporados nos países de origem dos gestores afetam decisões fiscais das empresas. Nosso estudo sugere que a instituição da família fornece uma perspectiva valiosa para compreender as diferenças internacionais em comportamentos corporativos.

摘要

国际商务研究既有文献研究了制度环境如何影响公司决策。我们通过调查家庭 (人类社会的基本制度) 与公司税务决策之间未经探索的联系来补充这一文献。运用社会规范和道德界限演变的理论, 我们认为社会中的家庭关系强度通过缩小道德责任范围使企业避税增加。我们通过使用来自 44 个国家的大量的公司样本进行回归分析来证实这一论点。此外, 家族关系对避税的积极影响对于具有包容性政治制度的国家的企业来说会减弱, 而对家族企业来说则会放大。使用美国公司的样本, 我们还发现, 当公司位于家庭关系较强的州以及首席执行官来自家庭关系较牢固的国家时, 公司会避免更多的税收, 这表明公司周围的社会规范和管理者原籍国的社会规范都会影响公司的税收决策。我们的研究表明, 家庭制度为理解企业行为的国际差异提供了一个有价值的视角。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A large literature focuses on the behaviors of family firms (Gedajlovic, Carney, Chrisman, & Kellermanns, 2012). In contrast, our study focuses on the impact of family ties at the society level. The effect generated by society-level family ties differs from that coming from family control of firms. First, family control at the firm level affects family firms, while the strength of family ties in a society affects the behaviors of all types of firms embedded in that environment. Second, comparing family firms and non-family firms in a given country does not account for the fact that there is heterogeneity in the strengths of familistic values across societies. Third, family firms are complex organizations that are different from non-family firms in several separate dimensions (Calabro, Chrisman, & Kano, 2022; Gedajlovic et al., 2012). In contrast, society-level family ties affect firm behaviors by operating as an informal institutional factor fostering shared values and norms in the environment in which firms are embedded.

  2. We provide empirical evidence that the strength of family ties in a society reduces individuals’ tax morale. See Online Appendix Table OA1.

  3. We determine the location of a firm by the location of the firm’s headquarter.

  4. Since the number of observations differs across different waves, averaging across all observations for each country implies that large waves are given more weights than small waves. We obtain similar regression results when we first average at the country-wave level and then average the resulting means across waves for each country. See Online Appendix Table OA2.

  5. Atwood et al. (2012) use pre-tax income before exceptional items instead of pre-tax income minus special items. We modify their measure of PTEBX to extend our sample to 2020.

  6. We also consider several alternative measures of inclusive political institutions and report the corresponding results in Online Appendix Tables OA7 and OA10.

  7. As the three measures of inclusive political institutions in Table 3 are highly correlated with each other, in the remaining empirical analyses we focus on the effects of Voice & accountability for brevity. The results using the other two measures are reported in Online Appendix Tables OA, OA11, and OA12.

  8. We check the robustness of the instrumental variable results by including additional cultural dimensions and find that our results hold. See Online Appendix Table OA14.

  9. After including a number of additional control variables, we still find significant positive coefficients on the two alternative measures of family ties. See Online Appendix Table OA15.

  10. We also consider the amount of taxes avoided as an alternative measure of corporate tax avoidance and report the corresponding results in Online Appendix Table OA16.

References

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. 2012. Why nations fail: Origins of power, poverty and prosperity. New York: Crown Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & Giuliano, P. 2011. Family ties and political participation. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(5): 817–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & Giuliano, P. 2014. Family ties. Handbook of Economic Growth, 2: 177–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang, J. B., & Fredriksson, P. G. 2017. Wheat agriculture and family ties. European Economic Review, 100: 236–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, J. D., & Krueger, A. B. 2001. Instrumental variables and the search for identification: From supply and demand to natural experiments. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4): 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arregle, J. L., Hitt, M. A., & Mari, I. 2019. A missing link in family firms’ internationalization research: Family structures. Journal of International Business Studies, 50: 809–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwood, T. J., Drake, M. S., Myers, J. N., & Myers, L. A. 2012. Home country tax system characteristics and corporate tax avoidance: International evidence. The Accounting Review, 87(6): 1831–1860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bame-Aldred, C. W., Cullen, J. B., Martin, K. D., & Parboteeah, K. P. 2013. National culture and firm-level tax evasion. Journal of Business Research, 66(3): 390–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banfield, E. C. 1958. The moral basis of a backward society. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T., Lin, C., & Ma, Y. 2014. Why do firms evade taxes? The role of information sharing and financial sector outreach. The Journal of Finance, 69(2): 763–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belnap, A., Hoopes, J. L., & Wilde, J. H. 2023. Who really matters in corporate tax? Journal of Accounting and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2023.101609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Larraza-Kintana, M. 2010. Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less? Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1): 82–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birhanu, A. G., & Gambardella, A. 2023. To commercialize inside or outside of the firm: Behavioral considerations in patent exploitation by family firms. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabro, A., Chrisman, J. J., & Kano, L. 2022. Family-owned multinational enterprises in the post-pandemic global economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(5): 920–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chacar, A. S., Newburry, W., & Vissa, B. 2010. Bringing institutions into performance persistence research: Exploring the impact of product, financial, and labor market institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 41: 1119–1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. 2010. Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1): 41–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P. 2005. Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5): 555–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. 2004. Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1): 591–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobham, A., & Janský, P. 2018. Global distribution of revenue loss from corporate tax avoidance: re-estimation and country results. Journal of International Development, 30(2): 206–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa-Font, J. 2010. Family ties and the crowding out of long-term care insurance. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 26(4): 691–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dammon, R. M., & Senbet, L. W. 1988. The effect of taxes and depreciation on corporate investment and financial leverage. The Journal of Finance, 43(2): 357–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dau, L. A., Chacar, A. S., Lyles, M. A., & Li, J. 2022. Informal institutions and international business: Toward an integrative research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(6): 985–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. 2008. Long-run corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review, 83(1): 61–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, L. 2010. Letter from the Editor-in-Chief: Lifting the veil on how institutions matter in IB research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2): 175–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisman, R., & Miguel, E. 2007. Corruption, norms, and legal enforcement: Evidence from diplomatic parking tickets. Journal of Political Economy, 115(6): 1020–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, M. M., Lynch, L. J., & Rego, S. O. 2009. Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting. The Accounting Review, 84(2): 467–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, J., Mayer, C., Volpin, P., & Wagner, H. F. 2012. The life cycle of family ownership: International evidence. The Review of Financial Studies, 25(6): 1675–1712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gande, A., John, K., Nair, V. B., & Senbet, L. W. 2020. Taxes, institutions, and innovation: Theory and international evidence. Journal of International Business Studies, 51: 1413–1442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gedajlovic, E., & Carney, M. 2010. Markets, hierarchies, and families: Toward a transaction cost theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(6): 1145–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gedajlovic, E., Carney, M., Chrisman, J. J., & Kellermanns, F. W. 2012. The adolescence of family firm research: Taking stock and planning for the future. Journal of Management, 38(4): 1010–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentili, E., Masiero, G., & Mazzonna, F. 2017. The role of culture in long-term care arrangement decisions. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 143: 186–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graafland, J., & Noorderhaven, N. 2020. Culture and institutions: How economic freedom and long-term orientation interactively influence corporate social responsibility. Journal of International Business Studies, 51: 1034–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. 2013. Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In Advances in experimental social psychology: vol. 47, pp. 55–130. Academic Press.

  • Graham, J. R., Hanlon, M., Shevlin, T., & Shroff, N. 2014. Incentives for tax planning and avoidance: Evidence from the field. The Accounting Review, 89(3): 991–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greif, A., & Tabellini, G. 2017. The clan and the corporation: Sustaining cooperation in China and Europe. Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(1): 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. 2010. A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3): 127–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, F. 2011. Econometrics. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henisz, W., & Swaminathan, A. 2008. Institutions and international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4): 537–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillenbrand, C., Money, K. G., Brooks, C., & Tovstiga, N. 2019. Corporate tax: What do stakeholders expect? Journal of Business Ethics, 158: 403–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage Publications.

  • Jaskiewicz, P., Combs, J. G., Shanine, K. K., & Kacmar, K. M. 2017. Introducing the family: A review of family science with implications for management research. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1): 309–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, P. 2020. Does private country-by-country reporting deter tax avoidance and income shifting? Evidence from BEPS Action Item 13. Journal of Accounting Research, 58(2): 333–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanagaretnam, K., Lee, J., Lim, C. Y., & Lobo, G. 2018. Societal trust and corporate tax avoidance. Review of Accounting Studies, 23(4): 1588–1628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. A. 1990. Tax policy: A survey. The Economic Journal, 100(399): 18–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, J. N. 2019. Transparency, information shocks, and tax avoidance. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(2): 1146–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Kim, Y., & Zhou, J. 2021. Time encoding in languages and investment efficiency. Management Science, 67(4): 2609–2629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlhase, S., & Pierk, J. 2020. The effect of a worldwide tax system on tax management of foreign subsidiaries. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(8): 1312–1330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovermann, J., & Wendt, M. 2019. Tax avoidance in family firms: Evidence from large private firms. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 15(2): 145–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1999. The quality of government. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15(1): 222–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landry, S., Deslandes, M., & Fortin, A. 2013. Tax aggressiveness, corporate social responsibility, and ownership structure. Journal of Accounting, Ethics & Public Policy, 14(3): 611–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, S. T., Omer, T. C., & Sharp, N. Y. 2012. The impact of religion on financial reporting irregularities. The Accounting Review, 87(2): 645–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miroshnychenko, I., De Massis, A., Miller, D., & Barontini, R. 2021. Family business growth around the world. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(4): 682–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., & Yeung, B. 2004. Family control and the rent–seeking society. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4): 391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. 1991. Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1): 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rego, S. O., & Wilson, R. 2012. Equity risk incentives and corporate tax aggressiveness. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(3): 775–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholes, M. S., Wolfson, M. A., Erickson, M., Maydew, E. L., & Shevlin, T. 2009. Taxes and business strategy: A planning approach: 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, J. F. 2022. Kin networks and institutional development. The Economic Journal, 132(647): 2578–2613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, J. F., Bahrami-Rad, D., Beauchamp, J. P., & Henrich, J. 2019. The Church, intensive kinship, and global psychological variation. Science, 366(6466): eaau5141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staiger, D., & Stock, J. H. 1997. Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica, 65(3): 557–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steijvers, T., & Niskanen, M. 2014. Tax aggressiveness in private family firms: An agency perspective. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(4): 347–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabellini, G. 2008. Institutions and culture. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(2–3): 255–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, E. 1990. L’invention de l’Europe. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. 2015. Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Cengage Learning.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Lemma Senbet (the Editor) and two anonymous referees for constructive comments and valuable suggestions. Niu acknowledges the financial support received from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71904160), the Humanities and Social Science Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China (23XJC790005), and the Higher Education Discipline Innovation Project of China (No. B16040). Wang acknowledges the financial support received from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71971046; No. 72172029). Zhou acknowledges the financial support received from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 72273098) and the Humanities and Social Science Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China (No. 21YJC790172). Gan acknowledges the financial support received from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 72303073) and Huazhong University of Science and Technology Double First-Class Funds for Humanities and Social Science. All authors contributed equally to this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Zhou.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Accepted by Lemma Senbet, Area Editor, 1 February 2024. This article has been with the authors for four revisions.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 1318 kb)

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 11.

Table 11 Definitions and sources of key variables

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niu, G., Wang, Y., Zhou, Y. et al. Family ties and corporate tax avoidance. J Int Bus Stud (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-024-00692-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-024-00692-9

Keywords

Navigation