Skip to main content
Log in

The role of net stable funding ratio on the bank lending channel: evidence from European Union

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Banking Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is motivated by the ongoing debate about the Basel III impact on the efficient functioning of the banking sector. We empirically examine the effect that the implementation of the net stable funding ratio has on real economy. Using data from the EU banking sector, we conduct a retrospective analysis by simulating and investigating historically the NSFR index and its role in the implementation of a common monetary policy. We intervene on the traditional bank lending channel of Bernanke and Blinder (Am Econ Rev 82:901–921, 1992) by incorporating the interaction term between liquidity and interest rates. The analysis is conducted both at an aggregated loan supply level and by loan category while it incorporates, additionally to the interaction term, conventional asset pricing approaches with the adoption of self-financing trading strategies detecting nonlinearities in the relationship between liquidity provisions and bank lending channel. According to our findings, there is evidence of a heterogeneous response of financial intermediaries’ loan supply (due to changes of interest rates) across different NSFR levels. Banks with higher NSFR respond positively to an interest rate increase, by restructuring their loans’ portfolios to achieve higher risk-adjusted returns, conditional on the presence of an efficient asset allocation. On the contrary, low NSFR banks reduce loan supply as a response to higher interest rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angelini, P., et al. 2011. Basel III: Long-term impact on economic performance and fluctuations. BIS Working Papers, No 338.

  2. Bank of International Settlements. 2012. Basel III regulator consistency assessment (Level 2) Preliminary report: European Union, October 2012.

  3. Bank of International Settlements. 2013. Basel III: The liquidity coverage ratio and liquidity risk monitoring tools, January 2013.

  4. Bank of International Settlements. 2014. “Consultative Document”, Basel III: The net stable funding ratio, April 2014

  5. Bernanke, B., and A. Blinder. 1992. The federal fund rate and the channels of monetary transmission. American Economic Review 82: 901–921.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blundell, R., and S. Bond. 1998. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 87: 115–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boot, A.W., and A.V. Thakor. 1993. Self-interested bank regulation. The American Economic Review 83: 206–212.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, L., et al. 2017. The Basel III net stable funding ratio adjustment speed and systemic risk. Research in International Business and Finance 39: 169–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, X. 2007. Banking deregulation and credit risk: Evidence from the EU. Journal of Financial Stability 2: 356–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chiaramonte, L., and B. Casu. 2017. Capital and liquidity ratios and financial distress. Evidence from the European Banking Industry 49: 138–161.

    Google Scholar 

  11. DeYoung, R., and K.Y. Jang. 2016. Do banks actively manage their liquidity? Journal of Banking & Finance 66: 143–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dietrich, A., et al. 2014. The good and bad news about the new liquidity rules of Basel III in Western European countries. Journal of Banking & Finance 44: 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Freixas, X., and A.M. Santomero. 2003. An overall perspective on banking regulation. UPF, Economics and Business Working Paper, No. 664.

  14. Funk, R.J., and D. Hirschman. 2014. Derivatives and deregulation, financial innovation and the demise of Glass–Steagall. Administrative Science Quarterly 59: 669–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gobat, J., et al. 2014. The net stable funding ratio: Impact and issues for consideration. International Monetary Fund Working Paper, WP/14/106.

  16. Härle, P., et al. 2010. Basel III and European banking: Its impact, how banks might respond, and the challenges of implementation. EMEA Banking, 16–17.

  17. Hong, H., et al. 2014. The information content of Basel III liquidity risk measures. Journal of Financial Stability 15: 91–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jobst, A. 2014. Measuring systemic risk-adjusted liquidity (SRL)—A model approach. Journal of Banking & Finance 45: 270–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Joskow, P.L., and R.G. Noll. 1981. Regulation in theory and practice: An overview. In Studies in public regulation, ed. G. Fromm. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kalish, L., III., and R.A. Gilbert. 1973. The influence of bank regulation on the operating efficiency of commercial banks. The Journal of Finance 28: 1287–1301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Khan, M.S., et al. 2016. Funding liquidity and bank risk taking. Journal of Banking & Finance 82: 203–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim, D., and W. Sohn. 2017. The effect of bank capital on lending: Does liquidity matter? Journal of Banking & Finance 77: 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. King, M.R. 2013. The Basel III net stable funding ratio and bank net interest margins. Journal of Banking & Finance 37: 4144–4156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Parker, D. 1999. Regulation of privatised public utilities in the UK: Performance and governance. International Journal of public sector management 12: 213–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Peek, Joe, and Eric Posengren. 1995. Bank regulation and the credit crunch. Journal of Banking and Finance 19: 679–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Perotti, E., and J. Suarez. 2011. A Pigovian approach to liquidity regulation. De Nederlandsche Bank Working Paper No. 291.

  27. Santomero, A.M. 1984. Modeling the banking firm: A survey. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 16: 576–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Uche, C.U. 2001. The theory of regulation: A review article. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance 9: 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wei, X., et al. 2017. The impacts of net stable funding ratio requirement on Banks’ choices of debt maturity. Journal of Banking & Finance 82: 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yan, M., et al. 2012. A cost–benefit analysis of Basel III: Some evidence from the UK. International Review of Financial Analysis 25: 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vasilios Sogiakas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4 and Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The total number of banks considered in the analysis accounting for the filters with respect to the EU-13 countries, the bank specialization, the size and the NSFR availability

Fig. 2
figure 2

The total number of banks considered in the analysis by country

Fig. 3
figure 3

The total number of banks considered in the analysis by specialization

Fig. 4
figure 4

Histogram of pooled NSFR and NSFR per annum

Table 1 List of variables with assigned weights (%) for the calculation of the NSFR according to BCBC
Table 2 List of variables with assigned weights (%) for the calculation of the approximation of NSFR
Table 3 Descriptive statistics of the core and control variables of the data
Table 4 Descriptive statistics of the NSFR factor across core and periphery countries and between the pre- and post-crisis periods
Table 5 Descriptive statistics of the NSFR across countries
Table 6 Descriptive Statistics of the NSFR by loan type
Table 7 Correlation matrix of the core and control variables
Table 8 The role of the NSFR on the bank lending channel
Table 9 The effect of financial crisis on the role of NSFR on the bank lending channel
Table 10 Bank lending channel and the role of NSFR on real economy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Papadamou, S., Sogiakas, D., Sogiakas, V. et al. The role of net stable funding ratio on the bank lending channel: evidence from European Union. J Bank Regul 22, 287–307 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-021-00144-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-021-00144-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation