Skip to main content
Log in

Individualism and stock price crash risk

  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Employing a sample of 26,473 firms across 42 countries from 1990 to 2013, we find that firms located in countries with higher individualism have higher stock price crash risk. Furthermore, individualism can be transmitted by foreign investors from overseas markets to influence local firms’ crash risk, and can exacerbate the impact of firm risk taking and earnings management on crash risk. Moreover, the positive relation between individualism and crash risk is amplified during the global financial crisis and attenuated by enhanced country-level financial information transparency and the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards.

Résumé

Utilisant un échantillon de 26 473 entreprises dans 42 pays de 1990 à 2013, nous constatons que les entreprises situées dans des pays où l’individualisme est fort font face à un risque plus élevé d’effondrement des cours boursiers. Par ailleurs, l’individualisme peut être transmis par des investisseurs étrangers venant de marchés extérieurs pour influencer le risque de crash des entreprises locales, et il peut accentuer l’impact de la prise de risque et de la gestion des gains sur le risque de crash. En outre, la relation positive entre l’individualisme et le risque de crash s’est amplifiée au cours de la crise financière mondiale et elle s’est atténuée grâce à la transparence accrue des informations financières au niveau des pays et à l’adoption de normes internationales d’informations financières.

Resumen

Usando una muestra de 26.473 empresas en 42 países entre 1990 y 2013, encontramos que las empresas ubicadas en países con mayor individualismo tienen mayores riesgos descalabro bursátil. Además, el individualismo puede ser transmitido por inversionistas extranjeros de mercados extranjeros para influenciar el riesgo de descalabro de las empresas locales, y puede exacerbar el impacto de tomar riesgos por parte de las empresas y la gestión de las ganancias de riesgo de descalabro. Así mismo, la relación positiva entre individualismo y riesgo de descalabro se amplifica durante la crisis financiera global y es atenuada mediante el mejoramiento de la transparencia de la información financiera a nivel país y la adopción de Normas Internacionales de Información Financiera.

Resumo

Empregando uma amostra de 26.473 empresas em 42 países, de 1990 a 2013, descobrimos que as empresas localizadas em países com maior individualismo têm maior risco de quebra do preço das ações. Além disso, o individualismo pode ser transmitido por investidores estrangeiros de mercados externos para influenciar o risco de quebra das empresas locais, e pode exacerbar o impacto da exposição ao risco da empresa e do gerenciamento de resultados no risco de quebra. Além disso, a relação positiva entre o individualismo e o risco de quebra é amplificada durante a crise financeira global e atenuada pela maior transparência de informações financeiras em nível nacional e pela adoção das Normas Internacionais de Contabilidade.

摘要

使用1990年到2013年间在42个国家的26,473家公司的样本,我们发现位于较高个人主义的国家的公司具有较高的股价崩盘风险。另外,个人主义可以通过来自海外市场的外国投资者传播,以影响本地公司的崩盘风险,并可能加剧公司风险承担和盈利管理对崩盘风险的影响。而且,个人主义和崩盘风险之间的正相关的关系在全球金融危机期间得到放大,并随着国家级的财务信息透明度的提高和国际财务报告标准的采用而减弱。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahern, K. R., Daminelli, D., & Fracassi, C. 2015. Lost in translation? The effect of cultural values on mergers around the world. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1): 165–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bae, K.-H., Chan, K., & Ng, A. 2004. Investibility and return volatility. Journal of Financial Economics, 71(2): 239–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, R. 2009. Market and political/regulatory perspectives on the recent accounting scandals. Journal of Accounting Research, 47(2): 277–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benmelech, E., Kandel, E., & Veronesi, P. 2010. Stock-based compensation and CEO (dis)incentives. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(4): 1769–1820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beugelsdijk, S., Kostova, T., & Roth, K. 2017. An overview of Hofstede-inspired country-level culture research in international business since 2006. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(1): 30–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleck, A., & Liu, X. 2007. Market transparency and the accounting regime. Journal of Accounting Research, 45(2): 229–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boubakri, N., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C., & Saffar, W. 2016. National culture and privatization: The relationship between collectivism and residual state ownership. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(2): 170–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braguinsky, S., & Mityakov, S. 2015. Foreign corporations and the culture of transparency: Evidence from Russian administrative data. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1): 139–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, R. M., Piotroski, J. D., & Smith, A. J. 2004. What determines corporate transparency? Journal of Accounting Research, 42(2): 207–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callen, J. L., & Fang, X. 2015. Religion and stock price crash risk. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 37(8): 3047–3063.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Hong, H., & Stein, J. C. 2001. Forecasting crashes: Trading volume, past returns, and conditional skewness in stock prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 61(3): 345–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J., & Contractor, F. J. 2016. Choosing an appropriate alliance governance mode: The role of institutional, cultural and geographical distance in international research & development (R&D) collaborations. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(2): 210–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chui, A. C., Titman, S., & Wei, K. J. 2010. Individualism and momentum around the world. Journal of Finance, 65(1): 361–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, N., & Nahata, R. 2016. Cultural differences and cross-border venture capital syndication. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(2): 140–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb, S. S., Kalev, P. S., & Marisetty, V. B. 2010. Are price limits really bad for equity markets? Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(10): 2462–2471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBacker, J., Heim, B. T., & Tran, A. 2015. Importing corruption culture from overseas: Evidence from corporate tax evasion in the United States. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1): 122–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review 70: 193–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFond, M. L., Hung, M., Li, S., & Li, Y. 2014. Does mandatory IFRS adoption affect crash risk? The Accounting Review, 90(1): 265–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devinney, T. M., & Hohberger, J. 2017. The past is prologue: Moving on from Culture’s Consequences. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(1): 48–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dezsö, C. L., & Ross, D. G. 2012. Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9): 1072–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, D. W., & Verrecchia, R. E. 1991. Disclosure, liquidity, and the cost of capital. Journal of Finance, 46(4): 1325–1359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimson, E. 1979. Risk measurement when shares are subject to infrequent trading. Journal of Financial Economics, 7(2): 197–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. 2003. Courts. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(2): 453–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., McLiesh, C., & Shleifer, A. 2007. Private credit in 129 countries. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2): 299–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eun, C. S., Wang, L., & Xiao, S. C. 2015. Culture and R2. Journal of Financial Economics, 115(2): 283–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R., & Chalmers, A. 2008. Is optimism universal? A meta-analytical investigation of optimism levels across 22 nations. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(5): 378–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. 2005. The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1): 3–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, S. J. 1988. Towards a theory of cultural influence on the development of accounting systems internationally. Abacus, 24(1): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C., Li, K., & Shao, L. 2017. National culture: The missing country-level determinant of corporate governance. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(6): 740–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, S., Kang, T., Salter, S., & Yoo, Y. K. 2010. A cross-country study on the effects of national culture on earnings management. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(1): 123–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heine, S. J. 2003. An exploration of cultural variation in self-enhancing and self-improving motivations. In V. Murphy-Berman & J. J. Berman (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 49. Cross-cultural differences in perspectives on the self (pp. 101–128). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. 1999. Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 106(4): 766–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. H. 1980. Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? Organizational Dynamics, 9(1): 42–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. H. 2001. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. H. 2005. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. H. 2006. What did GLOBE really measure? Researchers’ minds versus respondents’ minds. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6): 882–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, K., & Moskowitz, T. J. 2005. Market frictions, price delay, and the cross-section of expected returns. Review of Financial Studies, 18(3): 981–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. 2004. Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, A. P., Marcus, A. J., & Tehranian, H. 2009. Opaque financial reports, R2, and crash risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(1): 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ince, O. S., & Porter, R. B. 2006. Individual equity return data from Thomson Datastream: Handle with care! Journal of Financial Research, 29(4): 463–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. 1995. Understanding human resource management in the context of organizations and their environments. Annual Review of Psychology, 46(1): 237–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, L., & Myers, S. C. 2006. R2 around the world: New theory and new tests. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(2): 257–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, K., Saunders, A., & Senbet, L. W. 2000. A theory of bank regulation and management compensation. Review of Financial Studies, 13(1): 95–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, K., & Senbet, L. W. 1998. Corporate governance and board effectiveness. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(4): 371–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashima, E. S., & Kashima, Y. 1998. Culture and language: The case of cultural dimensions and personal pronoun use. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(3): 461–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. 2010. The worldwide governance indicators: A summary of methodology, data and analytical issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430.

  • Kim, J.-B., Li, Y., & Zhang, L. 2011a. CFOs versus CEOs: Equity incentives and crashes. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(3): 713–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.-B., Li, Y., & Zhang, L. 2011b. Corporate tax avoidance and stock price crash risk: Firm-level analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(3): 639–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.-B., Wang, Z., & Zhang, L. 2016. CEO overconfidence and stock price crash risk. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(4): 1720–1749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, B. L., Lowe, K. B., & Gibson, C. B. 2006. A quarter century of Culture’s Consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3): 285–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, B. L., Lowe, K. B., & Gibson, C. B. 2017. A retrospective on Culture’s Consequences: The 35-year journey. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(1): 12–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, S. P., Shu, S., & Wysocki, P. D. 2009. Do managers withhold bad news? Journal of Accounting Research, 47(1): 241–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6): 1113–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 1999. The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15(1): 222–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, M., Lins, K. V., & Maffett, M. 2012. Transparency, liquidity, and valuation: International evidence on when transparency matters most. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(3): 729–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuz, C., & Verrecchia, R. E. 2000. The economic consequences of increased disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 38(Supplement): 91–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, D., Nguyen, Q. N., Pham, P. K., & Wei, S. X. 2011. Large foreign ownership and firm-level stock return volatility in emerging markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(4): 1127–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., & Harrison, J. R. 2008. National culture and the composition and leadership structure of boards of directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5): 375–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, K., Griffin, D., Yue, H., & Zhao, L. 2013. How does culture influence corporate risk-taking? Journal of Corporate Finance, 23: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Licht, A. N., Goldschmidt, C., & Schwartz, S. H. 2007. Culture rules: The foundations of the rule of law and other norms of governance. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(4): 659–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lisak, A., Erez, M., Sui, Y., & Lee, C. 2016. The positive role of global leaders in enhancing multicultural team innovation. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(6): 655–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. 1991. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2): 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, G., Pinegar, M., & Thorley, S. 1996. Delayed reaction to good news and the cross-autocorrelation of portfolio returns. Journal of Finance, 51(3): 889–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, R., & Andrews, T. G. 2009. International management: Culture and beyond (4th ed.). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, M. A. 2009. Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22(1): 435–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. 2005. Building organization theory from first principles: The self-enhancement motive and understanding power and influence. Organization Science, 16(4): 372–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, R. S., & Rogovsky, N. 1998. Understanding compensation practice variations across firms: The impact of national culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1): 159–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. 1994. Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. 2004. Mapping and interpreting cultural differences around the world. In H. Vinken, J. Soeters, & P. Ester (Eds.), Comparing cultures: Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective (pp. 43–73). Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao, L., Kwok, C. C., & Guedhami, O. 2010. National culture and dividend policy. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8): 1391–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, L., Kwok, C. C., & Zhang, R. 2013. National culture and corporate investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(7): 745–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J. I., Licht, A. N., & Schwartz, S. H. 2011. Egalitarianism and international investment. Journal of Financial Economics, 102(3): 621–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spolaore, E., & Wacziarg, R. 2009. The diffusion of development. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(2): 469–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stulz, R. M., & Williamson, R. 2003. Culture, openness, and finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 70(3): 313–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. 2001. Individualism-collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69(6): 907–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verrecchia, R. E. 2001. Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1): 97–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbach, M. S. 1988. Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 20: 431–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All authors have equal contributions to this article. We are grateful to Lemma Senbet (the editor), two anonymous reviewers, and an additional resource person for their insightful and constructive comments. For helpful suggestions, we thank Chen, John Goodell, Ambrus Kecskés, Dong Wook Lee, and Hongping Tan; conference participants at the 2016 AsianFA Annual Conference, the 2016 Young Finance Scholars’ Conference, the 2016 INFINITI Conference on International Finance, the 2017 FMA Asia/Pacific Conference, and the 2017 EFMA Annual Conference; and seminar participants at the universities of Edinburgh, Essex, Glasgow, Jinan, and Sun Yat-sen. Zhe An acknowledges the financial support from the New Academic Staff Support Grant of Monash University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donghui Li.

Additional information

Supplementary information accompanies this article on the Journal of International Business Studies website (www.palgrave.com/journals).

Accepted by Lemma Senbet, Area Editor, 26 February 2018. This article has been with the authors for three revisions.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 55 kb)

Appendix: Variable Definitions and Data Sources

Appendix: Variable Definitions and Data Sources

Variable

Description

NCSKEW

The negative skewness of firm-specific weekly returns over a given year. Source: Datastream

DUVOL

The natural logarithm of the ratio of the standard deviation of down-week firm-specific weekly returns to the standard deviation of up-week firm-specific weekly returns over a given year. A firm-week is defined as a down (an up) week if the firm-specific weekly return is below (above) its annual mean. Source: Datastream

COUNT

The number of crash weeks minus the number of jump weeks over a given year. A firm-week is defined as a crash (jump) week if the firm-specific weekly return is 3.09 standard deviations below (above) its annual mean. Source: Datastream

IDV

The degree to which individuals focus on themselves and their immediate families over their societal groups. Source: Hofstede (2005)

SIGMA

The standard deviation of firm-specific weekly returns over a given year. Source: Datastream

ACCM

The three-year moving sum of the absolute value of discretionary accruals, where discretionary accruals are calculated based on the modified Jones model (Dechow et al., 1995). Source: Worldscope

RET

The mean of firm-specific weekly returns over a given year, multiplied by 100. Source: Datastream

DTURN

The difference between the average monthly stock turnover over the current year and that over the previous year, where monthly stock turnover is calculated as monthly trading volume scaled by the number of shares outstanding during the month. Source: Datastream

LEV

Total debt divided by total assets. Source: Worldscope

ROA

Earnings before interest and taxes divided by total assets. Source: Worldscope

MTB

The ratio of market value to book value of equity. Source: Worldscope

SIZE

The natural logarithm of the firm’s market capitalization (in constant 2005 US$). Source: Worldscope

GDP/CAPITA

The natural logarithm of the country’s GDP per capita (in constant 2005 US$). Source: World Development Indicators

GDP_GROWTH

The country’s annual GDP growth rate. Source: World Development Indicators

MCAP

The country’s stock market capitalization scaled by its GDP. Source: World Development Indicators

STKTURN

Total value of stocks traded divided by the country’s stock market capitalization. Source: World Development Indicators

CR

The country’s creditor rights index. Source: Djankov et al. (2007)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

An, Z., Chen, Z., Li, D. et al. Individualism and stock price crash risk. J Int Bus Stud 49, 1208–1236 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0150-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0150-z

Keywords

Navigation