Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Country-of-Origin Effects and Corporate Reputation in Multinational Firms: Exploratory Research in Latin America

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Corporate Reputation Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes an exploratory study of the relationship between a firm’s Country-of-Origin (COO) and public perceptions of multinational and domestic corporations operating in Latin America. Analyzing data from Reputation Institute’s 2012 Global RepTrakTM survey, we examined three research questions: First, does a firm’s country of origin predict public perceptions of the firm’s reputation? Second, does a firm’s county of origin predict public intent to behaviorally support the firm? Third, does a firm’s country of origin predict public perceptions of the key organizational competencies that drive reputation? Our analyzes showed that COO was related to both reputation perceptions and behavioral intent to support the firm, with companies headquartered in the United States and Northern Europe receiving significantly higher ratings than domestically based Latin American firms and companies headquartered in Southern Europe. COO was also significantly related to assessment of firm performance on a number of organizational competencies, though not all. Subsequent exploratory analyzes to identify avenues for future research suggest that COO effects may be moderated by the industry sector to which a firm belongs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed, S.A. and d’Astous, A. (2008) ‘Antecedents, moderators and dimensions of country-of-origin evaluations’, International Marketing Review, 25 (1), 75–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alloza, A. (2009) La Reputation de España en el Mundo, Instituto de Análisis de Intangibles, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S., Perez-Rocha, M., Dreyfus, R. and Artiga-Purcell, J.A. (2011) ‘Mining for profits in international Tribunals’, Institute for Policy Studies http://redge.intimedia-dev.net/sites/default/files/Mining_for_Profits_November_2011_Perez_Rocha.pdf.

  • Amine, L.S. (2008) ‘Country-of-origin, animosity and consumer response: Marketing implicatinos of anti-Americanism and Francophobia’, International Business Review, 17 (4), 402–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. and Hoffman, A. (2008) ‘Beyond corporate reputation: Managing reputational interdependence’, Corporate Reputation Review, 11 (1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M.L. and Pollock, T.G. (eds.) (2012) The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Reputation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R.G., Moore, C.B. and Al-Shammari, H.A. (2008) ‘Country of origin and foreign IPO legitimacy: Understanding the role of geographic scope and insider ownership’, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 32 (1), 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertels, S. and Peloza, J. (2008) ‘Running just to stand still? Managing CSR reputation in an era of ratcheting expectations’, Corporate Reputation Review, 11 (1), 56–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilkey, W. and Nes, E. (1982) ‘Country-of-origin effects on product evaluations’, Journal of International Business Studies, 13 (1), 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björkman, I., Fey, C.F. and Park, H.J. (2007) ‘Institutional theory and MNC subsidiary HRM practices: Evidence from a three-country study’, Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (3), 430–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg Reports (2014) Most Innovation in the World 2014: Countries, http://www.bloomberg.com/slideshow/2014-01-22/30-most-innovative-countries.html, accessed 27 April, 2014.

  • Boslough, S. (2007) Secondary Data Sources for Public Health: A Practical Guide, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S. and Jackson, G. (2012) ‘How Regulatory Institutions Influence Corporate Reputations: A Cross-Country Comparative Approach’, in M.L. Barnett and T.G. Pollock (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Reputation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 297–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brønn, P.S. and Vidaver-Cohen, D. (2009) ‘Corporate motives for social initiative: Legitimacy, sustainability, or the bottom line?’ Journal of Business Ethics, 87 (1), 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, J.P., Doney, P.M., Mullen, M.R. and Petersen, K.J. (2010) ‘Building long-term orientation in buyer-supplier relationships: The moderating role of culture’, Journal of Operations Management, 28 (6), 506–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cedrola, E. and Battaglia, L. (2013) ‘Country-of-origin effect and firm reputation influence in business-to-business markets with high cultural distance’, Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science: Bridging Asia and the World, 23 (4), 394–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H.-L. (2011) Effects of Country-of-Origin, Consumer Patriotism, and Values on Brand Strength: A Multi-attribute Setting, 2010 International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics, IPEDR, Hong Kong, 3: 267-272.

  • Deephouse, D., Li, L. and Newburry, W. (2009) ‘Institutional and national culture effects on corporate reputation.’ Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, Chicago, IL, August: 1–6.

  • Denk, N. and Kaufmann, L. (2012) ‘Liabilities of foreignness revisited: A review of contemporary studies and recommendations for future research’, Journal of International Management, 18 (4), 322–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, A. and Zeugner-Roth, K.P. (2010) ‘‘Country of Origin’ as brand element. Wiley’, International Encyclopedia of Marketing, 6, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781444316568.wiem06004/full.

  • Dinnie, K. (2004) ‘Country-of-origin 1965-2004: A literature review’, Journal of Customer Behaviour, 3 (2), 165–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doolan, D. and Froelicher, E. (2009) ‘Using an existing data set to answer new research questions: A methodological review’, Research and Theory for Nursing Practice: An International Journal, 23 (3), 203–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, P.W., Howell, J.P., Hibino, S., Lee, J.K., Tate, U. and Bautista, A. (1997) ‘Leadership in Western and Asian countries: Commonalities and differences in effective leadership processes across cultures’, Leadership Quarterly, 8 (3), 233–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, P., Mansour, J., Hanges, P., Dastmalchian, A. and House, R. (2012) ‘GLOBE: A twenty year journey into the intriguing world of culture and leadership’, Journal of World Business, 47 (3), 504–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, S. (eds.) (2012) The Global Innovation Index 2012: Stronger Innovation Linkages for Global Growth, INSEAD, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, S. and Lanvin, B. (eds.) (2013) The Global Innovation Index 2013: The Local Dynamics of Innovation. Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO, Ithaca, Geneva and Fontainebleau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elango, B. and Sethi, S.P. (2007) ‘An exploration of the relationship between country of origin (COE) and the internationalization-performance paradigm’, Management International Review, 47 (3), 369–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essoussi, L.H. and Marunka, D. (2007) ‘Consumers’ product evaluations in emerging markets: Does country of design, country of manufacture, or brand image matter?’ International Marketing Review, 24 (4), 409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froese, F.J., Vo, A. and Garrett, T.C. (2010) ‘Organizational attractiveness of foreign-based companies: A country of origin perspective’, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18, 271–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardberg, N.A. and Schepers, D.H. (2008) ‘Do stakeholders detect corporate social performance signals?’ Academy of Management 2008 Annual Meeting Proceedings, Anaheim, CA.

  • Guillén, M. (2005) The Rise of Spanish Multinationals: European Business in the Global Economy, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, C.M. (1989) ‘Country image: Halo or summary construct?’ Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 222–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. and Freeman, J. (1989) Institutional Carriers: Reviewing Modes of Transporting Ideas Over Time and Space and Considering their Consequences Organizational Ecology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage Foundation (2014) Index of Economic Freedom. http://www.heritage.org/index/ranking, accessed 18 April, 2014.

  • Hofstede, G. (1980) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, F. and Stening, B.W. (2013) ‘Do indigenous firms incur a liability of localness when operating in their home market? The case of China’, Journal of World Business, 48 (4), 478–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez, N.H. and San Martin, S. (2010) ‘The role of country-of-origin, ethnocentrism and animosity in promoting consumer trust. The moderating role of familiarity’, International Business Review, 19 (1), 34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, M. and Yang, S. (2010) ‘Comparing effects of country reputation and the overall corporate reputations of a country on international consumers’ product attitudes and purchase intentions’, Corporate Reputation Review, 13 (1), 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J.P., Werner, S. and Brouthers, L. (1999) ‘Does winning mean the same thing around the world? National ideology and the performance of global competitors’, Journal of Business Research, 44 (2), 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W. (2011) ‘Distinctiveness of administrative reform in Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain. Common characteristics of context, administrations and reforms’, Public Administration, 89 (3), 801–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidder, L. and Judd, C. (1986) Research Methods in Social Relations (5th Ed.) Holt, Rinehart &Winston.

  • Kostova, T. and Zaheer, S. (1999) ‘Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise’, Academy of Management Review, 24 (1), 64–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T. and Roth, K. (2002) ‘Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects’, Academy of Management Journal, 45 (1), 215–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, S.I. and Jaffe, E.D. (1996) ‘Country of origin effects of international market entry’, Journal of Global Marketing, 10 (2), 27–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leong, S.M., Cote, J.A. and Ang, S.H. et al (2008) ‘Understanding consumer animosity in an international crisis: Nature, antecedents, and consequences’, Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (6), 996–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leschke, J. and Watt, A. (2008) Job Quality in Europe. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute for Research, Education and Health and Safety (ETUI-REHS).

  • Li, W. and Wyer Jr. R.S. (1994) ‘The role of country of origin in product evaluations: Informational and standard-of-comparison eff ects’, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 3 (2), 187–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgreen, A. and Cordoba, J.-R. (2010) ‘Editorial: Corporate social responsibility in Latin America’, Journal of Business Ethics, 91 (2), 167–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loebnitz, N. (2009) The Impact of Country-of-Origin on Liability-of-Foreignness, PhD,Dissertation. Faculty of Business, Technology and Sustainable Development. Bond University, Queensland Australia.

  • Lopez, M. and Prado, F. (2012) Reputación Corporativa en Perú, Reputation Institute and GrupoInmark, Lima, Peru.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maheswaran, D., Chen, C.Y. and He, J. (2013) ‘Nation equity: Integrating the multiple dimensions of country of origin effects’, Review of Marketing Research, 10, 153–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mello, J. (2010) Strategic Human Resource Management, South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melo, T. and Garrido-Morgado, A. (2012) ‘Corporate reputation: A combination of social responsibility and industry’, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19 (1), 11–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, A. (2012) Las empresas españolas son las peor valoradas en la América de Evo y Kirchner. El Confidencial May 5 (accessed 7 November, 2012).

  • Meyer, J. and Rowan, B. (1977) ‘Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology, 83 (2), 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelis, M., Woisetschläger, D.M., Backhaus, C. and Ahlert, D. (2008) ‘The effects of country of origin and corporate reputation on initial trust: An experimental evaluation of the perception of Polich consumers’, International Marketing Review, 25 (4), 404–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirvis, P.H. (2009) Building Reputation Here, There and Everywhere Worldwide Views on Local Impact of Corporate Responsibility, Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship, Chestnut Hill, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, R., Dutta, M. and Green, R. (2013) ‘Corporate reputation in emerging markets: A culture-centered review and critique’, in C.E. Carrol. (ed.) handbook of communication and corporate reputation, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

  • Moeller, M., Harvey, M., Griffith, D. and Richey, G. (2013) ‘The impact of country-of-origin on the acceptance of foreign subsidiaries in host countries: An examination of the ‘liability-of-foreignness’, International Business Review, 22 (1), 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C.B., Bell, R.G. and Filatotchev, I. (2012) ‘Strategic and institutional effects on foreign IPO performance: Examining the impact of country of origin, corporate governance, and host country effects’, Journal of Business Venturing, 27 (2), 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nachum, L. (2010) ‘When is foreignness an asset or a liability? Explaining the performance differential between foreign and local firms’, Journal of Management, 36 (3), 714–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. (1993) ‘National innovation systems: A retrospective on a study*’, in, R. Nelson (ed.), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Study, New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 347–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newburry, W. (2010) ‘Reputation and supportive behavior: Moderating impacts of foreignness, industry and local exposure’, Corporate Reputation Review, 12 (4), 388–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newburry, W. (2012) ‘Waving the flag: The influence of country of origin on corporate reputation’, in, M. Barnett and T. Pollock (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Corporate Reputation, London, UK, pp 240–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newburry, W., Gardberg, N. and Belkin, L. (2006) ‘Organizational attractiveness is in the eye of the beholder: The interaction of demographic characteristics with foreignness’, Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (5), 666–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newburry, W., Gardberg, N. and Sanchez, J. (2014) ‘Employer attractivess in Latin America: The association among foreignness, internationalization and talent recruitment’, Journal of International Management, 20 (3), 327–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noorderhaven, N.G. and Harzing, A.W. (2003) ‘The ‘country-of-origin effect’ in multinational corporations: Sources, mechanisms and moderating conditions’, Management and International Review, 2 (2), 47–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noya, J. (2004) ‘La Imagen de España y sus inversiones en América Latina’, Universia Business Review, 3 (3), 46–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osland, A. and Osland, J.S. (2005) ‘Contextualization and strategic international human resource management approaches: The case of Central America and Panama’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16 (12), 2218–2236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Batres, L.A. and Eden, L. (2008) ‘Is there a liability of localness? How emerging market firms respond to regulatory punctuations’, Journal of International Management, 14 (3), 232–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Batres, L., Miller, V. and Pisani, M. (2010) ‘CSR, sustainability, and the meaning of global reporting for Latin American corporations’, Journal of Business Ethics, 91 (2), 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pharr, J. (2005) ‘Synthesizing country-of-origin research from the last decade: Is the concept still salient in an era of global brands’, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 13 (4), 34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponzi, L., Fombrun, C. and Gardberg, N. (2011) ‘RepTrak™ Pulse: Conceptualizing and validating a short-form measure of corporate reputation’, Corporate Reputation Review, 14 (1), 15–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poutsma, E., Hendrickx, J. and Huijgen, F. (2003) ‘Employee participation in Europe: In search of the participative workplace’, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 24 (1), 45–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prado, F. (ed.) (2013) ‘Latin America on the international stage’, Reputation Intelligence, 5 (2).

  • Raithel, S. and Schwaiger, M. (2014) ‘The effects of corporate reputation perceptions of the general public on shareholder value’, Strategic Management Journal, 36 (6), 945–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reputation Institute (2012) Global RepTrakTM Survey. Reputation Institute, New York.

  • Reuber, A.R. and Fischer, E. (2011) ‘When no one knows your name: Country-of-origin as a reputational signal for online businesses’, Corporate Reputation Review, 14 (1), 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidheiney, S. (2006) ‘Turning point: A view of corporate citizenship in Latin America’, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 21 (21), 21–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schooler, R. (1971) ‘Bias phenomena attendant to the marketing of foreign goods in the US’, Journal of International Business Studies, 2 (1), 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (2007) ‘Institutional theory: Contributing to a theoretical research program’, in, K.G. Smith and M.A. Hitt (eds.), Great minds management: The process of theory development, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (1987) ‘The adolescence of institutional theory’, Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 32 (4), 493–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P. (2011) ‘Country of origin effects in developed and emerging markets: Exploring the contrasting roles of materialism and value consciousness’, Journal of International Business Studies, 42 (February/March), 285–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, J.W. and Gómez, C. (2011) ‘MNEs and corruption: The impact of national institutions and subsidiary strategy’, Strategic Management Journal, 32 (3), 280–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, R. (2001) Exploratory Research in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.

  • Steurer, R., Matinuzzi, A. and Margula, S. (2012) ‘Public Policies on CSR in Europe: Themes, Instruments, and Regional Differences’, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19 (4), 206–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A.L. (1965) ‘Social structure and organizations’, in, J.G. March (ed.), Handbook of Organizations, Rand-McNally, Chicago, IL, pp. 142–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M.C. (1995) ‘Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches’, Academy of Management Review, 20 (3), 571–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Baumgarten, G. and Yucetepe, V. (2009) ‘Multinational firms’ leadership role in corporate social responsibility in Latin America’, Journal of Business Ethics, 85 (1), 217–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International (2013) Corruption Perceptions Index, http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2013/results/, accessed 16 April, 2014.

  • Tucker, L. and Melewar, T. (2005) ‘Corporate reputation and crisis management: The threat and manageability of anti-corporatism’, Corporate Reputation Review, 7 (4), 377–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verlegh, P.W. and Steenkamp, J.B. (1999) ‘A review and meta-analysis of country-of-origin research’, Journal of Economic Psychology, 20 (5), 521–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verlegh, P.W.J., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. and Meulenberg., M.T.G. (2005) ‘Country-of-origin effects in consumer processing of advertising claims’, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22 (2), 127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidaver-Cohen, D. and Brønn, P.S. (2015) Reputation, Responsibility, and Stakeholder Support in Scandinavian Firms: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(1): 49–64.

  • Vidaver‐Cohen, D. and Brønn, P.S. (2015) ‘Corporate citizenship and managerial motivation: Implications for business legitimacy’, Business and Society Review, 113 (4), 441–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C.L., Li, D., Barnes, B.R. and Ahn, J. (2012) ‘Country image, product image and consumer purchase intention: Evidence from an emerging economy’, International Business Review, 21 (6), 1041–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. and Yang, Z. (2008) ‘Does country-of-origin matter in the relationship between brand personality and purchase intention in emerging economies? Evidence from China’s auto industry’, International Marketing Review, 25 (4), 458–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westney, D.E. (1993) ‘Institutionalization theory and the multinational corporation’, in, S. Ghoshal and D.E. Westney (eds.), Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation, St. Martin’s Press, New York, pp. 53–76.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Winn, M., MacDonald, P. and Zietsma, C. (2008) ‘Managing industry reputation: The dynamic tension between collective and competitive reputation management strategies’, Corporate Reputation Review, 11 (1), 35–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yildiz, H.E. and Fey, C.F. (2012) ‘The liability of foreignness reconsidered: New insights from the alternative research context of transforming economies’, International Business Review, 21 (2), 269–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S. (1995) ‘Overcoming the liability of foreignness’, Academy of Management Journal, 38 (2), 341–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Li, H., Li, Y. and Zhou, L. (2010) ‘FDI spillovers in an emerging market: The role of foreign firms’ country of origin diversity and domestic firms’ absorptive capacity’, Strategic Management Journal, 31 (9), 969–989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Leonard Ponzi, PhD, Charles Fombrun, PhD and Reputation Institute for sharing data from RepTrak™ for use in this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management and International Business, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA

    Deborah Vidaver-Cohen & Carolina Gomez

  2. College of Management and Economics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada

    Scott R Colwell

Authors
  1. Deborah Vidaver-Cohen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carolina Gomez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Scott R Colwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Paper presented at Reputation Institute’s 18th Annual International Conference on Corporate Reputation, Brand, Identity & Competitiveness Miami, FL. 3–5 June, 2014 (C) 2014

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vidaver-Cohen, D., Gomez, C. & Colwell, S. Country-of-Origin Effects and Corporate Reputation in Multinational Firms: Exploratory Research in Latin America. Corp Reputation Rev 18, 131–155 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2015.7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2015.7

Keywords

Search

Navigation