Skip to main content
Log in

Do consumers of FMCGs seek brands with congruent personalities?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Brand Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Brand personality is an important source of differentiation for companies. Congruency theory suggests a link between human personality traits and the personalities of brands. This article revisits this link among less visibility brands. Specifically, it looks at pasta as a product category focusing on Barilla - a leading FMCG pasta brand in the Italian domestic market, and sets out to determine the extent to which consumers are choosing Barilla, as a result of congruency to their own personality traits. Two of five dimensions in each of brand and human personality support the congruency link. It is interesting that the dimensions exhibiting significance received the highest scores by respondents that exhibited the highest usage. Furthermore, these two dimensions of personality are the same associations highlighted over recent years in Barilla communication campaigns. The results of the research are useful for FMCG brand managers. In their quest to seek differentiation, brand managers may successfully associate human characteristics to their brands. Although there are currently no established instruments that can directly measure the congruency, the research provides a methodology that successfully investigates congruency between a pasta brand and human personality. Caution needs to be exercised in extending the findings to other product categories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, D. (1996) Building Strong Brands. New York: The Free Press, pp. 137–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, J. (1997) Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research 34 (3): 347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, J. and Fournier, S. (1995) A brand character and a person: Three perspectives on the question of brand personality. Advance in Customer Research 22 (1): 391–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alpatova, A. and Dall’Olmo Riley, F. (2011) Comparing brand personality measures. Paper presented at Academy of Marketing Conference 2011: Marketing Fields Forever, 5–7 July, Liverpool. UK, http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/20183/, accessed 5 May 2012.

  • Avis, M. (2012) Brand personality factor based models: A critical review. Australasian Marketing Journal 20 (1): 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azoulay, A. and Kapferer, J.L. (2003) Do brand personality scales really measure brand personality? Journal of Brand Management 11 (2): 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corstiens, J. and Corstiens, M. (1995) Store Wars: The Battle for Mindspace and Shelfspace. London: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Chernatony, L. and Dall’Olmo Riley, F. (1998) Defining a brand: Beyond the literature with experts interpretations. Journal of Marketing Management 14 (5): 417–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorresteijn, T. (2007) Creating a brand personality online outline of the book visual branding, http://visual-branding.com/eight-outlines/creating-a-brand-personality/, accessed 23 June 2012.

  • Douglass, M.F. and Douglass, R. (1993) The validity of the Myers-Briggs type indicator for predicting expressed marital problems. Family Relations 42 (4): 422–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (1996) The big five versus the big four: The relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI five factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences 21 (2): 303–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geuens, M., Weijters, B. and Wulf, Kr. (2009) A new measure of brand personality. International Journal of Research in Marketing 26 (2): 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, M. (1996) Divided by a common language: Diversity and deception in the world of global marketing. Journal of the Market Research Society 38 (2): 105–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, O.P. and Srivastva, S. (1999) The big five traits taxonomy: History. Measurement and theoretical perspective. In: L.A. Pervin and O.P. John (eds.) Handbook of Personality. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mccrae, R. and Costa Jr P.T. (1991) The NEO personality inventory: Using the five-factor model in counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development 69 (4): 367–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J.C. (1967) Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, B. (1986) A Method of studying the development of impressions of real people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (5): 907–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, B.T. (2009) A comparison of brand personality and brand user-imagery congruence. Journal of Customer Marketing 26 (3): 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, J.T. (1985) Brand personality: A strategic concept for multinational advertising. In: Marketing Educators Conference. New York: Young and Rubicam, pp. 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D.R. (1989) Type Differentiation Indicator: Manual: A Scoring System for Form J of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. California: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, L. (2000) Brands and brand equity: Definition and management. Management Decision 38 (9): 662–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kotryna Garsvaite.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garsvaite, K., Caruana, A. Do consumers of FMCGs seek brands with congruent personalities?. J Brand Manag 21, 485–494 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2014.17

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2014.17

Keywords

Navigation