Abstract
This paper is based on the commonality between free association and the practice of Buddhist meditation in light of the surprising fact that both great traditions devoted to healing human suffering rely on the same fundamental method. After reviewing some aspects of free association and evenly-suspended attention, relevant aspects of Buddhist meditation and Buddhism as a psychology, including thinking and emotion, are compared and contrasted with psychoanalysis. The Buddhist insight of impermanence is highlighted. Freud’s telephone metaphor becomes the basis for a discussion of psychoanalysis as a two-person meditation. Bion’s proposal for the analyst to eschew memory and desire to be in the moment with his patients serves as an introduction to a case by Thomas Ogden which illustrates both Bion’s points and provides an example of a two-person meditation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aguayo, J. (2014). Bion’s notes on memory and desire—Its initial clinical reception in the United States: A note on archival material. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 95, 889–910.
Aron, L. (1996). A meeting of minds: Mutuality in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
Balint, M. (1960). Primary narcissism and primary love. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 26, 6–43.
Bion, W. R. (1962). Learning from Experience (p. 93). London: Tavistock.
Bion, W. R. (1963). Elements of psychoanalysis (p. 19). London: Heinemann.
Bion, W. R. (1967). Notes on memory and desire. Psychoanalytic Forum, 2, 272–280.
Cooper, S. P. (2020). Realizational perspectives: Bion’s psychoanalysis and Dogen’s Zen. American Journal of Psychoanalysis. https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-020-09232-4.
Deutsch, H. (1983). Control analysis. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 19, 59–66.
Fenichel, O. (1939). Problems of psychoanalytic technique. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 8, 438–470.
Ferenczi, S. (1919). On the technique of psycho-analysis. In Further contributions to the theory and technique of psychoanalysis (pp. 177–189). London: Maresfield. Reprints. 1980.
Ferenczi, S. (1921). The further development of the active therapy in psychoanalysis. In Further contributions to the theory and technique of psychoanalysis (pp. 198-217). London: Maresfield Reprints. 1980.
Ferenczi, S. (1933). Confusion of tongues between adults and the child. The language of tenderness and of passion. In Final contributions to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis (pp. 156–167). London: Karnac Books. 1994. Also in International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 30, 225–230 (1949).
Ferenczi, S. & Rank, O. (1924). The development of psychoanalysis. New York: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing.
Feuer, C. (Producer), & Fosse, R. (Director). (1972). Cabaret. [Motion Picture]. USA: Allied Artists Pictures.
Freud, S. (1910). Five lectures on psycho-analysis. Standard Edition (Vol. 11, pp. 1–56). London: Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1912). Recommendation to physicians practising psycho-analysis. Standard Edition (Vol. 12, pp. 109–120). London: Hogarth
Freud, S. (1915). The unconscious. Standard Edition (Vol. 14, pp. 159–216). London: Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1915–1916). Introductory lectures on psychoanalysis (Parts 1 & 2). Standard Edition (Vol. 15). London: Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1923). Two encyclopaedia articles. Standard Edition (Vol. 18, pp. 235–259). London: Hogarth.
Hoffer, A. (2006). What does the analyst want? Free association in relation to the analyst’s activity, ambition, and technical innovation. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 66, 1–23.
Kander, J. (Composer), & Ebb, F. (Lyricist). (1964). Maybe this time. [recorded by Liza Minelli] on Liza! Liza! [Studio Album]. New York: NY: Capitol Records.
Mitchell, S. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ogden, T. H. (1994). The analytic third: Working with intersubjective clinical facts. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 3–19.
Ogden, T. H. (2015). Intuiting the truth of what’s happening. On Bion’s ‘notes on memory and desire’. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 84, 285–306.
Olendzki, A. (2010). Unlimiting mind: The radically experiential psychology of Buddhism. Boston: Wisdom.
Rickman, J. (1951). Number and the human sciences. Psychoanalysis and Culture, 4, 415–434.
Stolorow, R. & Atwood, G. (1978). Faces in a cloud: Subjectivity in personality theory. New York: Jason Aronson.
Sullivan, H. S. (1953). Interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: W.W. Norton.
Zwiebel, R. & Weischede, G. (2015). Buddha und Freud—Praesenz und Einsicht. Ueber buddistisches und psychoanalytisches Denken. Presence and insight: On Buddhist and psychoanalytic thinking. Goettingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Axel Hoffer, M.D., Training and Supervising Analyst, Boston Psychoanalytic Society and Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoffer, A. PSYCHOANALYSIS AS A TWO-PERSON MEDITATION: FREE ASSOCIATION, MEDITATION AND BION. Am J Psychoanal 80, 331–341 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-020-09259-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-020-09259-7