Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Empathy for Empathy’s Sake: Aesthetics and Everyday Empathic Sadism

  • Chapter
Empathy and its Limits

Abstract

Jesse Prinz, in a recent article called ‘Against Empathy’, discusses many cases of the ‘dark side of empathy’ that show how empathy may lead to an unfair judgment and may favour some at the expense of others.1 The problem with empathy, Prinz holds, is that empathy interferes with morality due to its ‘intrinsic partiality’ and ‘ineluctable locality’.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. J. Prinz (2011) ‘Against Empathy’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 49, pp. 214–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Smith (1976/1759) The Theory of Moral Sentiments (Indianapolis: Liberty Classics).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Halpern (2001) From Detached Concern to Empathy: Humanizing Medical Practice (Oxford: Oxford UP)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Tomasello (1999) The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition (Cambridge, MA.: Harvard UP).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Decety (2006) ‘Human Empathy’, Japanese Journal of Neuropsychology, 22, pp. 11–33

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Singer and C. Lamm (2009) ‘The Social Neuroscience of Empathy’, The Year in Cognitive Neuroscience. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, pp. 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. V. Gallese (2001) ‘The Shared Manifold Hypothesis. From Mirror Neurons to Empathy’, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, pp. 33–50

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Fogassi et al. (2005) ‘Partial Lobe. From Action Organization to Intentional Understanding’, Science, 308, pp. 15–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Lamm, D. Batson and J. Decety (2007) ‘The Neural Substrate of Human Empathy: Effects of Perspective Taking and Cognitive Appraisal’, Journal for Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, pp. 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Beaumont and P. Newcombe (2006) ‘Theory of Mind and Central Coherence in Adults with High-functioning Autism or Asperger Syndrome’, Autism, 10, pp. 365–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. V. Southgate and A. F. de C. Hamilton (2008) ‘Unbroken Mirrors. Challenging a Theory of Autism’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, pp. 225–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. C. L. Harenski, K. A. Harenski, M. S. Shane and K.A. Kiehl (2010) ‘Aberrant Neural Processing or Moral Violations in Criminal Psychopaths’, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 21, pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Batson suggests that the concepts of empathy respond to two distinct questions: ‘How can one know what another person is thinking and feeling? What leads one person to respond with sensitivity and care to suffering of another?’ The distinction between these two modes of empathy, namely knowledge and care/sensibility, does not in itself imply that there is a transition from the first to the other, but it raises the question of whether they may lead to each other. D. C. Batson (2009) ‘These Things called Empathy: Eight Related but Distinct Phenomena’ in J. Decety and W. Ickes (eds) The Social Neuroscience of Empathy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Leiberg and S. Anders (2006) ‘The Multiple Facets of Empathy: A Survey of Theory and Evidence’, Progress in Brain Research, 156, pp. 419–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. E. Thompson (2001) ‘Empathy and Consciousness’, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, pp. 5–7, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  16. F. de Vignemont und P. Jacob (2012) ‘What is It Like to Feel Another’s Pain’, Philosophy of Science, 79, pp. 295–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. E.-M. Engelen (2012) ‘Emotionen als Lernprozesse. Eine Theorie der Semantisierung von Emotionen als Voraussetzung für das Verstehen seiner selbst und anderer’, Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaften, 15, pp. 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. T. Singer, B. Seymour, J. O’Doherty, K. Stephan, R. Dolan and C. Frith. (2006) ‘Empathic Neural Responses are Modulated by the Perceived Fairness of Others’, Nature, 439, pp. 466–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Keen (2007) Empathy and the Novel (Oxford and New York: Oxford UP)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Keen (2010) ‘Narrative Empathy’ in F. Aldama (ed.), Toward a Cognitive Theory of Narrative Acts. (Austin: U of Texas Press), pp. 61–93.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. Dunbar (1992) ‘Neocortex Size as a Constraint on Group Size in Primates’, Journal of Human Evolution, 22, pp. 469–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. F. Breithaupt (2009) Kulturen der Empathie (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

  23. E. Burke (1958/1757) A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origins of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful, edited by J. Boulton (Notre Dame and London: University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 45–8.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Hanich, V. Wagner, M. Shah, T. Jacobsen, and W. Menninghaus (2014) ‘Why We Like to Watch Sad Films, The Pleasure of Being Moved in Aesthetic Experiences’, Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8 (2), pp. 130–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Keen (2007) Empathy and the Novel (Oxford and New York: Oxford UP).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. J. Madeira (2012) Killing Timothy McVeigh (New York: NYUP).

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. Holt, J. R. Meloy and S. Strack (1999) ‘Sadism and Psychopathy in Violent and Sexually Violent Offenders’, Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 27, pp. 23–32

    Google Scholar 

  28. K. A. Kiehl and M. B. Hoffman (2011) ‘The Criminal Psychopath: History, Neuroscience, Treatment, and Economics’, Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 51(4), pp. 355–97.

    Google Scholar 

  29. C. L. Harenski, K. A. Harenski, M. S. Shane and K.A. Kiehl (2010) ‘Aberrant Neural Processing or Moral Violations in Criminal Psychopaths’, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 21, pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Along the lines of F. de Vignemont und P. Jacob (2012) ‘What is It Like to Feel Another’s Pain’, Philosophy of Science, 79, pp. 295–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. B. Vermeule (2007) Why Do We Care about Literary Characters? (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP), p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  32. C. Batson (2009) ‘These Things called Empathy: Eight Related but Distinct Phenomena’ in J. Decety and W. Ickes (eds) The Social Neuroscience of Empathy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 3–16.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. M. Tomasello (1999) The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Fritz Breithaupt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Konstanz, Germany

    Aleida Assmann  & Ines Detmers  & 

Copyright information

© 2016 Fritz Breithaupt

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Breithaupt, F. (2016). Empathy for Empathy’s Sake: Aesthetics and Everyday Empathic Sadism. In: Assmann, A., Detmers, I. (eds) Empathy and its Limits. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137552372_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation