Skip to main content

Introduction: The Aesthetics and Politics of British TV Comedy

  • Chapter
British TV Comedies
  • 1651 Accesses

Abstract

TV comedies make up some of the most watched, most profitable and most controversial productions on British screens. Not least due to the role of public broadcasting, TV comedy in the UK enjoys a tradition and success probably unrivalled anywhere. Firmly embedded in the British media culture and shaped by the specific dynamics of the British television industry, British TV comedies are immensely powerful cultural media, which have developed distinctive filmic formats and nationally inflected narrative traditions (Dannenberg 169). The great popularity of the British TV comedy has certainly much to do with its formal and cultural flexibility. Even if its primary aim is to be funny and to entertain, comedy typically touches upon a whole range of cultural topics and explores a variety of ideological conflicts (Feuer 69). Typically oscillating between appreciation and denigration, affirmation and subversion, British TV comedy plays a significant role in the formation, dissemination and reflection of cultural values, structures of identification and notions of difference: concepts of class, gender, ethnicity, disability, sex, family, work and domesticity find a most intriguing and provocative expression in TV comedies. Consider, for instance, Men Behaving Badly (ITV/BBC1 1992–1999), probably the signature sitcom of the 1990s, whose depiction of the ‘new lad’ propelled debates about new concepts of masculinity and the historical dynamics of gender relations. Since British TV comedies, with very few exceptions, pick out central themes that concern British society in general or particular social groups at the time of production, they offer a rich source for gauging the intersections of British (popular) culture, history and media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bacon, Francis. Essays, Oliphant Smeaton (ed.). London: Dent, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail. Rabelais and His World, Hélène Iswolsky (trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, [ 1965 ] 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belton, John (ed.), Movies and Mass Culture. London: Continuum, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, Henri. Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic, S. Cloudesley, H. Brereton and F. Rothwell (trans.). New York: Macmillan, 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, Michael. Laughter and Ridicule: Towards a Social Critique of Humour. London: Sage Publications, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Richard Nice (trans.). London: Taylor and Francis, [ 1984 ] 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, Asa. The BBC: The First Fifty Years. Oxford University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadcasting Standards Commission. Codes of Guidance: Standards. London: HMSO, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, Matthew. ‘Eloquent Action: The Body and Meaning in Early Commedia Dell’Arte’. Theatre Survey 50 (2) (2009): 251–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. ‘Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory’. Theatre Journal 40 (4) (1988): 519–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, Sue-Ellen (ed.). Performing Feminisms: Feminist Critical Theory and Theatre. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, Deborah. ‘Comedies of Sexual Morality and Female Singlehood’ in Sharon Lockyer and Michael Pickering (eds), Beyond a Joke: The Limits of Humour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, 162–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisell, Andrew. An Introductory History of British Broadcasting. London: Routledge, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchley, Simon. On Humour. London: Routledge, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dannenberg, Hilary P. ‘Marketing the British Situation Comedy: The Success of the BBC Brand on the British and Global Comedy Markets’. Journal for the Study of British Cultures 11 (2) (2004): 169–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunphy, Graeme and Rainer Emig (eds), Hybrid Humour: Comedy in Transcultural Perspectives. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emig, Rainer. ‘The Family–A Sitcom?’ Journal for the Study of British Cultures 9 (2) (2002): 149–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emig, Rainer. ‘Taking Comedy Seriously: British Sitcoms in the Classroom’ in Gabriele Linke (ed.), New Media–New Teaching Options? Heidelberg: Winter, 2006, 17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emig, Rainer. ‘The Empire Tickles Back’ in Graeme Dunphy and Rainer Emig (eds), Hybrid Humour: Comedy in Transcultural Perspectives. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2010, 169–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuer, Jane. ‘Situation Comedy, Part 2’ in Glen Creeber (ed.), The Television Genre Book. London: British Film Institute, 2001, 81–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, Sigmund. Jokes and their Relation to the Unconscious: The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, James Strachey (ed. and trans. ). London: Hogarth Press, [ 1905 ] 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, Oliver. ‘Sentimental Comedy’ in John Hampden (ed.), She Stoops to Conquer. London: J.M. Dent, 1972, 163–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grote, David. The End of Comedy: The Sit-Com and the Comedic Tradition. Hamden: Archon, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hailsham, Viscount. ‘The Pilkington Report on Broadcasting’. Hansard. Milibank systems. com. 18 July 1962. Available at: http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/lords/1962/jul/18/the-pilkington-report-on-broadcasting (date accessed 13 July 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, John. ‘Situation Comedy, Part 1’ in Glen Creeber (ed.), The Television Genre Book. London: BFI, 2008, 78–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, Toby. ‘Atkinson Defends Right to Offend’, The Telegraph, 7 December 2004. Available at: www.telegraph.co.uk/education/3348850/Atkinson-defends-right-tooffend.html (date accessed 13 July 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons. Serious Organised Crime and Police Bill, November 2004. Available at: www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmbills/005/2005005. htm (date accessed 13 July 2015).

  • Jacobson, Howard. Seriously Funny: From the Ridiculous to the Sublime. London: Viking, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jason, David. ‘Political Correctness is Killing the British Sense of Humour’. The Telegraph 13 May 2012. Available at: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/9262146/SirDavid-Jason-Political-correctness-is-killing-the-British-sense-of-humour.html (date accessed 13 July 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, Chris. Transgression. London: Routledge, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampanelli, Lisa. ‘How Political Correctness is Killing Comedy (Guest Column)’. The Hollywood Reporter, 2 May 2013. Available at: www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/lisalampanelli-how-political-correctness-450210 (date accessed 13 July 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, Mark. ‘Fawlty Towers isn’t Racist. Major Gowen is’. The Guardian, 23 January 2013. Available at: www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/tvandradioblog/2013/ jan/23/fawlty-towers-isnt-racist-major-gowen-is (date accessed 13 July 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Stewart. ‘Guilt-Free Pleasures’. The Guardian, 3 January 2007. Available at: www.the-guardian.com/culture/2007/jan/03/comedy.television (date accessed 13 July 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockyer, Sharon and Pickering, Michael (eds). Beyond a Joke: The Limits of Humour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockyer, Sharon. ‘Breaking the Mould: Conversations with Omid Djalili and Shazia Mirza’ in Sharon Lockyer and Michael Pickering (eds), Beyond a Joke: The Limits of Humour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, 98–125.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lüdeke, Roger. ‘In-Yer-Face or Post-Political Theatre?’ in Sibylle Baumbach, Birgit Neumann and Ansgar Nünning (eds), A History of British Drama: Genres–Developments–Model Interpretations. Trier: WVT, 2011, 381–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, Sarita. Representing Black Britain: A History of Black and Asian Images on British Television. London: Sage Publications, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, Gillian. ‘It’s Good to Laugh: Identifying Verbal and Non-verbal Humour in the British TV Sitcom’. Textus: English Studies in Italy 21 (1) (2008): 27–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marc, David. Comic Visions: Television Comedy and American Culture. New York: Blackwell, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Daniel. ‘We Must Be Free to Insult Each Other: Rowan Atkinson Attacks New Rules that Outlaw “Insulting Words and Behaviour”’. Daily Mail, 18 October 2012. Available at: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2219385/Rowan-Atkinson-attacksnew-rules-outlaw-insulting-words-behaviour.html (date accessed 13 July 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, Graham. Dad’s Army: The Story of a Classic Television Show. London: Fourth Estate, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Mediawatch-UK for Family Values in the Media’, www.mediawatchuk.com (date accessed 13 July 2015).

  • Medhurst, Andy. ‘Introduction’ in Therese Daniels and Jane Gerson (eds), The Colour Black: Black Images in British Television. London: BFI, 1989, 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, Brett. ‘Comedy Verite: Contemporary Sitcom Form’. Screen 45 (1) (2004): 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, Brett. The Sitcom. Edinburgh University Press, 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, Brett. ‘Contemporary Comedy Performance in British Sitcom’ in Christine Cornea (ed.), Genre and Performance: Film and Television. Manchester University Press, 2010, 130–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morreall, John. ‘Funny Ha-Ha, Funny Strange, and Other Reactions to Incongruity’ in John Morreall (ed.), The Philosophy of Laughter and Humor. New York: SUNY Press, 1987, 188–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulkay, Michael. On Humour: Its Nature and its Place in Modern Society. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundy, John and White, Glyn. Laughing Matters: Understanding Film, Television and Radio Comedy. Manchester University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, Steve and Krutnik, Frank. Popular Film and Television Comedy. London: Routledge, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Robin. TV Drama in Transition: Forms, Values and Cultural Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1997.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, Jerry. Taking Humour Seriously. London: Routledge, 1994.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, Michael. Stereotyping: The Politics of Representation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, Michael and Lockyer, Sharon. ‘Introduction: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Humour and Comedy’ in Sharon Lockyer and Michael Pickering (eds), Beyond a Joke: The Limits of Humour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Political Correctness: The Awful Truth’, www.politicallyincorrect.me.uk (date accessed 13 July 2015).

  • Rancie, Jacques. The Politics of Aesthetics. London: Continuum, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revoir, Paul. ‘BBC Chief Wants Return to Wholesome Sitcoms without Sex and Swearing’. Daily Mail, 16 March 2007. Available at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-442567/BBC-chief-wants-return-wholesome-sitcoms-sex-swearing. html (date accessed 13 July 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, Kathleen. The Unruly Woman: Gender and the Genres of Laughter. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, Edward W. The World, the Text and the Critic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport. Broadcasting: Copy of Royal Charter for the Continuance of the British Broadcasting Corporation. London: HMSO, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sendall, Bernard. Independent Television in Britain: Expansion and Change 1958–68, vol. II. London: Macmillan, 1983.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, Tom. Television Light Entertainment. London: BBC, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, Roy. Von Shakespeare bis Monty Python: Eine transmediale Geschichte der englischen Komödie zwischen pragmatischer Poetik und generischem Gedächtnis. Trier: WVT, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, Simon. The Rhetoric of Racist Humour: US, UK and Global Race Joking. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitz, Eric. The Cambridge Introduction to Comedy. Cambridge University Press, 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Jürgen Kamm and Birgit Neumann

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kamm, J., Neumann, B. (2016). Introduction: The Aesthetics and Politics of British TV Comedy. In: Kamm, J., Neumann, B. (eds) British TV Comedies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137552952_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics