Abstract
In recent years, there has been a persistent question of whether management or members of a board of directors might be personally liable for the losses at their company. This concern has been heightened by the increasing tendency of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and other bank regulators to comment explicitly in examination reports about board and management deficiencies and to bring an increasing number of actions against them, and for shareholders to bring actions against them. This article presents an overview of and proposes various approaches to defining the duties and responsibilities on the part of directors and officers of insured depository institutions (IDIs) in an era of heightened regulatory expectations. It also suggests various measures that should be considered by directors and officers of IDIs and other companies to better demonstrate the good faith nature of their efforts to properly discharge their duties and responsibilities should the results of those efforts fail to prevent serious losses at, or, worse, a failure of, the IDI or another company. Finally, the article discusses suggestions for protections from such liabilities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2014) Consultive Document, Guidelines, Corporate Governance Principles for Banks. Basel, Switzerland: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.
Cornerstone Research (2012) Characteristics Of FDIC Lawsuits Against Directors And Officers Of Failed Financial Institutions. San Francisco, CA: Cornerstone Research.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) (1992) Statement Concerning the Responsibilities of Bank Directors and Officers. [website]. Washington DC: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/5000-3300.html, accessed 16 July 2015.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) (2014) Supervisory Trends: ‘Matters Requiring Board Attention’ Highlight Evolving Risks in Banking. [pdf]. Washington DC: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/examinations/supervisory/insights/sisum14/SIsummer2014.pdf, accessed 16 July 2015.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) (2015) Professional Liability Lawsuits. [website]. Washington DC: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, https://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/pls/, accessed 24 April 2015.
Marsh, H., Finkle, R. and Sonsini, L. (2000) Marsh’s California Corporation Law. 4th edn. New York: Aspen Publishers, § 11.03.
Miller, M. (2014) Remarks by Principal Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division Marshall L. Miller at the Global Investigation Review Program. New York: Department of Justice.
Morgenson, G. (2005) Ex-directors at WorldCom settle a new. New York Times, [online] 19 March, http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/19/business/exdirectors-at-worldcom-settle-anew.html, accessed 15 July 2015.
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) (2014) OCC Guidelines Establishing Heightened Standards for Certain Large Insured National Banks, Insurance Federal Savings Associations, and Insured Federal Branches; Integration of Regulations. Washington DC: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Pettersson, E. (2012) Ex-IndyMac CEO Perry reaches $12 million FDIC settlement. Bloomberg, [online] 14 December,http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-12-14/ex-indymac-ceo-perry-reaches-12-million-fdic-settlement, accessed 15 July 2015.
Reckard, E.S. (2012) Former IndyMac execs told to pay FDIC $169 million. Los Angeles Times, [online], http://articles.latimes.com/print/2012/dec/08/business/la-fi-indymac-verdict-20121208, accessed 15 July 2015.
Sanders, J.L. (2009) Liability and your board of directors. Bloomberg, [online] 30 June, http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/stories/2009-06-30/liability-and-your-board-of-directorsbusinessweek-business-news-stock-market-and-financial-advice, accessed 15 July 2015.
Tarullo, D. (2014) Remarks at the Mid-year Meeting of the Association of American Law Schools: Appropriate Governance and Prudential Regulation. Washington DC: Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System.
CASES
Aronson v. Lewis (1984) 473 A. 2d 805.
Atherton v. FDIC (1997) 519 U.S. 213.
Burt v. Irvine Co. (1965) 237 Cal. App. 2d 828.
Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc. (1993) 634 A. 2d 345.
FDIC v. Faigin [2013] 2013 WL3389490.
FDIC v. Loudermilk, et al (2013) 984 F. Supp. 2d 1354.
FDIC v. Loudermilk, et al (2014) 761 S.E.2d 332.
FDIC v. Skow (2014) 769 F. 3d 1307.
FDIC v. Van Dellen [2012] 2012 WL4815159.
Gaillard v. Natomas Co. (1989) 208 Cal. App. 3d 1250.
Hermelin v. K-V Pharmaceutical Co. (2012) 54 A.3d 1093.
In re Caremark Int’l, Inc. Derivative Litig. (1996), 698 A.2d 959.
In re Citigroup, Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation (2009), 964 A.2d 106.
Smith v. VanGorkom (1985) 488 A. 2d 858.
Stone v. Ritter (2006) 362 A. 2d 911.
Acknowledgements
The authors are partners in the law firm of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP. The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Robert Tian, Associate, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, in the preparation of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peck, R., Halloran, M. Fiduciary duties of financial institution directors and officers in the post-Dodd–Frank era. Int J Discl Gov 13, 221–235 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/jdg.2015.16
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jdg.2015.16