Abstract
We propose that metaphorical descriptions of newly formed international joint ventures (IJVs) contain important, diagnostic information regarding the way these cross-border alliances are managed and perform. In three studies, we examine how relational metaphors reflect semantic fit, or the IJV partners’ cognitive match of managerial schemas and their capability to recontextualize communications regarding alliance operations. We find IJV partners that share relational metaphors achieve superior outcomes, reflecting aligned managerial approaches to controlling shared resources and joint activities. Further, formal ownership as equity share moderates the impact managerial schemas implied by metaphors have on subjective, time-lagged performance of IJVs. Our analysis of metaphorical language not only reveals the way newly formed IJVs are managed, but also highlights performance variations associated with complex patterns of IJV controls.
Abstract
Nous suggérons que les descriptions métaphoriques de joint ventures internationales (JVI) nouvellement formées contiennent des informations d’analyse importantes concernant la manière dont ces alliances transfrontalières sont gérées et mises en oeuvre. Dans le cadre de trois études, nous examinons comment les métaphores relationnelles reflètent l’adéquation sémantique, ou l’adéquation cognitive des schémas managériaux des partenaires de JVI et leur capacité à recontextualiser la communication concernant les opérations d’alliance. Nous constatons que les partenaires de JVI qui partagent les métaphores relationnelles atteignent de meilleurs résultats, reflétant des approches managériales alignées pour contrôler les ressources partagées et les activités communes. Par ailleurs, la propriété formelle - comme la répartition du capital - modère l’impact que les schémas managériaux induits par des métaphores ont sur la performance subjective et décalée dans le temps des JVI. Notre analyse du langage métaphorique révèle non seulement la manière dont les JVI nouvellement formées sont gérées, mais souligne également les variations de performance associées aux modalités complexes de contrôle des JVI.
Abstract
Proponemos que las descripciones metafóricas de las empresas conjuntas (joint ventures) internacionales (IJV) recientemente formadas contienen información importante de diagnóstico con respecto a la formas en que estas alianzas transfronterizas se gestionan y realizan. En tres estudios, examinamos como las metáforas relacionales reflejan un ajuste semántico, o el emparejamiento cognitivo de los esquemas generacionales y su capacidad de re-contextualizar las comunicaciones con respecto a las operaciones de la alianza. Encontramos que los socios de las empresas conjuntas internacionales que comparten metáforas relacionales consiguen mayores resultados, reflejando enfoques gerenciales alineados para el control de los recursos compartidos y las actividades conjuntas. Además, la propiedad formal como participación de capital modera el impacto que los esquemas gerenciales implícitos en metáforas tienen con respecto al rendimiento subjetivo y de tiempo retardado de las empresas conjuntas internacionales. Nuestro análisis del lenguaje metafórico no solamente revela la manera como las recién formadas empresas conjuntas internacionales son gerenciadas, sino que también resalta las variaciones de rendimientos asociados con complejos patrones de controles de las empresas conjuntas internacionales.
Abstract
Propomos que as descrições metafóricas de joint ventures internacionais (IJVs) recém-formadas contêm importantes informações de diagnóstico sobre a forma como essas alianças transfronteiriças são gerenciadas e realizadas. Em três estudos, examinamos como metáforas relacionais refletem ajuste semântico, ou a combinação cognitiva de esquemas de gestão dos parceiros da IJV e sua capacidade de recontextualizar as comunicações relativas às operações da aliança. Nós concluímos que parceiros de IJV que compartilham metáforas relacionais alcançam resultados superiores, refletindo abordagens gerenciais alinhadas para controlar os recursos compartilhados e atividades conjuntas. Além disso, a propriedade formal sob a forma de participação no capital modera o impacto que esquemas de gestão inferidas por metáforas têm sobre o desempenho subjetivo e defasado por tempo das IJVs. A nossa análise da linguagem metafórica revela não somente a maneira pela qual as recém-formadas IJVs são geridas, mas também destaca as variações de desempenho associadas com padrões complexos de controles de IJV.
Abstract
我们认为对新成立的国际合资企业 (IJVs) 的比喻描述包含了关于这些跨国联盟管理和执行方式的重要诊断信息。在三项研究中, 我们研究关系比喻如何反映语义契合, IJV伙伴管理模式的认知匹配, 及他们关于联盟运营沟通再情景化的能力。我们发现那些共享关系比喻的IJV伙伴取得了卓越的成果, 这反映了对控制共享资源和联合活动相一致的管理方法。此外, 正式的所有权如股份减轻了管理模式的比喻对IJV的主观、时滞绩效的影响。我们对比喻语言的分析不仅揭示了新成立的IJVs的管理方式, 而且强调了与IJV控制的复杂形态相关的绩效变化。
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdi, H., & Williams, L. J. 2010. Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference test. In N. Salkind (Ed), Encyclopedia of research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Adair, W. L., & Brett, J. M. 2005. The negotiation dance: Time, culture, and behavioral sequences in negotiation. Organization Science, 16 (1): 33–51.
Alper, W. S., & Leidy, T. R. 1973. The impact of information transmission through television. Public Opinion Quarterly, 33 (4): 556–562.
Anand, B. N., & Khanna, T. 2000. Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3): 295–316.
Baldwin, M. W. 1992. Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112 (3): 461–484.
Bansal, T., & Corley, K. 2011. The coming of age for qualitative research: Embracing the diversity of qualitative methods. Academy of Management Journal, 54 (2): 233–237.
Barner-Rasmussen, W., & Björkman, I. 2007. Language fluency, socialization and inter-unit relationships in Chinese and Finnish subsidiaries. Management and Organization Review, 3 (1): 105–128.
Beamish, P. W., & Lupton, N. 2009. Managing joint ventures. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23 (2): 75–94.
Bello, D. C., Katsikeas, C. S., & Robson, M. J. 2010. Does accommodating a self-serving partner in an international marketing alliance payoff? Journal of Marketing, 74 (6): 77–93.
Brannen, M. Y. 2004. When Mickey loses face: Recontextualization, semantic fit, and the semiotics of foreignness. Academy of Management Review, 29 (4): 593–616.
Brannen, M. Y., & Doz, Y. L. 2012. The language of strategic agility: Trapped in your jargon or lost in translation. California Management Review, 54 (3): 77–97.
Brett, J., & Okumura, T. 1998. Inter and intra-cultural negotiation: US and Japanese negotiators. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (5): 495–510.
Brislin, R. W. 1970. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 1 (3): 185–216.
Butterfield, K., Trevino, L., & Ball, G. 1996. Punishment from the manager’s perspective: A grounded investigation and inductive model. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (6): 1479–1512.
Cantor, N., Mischel, W., & Schwartz, J. C. 1982. A prototype analysis of psychological situations. Cognitive Psychology, 14 (1): 45–77.
Cartwright, S., & Cooper, C. L. 1993. The role of cultural compatibility in successful organizational marriage. Academy Management Executive, 7 (2): 57–70.
Casson, M., & Mol, M. 2006. Strategic alliances: A survey of issues from and entrepreneurship perspective. In O. Shenkar, & J. Reuer (Eds), Handbook of strategic alliances 17–38. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Chang, L. S., Most, K. S., & Brain, C. W. 1983. The utility of annual reports: An international study. Journal of International Business Studies, 14 (1): 63–84.
Chen, C. C., & Meindl, J. R. 1991. The construction of leadership images in the popular press: The case of Donald Burr and people express. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36 (4): 521–551.
Chen, D., Park, S. H., & Newburry, W. 2009. Parent contribution and organizational control in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 30 (11): 1133–1156.
Chung, C. C., & Beamish, P. W. 2010. The trap of continual ownership change in international equity joint ventures. Organization Science, 21 (5): 995–1015.
Cohen, J. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20 (1): 37–46.
Cornelissen, J. P., & Kafouros, M. 2008. Metaphors and theory building in organization theory: What determines the impact of a metaphor on theory? British Journal of Management, 19 (4): 365–379.
Crooks, E. 2011. Exxon shows surer tread in following BP’s path. FT.Com, 30 August. http://ezproxy.gsu.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/885922788?accountid=11226, accessed 17 April 2015.
Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. 2002. The dynamics of alliance conditions in the alliance development process. Journal of Management Studies, 39 (5): 725–746.
Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. 2001. Survival and profitability: The roles of experience and intangible assets in foreign subsidiary performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (5): 1028–1038.
Demirbag, M., & Mirza, H. 2000. Factors affecting international joint venture success: An empirical analysis of foreign – local partner relationships and performance in joint ventures in Turkey. International Business Review, 9 (1): 1–35.
Denk, N., Kaufmann, L., & Roesch, J.-F. 2012. Liabilities of foreignness revisited: A review of contemporary studies and recommendations for future research. Journal of International Management, 18 (4): 322–334.
Dess, G. G., & Robinson, R. B. 1984. Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal, 5 (3): 265–273.
Dhanaraj, C., & Beamish, P. 2004. Effect of equity ownership on the survival of international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 25 (3): 295–305.
Dutton, J. E., & Dukerich, J. M. 1991. Keeping an eye on the mirror: The role of image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34 (3): 517–554.
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. 1998. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23 (4): 660–679.
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4): 532–550.
Fiske, A. P. 1992. The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99 (4): 689–723.
Fiske, A. P. 2004. Relational models theory 2.0. In N. Haslam (Ed), Relational models theory: A contemporary overview 3–25. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fiske, A. P., & Haslam, N. 1996. Social cognition is thinking about relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5 (5): 131–148.
Fitzpatrick, M. A. 1984. A typological approach to marital interaction: Recent theory and research. In L. Berkowitz (Ed), Advances in experimental social psychology, 18: 1–47. New York: Academic Press.
Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Jackson-Beeck, M., Jeffries-Fox, S., & Signorielli, N. 1978. Cultural indicators: Violence profile No. 9. Journal of Communication, 30 (3): 176–207.
Geringer, J. M., & Hebert, L. 1989. Control and performance of international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (2): 235–254.
Geringer, M. J., & Hebert, L. 1991. Measuring performance of international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 22 (2): 249–263.
Gibson, C. B., & Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E. 2001. Metaphors and meaning: An intercultural analysis of teamwork. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46 (2): 274–303.
Gilliland, D., Bello, D., & Gundlach, G. 2010. Control-based channel governance and relative dependence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38 (4): 441–455.
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. 2013. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16 (15): 15–31.
Gulati, R. 1995. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties on contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (1): 85–112.
Guthrie, J. 2011. A house divided. Financial Times, 10 August: 14. http://ezproxy.gsu.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/882336454?accountid=11226, accessed 17 April 2015.
Heide, J. B. 1994. Interorganizational governance in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing, 58 (1): 71–85.
Hinde, R. A. 1976. On describing relationships. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17 (1): 1–19.
Hirsch, P. M., & Andrews, J. 1983. Ambushes, shootouts, and knights of the round table: The language of corporate takeovers. In L. R. Pondy, P. J. Frost, G. Morgan, T. C. Dandridge, & S. B. Bacharach (Eds), Monographs in organizational behaviour and industrial relations, 1: Organizational symbolism 145–155. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. 2004. Leadership, culture and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Inkpen, A., & Currall, S. 2004. The co-evolution of trust, control, and learning in joint ventures. Organization Science, 15 (5): 586–599.
Jakobson, R., & Halle, M. 1956. Fundamentals of language. The Hague: Mouton & Co.
Katz, E. 1980. On conceptualizing media effects. In T. MacCorrmak (Ed), Communication studies: Decade of dissent 119–141. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Kogut, B., & Singh, H. 1988. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (3): 411–432.
Koller, V. 2002. A shot-gun wedding: Co-occurrence of war and marriage metaphors in mergers and acquisitions discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 17 (3): 179–203.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. 2000. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein, & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions 3–90. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., & Sheep, M. L. 2009. Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 52 (4): 704–730.
Lakoff, G. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed), Metaphor and meaning, 2nd edn 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lane, P. J., Salk, J. E., & Lyles, M. A. 2001. Absorptive capacity, learning and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (12): 1139–1161.
Leary, D. 1995. Naming and knowing: Giving forms to things unknown. Social Research, 62 (4): 267–298.
Lin, X., & Wang, C. L. 2008. Enforcement and performance: The role of ownership, legalism, and trust in international joint ventures. Journal of World Business, 43 (3): 340–351.
Link, P. 2013. An anatomy of Chinese: Rhythm, metaphor, politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Liu, D. 2002. Metaphor, culture, and worldview: The case of American English and the Chinese language. Lanham, MA: University Press of America, Inc.
Liu, L. A., Chua, C. H., & Stahl, G. 2010. Quality of communication experience: Definition, measurement, and implications for intercultural negotiations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95 (3): 469–487.
Liu, L. A., Friedman, R. A., Barry, B., Gelfand, M. J., & Zhang, Z.-X. 2012. The dynamics of consensus building in intracultural and intercultural negotiations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57 (2): 269–304.
Luo, Y., Shenkar, O., & Gurnani, H. 2008. Control-cooperation interfaces in global strategic alliances: A situational typology and strategic responses. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (3): 428–453.
Meek, G. K., Roberts, C. B., & Gray, S. J. 1995. Factors influencing voluntary annual report disclosures by US, UK and continental European multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 26 (3): 555–572.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mjoen, H., & Tallman, S. 1997. Control and performance in international joint ventures. Organization Science, 8 (3): 257–274.
Morgan, G. 2006. Images of organization, 2nd edn Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. 1994. Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67 (6): 949–971.
Morris, M. W., Sheldon, O., Ames, D., & Young, M. J. 2007. Metaphor and markets: Agent and object schemas in stock market interpretations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102 (2): 174–192.
Muthusamy, S. K., & White, M. 2006. Does power sharing matter? The role of power and influence in alliance performance. Journal of Business Research, 59 (7): 811–819.
Nooteboom, B., Berger, H., & Noorderhaven, N. G. 1997. Effects of trust and governance on relational risk. Academy of Management Review, 40 (8): 308–338.
Oswick, C., Keenoy, T., & Grant, D. 2002. Metaphor and analogical reasoning in organization theory: Beyond orthodoxy. Academy of Management Review, 27 (2): 294–303.
Paisley, W. 1981. Public communication campaigns: The American experience. In R. E. Rice, & W. J. Paisely (Eds), Public communication campaigns 15–40. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. 2001. Linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC): LIWC 2001. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Publishers.
Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R., & Niederhoffer, K. G. 2003. Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54: 547–577.
Petersen, B., & Pedersen, T. 2002. Coping with liability of foreignness: Different learning engagements of entrant firms. Journal of International Management, 8 (3): 339–350.
Pratt, M. G., Rockmann, K. W., & Kaufmann, J. B. 2006. Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (2): 235–262.
Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. 1994. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19 (1): 90–118.
Roberts, D. F., & Maccoby, N. 1985. Effects of mass communication. In G. Lindzey, & E. Aronson (Eds), Handbook of social psychology 539–598. New York: Random House.
Robson, M. J., Skarmeas, D., & Spyropoulou, S. 2006. Behavioral attributes and performance in international strategic alliances. International Marketing Review, 23 (6): 585–609.
Russon, J. 2003. Human experience: Philosophy, neurosis, and the elements of everyday life. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. 2001. The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52: 471–499.
Stahl, G. K., Mendenhall, M. E., Pablo, A. L., & Javidan, M. 2005. Mergers and acquisitions: Managing culture and human resources. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.
Steensma, H. K., & Lyles, M. A. 2000. Explaining IJV survival in a transitional economy through social exchange and knowledge-based perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (9): 831–851.
Sussman, M. B., Steinmetz, S. K., & Peterson, G. W. 1999. Handbook of marriage and the family, 2nd edn. New York: Plenum Press.
Woodcock, C. P., Beamish, P. W., & Makino, S. 1994. Ownership-based entry mode strategies and international performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 25 (2): 253–274.
Yan, A. 1998. Structural stability and reconfiguration of international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 29 (4): 773–796.
Yan, A., & Gray, B. 1994. Bargaining power, management control and performance in US – Chinese joint ventures: A comparative case study. Academy of Management Journal, 37 (6): 1478–1517.
Yan, A., & Gray, B. 2001. Antecedents and effects of parent controls in international joint ventures. Journal of Management Studies, 38 (3): 393–416.
Yan, A., & Zeng, M. 1999. International joint venture instability: A critique of previous research, a reconceptualization, and directions for future research. Journal of International Business Studies, 30 (2): 395–414.
Yin, R. K. 2009. Case study research – Design and methods, 4th edn. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Zaheer, S. 2002. The liability of foreignness, redux: A commentary. Journal of International Management, 8 (3): 351–358.
Acknowledgements
Earlier versions of this article received helpful comments from Susanne Tietze, three anonymous reviewers, and seminar participants at Nanyang Business School, Peking University, Toulouse Business School, and the People At Work (PAW) Group of Georgia State University. We appreciate Wei Cai, Claudia Dale, Brigid Scarbrough, and Xiang Geng for research assistance. Financial support for this research was provided to Leigh Anne Liu in the form of a faculty summer research grant and CIBER research grant from Georgia State University’s Robinson College of Business.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Accepted by Susanne Tietze, Guest Editor, 9 March 2015. This article has been with the authors for four revisions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, L., Adair, W. & Bello, D. Fit, misfit, and beyond fit: Relational metaphors and semantic fit in international joint ventures. J Int Bus Stud 46, 830–849 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2015.13
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2015.13