Skip to main content
Log in

The Impact of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising on Health Insurance Markets

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) for drugs has increased from US$200 million in 1997 to US$4 billion in 2011. While studies show that DTCA impacts the patient-physician relationship, little is known of the effect of DTCA on health insurance markets. We test whether DTCA raises the costs in these markets or makes the markets more efficient in drug pricing. Across 212 markets, we examine the impact of DTCA on insurers’ negotiated prices for 166 drugs. Controlling for unobserved pharmacy and pharmacy benefit manager attributes, as well as manufacturer advertising market selection effects, we find that an increase in a manufacturer’s DTCA spending lowers insurer prices and reduces insurance market price dispersion. These competitive effects intensify as DTCA competition increases between drug manufacturers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Keehan et al. (2012).

  2. IMS (2011).

  3. Magna (2010).

  4. Brownfield et al. (2004).

  5. See Iizuka and Jin (2005); Bradford et al. (2005); Wosinska (2005); Ridley (2013) and Donohue et al. (2004). See Berndt and Donohue (2008) for a recent review of the literature on the effects of DTCA.

  6. GAO (2006).

  7. Randomised controlled trials show that physicians often prescribe brand drugs to patients requesting the drug, even for weak indications (Kravitz et al., 2005).

  8. Humphreys (2009).

  9. Some papers have looked at the effect of drug advertising on other commodity prices. For example, Safferet al. (2007) estimate that a ban on nicotine replacement therapy drug advertising would increase cigarette prices by 10 per cent.

  10. Myers et al. (2011).

  11. Weissman et al. (2004).

  12. Bradford et al. (2005, 2006).

  13. Donohue et al. (2004); Wosinska (2005); Armantier and Namoro (2006); Bradford et al. (2006).

  14. Berndt and Donohue (2008).

  15. Rather, physician detailing impacts individual share (Donohue and Berndt, 2004).

  16. Iizuka (2004) and Iizuka and Jin (2005).

  17. Palumbo and Mullins (2002).

  18. Cady (1976). See Kaul and Wittink (1995) for a review of price advertising.

  19. Similar pro-competitive effects have been found with price advertising for eyeglasses, optometric services, physician services and legal services. See Rizzo and Zeckhauser (1992) for a review.

  20. Moreover, very few pharmacies and retailers advertise full price information, even when required by law (Council of the City of New York, 2004).

  21. See Farris and Albion (1980); Leffler (1981); Capella et al. (2009).

  22. Kaldor (1950); Bain (1956); Schmalensee (1972).

  23. Leffler (1981).

  24. Comanor and Wilson (1967, 1969, 1974).

  25. Comanor and Wilson (1974).

  26. Stigler (1961); Telser (1964); Nelson (1974).

  27. Steiner (1973, 1993).

  28. Stigler (1961); Sorensen (2000) and Hong and Shum (2006).

  29. No one model seems to dominate in the empirical marketing literature. In 12 nonprice advertising papers in the marketing literature reviewed by Kaul and Wittink (1995), nine found that advertising reduced price sensitivity and four increased price sensitivity. In marketing theory, Amaldoss and He (2009) show in a theory model that no one effect should be expected to dominate across all scenarios.

  30. Huh and Becker (2005).

  31. Capella et al. (2009).

  32. Dave and Saffer (2010).

  33. Available at www.fda.gov/Drugs/InformationOnDrugs/ucm142438.htm.

  34. The dispersion will be even larger between cash-paying customers and insured customers.

  35. Congressional Budget Office Report (2007).

  36. Lipton et al. (1999).

  37. Brooks et al. (1999).

  38. PBMI (2012).

  39. For fixed effects methods used with DTCA, see Mizik and Jacobson, 2004.

  40. Federal Trade Commission Report, page 47 (2005).

  41. Federal Trade Commission Report (2005).

  42. Calfee (2002).

References

  • Amaldoss, W. and He, C. (2009) ‘Direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs: A strategic analysis’, Marketing Science 28 (3): 472–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armantier, O. and Namoro, S. (2006) ‘Prescription drug advertising and patient compliance: A physician agency approach’, The B.E. Journal of Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy 6 (1): 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, J.S. (1956) Barriers to New Competition: Their Character and Consequences in Manufacturing Industries, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, E. and Donohue, J. (2008) ‘Direct-to-consumer advertising in health care: An overview of economic issues’, in F.A. Sloan and H. Kasper (eds) Incentives and Choice in Health Care, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 131–162.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, W.D., Kleit, A., Neitert, P. and Ornstein, S. (2005) The Effect of Direct-to-Consumer Television Advertising on the Timing of Treatment, Publication 05-19, AEI-Brookings Joint Center on Regulation, Washington, DC.

  • Bradford, W.D., Kleit, A.N., Neitert, P.J. and Ornstein, S. (2006) ‘Effects of direct-to-consumer advertising of hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme a reductiase inhibitors on attainment of LDL-C goals’, Clinical Therapeutics 23 (12): 2105–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J., Doucette, W. and Sorofman, B. (1999) ‘Factors affecting bargaining outcomes between pharmacies and insurers’, Health Services Research 34 (1): 439–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownfield, E., Bernhardt, J., Phan, J., Williams, M. and Parker, R. (2004) ‘Direct-to-consumer drug advertisements on network television: An exploration of quantity, frequency, and placement’, Journal of Health Communication 9 (6): 491–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cady, J. (1976) ‘An estimate of the price effects of restrictions on drug price advertising’, Economic Inquiry 14 (4): 493–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calfee, J.E. (2002) ‘Public policy issues in direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs’, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 21 (2): 174–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capella, M.L., Taylor, C.R., Campbell, R.C. and Longwell, L.S. (2009) ‘Do pharmaceutical marketing activities raise prices? Evidence from five major therapeutic classes’, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 28 (2): 146–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comanor, W. and Wilson, T. (1967) ‘Advertising market structure and performance’, The Review of Economics and Statistics 49 (4): 423–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comanor, W. and Wilson, T. (1969) ‘Advertising and the advantage of size’, American Economic Review 59 (2): 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comanor, W. and Wilson, T. (1974) Advertising and Market Power, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congressional Budget Office (2007) Prescription Drug Pricing in the Private Sector, January.

  • Council of the City of New York (2004) Prescription Drug Prices: All Over the Map, Staff Report to the Committee on Oversight and Investigation, February.

  • Dave, D. and Saffer, H. (2010) ‘The impact of direct-to-consumer advertising on pharmaceutical prices and demand’, Southern Economic Journal 79 (1): 97–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue, J. and Berndt, E. (2004) ‘Effects of direct-to-consumer advertising on medication choice: The case of antidepressants’, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 23 (2): 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue, J., Berndt, E., Rosenthal, M., Epstein, A. and Frank, R. (2004) ‘Effects of pharmaceutical promotion on adherence to the treatment of guidelines for depression’, Medical Care 42 (12): 1176–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris, P.W. and Albion, M.S. (1980) ‘The impact of advertising on the price of consumer products’, Journal of Marketing 44 (3): 17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Trade Commission (2005) Pharmacy Benefit Managers: Ownership of Mail-order Pharmacies, from www.ftc.gov/reports/pharmbenefit05/050906pharmbenefitrpt.pdf, accessed 2 March 2009.

  • Hong, H. and Shum, M. (2006) ‘Using price distributions to estimate search costs’, The RAND Journal of Economics 37 (2): 257–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huh, J. and Becker, L.B. (2005) ‘Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising: Understanding its consequences’, International Journal of Advertising 24 (4): 441–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, G. (2009) ‘Direct-to-consumer advertising under fire’, Bulletin of the World Health Organization 87 (8): 576–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iizuka, T. (2004) ‘What explains the use of direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs?’ The Journal of Industrial Economics 52 (3): 349–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iizuka, T. and Jin, G.Z. (2005) ‘The effect of prescription drug advertising on doctor visits’, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 14 (3): 701–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMS Health (2011) ‘Total US promotional spend by type, 2011’, from http://www.imshealth.com/deployedfiles/ims/Global/Content/Corporate/Press%20Room/Top-Line%20Market%20Data%20&%20Trends/2011%20Top-line%20Market%20Data/Promo_Spend_By_Type.pdf,accessed21August2014.

  • Kaldor, N. (1950) ‘The economic aspects of advertising’, The Review of Economic Studies 18 (1): 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, A. and Wittink, D.R. (1995) ‘Empirical generalizations about the impact of advertising on price sensitivity and price’, Marketing Science 14 (3 - part 2 of 2) [Special Issue on Empirical Generalizations in Marketing]: G151–G160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keehan, S.P., Cuckler, G.A., Sisko, A.M., Madison, A.J., Smith, S.D., Lizonitz, J.M., Poisal, J.A. and Wolfe, C.J. (2012) ‘National health expenditure projections: Modest annual growth until coverage expands and economic growth accelerates’, Health Affairs 31 (7): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kravitz, R., Epstein, R.M., Feldman, M.D., Franz, C.E., Azari, R., Wilkes, M.S., Hinton, L. and Franks, P. (2005) ‘Influence of patients’ requests for direct-to-consumer advertised antidepressants: A randomized controlled trial’, JAMA 293 (16): 1995–2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leffler, K. (1981) ‘Persuasion or information? The economics of prescription drug advertising’, The Journal of Law and Economics 24 (1): 45–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, H., Kreling, D.H., Collins, T. and Hertz, K.C. (1999) ‘Pharmacy benefit management companies: Dimensions of performance’, Annual Review of Public Health 20: 361–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magna (2010) ‘Magna Global Advertising Forecasts 2012’, from http://news.magnaglobal.com/article_pdf.cfm?article_id=1375, accessed 22 August 2014.

  • Myers, S., Royne, M. and Deitz, G. (2011) ‘Direct-to-consumer advertising: Exposure, behavior, and policy implications’, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 30 (1): 110–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizik, N. and Jacobson, R. (2004) ‘Are physicians “easy marks”? Quantifying the effects of detailing and sampling on new prescriptions’, Management Science 50 (12): 1704–1715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, P. (1974) ‘Advertising as information’, Journal of Political Economy 24 (July/August): 729–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palumbo, F. and Mullins, C. (2002) ‘The development of direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising regulation’, Food and Drug Law Journal 57 (3): 423–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • PBMI (2012) ‘Top 10 pharmacy benefit management companies and market share by annual prescription volume as of 2nd Quarter 2011’ from www.pbmi.com/PBMmarketshare1.asp.

  • Ridley, D.B. (2013) ‘Payments, promotion, and the purple pill’, Health Edonomics. doi: 10.1002/hec.3005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo, J. and Zeckhauser, R. (1992) ‘Advertising and the price, quantity, and quality of primary care physician services’, Journal of Human Resources 27 (3): 381–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saffer, W., Wakefield, M. and Terry-McElrath, Y. (2007) The effect of nicotine replacement therapy advertising on youth smoking, NBER Working Paper No. 12964, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Schmalensee, R. (1972) The Economics of Advertising, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 245–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, A. (2000) ‘Equilibrium price dispersion in retail markets for prescription drugs’, Journal of Political Economy 108 (4): 833–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, R. (1973) ‘Does advertising lower consumer prices’, Journal of Marketing 37 (4): 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, R. (1993) ‘The inverse association between the margins of manufacturers and retailers’, Review of Industrial Organization 8 (6): 717–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. (1961) ‘The economics of information’, Journal of Political Economy 69 (3): 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telser, L. (1964) ‘Advertising and competition’, Journal of Political Economy 72 (December): 537–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Government Accountability Office (2006) Prescription Drugs: Improvements Needed in FDA’s Oversight of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising, GAO-07-54, November.

  • Weissman, J., Blumenthal, D., Silk, A.J., Newman, M., Zapert, K., Leitman, R. and Feibelmann, S. (2004) ‘Physicians report on patient encounters involving direct-to-consumer advertising’, Health Affairs. Web Exclusive 28: W4-219 to W4-233.

  • Wosinska, M. (2005) ‘Direct-to-consumer advertising and drug therapy compliance’, Journal of Marketing Research 42 (3): 323–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful for comments from David Bradford and from participants at the Federal Trade Commission’s Roundtable on Pharmaceutical Economics, the Annual Health Economics Conference at the University of Chicago and the American Society of Health Economists Meetings at Duke University. We thank also Tamer Abdelgawad of Pfizer, Inc., for insightful comments. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors, and no official endorsement by AHRQ or DHHS is intended or should be inferred.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Encinosa, W., Meyerhoefer, C., Zuvekas, S. et al. The Impact of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising on Health Insurance Markets. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 39, 749–767 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2014.33

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2014.33

Keywords

Navigation