Abstract
The key assumptions in the debate between MMTers and CMEers are about the relationship between monetary and fiscal institutions. CMEers assume the Treasury and the Fed are independent.MMTersassume either that the Fed is consolidated into the Treasury, or that, whenever the Treasury wants to spend money, the Fed adds reserves to the Treasury’s account at the Fed. MMT is also wrong at the very start in its assumption that the money supply is the instrument of monetary policy; the federal funds rates is. The fact that MMT’s assumptions are wrong means that all the conclusions that follow from them must also be wrong. For example, with respect to crowding out, not only don’t interest rates rise with an increase in government spending in MMT, they actually fall, indeed, all the way to zero! This analysis of the effect of government spending on rates is wildly off the mark. It is also not comforting that the MMT framework would have Congress accept responsibility for the current Fed mandates Nonetheless, MMT has highlighted a central policy question: whether the large spending programs called for to meet unmet social needs can be financed without adverse consequences.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Furman, Jason, and Lawrence H. Summers. 2019. Who’s Afraid of Budget Deficits? How Washington Should End Its Debt Obsession. Foreign Affairs, March/April.
Helfand, Zach. 2019. The Economist Who Believes the Government Should Just Print More Money. The New Yorker, August 20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Taken from a presentation made at the session Modern Monetary Theory: Exploring the Pros and Cons at the NABE annual meeting on October 7, 2019.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meyer, L. MMT: assume a can opener. Bus Econ 55, 18–20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s11369-019-00155-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s11369-019-00155-2