Abstract
This paper discusses the political nature of psychoanalytic audacity in an era of fake news and disinformation as receptive populations accustom themselves to societal and political misrepresentations of anti-thinking. Against the aggressive rise of anti-thinking that cauterizes individual and societal registration of precarity, the ideological foundation of psychoanalytic inquiry is in the freeing of that which emotionally and ideationally, has felt to be impenetrable, making such contents and expressions available for clarification within the consensual understandings between two very different individuals. Psychoanalysis, in its dyadic pairing, its regularity of meetings, and its continuous action of recognizing what is obscure or hidden, is the heir to the Enlightenment motto, “aude sapere” the ongoing act of daring to question (Kant, 1784). Operating against defensive foreclosure, psychoanalysis conditions the toleration of painful states of mind toward contingent consideration of the causes and effects from which productive future action might be considered. The dyadic engagement of psychoanalytic participants operates as a unitary political organization in witness of the human condition, from within which what was unthinkable becomes nameable, and what is named becomes spoken in clarification of anti-thinking’s foreclosures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Améry, J. (1980). At the mind’s limits. Contemplations by a survivor on Auschwitz and its realities (S. Rosenfeld & S. P. Rosenfeld, Trans.). Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
Balint, M. (1968). The basic fault. Therapeutic aspects of regression. New York: Brunner Mazel. 1979.
Baudrillard, J. (1994). Similacra and simulation. (The body, in theory: Histories of cultural materialism). (S. F. Glaser, Trans.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond doer and done to: An intersubjective view of thirdness. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73, 5–46.
Bion, W. R. (1959). Attacks on linking. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 40, 308–315.
Bion, W. R. (1962). The psycho-analytic study of thinking. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 43, 306–310.
Breuer, J., & Freud, S. (1895). Studies on hysteria. (J. Strachey, Ed. & Trans.) New York: Basic Books.
Brooks, D. (2018). The end of the two-party system. New York Times. Retrieved February 12, 2018, from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/12/opinion/trump-republicans-scarcity.html?mtrref=www.google.com&gwh=888ED5103007EC3B0B0AB4950F2DECEA&gwt=pay&assetType=opinion.
Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life. The powers of mourning and violence. New York: Verso.
DeCerteau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. (S. F. Rendall, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dodge, M. M. (1865). Hans Brinker or the silver skates. Cabin John, MD: Wildside Press. 2007.
Erős, F. (2014). Freedom and authority in the Clinical Diary. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 74, 367–380.
Ferenczi, S. (1923). The dream of the ‘clever baby’. In Further contributions to the theory and technique of psychoanalysis. (pp. 349–350). London: Karnac, 1980.
Ferenczi, S. (1930). The principle of relaxation and neocatharsis. In Final contributions to the problems and methods of psycho-analysis. (pp. 108–125). New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1980.
Ferenczi, S. (1932). The clinical diary of Sándor Ferenczi (J. Dupont, Ed., M. Balint & N. Z. Jackson, Trans.) Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press. 1988.
Frankfurt, H. (2005). On bullshit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Freud, S. (1905). Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. Standard edition (Vol. 8, pp. 9–36). London: Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1910). Five lectures on psycho-analysis. Standard edition, (Vol. 11, pp. 1–56). London: Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1930). Civilization and its discontents. Standard edition, (Vol. 21, pp. 59–145). London Hogarth.
Garon, J. (2004). Skeletons in the closet. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 13, 84–92.
Garon, J. (2012). From disavowal and murder to liberty. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 72, 33–45.
Green, A. (2000). The central phobic position: A new formulation of the free association method. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 81, 429–451.
Green, K., & Iverson, K. (2009). Computerized cognitive-behavioral therapy in a stepped care model of treatment. Professional Psychology, 40, 96–103.
Groddeck, G. (1923). The book of the it. New York: International Universities Press. 1976.
Hayden, M. V. (2018). The end of intelligence. The New York Times. Retrieved April 28, 2018, from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/28/opinion/sunday/the-end-of-intelligence.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fsunday.
Hirai, M., & Clum, G. (2005). An internet-based self-change program for traumatic event related fear, distress, and maladaptive coping. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 18, 631–636.
Hume, D. (1748). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2008.
Israel, J. (2001). Radical enlightenment. Philosophy and the making of modernity 1650–1750. New York: OUP Oxford.
Kant, E. (1784). An answer to the question what is enlightenment? Koenigsburg. Retrieved from: http://library.standrews-de.org/lists/CourseGuides/religion/rs-vi/oppressed/kant_what_is_enlightenment.pdf.
Kilborne, B. (2011). Trauma and the wise baby. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 71, 185–206.
Klemperer, V. (1957). The language of the Third Reich (M. Brady, Trans). London: Bloomsbury. 2013.
Koestler, A. (1940). Darkness at noon. New York: Bantam Books. 1984.
Lear, J. (2008). Radical hope. Ethics in the face of cultural devastation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lipton, R. J. (2018). The assault on reality. Dissent Magazine. Retrieved April 10, 2018, from https://www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/assault-on-reality-robert-lifton-trump.
Lorey, I. (2015). State of insecurity. Government of the precarious. London, New York: Verso Futures.
Meltzer, D. (1992). The claustrum. An investigation of claustrophobic phenomena. Worcester: Clunie Press.
Miller, I. (2015). On minding and being minded: Experiencing Bion and Beckett. London: Karnac.
Miller, I. (2016). Defining psychoanalysis: Achieving a vernacular expression. London: Karnac.
Miller, I., & Souter, K. (2013). Beckett and Bion: The (IM) patient voice in psychotherapy and literature. London: Karnac.
Miller, I., & Sweet, A. (2018). On the daily work of psychodynamic psychotherapy. London: Routledge.
Ogden, T. (1989). The primitive edge of experience. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
Orwell, G. (1949). 1984. New York: Signet Classics. 1977.
Prince, R. (2018). Sympathy for the devil: Evil, social process, and intelligibility. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 54, 103–121.
Solon, O., & Laughland, O. (2018). Cambridge Analytica closing after Facebook data harvesting scandal. The Guardian. Retrieved May 2, 2018, from https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/may/02/cambridge-analytica-closing-down-after-facebook-row-reports-say.
Sorkin, D. J. (1983). Wilhelm von Humboldt: The theory and practice of self-formation (Bildung), 1791–1810. Journal of the History of Ideas, 44, 55–73.
Sorkin, D. J. (1987). The transformation of German Jewry 1780–1840. New York: OUP Oxford.
Stonequist, E. V. (1937). The marginal man—A study in personality and culture conflict. New York: Russell and Russell, 1961.
Sweet, A. D. (2014). Objects of desire and the mediated self: addictions, compulsions and fetishism in the technoculture arena. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 28, 176–192.
Tsing, A. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world. On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Vince, R. (2002). The politics of imagined stability: A psychodynamic understanding of change at Hyder plc. Human Relations, 55, 1189–1208.
Volkan, V. (2001). Transgenerational transmissions and chosen traumas: An aspect of large-group identity. Group Analysis, 34, 79–97.
Weizenbaum, J. (1966). ELIZA—A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 9, 35–36. Retrieved from: http://i5.nyu.edu/~mm64/x52.9265/january1966.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Address correspondence to Prof. Ian S. Miller, Ph.D., Kilmainham Congregational Church, Inchicore Rd., Dublin 8, Ireland.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miller, I.S. Beyond Anti-thinking: Psychoanalysis as Politics*. Am J Psychoanal 78, 463–477 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-018-9170-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-018-9170-5