Skip to main content
Log in

Teaching public policy advocacy by combining academic knowledge and professional wisdom

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Interest Groups & Advocacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lobbying is a well-established occupation and has attained a professional status in the United States and other democracies in the world that can be taught in the university setting. This article discusses what lobbying skills can be learned in a university setting, and second what subjects are and should be included in the curriculum of public affairs and lobbying courses. From over 20 years’ experience at American University’s Public Affairs and Advocacy Institute (PAAI) in Washington DC and for the last 12 years in the European Public Affairs and Advocacy Institute (EPAAI) in Brussels, we know ethical lobbying skills and knowledge can be taught effectively in a university setting. With the help of professional lobbyists, we have taught technical skills, professional norms and ethics, and strategies and tactics of advocacy to over 1000 students, since the founding of PAAI in 1992. Effective lobbying strategies, tactics and ethics can be taught and learned with a combination of rigorous academic research and applied/practical wisdom from professional advocates. From our program we have launched hundreds of PAAI graduates into successful advocacy careers. The underlying approach in PAAI is ‘The Campaign Mindset’, an operational theory of change in advocacy and the policy process. Our curriculum instructionally mirrors the content and process that a comprehensive advocacy campaign would embrace, from conception through implementation, to conclusion. Specifically, our curriculum content is organized into six general interrelated and at times overlapping modules. The modules reflect the conceptual building blocks that are typically used in a major advocacy campaign. However, many important topics and tools critical to advocacy action plans are also discussed within each module. The PAAI Modules are: Political Environment Assessment for Strategy and Action Plan Development and Management; Direct Lobbying; Communications Strategy, Message Development and Execution; Coalition Building; Building and Using Grassroots and Grasstops Support; and Understanding and Operating Within the Ethical Laws, Rules and Norms Pertaining to all Aspects of Advocacy. We have integrated professional lobbyist mentors into PAAI who have helped keep the curriculum up-to-date (for example, especially social media) and essential in placing our students in the advocacy profession.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For each institute we have two to three prominent professional lobbyists as mentors for the students. Student teams develop lobbying plans with the guidance of the mentors and the mentors evaluate the plans at the end of the institute.

  2. Over 1200 students and young professionals have taken PAAI since its inception in 1992. PAAI is based upon the Campaign Management Institute (CMI) started in 1985 at the Center for Congressional and Presidential Studies.

  3. Graduates of PAAI have recently started lobbying institutes in Ukraine, Hungary and Croatia. Educators from Asian nations have applied some lessons learned in PAAI to lobbying classes in their countries.

  4. In the most recent PAAI, we have had the students read the following works: Ainsworth (2002); Andres (2009); Baumgartner et al (2009); Berry (1997); Levine (2009); and Luneburg et al (2009).

  5. Andres et al (2000); Thurber (1996, 2002, 2006, 2011a, 2011b, 2012); Ingle (2007).

  6. See Thurber (1996) for a description of mapping the stakeholders. Also see Browne (1990).

  7. We also teach a special workshop on ‘Lobbying and Ethics’ for students and lobbyists each year.

  8. See our website at www.american.edu/spa/ccps for videos of speeches by numerous speakers we have used in PAAI.

References

  • Ainsworth, S.H. (2002) Analyzing Interest Groups: Group Influence on People and Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andres, G.J. (2009) Lobbying Reconsidered: Under the Influence. New York: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andres, G.J., Griffin, P. and Thurber, J.A. (2000) The contemporary presidency: Managing White House-Congressional relations: Observations from inside the process. Presidential Studies Quarterly 30 (3): 553–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F.R., Berry, J.M., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D.C. and Leech, B.L. (2009) Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses and Why? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J.M. (1977) Lobbying for the People. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J.M. (1997) The Interest Group Society, 5th edn. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, W. (1990) Organized interests and their issue niches: A search for pluralism in a policy domain. Journal of Politics 52 (2): 477–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleisher, C.S. (2001) The state of North American higher education in corporate public affairs. Journal of Public Affairs 1 (4): 436–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleisher, C.S. (2003) The development of competencies in international public affairs. Journal of Public Affairs 3 (1): 76–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleisher, C.S. (2007) Developing the public affairs body of knowledge. Journal of Public Affairs 7 (3): 281–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleisher, C.S and Blair, N.M. (1999) Tracing the parallel evolution of public affairs and public relations: An examination of practice, scholarship and teaching. Journal of Communication Management 3 (3): 276–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, T.R. (2012) Forget creativity: Can lobbying be taught?. Washington Post, 19 November, http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/forget-creativity-can-lobbying-be-taught/2012/11/18/a5c29ae4-16eb-11e2-8792-cf5305eddf60_story.html, accessed 15 July 2014.

  • Ingle, E. (2007) Government relations. In: J. Doorley and H.F. Garcia (eds.) Reputation Management. New York: Routledge, pp. 159–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, B.J. (2009) The Art of Lobbying: Building Trust and Selling Policy. Washington DC: CQ Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luneburg, W.V., Susman, T.M. and Gordon, R.H. (eds.) (2009) The Lobbying Manual, 4th edn. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, C. (2005) Towards a lobbying profession: Developing the industry’s reputation, education and representation. Journal of Public Affairs 5 (2): 124–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, C. (2006) The ideal lobbyist: Personal characteristics of effective lobbyists. Journal of Communication Management 10 (1): 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurber, J.A. (1996) Political power and policy subsystems in American politics. In: B.G. Peters and B.A. Rockman (eds.) Agenda for Excellence: Administering the State. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, pp. 76–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurber, J.A. (2002) From campaigning to lobbying. In: C.J. Nelson, D.A. Dulio and S.K. Medvic (eds.) Shades of Gray: Perspectives on Campaign Ethics. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 151–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurber, J.A. (2006) Lobbying, ethics, and procedural reforms: The do-nothing 109th congress does nothing about reforming itself. Extensions (Fall): 10–15.

  • Thurber, J.A. (2011a) Changing the way Washington works? Assessing President Obama’s battle with lobbyists. Presidential Studies Quarterly 41 (2): 358–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurber, J.A. (ed.) (2011b) Obama’s battle with lobbyists. In: Obama in Office. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers, pp. 127–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurber, J.A. (2012) Agony, angst, and the failure of the supercommittee. Extensions (Summer): 1–10.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James A Thurber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Griffin, P., Thurber, J. Teaching public policy advocacy by combining academic knowledge and professional wisdom. Int Groups Adv 4, 40–51 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2014.24

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2014.24

Keywords

Navigation