Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The ‘art and science’ of preparing crime risk assessment reports

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Crime Prevention and Community Safety Aims and scope

Abstract

Much has been made of the impact of neo-liberalism on crime control and prevention in recent decades. The privatisation of corrections, security and other criminal justice functions has been the focus of considerable commentary. One feature of this debate that has received little attention has been the work of private consultants. Interviews with a small number of private consultants engaged (among other things) in the preparation of crime risk assessment reports in New South Wales (Australia) shed some light on this dimension of crime prevention through environmental design practice in NSW. In particular, analysis of interview transcripts revealed the striking similarity of approaches to compiling a crime risk assessment, the challenges of maintaining independence and quantifying crime risks, the lack of consistency of councils (local government) to review crime risks of proposed developments and the need for research and professional development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, C. (2013) What constitutes success? A critical review of the practice and implementation of crime prevention through environmental design in New Zealand. Safer Communities: A Journal of Practice, Opinion, Policy and Research 12 (4): 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, N. (1994) Crime Control as Industry. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancey, G. (2011) Are we still ‘flying blind’? Crime data and local crime prevention in New South Wales. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 22 (3): 491–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancey, G., Fisher, D. and Lee, M. (2012) Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) and the New South Wales crime risk assessment guidelines: A critical review. Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal 14 (1): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clancey, G., Fisher, D. and Rutherford, A. (2014) An exploratory study of crime risks and the planning process. Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal 16 (1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clancey, G., Lee, M. and Fisher, D. (2011) Do crime risk assessment reports measure crime risks? Current Issues in Criminal Justice 23 (2): 235–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozens, P. (2014) Think Crime! Using Evidence, Theory and Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) for Planning Safer Cities. Quinns Rock, Western Australia: Praxis Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, A. (1998) Crime Prevention and Community Safety: Politics, Policies and Practices. Essex, UK: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R., Halibozek, E. and Walters, E. (2013) Introduction to Security. 9th edn. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimwood, G. (2014) Prisons: The Role of the Private Sector. SN/HA/6811, London: House of Commons Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, R. (1997) Private Prisons and Public Accountability. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazzard, B. (2013) Second Reading Speech of Planning Bill 2013 and Planning Administration Bill 2013, NSW Legislative Council. Hansard, 22 October.

  • Hughes, G. (2007) The Politics of Crime and Community. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kagi, H. (1969) The roles of private consultants in urban governing. Urban Affairs Review 5 (1): 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalton, H. (1983) Introduction to Survey Sampling: Qualitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, J. (2013) Safety and urban design – The role of CPTED in the design process. Safer Communities: A Journal of Practice, Opinion, Policy and Research 12 (4): 176–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. (2007) Inventing Fear of Crime: Criminology and the Politics of Anxiety. Devon, UK: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., Clancey, G. and Fisher, D. (2014) Risky reports: Crime risk assessments and spatial governance. Critical Criminology 22 (2): 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monchuk, L. (2011) The way forward in designing out crime?: Greater Manchester police design for security consultancy. Safer Communities: A Journal of Practice, Opinion, Policy and Research 10 (3): 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monchuk, L. and Clancey, G. (2013) A comparative analysis of crime risk assessments and their applications. Built Environment 39 (1): 74–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P. (2000) Profiting from Punishment—Private Prisons in Australia: Reform or Regression? Annandale, VA: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, W. (2006) Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 6th edn. Boston: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSW Department of Urban Affairs and Planning (2001) Crime Prevention and the Assessment of Development Applications: Guidelines Under Section 79c of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW). Sydney, Australia: DUAP.

  • NSW Police Force (2013) Safer By Design Manual. Sydney, Australia: NSW Police Force.

  • O’Malley, P. (2008) Neo-liberalism and risk in criminology. In: T. Anthony and C. Cunneen (eds.) The Critical Criminology Companion. Annandale: Hawkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, P. (2010) Crime and Risk. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prenzler, T., Earle, K. and Sarre, R. (2009) Private security in Australia: Trends and key characteristics. In: Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice. No. 374. Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, S. (2013) The role of CPTED in post-earthquake Christchurch. Safer Communities: A Journal of Practice, Opinion, Policy and Research 12 (4): 185–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumming, K. and Davies, J. (2014) To what extent ‘an entirely new approach to how planning is done’? Tracing planning system reform in New South Wales. Australian Planner 51 (2): 122–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarre, R. (1994) Uncertainties and Possibilities: A Discussion of Selected Criminal Justice Issues in Contemporary Australia. Adelaide, Australia: University of South Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, R.H. and Kitchen, T. (2007) Crime Prevention and the Built Environment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, R. and Kitchen, T. (2013) Putting crime prevention through environmental design into practice via planning systems: A comparison of experience in the US and UK. Built Environment 39 (1): 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selmon, D. and Leighton, P. (2010) Punishment for Sale: Private Prisons, Big Business and the Incarceration Binge. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, A., Cherney, A. and White, R. (2008) Crime Prevention: Principles, Perspectives and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. and Shearing, C. (2007) Imagining Security. Devon, UK: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahm, D. (2005) Learning, translating and implementing CPTED. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 22 (4): 284–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedner, L. (2009) Security. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been made possible through a grant from the Legal Scholarship Support Fund (Sydney Law School, University of Sydney). The Sydney University Human Research Ethics Committee granted approval for this research [2014/066].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sydney Institute of Criminology, The University of Sydney, Law School Building (F10), Eastern Avenue, Camperdown Campus, Sydney, 2006, NSW, Australia

    Garner Clancey, Daren Fisher & Murray Lee

Authors
  1. Garner Clancey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daren Fisher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Murray Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Garner Clancey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clancey, G., Fisher, D. & Lee, M. The ‘art and science’ of preparing crime risk assessment reports. Crime Prev Community Saf 17, 270–290 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/cpcs.2015.16

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/cpcs.2015.16

Keywords

Search

Navigation