Skip to main content
Log in

Virtuous networks: Machiavelli, speed and global social movements

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article uses accounts of the different ‘Facebook Revolutions’ of 2011–2012 (the Arab Spring, European Anti-Austerity protests, Occupy) to speak to a broader narrative in contemporary culture: the cyber-utopian belief in social media as a fast track to political change. To critique this narrative, the article turns to the work of Machiavelli (specifically the vision of temporality expressed in his concept of fortuna). Machiavelli’s nuanced theory of politics, with its attentiveness to both slow-moving community-building, as well as audacious, fast-moving action, makes him ideal for thinking through transnational activism in a globalized and accelerating world. Such a framework can help us think critically about social media, avoiding the pitfalls of cyber-utopianism, while embracing opportunities that information technologies might provide us with. It also reorients our thinking about Machiavelli, rescuing him from his caricature as a ‘thinker of speed’, instead highlighting his attentiveness to the multiple temporalities of political life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Though note this is not the same as claiming that social media ‘caused’ the Egyptian revolution, or even more strongly, that social media necessarily leads to a more open society (see Khondker, 2011; Castells, 2012; Hussein and Howard, 2011, 2012).

  2. For a description of Machiavelli’s republican ethos, see Viroli (1990) and Bernard (2008).

  3. See Deudney’s (2007) work on what he terms the ‘Iron Law of Polis Republicanism’ (p. 93).

  4. See here Deibert (2000) and Keck and Sikkink (1998).

  5. Again, see here Deibert (2000).

  6. No discussion of the role of digital networks and social media in popular movements in the future will be complete without an analysis of the role of new techniques of censorship and surveillance. For a starting point to such an analysis, see Deibert (2013).

References

  • Bernard, J. (2008) Why Machiavelli Matters: A Guide to Citizenship in Democracy. New York: Praeger Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2012) Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deibert, R. (2000) International plug ‘n play: Citizen activism, the internet, and global public policy. International Studies Perspectives 1 (3): 255–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deibert, R. (2013) Black Code: Surveillance, Privacy and the Dark Side of the Internet. Toronto, Canada: Signal Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deudney, D. (2007) Bounding Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, S. (2000) Toward a postmodern prince? The battle in Seattle as a moment in the new politics of globalisation. Millennium – Journal of International Studies 29 (1): 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M. and Negri, A. (2000) Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauslohner, A. (2011) Is Egypt about to have a Facebook revolution? Time World 24 January, http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2044142,00.html, accessed 16 August 2012.

  • Hussein, M.M. and Howard, P.N. (2011) The role of digital media. Journal of Democracy 22 (3): 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussein, M.M. and Howard, P.N. (2012) Democracy’s fourth wave? Information technologies and the fuzzy causes of the Arab Spring. Unpublished paper presented at International Studies Association San Diego, 27 March, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2029711, accessed 16 August 2012.

  • Keck, M.E. and Sikkink, K. (1998) Activists Beyond Borders. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khondker, H.H. (2011) Role of the new media in the Arab Spring. Globalizations 8 (5): 675–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli, N. (1998) The Prince, Translated by H.C. Mansfield. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, R. (2012) Consent of the Networked. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messing, P., Schram, J. and Golding, B. (2014) Protestors using tech to run rings around cops. The New York Post 1 December, http://nypost.com/2014/12/01/social-media-keeps-protesters-one-step-ahead-of-cops/, accessed 9 June 2015.

  • Rainie, L. and Wellman, B. (2012) Networked: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viroli, M. (1990) Machiavelli and the republican idea of politics. In: G. Bock, Q. Skinner and M. Viroli (eds.) Machiavelli and Republicanism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 121–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R.B.J. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D.J. (2003) Six Degrees. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank Daniel Levine, Jairus Grove, Antonio Cerella, R.B.J. Walker, and Elisabetta Brighi for their help on this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Glezos, S. Virtuous networks: Machiavelli, speed and global social movements. Int Polit 53, 534–554 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2016.14

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2016.14

Keywords

Navigation