Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Insider perspectives on European banking challenges in the post-crisis regulation environment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Banking Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to make a highly topical and practical contribution by investigating the interplay between capital and liquidity risk management and managerial decision making in banking, following the Basel III introduction for enhancing the safeguards against systemic risk. Specifically, we attempt to gauge the experience and assess the degree of tensions among banking practitioners’ perspectives on the reformed banking liquidity practice and risk-capital management in light of the newly introduced increased capital and liquidity requirements, which are to become fully and unilaterally effective as of 2019. As currently seen the liquidity provision requirement has become a distinct form of ‘sharing’ financial risks in the global economy, which includes the supply of capital from its issuers. This article reviews the issue from a European perspective attempting to gain insight into: (1) the suggestion that the new regulations lack internal consistency owed to their complexity, which creates the potential for both inter- and intra-company regulatory capital arbitrage and credit constriction; and (2) the suggestion that increased capital and liquidity requirements may have a significant impact on bank behaviour and/or certain business model segments. Both of the above can potentially distort managerial behaviour through altering managerial incentives and hence fail to adequately regulate bank behaviour. With regard to the liquidity requirements, whilst we do not attempt to quantifiably assess the degree to which liquidity regulations (the liquidity coverage ratio in particular—LCR henceforth) affect returns on equity/assets to banks, our interviews are used as a triangulating measure for complementing quantitative studies that can provide a further insight into the perception of affecting managerial incentives. We aim to add to, update, and enrich the studies around the vital research question of whether the new regulation and liquidity standards can achieve their ultimate objective of upholding financial soundness and stability. Therefore, this research is important to complete the extant literature on updated insiders’ perspectives that investigate the effectiveness of the new regulatory framework imminently to be fully applicable by 2019. Where the views of the professionals who have voiced their concerns, support, and/or proposals provide for a material contribution, these have also been provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source: Standard and Poor’s calculation, BIS, ECB, FED

Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Flannery, M., and K. Rangan. 2008. What caused the bank capital build-up of the 1990s? Review of Finance 12(2): 391–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen, F., E. Carletti, and D. Gale. 2009. Interbank market liquidity and central bank intervention. Journal of Monetary Economics 56(5): 639–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lastra, R.M. 2013. Defining forward-looking, judgement-based supervision. Journal of Banking Regulation 14(3/4): 221–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dietrich, A., K. Hess, and G. Wanzenried. 2014. The good and bad news about the new liquidity rules of Basel III in Western European countries. Journal of Banking & Finance 44(3): 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Handorf, W.C. 2014. The cost of bank liquidity. Journal of Banking Regulation 15(1): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aragon, G.O., and P. Strahan. 2012. Hedge funds as liquidity providers: Evidence from the Lehman bankruptcy. Journal of Financial Economics 103(3): 570–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Comerton-Forte, C., T. Hendershott, C.M. Jones, P.C. Moulton, and M.S. Seasholes. 2010. Time variation in liquidity: The role of market-maker inventories and revenues [Electronic version]. Cornell University, School of Hospitality. http://scholarship.sha.cornell.edu/articles/4/. Accessed 15 Jan 2016.

  8. Jylhä, P., and M. Suominen. 2011. Speculative capital and currency carry trades. Journal of Financial Economics 99(1): 60–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Acharya, V., L. Lochstoer, and T. Ramadorai. 2013. Limits to arbitrage and hedging: Evidence from commodity markets. Journal of Financial Economics 109(2): 441–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Arif, A., and A.N. Anees. 2012. Liquidity risk and performance of banking system. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance 20(2): 182–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bordeleau, É., and C. Graham. 2010. The impact of liquidity on bank profitability. Bank of Canada: Financial Stability Department. Working Paper 2010-38, December 2010.

  12. Naceur, S.B., and M. Kandil. 2009. The impact of capital requirements on banks’ cost of intermediation and performance: The case of Egypt. Journal of Economics and Business 61(1): 70–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. VanHoose, D. 2007. Theories of bank behaviour under capital regulation. Journal of Banking & Finance 31(12): 3680–3697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Blackrock. 2016. Addressing market liquidity: A broader perspective on today’s bond markets. Blackrock: Addendum. https://www.blackrock.com/corporate/en-sg/literature/whitepaper/viewpoint-liquidity-bond-markets-broader-perspective-february-2016.pdf. Accessed Nov 2016 (updated and re-issued).

  15. European Banking Authority. 2015. Second report on impact assessment for liquidity measures under Article 509(1) of the CRR. Brussels: EBA Report. https://www.eba.europa.eu/documents/10180/950548/2014+LCR+IA+report.pdf. Accessed 15 Sep 2017.

  16. Standard and Poor’s. 2011. Why Basel III and Solvency II will hurt corporate borrowing in Europe more than in the U.S. Standard and Poor’s: US. http://www.argusdelassurance.com/mediatheque/9/6/2/000011269.pdf. Accessed Sept 27.

  17. Freixas, X. 2010. Post-crisis challenges to bank regulation. Economic Policy 25(62): 375–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Asongu, S.A. 2013. Post-crisis bank liquidity risk management disclosure. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets 5(1): 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tirole, J. 2011. Illiquidity and all its friends. Journal of Economic Literature 49(2): 287–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Clayton, N. 2013. An overview of the inconsistencies of approach in regulating the capital position of banks: Will the United Kingdom step out of line with Europe? Journal of Banking Regulation 14(2): 107–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brammertz, W. 2010. Risk and regulation. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance 18(1): 46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Laker, J. 2010. Global regulatory reforms—An update: Introductory remarks. In Proceedings of the FINSIA financial services conference; 20 October 2010. Sydney: Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority.

  23. King, M. 2010. Banking—From Bagehot to Basel and back again. Speech in the second Bagehot lecture series. New York: Buttowood Gathering.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Akinbami, F. 2013. Is meta-regulation all it’s cracked up to be? The case of UK financial regulation. Journal of Banking Regulation 14(1): 16–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Meszaros, G. 2013. Macroprudential regulation: A contradiction in its own terms. Journal of Banking Regulation 14(2): 164–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ertürk, I. 2016. Financialization, bank business models and the limits of post-crisis bank regulation. Journal of Banking Regulation 17(1/2): 60–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Aldasoro, I., and E. Faia. 2016. Systemic loops and liquidity regulation. Journal of Financial Stability 27(C): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. George, R., and T. Mohan. 2015. Liquidity coverage ratio requirement increases cost of securitization for U.S. banks. The Journal of Structured Finance 20(4): 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kondor, P., and D. Vayanos. 2018. Liquidity risk and the dynamics of arbitrage capital. The Journal of Finance. (forthcoming).

  30. Banerjee, R., and H. Mio. 2014. The impact of liquidity regulation on banks. Basle: Bank for International Settlements. Working Paper No. 470.

  31. European Banking Authority. 2012. New bank liquidity rules: Dangers ahead. Brussels: EBA Report, A Position Paper by EBA’s Banking Stakeholder Group.

  32. Kowalik, M. 2013. Basel liquidity regulation: Was it improved with the 2013 revisions? Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Second Quarter Economic Review 2: 65–87.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Simion, G., U. Rigoni, E. Cavezzali, and A. Veller. 2016. Basel liquidity regulation and credit risk market perception: Evidence from large European banks. In World finance conference in New York; November 9, USA.

  34. Bruno, B., E. Onali, and K. Schaeck. 2018. Bank reaction to bank liquidity regulation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 53(2): 899–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. McIlroy, D.H. 2008. Regulating risk: A measured response to the banking crisis. Journal of Banking Regulation 9(4): 284–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Van den End, J.W., and M. Kruidhof. 2013. Modelling the liquidity ratio as macroprudential instrument. Journal of Banking Regulation 14(2): 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Osborne, M., and W.B. Francis. 2012. Capital requirements and bank behavior in the UK: Are there lessons for international capital standards? Journal of Banking & Finance 36(3): 803–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cerrato, M., M. Choudhry, J. Crosby, and J. Olukuru. 2012. Why do UK banks securitize? University of Glasgow: UK. Glasgow Business School Working Paper, April 26. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2051379.

  39. Loutskina, E. 2011. The role of securitization in bank liquidity and funding management. Journal of Financial Economics 100(3): 663–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Härle, P., E. Lüders, T. Pepanides, S. Pfetsch, T. Poppensieker, and U. Stegemann. 2010. Basel III and European banking: Its impact, how banks might respond and the challenges of implementation. EMEA banking. McKinsey & Company. Working Papers on Risk No. 26.

  41. King, M.R. 2013. The Basel III net stable funding ratio and bank net interest margins. Journal of Banking & Finance 37(11): 4144–4156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Goodhart, C. 2008. The boundary problem in financial regulation. National Institute Economic Review 206(1): 48–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. European Banking Authority. 2016. EBA sees high NPL levels and low profitability as the main risks for EU banks. Risk Assessment of the European Banking System, 02 December https://www.eba.europa.eu/-/eba-sees-high-npl-levels-and-low-profitability-as-the-main-risks-for-eu-banks. Accessed 15 Jan 2017.

  44. Meekings, K., and M.L. Delarue. 2016. Seeking stability in an uncertain world. European banking barometer 2016, 7th ed. New York: Ernst and Young Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Constâncio, V. 2016. Challenges for the European banking industry. In Conference proceedings on European banking industry: What’s next? 7 July 2016. Madrid: University of Navarra.

  46. Aiyar, S., C. Calomiris, and T. Wiedalek. 2014. Does macro-prudential regulation leak? Evidence from a UK policy experiment. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 46(1): 181–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Aiyar, S., C. Calomiris, and T. Wiedalek. 2014b. How does credit supply respond to monetary policy and bank minimum capital requirements? London: Bank of England. Working Paper No. 508.

  48. Mesonnier, J.S., and A. Monks. 2014. Did the EBA capital exercise cause a credit crunch in Euro area? Paris: Banque de France. Working Paper No. 491.

  49. Brun, M., H. Fraisse, and D. Thesmar. 2013. The real effects of bank capital requirements. Paris, France: Banque de France. Débats économiques et financiers. Working Paper No. 8.

  50. Noss, J., and P. Toffano. 2014. Estimating the impact of changes in aggregate bank capital requirements during an upswing. London: Bank of England. Working Paper No. 494.

  51. Goffinet, Y. 2016. European banks: A problem of profitability—but not of liquidity or solvency. Pictet Group, Search Perspectives, February 12. https://perspectives.pictet.com/2016/02/12/european-banks-a-problem-of-profitability-but-not-of-liquidity-or-solvency/. Accessed 22 March 2016.

  52. De Nicolò, G., A. Gamba, and M. Lucchetta. 2014. Microprudential regulation in a dynamic model of banking. Review of Financial Studies 27(7): 2097–2138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Baker, M., and J. Wurgler. 2015. Do strict capital requirements raise the cost of capital? Bank regulation, capital structure, and the low-risk anomaly. American Economic Review 105(5): 315–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Kiesel, F., F. Lüke, and D. Schiereck. 2015. Regulation of uncovered credit default swaps: evidence from the European Union. Journal of Risk Finance 16(10): 425–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. 2016. Literature review on integration of regulatory capital and liquidity instruments. Basel: B.I.S. Working Paper No. 30.

  56. De Nicolò, G. 2015. Revisiting the impact of bank capital requirements on lending and real activities. In Conference proceedings on macro, money and international finance, 26–27 February. Munich: CESifo.

  57. Benczur, P., G. Cannas, J. Cariboni, F. Di Girolamo, S. Maccaferri, and M.P. Giudici. 2017. Evaluating the effectiveness of the new EU bank regulatory framework: A farewell to bail-out? Journal of Financial Stability 33: 207–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Petriaa, N., B. Caprarub, and I. Ihnatovc. 2015. Determinants of banks’ profitability: Evidence from EU 27 banking systems. Procedia Economics and Finance 20: 518–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Hong, H., J.Z. Huang, and D. Wu. 2014. The information content of Basel III liquidity risk measures. Journal of Financial Stability 15: 91–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Bord, V.M., and J.A.C. Santos. 2014. Banks’ liquidity and the cost of liquidity to corporations. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 46(1): 13–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Berger, A.N., and C.H.S. Bouwman. 2013. How does capital affect bank performance during financial crises? Journal of Financial Economics 109(1): 146–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. de Bandt, O., B. Camara, P. Pessarossi, and M. Rose. 2014. Regulatory changes and the cost of equity: Evidence from French banks. Paris: Banque de France. https://acpr.banquefrance.fr/fileadmin/user_upload/acp/publications/Debats_economiques_et_financiers/201403-Regulatory-changes-and-the-cost-of-equity-evidence-from-French-banks.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2017.

  63. Schmaltz, C., S. Pokutta, T. Heidorn, and S. Andrae. 2014. How to make regulators and shareholders happy under Basel III. Journal of Banking and Finance 46(C): 311–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. 2016. Literature review on integration of regulatory capital and liquidity instruments. Basel: Bank for International Settlements. Working Paper No. 30.

  65. KPMG. 2016. The profitability of EU banks: Hard work or a lost cause? KPMG International. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2016/10/the-profitability-of-eu-banks.pdf. Accessed 17 Oct 2017.

  66. Allen, B., K.K. Chan, A. Milne, and S. Thomas. 2012. Basel III: Is the cure worse than the disease? International Review of Financial Analysis 25(C): 159–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Alfon, I., I. Argimon, and P. Bascuñana-Ambrós. 2004. What determines how much capital is held by UK banks and building societies? London: Financial Services Authority. Occasional Working Paper No. 22.

  68. Gray, J. 2016. Behavioural finance and the macroprudential dimension. Journal of Banking Regulation 17(4): 296–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Horváth, R., J. Seidler, and L. Weill. 2012. Bank capital and liquidity creation. Brussels: European Central Bank. Working Paper No. 1497.

  70. Acharya, V.V., and D.R. Skeie. 2011. A model of liquidity hoarding and term premia in inter-bank markets. Journal of Monetary Economics 58(5): 436–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Acharya, V.V., and O. Merrouche. 2012. Precautionary hoarding of liquidity and interbank markets: Evidence from the subprime crisis. Review of Finance 17(1): 107–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Aspachs, O., E. Nier, and M. Tiesset. 2005. Liquidity, banking regulation and the macroeconomy: Evidence on bank liquidity holdings from a panel of UK resident banks. London: London School of Economics. (mimeo 1-26).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  73. Hsieh, H., and S.E. Shannon. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15(9): 1277–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Rubin, H.J., and I.S. Rubin. 1995. Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Hochschild, J.L. 2009. Conducting intensive interviews and elite interviews. In Workshop on interdisciplinary standards for systematic qualitative research. Harvard University: Cambridge.

  76. Gillham, B. 2005. Research interviewing: The range of techniques. Berkshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Accounting, Finance and Informatics, Kingston Business School, Kingston University, Surrey, UK

    Yiannis Anagnostopoulos & Jackie Kabeega

Authors
  1. Yiannis Anagnostopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jackie Kabeega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yiannis Anagnostopoulos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anagnostopoulos, Y., Kabeega, J. Insider perspectives on European banking challenges in the post-crisis regulation environment. J Bank Regul 20, 136–158 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-018-0076-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-018-0076-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation