Skip to main content
Log in

Canaries in the Mind: Reflections on Paul Lippmann and the World of Dreams

  • Article
  • Published:
The American Journal of Psychoanalysis Aims and scope

Abstract

Nowhere do we see the beauty of our struggles so clearly as in the world of dreams. This past year saw the passing of one of our most creative and inspiring poets of the world of dreams, Paul Lippmann. In this paper, I speak from and about the world of dreams, recognizing ways in which they call to our attention aspects of experience which, unparsed, leave us caught emotionally. Considered will be the dream itself, its forms and functions, ways in which our emotional tangles within the dream space become visual pictograms. Bion suggested that the purpose of psychoanalysis is to enhance the capacities for feeling, thinking and dreaming. The dreaming process is enhanced by and in the psychoanalytic session. Through the dream work of analyst and analysand, dream elements become more fully elaborated into meaningful symbols that enrich the evolving narratives within the sessions. I will also consider ways in which psychosocial perspectives and psychoanalytic field theory have enhanced our understanding of and ability to make sense of our dreams, providing an enlarged playing field beyond the reconstructive efforts of early psychoanalysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aron, L. (2006). Analytic impasse and the third: Clinical implications of intersubjectivity theory. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87(2), 349–368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bachelard, G. (1958). The poetics of space. M. Jolas (Trans.). New York: Penguin Group. 1964.

  • Baranger, M. (2012). The intrapsychic and the intersubjective in contemporary psychoanalysis. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 21(3), 130–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baranger, M., & Baranger, W. (2008). The analytic situation as a dynamic field. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 89(4), 795–826.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. R. (1961). Experiences in groups and other papers. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. R. (1963). Elements of psycho-analysis. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. R. (1965). Transformations. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. R. (1967). Notes on memory and desire. Psychoanalytic Forum, 23(3), 161–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. R. (1977). Seven servants. Lanham, MD: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. R. (1987). Clinical Seminars and four papers. F. Bion (Ed.) Abingdon: Fleetwood Press 1990.

  • Bion, W. R. (1990). Brazilian Lectures: 1973 São Paolo. 1974 Rio de Janeiro/São Paolo. F. Bion (Ed.). Abingdon: Fleetwood Press.

  • Bion, W. R. (1992). Cogitations. London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunswick, R. M. (1929). A supplement to Freud’s “History of an infantile neurosis.” In The Wolf-Man by the Wolf-Man: The double story of Freud’s most famous case. M. Gardiner (Ed.). (pp. 263–318). New York: Basic Books. 1971.

  • Cassirer, E. (1957). The philosophy of symbolics forms: Volume three: The phenomenology of knowledge. R. Manheim (Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.

  • Charles, M. (2002). Patterns: Building blocks of experience. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, M. (2003). Dreamscapes: Portrayals of rectangular spaces in Doris Lessing’s memoirs of a survivor and in dreams. Psychoanalytic Review, 90(1), 1–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, M. (2006). On dreams: Discussion of Paul Lippmann’s paper “The canary in the mind.” American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 66(2), 131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, M. (2010). When cultures collide: Myth, meaning, and configural space. Modern Psychoanalysis, 34(1), 26–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, M. (April 22, 2010). Panel: “The psychoanalyst as shaman: Notes from the field”, Annual Meeting of APA Division 39, Chicago, IL.

  • Charles, M. (April 16, 2011). Panel: “The psychoanalyst as shaman: Part II: Integrating past and present wisdoms”, Annual Meeting of APA Division 39, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, M. (2019). The dream and the image: Creative transformations in psychoanalytic space. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 79(2), 174–195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, M. (2020). Creative transformations: The establishment, the mystic, and the aesthetic drive. In: M. Brown & R. S. Brown (Eds.). Emancipatory perspectives on madness, (pp. 152–167). London: Routledge.

  • Charles, M. (2022). The Haunting of Hill House: Psyche, soma, and destiny. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 82(1), 1–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Civitarese, G. (2006). Dreams that mirror the session. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87(3), 703–723.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • da Rocha Barros, E. M. (2000). Affect and pictographic image: The constitution of meaning in mental life. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 81(6), 1087–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Rocha Barros, E. M. (2002). An essay on dreaming, psychical working out and working through. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 83(5), 1083–1093.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • da Rocha Barros, E. M., & da Rocha Barros, E. L. (2011). Reflections on the clinical implications of symbolism. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 92(4), 879–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferro, A. (2002a). Narrative derivatives of alpha elements: Clinical implications. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 11(3), 184–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferro, A. (2002b). Some implications of Bion’s thought: The waking dream and narrative derivatives. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 83(3), 597–607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferro, A. (2006). Trauma, reverie, and the field. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 75(4), 1045–1056.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferro, A. (2009). Transformations in dreaming and characters in the psychoanalytic field. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 90(2), 209–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. Standard Edition, Vols. 4–5, (pp. 1–626). London: Hogarth. 1953.

  • Freud, S. (1918). From the history of an infantile neurosis. Standard Edition, Vol. 17, 1-122. London: Hogarth.

  • Froggett, Lynn, Manley, Julian, Roy, & Alastair (2015). The visual matrix method: Imagery and affect in a group-based research setting. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 16(3), Art. 6, Retrieved from: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs150369

  • Galatzer-Levy, R. (2004). Chaotic possibilities: Toward a new model of development. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 85(2), 419–441.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galatzer-Levy, R. (2009). Good vibrations: Analytic process as coupled oscillations. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 90(5), 983–1007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallese, V. (2013). Mirror neurons, embodied simulation and a second-person approach to mindreading. Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 49(10), 2954–2956.

  • Gardiner, M. (1971). The Wolf-Man by the Wolf-Man: The double story of Freud’s most famous case. Basic Books. 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. (1975). The analyst, symbolization and absence in the analytic setting (on changes in analytic practice and analytic experience): In memory of D.W. Winnicott. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 56(1), 1–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, J. (1979). The dream and the underworld. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. (2018). Psychoanalytic field theory. In: M. Charles (Ed.), Introduction to contemporary psychoanalysis: Defining terms and building bridges (pp. 145–164). London: Routledge.

  • Katz, S. M. (2013). General psychoanalytic field theory: Its structure and applications to psychoanalytic perspectives. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 33(3), 277–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, S. M. (2017). Contemporary psychoanalytic field theory: Stories, dreams and metaphor. Abington, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, S. M., Cassorla, R., & Civitarese, G. (Eds.). (2016). Advances in contemporary psychoanalytic field theory: Concept and future development. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1966). The function and field of speech and language in psychoanalysis. In: Écrits. pp. 292–325, A. Sheridan (Trans.). New York: W. W. Norton.

  • Lacan, J. (1973). The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis, J.-A. Miller (Ed.), A. Sheridan (Trans.). New York: W. W. Norton. 1981. [Originally published in French, 1973]

  • Lacan, J. (1974–1975). Jacques Lacan in Ireland Seminar XII. RSI, C. Gallagher (Trans.). Retrieved from: http://www.lacaninireland.com/web/published-works/seminars.

  • Lacan, J. (2005). The sinthome: The seminars of Jacques Lacan, Book XXIII, J.-A. Miller (Ed.), A. R. Price (Trans.). Cambridge, UK & Malden, MA: Polity Press. [Originally published in French in 2005; in English, 2016.]

  • Laplanche, J. (1995). Seduction, persecution, revelation. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 76(4), 663–682.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laplanche, J. (2007). Closing and opening of the dream: Must chapter VII be rewritten? T. A. Pepper & M. Reinberg (Trans.). In: C. Liu, J. Mowitt, T. Pepper, and J. Spicer (Eds.), The dreams of interpretation: A century down the royal road (pp. 177–196). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Lippmann, P. (1998). On the private and social nature of dreams. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 34(2), 195–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann, P. (2000). Nocturnes: On listening to dreams. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann, P. (2002). Dreams, psychoanalysis and the emergent economic electronic culture. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 11(1), 27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann, P. (2006). The canary in the mind: On the fate of dreams in psychoanalysis and in contemporary culture. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 66(2), 113–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lysaker, P. H., Buck, K. D., Carcione, A., Procacci, M., Salvatore, G., Nicolo, G., & Dimaggio, G. (2011). Addressing metacognitive capacity for self-reflection in the psychotherapy for schizophrenia: A conceptual model of the key tasks and processes. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 84(1), 58–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manley, J. (2014). Gordon Lawrence’s social dreaming matrix: Background, origins, history and developments. Organisational and Social Dynamics, 14(2), 322–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matte-Blanco, I. (1975). The unconscious as infinite sets: An essay in bi-logic. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matte-Blanco, I. (1985). Thinking, feeling and being: Clinical reflections on the fundamental antinomy of human beings and world. London & New York: Routledge.

  • Meltzer, D. (1984). Dream-life: A re-examination of the psychoanalytic theory and technique. Strath Tay: Clunie.

  • Meltzer, D., & Harris Williams, M. (1988). The apprehension of beauty: The role of aesthetic conflict in development, violence and art. Clunie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, M. (1952). The role of illusion in symbol formation. In The suppressed madness of sane men: Forty-four years of exploring psychoanalysis (pp. 83–113). London: Tavistock. 1987

  • Milner, M. (1957). The ordering of chaos. In The suppressed madness of sane men: Forty-four years of exploring psychoanalysis (pp. 216–233). London: Tavistock.1987.

  • Molino, A. (2004). Culture, subject, psyche: Dialogues in psychoanalysis and anthropology. Whurr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obeyesekere, G. (1990). The work of culture: Symbolic transformation in psychoanalysis and anthropology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palombo, J. (2013). The self as a complex adaptive system Part I: Complexity, metapsychology, and developmental theories. Psychoanalytic Social Work, 20(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1970). Freud and philosophy: An essay on interpretation. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, S. (2006). Dynamic systems theories as a metaframework for psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 15(2), 285–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. N. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marilyn Charles.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Charles, M. Canaries in the Mind: Reflections on Paul Lippmann and the World of Dreams. Am J Psychoanal 83, 152–177 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-023-09399-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-023-09399-6

Keywords

Navigation