Skip to main content
Log in

Handle mergers and acquisitions with care: the fragility of trust between the IT-service provider and end-users

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

Information technology (IT) implementation continues to be a challenging process for many organizations. The challenge is heightened when systems are changed due to mergers and acquisitions (M&A). The recent focus on IT-service management highlights the importance of having positive relationships between IT-service providers and end-users. In an M&A situation, there is often little history, and thus limited basis for trust in the IT organization, yet systems often need to be changed in these situations. The current study examines the IT-service provider’s relationship with the end-user to ascertain the factors that influence that relationship and ultimately influence end-user attitudes toward the new system. We study a mandated implementation following an acquisition in the banking industry. The results highlight the important and fragile nature of trust in the IT-service provider. In addition, the results demonstrate that there are significant differences in what matters at what time during the implementation process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal R and Prasad J (1997) The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sciences 28 (3), 557–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (1985) From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior (Kuhl J and Beckman J, Eds), pp 11–39, Springer Verlag, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I and Fishbein M (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akkermans H and van Helden K (2002) Vicious and virtuous cycles in ERP implementation: a case study of interrelations between critical success factors. European Journal of Information Systems 11 (1), 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amoako-Gyampah K (2004) ERP implementation factors: a comparison of managerial and end-user perspectives. Business Process Management Journal 10 (2), 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ancona D, Goodman P, Lawrence B and Tushman M (2001) Time: a new research lens. Academy of Management Review 26 (4), 645–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R (1973) Consumer dissatisfaction: the effect of disconfirmed expectancy on perceived product performance. Journal of Marketing Research 10 (1), 38–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bala H and Venkatesh V (2013) Changes in employees’ job characteristics during an enterprise system implementation: a latent growth modeling perspective. MIS Quarterly 37 (4), 1113–1140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay D, Higgins C and Thompson R (1995) The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies 2 (2), 285–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17 (1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaudry A and Pinsonneault A (2005) Understanding user reponses to information technology: a coping model of user adaptation. MIS Quarterly 29 (3), 493–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behr A and Heid F (2011) The success of bank mergers revisited. An assessment based on a matching strategy. Journal of Empirical Finance 18 (1), 117–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernroider E (2013) Effective ERP adoption processess: the role of project activators and resource Investments. European Journal of Information Systems 22 (2), 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besson P and Rowe F (2001) ERP project dynamics and enacted dialogue: understanding perceived leeway, and the nature of task-related conflicts. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 32 (4), 47–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacherjee A (2001) Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly 25 (3), 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacherjee A (2012) Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices. Createspace, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom R, Olfman L and Sein M (1990) The importance of learning style in end-user training. MIS Quarterly 14 (1), 101–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley L (2003) Mergers and acquisitions as collaborative challenges, in (ed.) Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams (Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams, Volume 9), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 233–246, http://www.emeraldinsight.com/action/doSearch?ContribStored=Bradley%2C+L.

  • Brown SA, Chervany NL and Reinicke BA (2007) What matters when introducing new information technology? Communications of the ACM 50 (9), 91–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown SA, Massey A, Montoya-Weiss M and Burkman J (2002) Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. European Journal of Information Systems 11 (4), 283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown SA, Venkatesh V and Goyal S (2012) Expectation confirmation in technology use. Information Systems Research 23 (2), 474–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown SA, Venkatesh V and Goyal S (2014) Expection confirmation in information systems research. A test of six competing models. MIS Quarterly 38 (3), 729–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown SA, Venkatesh V, Massey A and Kuruzovich J (2008) Expectation confirmation: an examination of three competing models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 105 (1), 52–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E and Hitt L (1996) Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science 42 (4), 541–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E and Hitt L (2000) Beyond computation: information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (4), 23–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busquets J (2015) Discovery paths: exploring emergence and IT evolutionary design in cross-border M&As. Analyzing groupo Sandtander’s acquisition of abby (2004–2009). European Journal of Information Systems 24, 178–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin WW (1998) Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly 22 (1), vii–xvi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornett MM, Mcnutt JJ and Tehranian H (2006) Performance changes around bank mergers: revenue enhancements versus cost reductions. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 38 (4), 1013–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan R and Connolly T (2001) Predicting affective responses to unexpected outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 85 (2), 211–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter KS and Coulter RA (2002) Determinants of trust in a service provider: the moderating role of length of relationship. The Journal of Services Marketing 16 (1), 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings LL and Bromiley P (1996) The organizational trust inventory (OTI): development and validation. In Trust in Organizations (Kramer RM and Tyler TR, Eds), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TD (2005) The coming commoditization of processes. Harvard Business Review 83 (6), 100–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis F, Bagozzi R and Warshaw P (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparision of two theoretical models. Management Science 35 (8), 982–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dedrick J, Gurbaxani V and Kraemer KL (2003) Information technology and economic performance: a critical review of the empirical evidence. Computing Surveys 35 (1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLone WH and McLean ER (1992) Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research 3 (1), 60–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLone WH and McLean ER (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal Of Management Information Systems 19 (4), 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson M, Smith D, Grojean M and Ehrhart M (2001) An organizational climate regarding ethics: the outcome of leader values and the practices that reflect them. Leadership Quarterly 12 (2), 197–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks KT and Ferrin DL (2001) The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science 12 (4), 450–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos BL and Peffers K (1995) Rewards to investors in innovative information technology applications: first movers and early followers in ATMs. Organization Science 6 (3), 241–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM and Pisano GP (2001) Disrupted routines: team learning and new technology implementation in hosptials. Administrative Science Quarterly 46 (4), 685–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evanoff D and Ors E (2002) Local Market Consolidation and Bank Productive Efficiency. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago FRB of Chicago Working Paper No. 2002-25, http://ssrn.com/abstract=367200.

    Google Scholar 

  • FDIC (2015) [WWW document] https://www.fdic.gov/bank/statistical/stats/2014dec/FDIC.pdf, accessed 29 April 2015.

  • Fishbein M and Ajzen I (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galletta D, Ahuja M, Hartman A, Teo T and Peace G (1995) Social influence and end-user training. Communications of the ACM 38 (7), 70–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gattiker TF and Goodhue DL (2005) What happens after ERP implementation: understanding the impact of inter-dependence and differentiation on plant-level outcomes. MIS Quarterly 29 (3), 559–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gefen D (2004) What makes an ERP implementation relationship worthwhile: linking trust mechanisms and ERP usefulness. Journal of Management Information Systems 21 (1), 263–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gefen D, Benbasat I and Pavlou PA (2008) A research agenda for trust in online environments. Journal of Management Information Systems 24 (4), 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gefen D, Karahanna E and Straub D (2003) Inexperience and experience with online stores: the importance of TAM and trust. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 50 (3), 307–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gefen D, Straub D and Boudreau M (2000) Structural equation modeling techniques and regression: guidelines for research practice. Communications of AIS 7 (7), 1–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • George J and Jones G (2000) The role of time in theory and theory building. Journal of Management 26 (4), 657–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie N and Dietz G (2009) Trust repair after an organization-level failure. Academy of Management Review 34 (1), 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginzberg M (1981) Early diagnosis of MIS implementation failure: promising results and unanswered questions. Management Science 27 (4), 459–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman R and Oldham G (1976) Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16 (2), 250–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman JR and Oldham GR (1980) Work Redesign. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper GR and Utley DR (2001) Organizational culture and successful information technology implementation. Engineering Management Journal 13 (2), 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart P and Saunders C (1997) Power and trust: critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange. Organization Science 8 (1), 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwick J and Barki H (1994) Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science 40 (4), 440–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilgen DR (1971) Satisfaction with performance as a function of the initial level of expected performance and the deviation from expectation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 6 (3), 345–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa SL and Todd PA (1997) Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the world wide web. Journal of Electronic Commerce 1 (2), 59–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia R, Reich B and Pearson M (2008) IT service climate: an extension to IT service quality research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 9 (5), 294–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang JJ, Hsu MK, Klein G and Lin B (2000) E-commerce user behavior model: an empirical study. Human Systems Management 19 (4), 265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang JJ, Klein G and Saunders C (2012) Discrepancy theory models of satisfaction in IS research. In Information Systems Theory: Explaining and Predicting Our Digital Society (Dwivedi YK, Wade MR and Schneberger SL, Eds), Vol. 1, pp 355–381.

  • Joshi KD (1991) A model of users’ perspectives on change: the case of information systems technology implementation. MIS Quarterly 15 (2), 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi KD, Sarker S and Sarker S (2007) Knowledge transfer within information systems development teams: examining the role of knowledge source attributes. Decision Support Systems 43 (2), 322–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karahanna E, Straub D and Chervany N (1999) Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly 23 (2), 183–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karasek RA (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redsign. Administrative Science Quarterly 24 (2), 285–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim HW and Kankanhalli A (2009) Investigating user resistance to information systems iimplementation: a status quo bias perspective. MIS Quarterly 33 (3), 567–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P (1997) Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control, Vol. 9, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer RM (1999) Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology 50, 569–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer RM and Tyler TR (1996) Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapointe L and Rivard S (2005) A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Quarterly 29 (3), 461–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latak JC and Foster LW (1985) Implementation of compressed work schedules: participation and job redesign as critical factors for employee acceptance. Personnel Psychology 38 (1), 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki RJ and Bunker BB (1996) Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In Trust in Organizations: Frontier of Theory and Research (Kramer RM and Tyler TR, Eds), pp 114–139, Sage Publicatons, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki RJ and Wiethoff C (2000) Trust, trust development, and trust repair. In The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and practic (Deutsch M and Coleman P, Eds), pp 86–107, Jossey-Bass, San Fransico, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang HG, Saraf N, Hu Q and Xue Y (2007) Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quarterly 31 (1), 59–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Hess T and Valacich J (2008) Why do we trust new technology? A study of trust formation with organizational information systems. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 17 (1), 39–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1979) Trust and Power. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen K (1988) Expectation failure concept and systems analysts’ view of information system failure: results of an exploratory study. Information & Management 14 (1), 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majchrzak A and Cotton J (1988) A longitudinal study of adjustment to technological change: from mass to computer-automated batch production. Journal of Occupational Psychology 61 (1), 43–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra NK, Kim SS and Patil A (2006) Common method variance in IS research: a comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science 52 (12), 1865–1883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus ML and Tanis C (2000) The enterprise systems experience – from adoption to success. In Framing the Domains of IT Research: Glimpsing the Future Through the Past (Zmud RW, Ed), pp 173–207, Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Cincinnati, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinko MJ (1996) An attributional explanation of individual resistance to the introduction of information technologies in the workplace. Behaviour & Information Technology 15 (5), 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey A, Montoya-Weiss M and Brown S (2001) Reaping the benefits of innovative IT: the long and winding road. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 48 (3), 348–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer RC, Davis JH and Schoorman FD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review 20 (3), 709–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCole P, Ramsey E and Williams J (2010) Trust considerations on attitudes towards online purchasing: the moderating effect of privacy and security concerns. Journal of Business Research 63 (9), 1018–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKnight DH and Chervany NL (2006) Reflections on an initial trust building model. In Handbook of Trust Research (Bachmann R and Zaheer A, Eds), pp 29–51, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millman Z and Hartwick J (1987) The impact of automated office systems on middle managers and their work. MIS Quarterly 11 (4), 479–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills P and Moberg D (1982) Perspectives on the technology of service operations. Academy of Management Review 7 (3), 467–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montoya M, Massey A and Khatri V (2010) Connecting IT services operations to services marketing practices. Journal of Management Information Systems 26 (4), 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris M and Venkatesh V (2010) Job characteristics and job satisfaction: understanding the role of enterprise resource. MIS Quarterly 34 (1), 143–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullarkey S, Jackson PR, Wall TD, Wilson JR and Grey-Taylor SM (1997) The impact of technology characteristics and job control on worker mental health. Journal of Organizational Behavior 18 (5), 471–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nah F, Lau J and Kuang J (2001) Critical factors for successful implementation of enterprise systems. Business Process Management 7 (3), 285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyhan R and Marlowe H (1997) Development and psychometric properties of the organizational trust inventory. Evaluation Review 21 (5), 614–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver RL (1977) Effect of expectation and disconfirmation on postexposure product evaluations: an alternative interpretation. Journal of Applied Psychology 62 (4), 480–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ and Hofman JD (1997) An improvisational model for change management: the case of groupware technologies. Sloan Management Review 38 (2), 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker SK and Wall TD (1998) Job and Work Design. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlou PA and Gefen D (2004) Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information Systems Research 15 (1), 37–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peffers K and Dos Santos BL (1996) Performance effects of innovative IT applications over time. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 43 (4), 381–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petter S, Straub D and Rai A (2007) Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 31 (4), 623–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, Mackenzie S, Lee JY and Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringle CM, Wende S and Will A (2005) SmartPLS. Hamburg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivard S and Lapointe L (2012) Informatino technology implementers’ responses to user resistance: nature and effects. MIS Quarterly 36 (3), 897–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson P, Roberts D and Porras J (1993) Dynamics of planned organizational change: assessing empirical support for a theoretical model. Academy of Management Journal 36 (3), 619–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson SL (1996) Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly 41 (4), 574–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter JB (1971) Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. American Psychologist 26 (5), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau DM, Sitkin SB, Burt RS and Carmerer C (1998) Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review 23 (3), 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau DM and Tijoriwala SA (1999) What’s a good reason to change? Motivated reasoning and social accounts in organizational change. Journal of Applied Psychology 84 (4), 514–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson W and Zeckhauser R (1988) Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk & Uncertainty 1 (1), 7–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savino DM (2009) The role of technology as an enabler in job redesign. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 4 (3), 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer ME, Hershey JC and Bradlow ET (2006) Promises and lies: restoring violated trust. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 101 (1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott J and Vessey I (2002) Managing risks in enterprise systems implementations. Communications of the ACM 45 (4), 74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeborg IS (1978) The influence of employee participation in job redesign. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 14 (1), 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman HD and Rupert T (2006) Do bank mergers have hidden or foregone value? Realized and unrealized operating synergies in a bank merger. European Journal of Operations Research 168 (1), 253–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin DH (2010) The effects of trust, security and privacy in social networking: a security-based approach to understand the pattern of adoption. Modelling User Experience – An Agenda for Research and Practice 22 (5), 428–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P (1993) Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis 13 (6), 675–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer GM and Mishra AK (1999) Giving up control without losing control: trust and its substitutes’ effects on managers’ involving employees in decision making. Group and Organizational Management 24 (2), 155–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl G and Mendenhall M (2005) Mergers and Acquisitions: Managing Culture and Human Resources. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes TA, Venkatesh V and Johnson JL (2014) Enterprise system implementation and employee job performance: understanding the role of advice networks. MIS Quarterly 38 (1), 51–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szajna B and Scamell R (1993) The effects of information system user expectations on their performance and perceptions. MIS Quarterly 17 (4), 493–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor S and Todd PA (1995) Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research 6 (2), 144–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thong J, Hong S and Tam K (2006) The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64 (9), 799–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veiga JF, Keupp MM and Kellermanns FW (2014) The longitudinal impact of enterprise system users’ pre-adoption expectations and organizational support on post-adoption proficient usage. European Journal of Information Systems 23 (6), 691–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V and Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46 (2), 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V and Goyal S (2010) Expectation disconfirmation and technology adoption. Polynomial Modeling and Response Surface Analysis 34 (2), 281–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis GB and Davis F (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27 (3), 425–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel E (1988) The Sources of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner H, Dainty A, Hague R, Tuck C and Ong MH (2008) The effects of new technology adoption on employee skills in the prosthetics profession. International Journal of Production Research 46 (22), 6461–6478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W and Benbasat I (2005) Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 6 (3), 72–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward KW, Brown S and Massey A (2005) Organisational influences on attitudes in mandatory system use environments: a longitudinal study. International Journal of Business Information Systems 1 (1–2), 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver D and Brickman P (1974) Expectancy, feedback, and disconfirmation as independent factors in outcome satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 30 (3), 420–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi Y (1990) A critical review of consumer satisfaction. In Review of Marketing (Zeithaml V, Ed), pp 68–123, American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi M and Davis F (2001) Improving computer training effectiveness for decision technologies: behavior modeling and retention enhancement. Decision Sciences 32 (3), 521–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff S (1988) In the Age of the Smart Machine. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan A Brown.

Appendix

Appendix

Table A1

Table A1 U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) Banking profile – historical statistics (FDIC, 2015)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown, S., Massey, A. & Ward, K. Handle mergers and acquisitions with care: the fragility of trust between the IT-service provider and end-users. Eur J Inf Syst 25, 170–186 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2015.10

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2015.10

Keywords

Navigation